1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Classic Pale Ale - Whistler Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Classic Pale AleClassic Pale Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
77
okay

33 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 33
Reviews: 27
rAvg: 3.28
pDev: 17.99%
Wants: 0
Gots: 0 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Whistler Brewing Company visit their website
British Columbia, Canada

Style | ABV
English Pale Ale |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BDTyre on 08-02-2006)
View: Beers (13) | Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | Likes | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 33 | Reviews: 27 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by GrimmReaper:
Photo of GrimmReaper
3.5/5  rDev +6.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Variety pk,pours a copper with orange tinge,decent tan head and nice lacing,Nose is floral,caramel,mild grass and spices.Taste is hoppy,citrus,tangy and bitter,caramel and earthy tones coming through,medium mouth,very easily to down,not a bad brew at all,well worth a try,will buy again but not the variety pk,just cause i don't care for the weisbier.

More User Reviews:
Photo of Lazaro
3.5/5  rDev +6.7%

Photo of chickenm
3.88/5  rDev +18.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pours a clear copper color with an average white head. The aroma is mostly malt with some smokiness to it. The taste is more malt with some bitter hops in the finish. Medium-light bodied with light carbonation and a smooth mouthfeel. This beer is actually pretty good - although it could use a bit more hops. Still, its very drinkable and makes a nice session ale.

Photo of biboergosum
3.38/5  rDev +3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

330ml bottle.

This beer pours a clear medium amber hue, with a stingy finger of thin foamy off-white head, which fizzes away anon, leaving some spreading, actively dissipating lace around the glass. It smells of biscuity malt, some sour fruitiness, and musty grassy hops. The taste is bready, somewhat caramelized malt, a mild baker's yeastiness, and bitter earthy, weedy hops. The carbonation is moderate, a zing or two, here and there, the body medium-light in weight, and generally smooth. It finishes off-dry, the consistent malt pushed a bit more by some peppy grassy hops.

A good example of a more hoppy English pale ale, even if those hops seem haphazard and muddled. Oh well, the result is a decent enough quaff, the sort better consumed without the burden of analysis, from my humble experience.

Photo of bum732
3.55/5  rDev +8.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Pours a hazy yellowish brown, decent creamy head with ok retention and lacing. Smells of mellow fruity malt, pineapple, apple, pear, plums, some grassy and earthy hops, . Tastes of much the same, fruity malt with a mild earthy bitterness. Finishes fairly neutral with a touch of dryness.

An ok beer, i like the fruitiness of the malt, i wish there was a touch more hops to bring it together. The mouthfeel is fairly thin as well bringing down the score.

Photo of elricorico
3.8/5  rDev +15.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

A pale orange with just a slight haze. A thick white head on top. More lacing that almost any of the style that I've seen.

Earthy toffee sweetness and an herbal hop aroma hit the nose. Well balanced aroma.

Caramel and some bitterness are noted right away, and the finish is a mix of citrus and herbal hopping. All pleasant. Nothing overpowering.

Has just a hint of watery feeling, but otherwise the mouthfeel is alright. Sharp but not overdone carbonation.

This is a pub beer if I've ever had one. Easy sipping, lots of balance, and overall feels light.

Photo of IronDjinn
2.98/5  rDev -9.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Pours out a transparent copper hue, foamy white head that slowly decends leaving some sticky lacing behind it.

Clean, sweet toffee malt on the nose, the hops really don't play through at all.

The malt becomes somewhat grainy in the flavour, almost a dry earthy note to it all by the middle. The hops do make an apprearance now, dry and grassy.

Mouthfeel is leaning towards the light side. However there is another curious phenomenon of it leaving this phantom clay-like, almost chalky texture in the mouth with the aftertaste.

Not a very memorable pale ale all things considered, it certainly has its set of kinks that could use some ironing out.

Photo of BigBry
3.03/5  rDev -7.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Found this on sale at the government liquor store on Vancouver. 6 pack of cans came with a small soft sided cooler. Label claims to be "Brewed exclusively with Whistler Glacier Water". No date code visible.
Clear, bronze/gold color, with 2 fingers of fluffy white foam. Decent retention thin string of lace. Smell of grassy hops, earthy rather than fruity,with slight caramel malt. Taste has good bitterness blended with biscuit malt. Chewy, grainy hop, with out the grapefruit and floweriness in other american pale ales. A decent british style ale. Medium body with good carbonation. Good, but I thought there was nothing to make it more than just average. (Maybe it was getting old, and that is why it was on sale)

Yep, that picture is of my can. They have since discontinued cans, but I was able to get one for my collection.

Photo of DoctorStrangiato
3.18/5  rDev -3%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured a 330-ml bottle into a tulip glass.

Appearance - copper-amber colour with a decent 1-inch head, lasting minutes, then deteriorating to a frothy-foamy-sudsy uneven 1/8-inch head. Very nice lace to show for this reduction.

Smell - nothing but cream on the nose. Creamy malt, sweetness below... this worries me for a pale ale.

