1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Stone Mill Organic Pale Ale - Green Valley Brewing Company (Crooked Creek)

Not Rated.
Stone Mill Organic Pale AleStone Mill Organic Pale Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
72
okay

212 Ratings
THE BROS
81
good

(view ratings)
Ratings: 212
Reviews: 189
rAvg: 3.11
pDev: 18.01%
Wants: 2
Gots: 0 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Green Valley Brewing Company (Crooked Creek) visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
English Pale Ale |  5.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Todd on 09-04-2006)
View: Beers (2) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Stone Mill Organic Pale Ale Alström Bros
Ratings: 212 | Reviews: 189 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Rayek
Rayek

Colorado

3.38/5  rDev +8.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A; Pale amber with minimal carbonation. Soapy head doesn't retain well and leaves only traces of lace.

S: Straw and hay, plus a bit of lemony citrus.

T: Not bad. Quite mild, but well balanced and interesting. Dry malts are followed by a citrus and spice hop kick. Finishes with a lingering spicy bitterness.

M: Medium light body has the right amount of fizz.

D: Nice session beer. Isn't the most interesting beer, but still quite drinkable.

Serving type: bottle

11-03-2008 17:26:08 | More by Rayek
Photo of ncbeermonger
ncbeermonger

North Carolina

3.55/5  rDev +14.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

I like the organic aspect of this beer. This pale ale is very good.

It smells crisp, and you can detect the hops on first whiff. The beer tastes like a crisp American style pale ale. It is smooth, and the fact that it is organic is forgotten because of the pleasing taste of this beer. The mouthfeel is great and helps make this a very drinkable beer.

Serving type: bottle

10-22-2008 07:06:39 | More by ncbeermonger
Photo of popery
popery

California

2.63/5  rDev -15.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Meh. This beer just isn't very good and is somewhat confusing as a pale ale. It looks fine. Foamy head dissipated rather quickly, not leaving much behind. It smells malty. Hops are notably missing. I guess it has a balanced flavor, but I'm not certain that's a compliment here. It's mostly malt, but it's kind of like a good beer in some other style. Unfortunately, it's also a bit watery and fizzy. I wouldn't turn my nose up at a free one. Sorry, the drinkability category doesn't make a ton of sense for a lot of beers.

Serving type: bottle

10-17-2008 06:40:59 | More by popery
Photo of Reagan1984
Reagan1984

Massachusetts

3.48/5  rDev +11.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Had a pint of this last night at Bison County in Waltham, MA

The pint came with virtually no head. The beer was a Amber/Brown color with some reddish highlights but still seemed to border more on the brown side. Slightly hazy with no real visible carbonation. No lacing at all.

Aroma was peppery and spicy with some roasted malt tones as well.

As with the aroma I was struck by the black pepper taste. Fairly well balanced, nothing to complex. Some malt backbone, bread like flavors and a mild hop bite.

The pepper with the tingly carbonation presented an interesting and somewhat lively mouth feel.

Nice drinkability.

I guess my final verdict is that I moved onto another beer for my 2nd pint.

It's good. Not great.

Serving type: on-tap

10-14-2008 10:22:16 | More by Reagan1984
Photo of BigBry
BigBry

Alberta (Canada)

3.23/5  rDev +3.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Picked up a 6 pack while vacationing in the States, not realizing (or caring) that this is a disguised A-B product. 12 oz bottle, label as pictured above.
Clear coppery orange color, slightly off-white head. Looks OK, average retention, minor lacing. Hop aroma is mild, slightly floral and grassy. The flavor is well balanced between the caramel malt and the earthy, grassy hops.
Medium body, appropriate mouthfeel for the style. All around a pretty decent English Pale Ale, would be a good sessional.

Serving type: bottle

10-03-2008 19:04:38 | More by BigBry
Photo of brushtachio
brushtachio

Ohio

2.95/5  rDev -5.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

based on the other selections at this hotel bar, I had rather low expectations for this draft. It was a little better than expected but not much. Dark bar made it tough to judge appearance but whatever leeway I was prepared to give was counterbalanced by a thin to non existant head. Smell wasn't bad just barely discernable. Taste was that of a conventional mainstream PA - except for an odd metallic twang that my palate quickly adjusted to, it could just as easily been a Bass. Run of the stone mill english pale ale

Serving type: on-tap

09-26-2008 18:23:09 | More by brushtachio
Photo of Pauly2X
Pauly2X

Wisconsin

3.5/5  rDev +12.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

A- Clear deep gold, half finger head.

