Shiner Kosmos Reserve - Spoetzl Brewery
Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
Ratings: 719 | Reviews: 221 | Display Reviews Only:
1.25/5 rDev -62.3%
what an absolute insult to Kosmos, but seeing as the Spoetzl family let this get out to the public, fuck 'em.. Please Lord, if you are there, please strike down Spoetzl brewery into dust, and forever blank the worlds mind of this crap they call beer, from Bock to Leight to this garbage.. words aren't enough, pure shit .. . pours a tawny tan, with almost no head after a minute .. . ever smelled a metal malt extract can that expired in 1994, then you know what this smells off.. . does have a decent mouth, as in it doesn't linger too long, but horribly muddled with an odd metallic backbone bitterness, and a wrong expired maple syrup flavour, maybe some moldy hops ..maybe...
.. pretty much offensive to all my senses...
04-27-2009 22:54:49 | More by Onslow
2.03/5 rDev -38.9%
Drank this with a snifter a Pilsner glass would have been better but I was expecting more hop character
A - It's defined as an American Pale Lager but if you see it poured you don't get any of those characteristics. It's a copper colored pour with zero carbonation and almost no head or lacing at all much like the Shiner Ruby Redbird.
S - The nose is a weak/sweet honey or some sort of wheat malt I tried swirling it and I got a bit more of the same but still very weak.
T - The taste is very mild and doesn't really have a recognizable characteristic at all it's just a bit hoppy but its like eating a piece of white bread and trying to describe the taste lots of confectionary yeast flavors but its all melds together and provides nothing unique in terms of flavor.
M - Very sharp and clean tasting with some effervescence and bite.
O - I do not like the style I think its boring and flat. If you like Budweiser I would say try this I am pretty indifferent to this and wont be seeking this out again. The problem here is with all of the awesome stuff being done in craft brewing why is Shiner trying to make an average tasting beer without any characteristics at all? I am not even remotely ready to give up on this brewery they just need to retire this stuff though its been done a million times before.
05-03-2012 21:39:54 | More by swoopdog
2.1/5 rDev -36.7%
Appearance: Dark yellow and gold; lively carbonation; initial 1.5 finger head that quickly dropped to one finger, no lacing or rings.
Smell: Earthy, light malt, no noticeable hop aroma except for a very, very slight fruitiness.
Taste: pretty bland; a light roasted, biscuit-like flavor. Bitterness is pretty well hidden, too - didn't notice it until way after swallowing and it seemed mixed with some sort of metallic off-taste.
Mouthfeel: okay - light to medium body
Overall: can't find much difference between this 'hop jacked lager' compared to other main stream consumer beers like Budweiser or Miller High Life. Drinkable in a pinch, but not for someone looking for a more distinctive hoppy and/or malt flavored craft beer. Great example of a below average beer!
12-29-2011 03:29:33 | More by beergoot
2.14/5 rDev -35.5%
While the majority of my experience with Shiner’s mixed 6-pack was lack-luster, the Kosmos Pale Lager was the epitome of bland. Long story short, its malty taste made it easy to drink, but it lacked any real depth or strong flavor profiles. It simply didn’t stand out.
11-01-2013 16:24:33 | More by BeerNewbs
2.15/5 rDev -35.2%
12 fl oz bottle served in a pilsner glass, reviewed live:
A - Pours a transparent golden/orange color. The head is 1.5 fingers and dissipates quickly and leaves no lacing.
S - Pale malt, indistinct hops, stale adjunct and honey. Mild and uninteresting.
T - Cloying sweet pale malt, and an obtrusive bitter finish. Muddy simple, and not really very good. Poorly built. Entirely too simple.
M - Light and crisp. Probably ideal, for the style (if you can call it that).
D - It's drinkable and definitely sessionable, but really simple and boring. Don't waste your time.
12-28-2011 02:59:59 | More by blakelive784
2.15/5 rDev -35.2%
Initial impression from the pour does not impress, as there is not much aroma and little head retention. The first sip reminds me a bit of Sam Adams Boston Lager, but that quickly fades as the long malty finish disappoints. There is a touch of sweetness to this medium bodied clear amber lager, but it leaves me wanting for more. While it may be a better alternative to the mass market lagers, I'll not pursue it again.
08-02-2009 17:47:58 | More by HoppyAlesToYou
2.16/5 rDev -34.9%
A: The beer poured a nice medium amber, clear with no sediment.
S: This beer has a very pleasant smell, lightness and earthy
T: completely jacked up with hops, distastefully so. I couldn't taste any notes over the insane amount of hops.
O: I did not enjoy this beer, Way too much hops that takes over any flavour profile that may be present, distracting. Will not be purchasing again.
07-16-2014 02:33:58 | More by utz
2.2/5 rDev -33.7%
A: Pours a clear copper color. A minimal white head forms and leaves no lace.
S: Sweet malt at first. Some very faint hop bitterness. Metallic and copper. Blah.
T: I can't really pick anything out. A very faint sweetness and hop bitterness.
M/D: A light body, over carbonated, watery, and thin. Easy enough to drink for a light lager.
This beer is the only reason why I bought the Shiner Family mixed packed. After trying it, I am disappointed. I can't really make anything out in the nose or flavor. Just bland. I am sorry Kosmos Spoetzl, this is a disservice to you.
03-17-2009 21:46:02 | More by champ103
2.24/5 rDev -32.5%
12 fl oz brown glass bottle with typical label art and a branded twist-off pressure cap acquired as part of a Shiner mixed twelve-pack at an HEB Grocery here in Austin and served into an Independence Brewing pilsner glass in me gaff in low altitude Austin, Texas. Reviewed live. Expectations are above average given the brewery.
Brewed with Czech Saaz hops, candi sugar, and Belgian yeast. Best before: 01/26/14.
Served cold - straight from me fridge - and allowed to warm over the course of consumption. Side-poured with standard vigor as no carbonation issues are anticipated.
Reviewed as an American Pale Lager per its identification on Spoetzl's wikipedia; their own site is crap.
A: No bubble show forms as I pour.
Pours a 2.5 finger wide head of white colour. Disappointingly thin. Lacks appealing creaminess. No lacing as the head recedes. Head retention is average - about two minutes.
Body colour is a clear copper of average vibrance. Translucent. No yeast particles are visible.
Sm: Has a rather generic floral hop presence. Pale malts. Pilsner malts. A kiss of crackery malts. Grainy. Some caramalt. Clean and simple.
No yeast character or alcohol is detectable. A generally appealing aroma of average strength, with some surprising spiciness.
T: Body is primarily grainy, with some caramalt and crackery malts lending a bit more complexity. Pale malts and pilsner malts fill out the body. Has a generic floral hop character that doesn't do much for it. "Hop-jacked"? Nah. Painfully simple. No yeast character or alcohol comes through, the the hop notes are rather tame. Even the balance isn't all that great. A bland, boring lager overall.
Not gestalt. Zero depth of flavour. Below average duration and intensity of flavour.
Mf: Smooth and wet. Light, weak, and thin. Not full-bodied. Overcarbonated. Artificial; even a touch syrupy. Somehow, it's also a bit watery at the same time. Doesn't suit the flavour profile well really at all.
Dr: A disappointing offering from Spoetzl. I do have to compliment them on their marketing; the whole "Reserve" shtick coupled with the clever "Hop-jacked" description will sucker many into buying it. At the end of the day, it's a bland lager that isn't worth trying. I definitely won't be getting it again, but I suppose it's drinkable enough.
09-14-2013 22:32:55 | More by kojevergas
Shiner Kosmos Reserve from Spoetzl Brewery
76 out of 100 based on 719 ratings.