Taste - soft malt on the palate with abundant subtle creaminess, virtually no hoppiness to speak of. Very even flavour however, perhaps a redeeming quality.

Mouthfeel - although very smooth, this lacks some of the character one would expect from a pale ale. Borders on boring.

Drinkability - I wouldn't get this again, or the variety 12-pack I picked up. Expensive and not really engaging... just not what the doctor ordered.

Photo of cdwil
3/5  rDev -8.5%

Photo of donniecuffs
2.55/5  rDev -22.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Had this on tap at The Keg, on a recent business trip to Vancouver. Poured copper with literally zero head into a pint glass. Possible soap residue issue? Well, maybe, but given the fact that my two buddies' pints of other beers both had nice heads (that lasted), it was not a good first impression. Literally no aroma aside from basic biscuit, but this was likely compounded by the lack of head. The taste was only modestly better, with only an additional hint of nuttiness to speak of. The texture was very thin, but obviously sessionable. Maybe I'll give this a second try on my next trip.

Photo of soju6
3/5  rDev -8.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A: Pours a hazy dark copper color with a very small head and no real lacing.

S: Aroma or malt, nuts and a bit of dark fruit.

T: Taste of roasted malt, bit of toffee and nuts. Mild bitterness and a clean finish.

F: Fairly moderate body, smooth but a bit short on flavor.

O: Fairly bland non-offensive English Pale Ale.

Photo of Derek
4.03/5  rDev +22.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

"Brewed exclusively with Whistler Glacier Water".

A: Bronze, fluffy white head, great retention & lace.

S: Earthy hops, grass, a little bready malt & caramel, some fruity esters.

T: Earthy bitterness up front, a little orange & slightly grassy. Plenty of bitterness & a well-rouned hop profile, but it could perhaps use a little more hop flavour. Bready/biscuity malt, toffee, detectable grain, cotton-candy fruity esters. Crisp finish.

M: Moderate body & carbonation. Slight acidity.

D: Very good.

I was pleasantly surprised by this quality brew. I recommend it, and I may even give the lager a try!

Photo of froghop
2.93/5  rDev -10.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

pours semi-clear amber-orange with a thin beige head, and some lacing.

smell of of malt, nuts, and caramel.

taste is of malt, caramel, grain, a touch of corn, and some earth, ends just a little bitter.

overall just okay for a pale ale could have a better look and ending.

Photo of Grunewald
3.55/5  rDev +8.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 4

A - poured from a 330ml bottle into a weizen glass. It pours clear amber with a foamy white head. The lace the head leaves is quite powdery.

S - smokey malt, leather and hops

T - slightly bitter malt, some coffee, smoked/roasted elements and a tannic hop finish

M - thin body, medium-light carbonation and a neutral finish

D - smokey smell and flavor, but a bit thin

Photo of UCLABrewN84
2.08/5  rDev -36.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 1 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

Part of the Summer Brews pack from Cost Plus World Market.

Pours a clear copper orange with a 1 inch bone colored head that fades to a film on the top of the beer. Nice foamy rings of lace form on the glass on the drink down. Smell is of malt, wheat germ, and cereal grains. No other smells whatsoever, but that isn’t necessarily a bad thing. Taste is horrendous with an acidic, astringent, solvent, metallic taste. Some malt pops up in the aftertaste but not enough to salvage this beer. A good level of carbonation with a crisp yet smooth mouthfeel. Overall, this seemed like a promising beer from the look and smell but once I tasted it all bets were off. Drain pour on this one.

Photo of wordemupg
3.5/5  rDev +6.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

330ml bottle poured into pint glass jan4 2010

A clear copper with a fast falling two finger head that left lace where it existed

S sweet malts with a little toffee and nuts

T a little nuttier with some very mild chocolate and some mellow hops

M lighter then I expected but good carbonation helps its cause

D well rounded beer not lacking in any areas but not excelling anywhere either

not a bad beer but I don't recommend you go looking for it but it's worth drinking if in front of you

Photo of itomek
3.16/5  rDev -3.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3

A: more copper-red than most pales, filtered, clear, 3/4 inch nice head that lasted most of the pint.
S: biscuity, malty, pleasant notes of caramel.
T: like a red ale, not hoppy enough to be called a pale ale in North America! Malt is the emphasis here, sessionable. Slight coppery taste, sweet caramel undertones.
O: hard for me to review, I would say this fits more in the red ale category, and little distinguishes this from a Rikards Red pour. Solid and sessionable, non-offensive, but nothing special compared to the other competition on this category. Would not buy again

Photo of Shadman
3.53/5  rDev +7.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Nice bright copper brown. Decent head and lacing.

Toasted malts and a hint of floral hop. Nice balance.

Ditto on the taste. Tasted malts, hint of butter toffee, and enough hop bitterness to keep it from being a one trick pony. Touch watery, but all-in all a nice taste experieince.

Smooth, carbontion seems to fit for the flavours.

Their best beer out of the 3 or 4 I've tried hands down. A good take on the English style of Pale Ale.