S- Mellow hop aroma coupled with a subtle fruitiness.

T- Good malt hop balance, neither one overpowers. Somewhat dry finish.

M- Low carbonation, smooth, a touch light.

D- Nothing offensive.

Not a bad pale ale at all. It lacks any kind of wow factor, but its pretty solid nevertheless.

Serving type: bottle

09-14-2008 22:26:01 | More by Pauly2X
Photo of Kraken
Kraken

Maryland

3.35/5  rDev +7.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Reviewed from notes while on vacation in Myrtle Beach

Poured from a 12 oz bottle into a standard pint glass. Firm pour offers up a one finger off white head. Head diminishes very quickly, leaving a light lace. Color is a dark amber.

Nose- Almost no smell to speak off. Slightly metallic, faint citric hops.

Taste- Light hops, metallic, bitter finish. Smooth faint caramel and toffee. Citric hops in the finish.

Mouthfeel- Decent, dry bitter finish.

Drinkability- Good, nice pale to session with SN is still a better bet.

Serving type: bottle

09-02-2008 02:02:04 | More by Kraken
Photo of scottyshades
scottyshades

Florida

3.2/5  rDev +2.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

After seeing this at EVERY supermarket, I decided to give it a try

Tasting Date: 08/29/2008
Born on Date: 08/2008

A: Pours a cheap looking golden/straw color that is very transparent...The head is a pretty good 1 incher that leaves a spotty lace around the glass. The carbonation looks very intense from the pour, which was a medium aggressive one

S: Hops are present, notes of metal, and earthy tones are apparent. Not much to the nose to be quite honest...again, smells cheap

T: The taste is much better than the nose predicted. Hops are present, but there is a sweet note that helps balance the bitterness...I cannot exactly identify what it is, but it tastes like caramel

MF: Light in body, carbonation is intense throughout the ride. Finishes smoother than I had though, but leaves a slight bitter metallic taste

D: Decent. The carbonation is a little intense for me. I would not consider this to be a session beer

Serving type: bottle

08-29-2008 20:28:46 | More by scottyshades
Photo of hooligan
hooligan

Florida

3.2/5  rDev +2.9%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Another hotel bar. Common beers galore with your usual Heineken/Newcastle additions... but thankfully there was at least one batch ale offering, the bonus being I've yet to taste at this one.

Chilly hazy orange amber with a thin lispy head.

Floral, slightly medicinal with hints of peppermint, cherry, and toffee in the nose.

Mint-like grassy hop character upfront, with the same medicinal mint/fruit character found in the nose. Very sweet cherry and light toasted oats character. Hop presence lingers throughout and doesn't fade out at the end.

Nice mouthfeel, just enough "heft" without being overpoweringly thick for the style. Nice level of effervescence, appropriate for this beer.

A good pale ale, but I've truly yet to find an organic craft brew that was on par with exceptional. I visited the African themed bar to have the African beer, and ended up having a couple American microbrews. Go figure.

Serving type: bottle

08-25-2008 00:57:49 | More by hooligan
Photo of ryseone
ryseone

Tennessee

4.33/5  rDev +39.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

This beer looks a bit cloudy with a thin head
It smells a bit fruity with an odd twist and a fruity back
It has a crispy easy to drink quality with a nutty banana flavor and a citrusy floral hop finish it is crisp and refreshing
I felt people down this beer for its organic quality. i would love to be one of those people as i feel the word organic is added to beer to sell more beer. in this case i am wrong. this is a quallity beer with a beuatiful balance of a crisp wheaty malt and a citrus fruit like hops. it was well carbonated and did not smell or taste as bad as i pictured a"organic" hippy beer tasting.
A must try for any hefewiezzen beer lover or an IPA fan

PS i am not a speller and am to lazy to spell check feel free to hit me up in the near areas to have a beer
CHEERS

Serving type: bottle

07-22-2008 03:03:30 | More by ryseone
Photo of lawman834
lawman834

Texas

3.1/5  rDev -0.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A - Copper. The head went away too quickly.

S - Faint. Malt, no hops. Real fruity, almost like apple juice or something.

T - Odd. Super malty to me, and the afore mentioned fruit is there in a big way. There is an OK hop bite on the finish, but it's nothing to write home about.

