1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Believer - Ninkasi Brewing Company

Not Rated.
BelieverBeliever

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
85
very good

387 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 387
Reviews: 169
rAvg: 3.79
pDev: 11.61%
Wants: 15
Gots: 27 | FT: 1
Brewed by:
Ninkasi Brewing Company visit their website
Oregon, United States

Style | ABV
American Amber / Red Ale |  6.90% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
An Imperial American Red Ale.

Ninkasi website:
"6.9 % alc./vol. 60ibus. Always available in 22 oz bottles, and on draft."

(Beer added by: Cascadia on 06-23-2007)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 387 | Reviews: 169 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of JLapadura
JLapadura

New York

2/5  rDev -47.2%

10-05-2012 01:59:31 | More by JLapadura
Photo of chugalug06
chugalug06

Colorado

2.43/5  rDev -35.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Very little cream colored head rises. Not much lacing either. Brew is very dark red-purple with lots of browns.

Crisp caramel scent with nice subtleness.

Bland flavors. Relaxed hops and not very crisp. The flavor lingers with off metallic flavors. Carbonation is high and bitterness is missing. Very sweet for a Red.

Eh. Take it or leave it. I'll never seek this one again.. Can't recommend it either. But, it does go down rather quickly.

Serving type: bottle

07-30-2012 03:42:42 | More by chugalug06
Photo of ohmybock
ohmybock

Georgia

2.48/5  rDev -34.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 4 | overall: 2

Well, the bottle states this brew has a "rich dark malt complexity" among other things. I'd certainly have to agree after tasting it. Unfortunately, I don't care for that rich dark malt complexity at all in this red ale. For my tastes, that dark, bitter, harsh, roasted character doesn't work for me at all here. I like my red ales "red", but without an overpowering harsh chocolate/roasted character. I did like the hop character which is mingled in with the other flavors. I also liked the color and clarity of this brew. There could have been more head, but that's not a big deal. Overall, this brew just didn't work for me. Oh well, that's why they make lots of different brews, right? Everybody has different likes and dislikes.

Serving type: bottle

06-10-2008 00:05:23 | More by ohmybock
Photo of sourdog
sourdog

California

2.5/5  rDev -34%

04-08-2014 05:56:55 | More by sourdog
Photo of g_jenkins
g_jenkins

California

2.5/5  rDev -34%

04-13-2014 05:08:12 | More by g_jenkins
Photo of largadeer
largadeer

California

2.5/5  rDev -34%

05-08-2013 04:25:37 | More by largadeer
Photo of jeffeljefe
jeffeljefe

Washington

2.58/5  rDev -31.9%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

A) Rocky head fades after a few seconds leaving nice lacing, hazy reddish orange
S) sweet malty aroma, fruits
T) Sweet and roasty malt, resinous, slightly bitter, estery body, metallic finish
M) smooth medium-body, prickly carbonation, long bitter finish
O) Never really been a fan of red ales to date, this one not converting me. Appearance and smell are the high points, taste is pretty good until it fades to the bitter, piney finish that coats my mouth

Serving type: bottle

04-17-2013 03:40:52 | More by jeffeljefe
Photo of magictacosinus
magictacosinus

California

2.69/5  rDev -29%
look: 3.25 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.75

This was one of the many beers poured at the December Albany Taproom bottle share. Whoever bought it, thanks! Poured out of a 22oz bottle into a tulip glass. This was 60-90 days old, so keep that in mind as I review.

Pours a darkened reddish amber color - looks a lot like your typical English bitter, mind you, if it weren't for the off-white fizzy looking head that I've typically seen in all of this brewery's beers. Some bubbles stick to the sides of the glass upon the initial pour, and while it seems relatively lively it isn't enough, apparently to solve it from completely dissipating overall. Slightly viscous in appearance, but otherwise pretty average for the style.

Smells slightly citrusy, with a mostly earthy grainy and spicy yeasty feel overall. In other words, this is how MOST hoppy Ninkasi beers have been for as long as I can remember. Some orange peel, big pine, and maybe some grapefruit, but it's otherwise very earthy, spicy, and grainy, with some light soapy notes as well. Something's really up with whatever yeast they're using, because it's really disjointed overall.

Tastes equally earthy, and while there's a better dose of citrus and pine here, it ends up feeling very peppery and soapy. Granted, this bottle may be slightly past its prime, but I have no idea what this probably tasted like fresh. Maybe a little bit juicier? Regardless, there's nothing more here than some dried citrus rinds, pine, pepper, and some slight earthiness, with a biscuit caramel backbone that becomes excessively overrun by the soapy properties. Finishes pretty astringent and malty, and the floral soap notes become stronger at the finish as well. It's slightly refreshing, but mainly while it's cold. As it warms up, it gets progressively maltier, much to its disadvantage. It's not the worse, but not a very good interpretation of the style.

Something's up with Ninkasi - I've been drinking their beers for a while, but a lot of them have gotten yeastier, earthier, and soapy in the past year or so. This is a prime example of many things that are a little strange with their beers these days, and I'm not sure if it's just my changing taste buds, or something particularly worse. Otherwise, I had some trouble enjoying this, which is bizarre as this is merely an amber ale! Not very recommended, but okay if you're just starting to get into amber ales.

Serving type: bottle

03-11-2014 23:44:23 | More by magictacosinus
Photo of craigreno
craigreno

Oregon

2.75/5  rDev -27.4%

07-09-2013 05:16:38 | More by craigreno
Photo of Offa
Offa

California

2.78/5  rDev -26.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

This is very much a west coast strong amber ale-type that, after a somewhat promising start, falls flat into rough, one-dimensional caramelised-citrus bitterness and not much else.