Photo of shagal
2/5  rDev -39%

Photo of Hornet2003
4.08/5  rDev +24.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

This was quite a surprise from a small brewery. This smells and drinks like an IPA to me. Perhaps it's just my hop sensitive PACNW palate, but this is a really hoppy pale ale. Pours just liek an IPA. Decent head, leavind rings on the glass as I drink it. The aroma is dominated by hops. Not so much malt like some APA's may have. Tastes delicious. Like a SLIGHTLY toned down IPA. Retains the hoppy bitterness, but is lower in alcohol so the associated maltiness is not necessary to balance out. Perfect carbonation leads to this being a light feeling beer. Small bubbles and no syrupiness means this is one pleasant Pale Ale. I could definately see myself buying this one again. A six pack could suffice while watching a hockey game. Great stuff.

Photo of canucklehead
3.83/5  rDev +16.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

This beer is showing up more and more as the Olympics gets closer. Turns out this is what OK Springs Pale Ale should have been. A mid dark gold beer with a fresh hoppy nose this is full flavoured and has enough complexity to make it interesting. there is still a softness to it which is an old BC trademark on pale ales but it has enough hops to make me want to buy it again.

Photo of BDTyre
3.73/5  rDev +13.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

From notes taken in May.

Whistler Brewing Co. is closed...long live Whistler Brewing. Whistler Brewing, est. 1989 closed sometime ago but has now supposedly been revived by a BC businessman. For a time, WBC was owned by Big Rock, but was sold off to Bruce Dean in October 2005. The bottle lists a Whistler/Vancouver postal code (but no address or phone number) and the website is just a front page with non-working links and it suggests returning after May 15/06. (The site finally started working sometime in July!) Googling Whistler Brewing resulted in the prior information, plus the intersting tidbit that although the claim on the bottle of being brewed exclusively with Whistler glacier water is true, the beer itself is brewed in Kamloops (that’s about a six hour drive). This means that Dean and his associates are still using the facilities that Big Rock used for WBC before shutting down production, although a Whistler based brewery is in the works.

This beer pours like a pale ale should: a nice light copper with a thick, white head. Smells is predominantly British malts, with a bit of hops. Hints of nuts, fresh bread and toffee.

Taste is decent pale ale. Mostly malt, a bit of hops. Doughy, slightly acidic and sour but not bad. Nothing spectacular, but one of the better BC brews I’ve tried. A little bit fizzy on the mouth, but overall very drinkable. i should have spent the extra money and bought a six pack. I look forward to trying their Export Lager.

Photo of bagpiper2005
3.58/5  rDev +9.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Pour: Clear medium orange-amber in color. Two fingers of white head with decent retention and some small streaks of lacing on the glass. Active carbonation.

Smell: Very biscuity aroma with hints of pale malt and fruitiness. Light hop tang.

Taste: Sweet pale malt front end with a hint of honey. The middle reveals a strong biscuity flavor akin to an Amber Ale. Light citrusy hop bitterness in the back.

Mouthfeel: Light to medium in body with high carbonation, yet there's a certain degree of smoothness as well.

Drinkability/Overall: Good flavors going on here, and very easy and smooth drinking. Very refreshing.

Final Notes: This beer won't knock your socks off but it'll definitely hold its own. Great summertime beer.

Photo of doktorhops
2.2/5  rDev -32.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

Whistler is apparently a beautiful place to visit and break your leg skiing, or so I've been led to believe. So I purchased a bottle of this supposedly pure distinctive ale [according to the label] which I will now drink, hopefully without breaking my leg.

Poured from a 330ml bottle into a nonic pint.

A: This is not a pale pale ale, it's more of a deep copper ale, which doesn't sound as catchy as 'pale ale' but is more befitting IMO. Also note; there is a thin white lacing on top.

S: Has a distinct Vegemite aroma, perhaps a means to get Aussie ex-pats into it. This aside there are notes of burnt caramel, rye, earthy hops and yeast. Not really pale ale stuff again, more like an English dark ale or a brown ale.

T: Amazingly bland compared to the aroma. Tastes like a soda-stream soft drink before you mix the flavour with the soda water, then it hits you with an additive flavour of burnt caramel, rye, earthy hops and yeast. Finishes as boring as it began with a tapered hop bitterness and a long dry taste. Not impressed by this at all.

M: Light bodied, watery with a hyperactive carbonation taking into consideration the last two items.

D: I hope you can see where I'm going with this review, a pale ale that isn't a pale ale, tastes like an awful soft drink, gassy and most importantly: lacking in coherent flavour. This beer is one reason not to go to Whistler, though my guess is that the Export Rule applies with this brew [the Export Rule being that countries always export their shitest beers , QED: Fosters for Australia] so I imagine their are some really good brews hiding over there. Damn you Export Rule!

Food match: Pour this beer down the sink and drink water with your meal, no joke.

« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Classic Pale Ale from Whistler Brewing Company
77 out of 100 based on 33 ratings.