Oh well, it's one more that I have tried, but I won't pick it up again. I can't put my finger on it. It's not that it's that bad, but I just don't really like anything about it.

Serving type: bottle

07-14-2008 23:12:45 | More by lawman834
Photo of elniko
elniko

Texas

3.4/5  rDev +9.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured into pint glass from bottle

A: Rich amber hue, finger of head that dissipated. High carbonation.

S: Nose mostly malty and grassy. Not terrible strong.

T & M: The best word I can use to describe this brew is crisp. I can't say there are a lot of complexities but it is refreshing mostly malty pale ale. More along the lines of English Pale Ale.

D: Definitely drinkable, I can see myself having the beer again. Being organic is very cool as well.

Serving type: bottle

06-19-2008 01:12:51 | More by elniko
Photo of Jorge
Jorge

Illinois

3.43/5  rDev +10.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A--Deep copper amber, thin ephemeral head of tiny bubbles

A-- Slight funk, yieldin to a crips light hoppiness; a hint of resin.

T-- Not a terribly distinct falavor: typical hoppiness for the style with well-balanced malts, hints of apple.

M--Light, refreshing, slightly acidic & bitter

D--A very drinkable beer, but not distinctive.

Serving type: bottle

06-16-2008 01:57:01 | More by Jorge
Photo of ChainGangGuy
ChainGangGuy

Georgia

2.3/5  rDev -26%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Appearance: Clear, orange body with a small, diminishing, white head.

Smell: Very basic, extremely light aroma of toasted malts with some vague floral hints to it.

Taste: Toasted malts with a faint sweetness. Drop of apple fruitiness. Floral hops, faintly bitter. Dry finish.

Mouthfeel: Light-bodied. Medium carbonation.

Drinkability: This one really took the "pale" and applied it to all of the beer's aspects. Not recommended.

Serving type: bottle

06-10-2008 20:08:47 | More by ChainGangGuy
Photo of Gambrinus1184
Gambrinus1184

Connecticut

3.68/5  rDev +18.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Served on-tap at the Groggy Frogg in Southington, Conn.

A: Poured a grainy, medium amber with sparse carbonation and a thin layer of creamy white foam which left some nice sticky lace and held great retention.

S: Smells a tad sour, slightly of toasted grain and yeast with a slight floral bouquet in the nose.

T: Taste is smooth, slightly creamy toasted caramel malt with a floral bitterness from the hops in the end. Not overly impressive, and a little sweet.

M: Mouthfeel is medium and creamy, quite drinkable.

D: Drinkability is pretty decent, given the sessionable ABV and smooth, creamy taste left by the English malts. Not the best, but not a bad option on tap.

Organic or not, this is a pretty decent brew, but not overly impressive. Wolaver's offers a more impressive line of organics, but this is alright too. Worth a try.

Serving type: on-tap

05-28-2008 22:22:54 | More by Gambrinus1184
Photo of Offa
Offa

California

2.93/5  rDev -5.8%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

This is ok and fairly drinkable but ultimately it's neither interesting nor good with food.

This is copper with a medium, light tan head steadily shrinking to a thin top that leaves no lace.

The aroma is very nice and has a definite English quality about it, with bread crust, hints of fruit and pine, caramel and citrus.

The taste, unfortunately, doesn't rise to the same level. It starts out decently well, fruity with a little caramel and toasty grain, a hint of earth and citrus, and lingering bitter pine. It soon degrades, however, becoming more bland and too acloholic. With food, it is rough and alcoholic.

Serving type: bottle

05-13-2008 18:00:49 | More by Offa
Photo of aquaderek
aquaderek

California

2.7/5  rDev -13.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Poured from the bottle into a pint glass. It is golden orange in color and has a small off white head which dissipates immediately. The nose is slightly sulfury like cooked cabbage, some slight malt and not detectable hops. The taste is slightly acetic, and has strange hop bitterness. Not very impressed with this offering, the nose and the taste do not work well. The taste is slightly out of balance. Would not recommend this beer nor would I keep it in the fridge.

Serving type: bottle

05-12-2008 00:23:28 | More by aquaderek
Photo of SIRIUS2
SIRIUS2

North Carolina

3.08/5  rDev -1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a 12 oz. bottle into a pint glass.