Deep red brown-copper, it is faintly hazy with a medium-big orange-tan head slowly shrinking to a thin foamy top and leaving some decent foamy lace.

Aroma is pine caramel, caramelised orange, plain sweet caramel and caramelised barley.

Taste starts off fairly well but goes downhill. It has up front a winey caramelisede toast character that quickly fades and never returns, lightly sweet, with some citrisy-woody bitterness with a little pine and burnt bitter orange, grapefruit and a toasted barley bitterness, all dominating the finish and aftertaste at first. However, things soon degrade, compelxity vanishes, and it ends up overly bitter, sharp burnt citrus and wood with a little dry barley, leaving a character that is rather plain, thin, and barely 2-dimensional. Feel is light but pretty good. It becomes tedious fast.

Serving type: bottle

12-02-2010 22:33:25 | More by Offa
Photo of illidurit
illidurit

California

2.8/5  rDev -26.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

Bomber poured into a pint glass. Pours sort of orange but sits a deep clear amber in the glass. Nice foamy beige head. Aroma isn't too robust for the style. It's hoppy but not a tropical citrus blast like Winter Yulesmith etc. Notes of pine sap and caramel with a little solvent and grapefruit. Flavor is a letdown. Barely anything there. The body is so thin that it seems like the flavor is washed away before I can taste it. Fleeting bready malts and an herbal hoppiness along with a tobacco note, however faint. One positive here is the bitterness, which is very substantial. Carbonation is a little on the low side. All it needs is body and it could be a decent beer.

Serving type: bottle

03-13-2010 05:48:39 | More by illidurit
Photo of homebrew311
homebrew311

Illinois

2.88/5  rDev -24%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

Picked this one up while I was in Washington. Poured in to a standard pint glass.

A: pours a deep red, 2 finger foamy head, heavy lacing

S: piny and earthy hops all over in the front along with a backbone of sweet malts

T: like the nose, spicy hops up front with a considerable amount of bitterness, by mid palate- it turns into a bit of a mess. Some tea leaf like flavors which throws me off a bit. Poorly balanced.

MF: medium body, high carbonation

D: this was not that great for a red ale, the nose and appearance were promising, but the taste did not deliver.

Serving type: bottle

08-20-2010 23:39:04 | More by homebrew311
Photo of ThickNStout
ThickNStout

Georgia

2.95/5  rDev -22.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

22oz bottle from LetsPour. No discernable bottling info. Served in a Sweetwater snifter.

Pours deep murky red brown with about a half finger of off white head that quickly recedes.

Aroma is fairly faint. Caramel, bread and herbal earthy hops.

Flavor is bready malt forward. Toast, caramel, toffee, lemongrass and herbal hops. No real alcohol presence in the taste.

Medium light body with an interesting carbonated zest with each sip that quickly calms to a slow sizzle on the tongue. Long lasting grassy bitter hops in the aftertaste.

Not sure what makes this a "double" red ale because I'm pretty sure it has neither twice the malts nor twice the hops of a standard red ale. It's still a pretty solid beer and I had no problems polishing off a bomber by myself.

Serving type: bottle

11-30-2012 06:11:20 | More by ThickNStout
Photo of katybee
katybee

Oregon

2.95/5  rDev -22.2%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Unfortunately, I had to give this beer slightly lower marks based on its appearance, which doesn't seem fair, except that it contrasted with it's labelling which declares it "double red". Instead, I found the color a medium brown-gold. I would perhaps list it as a brown ale, except for the brewing process. But perhaps I'm being picky. Perhaps I was disappointed also in the quickly disipating head and minimal carbonation. Except that I dislike excessive carbonation, so this was actually a plus for me.

Actually the mildly bitter hops smell and bitter hops taste was rather refreshing, coming on the tail of numerous malty stouts I've been sampling. This was crisp and refreshing, with a biting peppery taste that hinted of lemony citrus. Much more complex and herbal than an average American lager. Yet just a hint of sweetness and nothing sour at all. A true light-medium body, not creamy, but not thin either, with a nice tingle on the tongue.

Drinking this beer was an easy interactive experience. Substantial flavor, even if not my preferred.

Serving type: bottle

01-07-2011 23:50:47 | More by katybee
Photo of trubeernick
trubeernick

California

3/5  rDev -20.8%

03-01-2014 05:14:51 | More by trubeernick
Photo of jbakajust1
jbakajust1

Oregon

3/5  rDev -20.8%

06-13-2014 02:03:30 | More by jbakajust1
Photo of bernat1971
bernat1971

Washington

3/5  rDev -20.8%

09-15-2013 08:55:04 | More by bernat1971
Photo of Luiz0930
Luiz0930

California

3/5  rDev -20.8%

11-02-2013 18:39:36 | More by Luiz0930
Photo of mrkinnex
mrkinnex

Oregon

3/5  rDev -20.8%

02-16-2012 22:51:55 | More by mrkinnex
Photo of jtosch
jtosch

Oregon

3/5  rDev -20.8%

02-27-2012 22:59:53 | More by jtosch
Photo of towlea25
towlea25

Washington

3/5  rDev -20.8%

01-07-2012 18:16:26 | More by towlea25
Photo of Wedcat
Wedcat

California

3/5  rDev -20.8%

09-05-2013 01:40:31 | More by Wedcat
Photo of od_sf
od_sf

California

3/5  rDev -20.8%

02-01-2014 03:52:00 | More by od_sf
Photo of Geno206
Geno206

Washington

3/5  rDev -20.8%

05-31-2013 05:30:44 | More by Geno206
Photo of Unchi
Unchi

California

3/5  rDev -20.8%

12-13-2013 03:02:52 | More by Unchi
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Believer from Ninkasi Brewing Company
85 out of 100 based on 387 ratings.