A: Pale golden in color with a bit of an amber tinge - crystal clear at the pour. Big initial soapy white head of about an inch, but quickly dissipates to a basic ring. Some light lacing.

S: Very... basic. There are some average malt smells, a very light smell of bread, and that was about it. I could not detect any hops on the nose, which struck me as a little odd.

T&M: Moderately light malts, more dry than sweet, roll over the tongue with decent thirst quenching effect. It seems clear that there are indeed hops in the brew but the effect seems to balance the hops, but stops just short allowing for the malts to come through. The finish is basically short and malty, with linger moving to something a bit more to the dry. Overall impressions of this brew are just very average with nothing jumping out as impressive.

D: All said, this is still a relatively satisfying thirst quencher and doesn't taste bad. It just falls short in several areas and at best seems to pull itself up to average.

Serving type: bottle

05-04-2008 02:39:05 | More by SIRIUS2
Photo of PBBC
PBBC

New York

2.83/5  rDev -9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Organic Beer. Interesting...

The presentation of this beer somehow felt wrong... I thought that it may have been my preconceptions getting the best of me... The label seems very 'rustic' looking, but in a fake way... as if someone were trying to hard to appeal to a certain aspect of the market.

The beer pours a nice light amber color with a tangy aroma... the had does not linger very long. I associated the smell more with 'tanginess' than 'hoppiness'...

The taste was not in sync with the color of the beer... the beer felt thin across the tongue, leaving a lingering film of the underdeveloped tastes... as if it had not been finished well. The hops in this beer were not very present at all... While the lightness of the beer would seem to lend well to drinkability... i would not want many of these brews in a row.

Perhaps this beer could be a gateway microbrew for light beer drinkers?

Serving type: bottle

04-10-2008 05:37:58 | More by PBBC
Photo of lionking
lionking

Pennsylvania

3.5/5  rDev +12.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

I went to review this beer and found it under Green Valley Brewing Company. Thats funny, the big brewery where I drank it said Budweiser on it (Fairfield, CA brewery tour). Poured a nice one finger head into a glass. The beer had a nice copper/amber color to it. Nice balance taste with an emphasis on hops I think. Overall, not a bad beer but the pale ale is not favorite style. Based on this one and some others, I think Bud can brew micros if they need to.

Serving type: bottle

04-05-2008 23:43:17 | More by lionking
Photo of Shiloh
Shiloh

Ontario (Canada)

3.1/5  rDev -0.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

This brew is a golden/bronze colour with medium carbonation with a thin tan crown.
The body is full.
The nose is very lightly of grain.
The taste is truly well balanced, to the point of being bland. It does have some hop like aftertaste which is very surprizing and adds a small bit of character to which this brew is in need of.
I can find no faults with this offering, I find it lacking.

Serving type: bottle

03-30-2008 00:26:56 | More by Shiloh
Photo of MTNboy
MTNboy

Germany

2.68/5  rDev -13.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Appearance: Bonze in color. A foamy off white head with tight lace.

Smell: Floral but faint.

Taste: A pretty bland beer for the most part with a sour aftertaste. If you hold in your mouth for a few second it becomes a little bitter sweet.

Mouthfeel: Light and fizzy.

Drinkability: I would not go out of my way for this beer but it isn't totally bad.

Serving type: bottle

03-26-2008 06:03:35 | More by MTNboy
Photo of naterock
naterock

Missouri

3.3/5  rDev +6.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Not To impressed, and that's what I thought before I saw the AB label. an overwhelming smell and taste of alcohol. This beer lacked where Pale Ales should be successful. Overall, a very unremarkable beer. The next beer I had that evening was something else.

Serving type: on-tap

03-22-2008 18:40:46 | More by naterock
Photo of jadpsu
jadpsu

Georgia

3.85/5  rDev +23.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

This was my first consumption of an organic beer where I was focused on, and thinking about the beer qualities to be rated.
This beer poured a generous head that had above average staying power. Moderate clear amber color that made for a pleasant appearance.
Malt hop balance definitly leaned on the malt side in both smell and taste, but hops came though in slightly bitter after taste. Slight caramel oder as well.

Mouthfeel is full and creamy. A good beer that you will want to take your time and enjoy.

Serving type: bottle

02-22-2008 21:41:28 | More by jadpsu
Stone Mill Organic Pale Ale from Green Valley Brewing Company (Crooked Creek)
72 out of 100 based on 212 ratings.