1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Stone 14th Anniversary Emperial IPA - Stone Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
Stone 14th Anniversary Emperial IPAStone 14th Anniversary Emperial IPA

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
87
very good

751 Ratings
THE BROS
87
very good

(view ratings)
Ratings: 751
Reviews: 575
rAvg: 3.85
pDev: 14.29%
Wants: 10
Gots: 35 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Stone Brewing Co. visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
American Double / Imperial IPA |  8.90% ABV

Availability: Limited (brewed once)

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: jeffthecheff on 06-19-2010)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Stone 14th Anniversary Emperial IPA Alström Bros
Ratings: 751 | Reviews: 575 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of magnj
magnj

New Jersey

4.33/5  rDev +12.5%

A - Hazy orange body with a white frothy head that subsides quickly but still hangs around enough to leave some lacing on my snifter.

S - Awesome. IPA but not American (not that they are bad). Hops are very aggressive but not the typical "C" hops that give off pine and tropical fruits. These are more grassy and herbal, still some citrus but that may also be attributed to the English yeast a bit. Aside from the hops which are the main show you get a sugary sweet character.

T - Just like it smells this thing is all business with a ton of hops up front, grassy but pungent. There is a mildly fruity thing in there, not sure again if it's yeast driven or hops or both. Malts really don't come through much except towards the end and even then it seems to be a simple recipe, clean but nothing fancy. Overall really enjoyable and I'm just starting the bomber. ABV so far is not an issue though I suspect as it warms it will pop up.

M/D - Full body but backed up by the huge hops additions and strong ABV it seems appropriate. Dangerously drinkable.

07-29-2010 22:38:45 | More by magnj
Photo of tmalone510
tmalone510

California

4.47/5  rDev +16.1%

I really liked this IPA. I typically prefer a lighter IPA with aggressive, but not over the top, hop flavor and aroma. I prefer color on the lighter side which yields a more drinkable and refreshing taste in my opinion. The Target hops are a clear standout and in my opinion make the beer. This is a true success.

07-29-2010 05:54:50 | More by tmalone510
Photo of mothman
mothman

United Kingdom (Wales)

3.4/5  rDev -11.7%

Poured into Weyebacher tulip.

Pours 1 finger of creamy white head. Decent retention with some sticky lace. Color is a pale golden straw yellow.

Aroma: Grassy floral hops. Light citrus. Bready malts. Has some herbal notes like a saison would.

Taste: Much different than the aroma. Lots of English malts. Bready. Floral grassy hops. Light citrus. Very odd. Not a fan.

Mouthfeel: Bitter, but creamy. Medium bodied with a medium amount of carbonation. Some alcohol showing. Ends with a bitter hop bite.

Overall, not a bad English IPA. It was worth a try and I was able to finish the bomber. Glad it was hopped up. Just a tad too much malt for me.

07-29-2010 04:50:57 | More by mothman
Photo of scottfrie
scottfrie

California

4.58/5  rDev +19%

22oz bottle into Duvel tulip.

A: Pours a light lemon-tangerine hue with a large, oily, bright white head that faded into a thin scum that left sticky lace down the glass.
S: Ok. So I've seen threads where people claim that some hops and therefore IPA's smell a bit like marijuana, but I've never encounter such a beer. THIS beer to me smell like weed. It's so very perfume-y and floral in addition to notes of citrusy lemon, tangerine, grapefruit and...cantaloupe. But there is definitely a grassy herbal quality to this beer, not unlike its cousin of the same plant family.
T: Big herbal and floral hop punch with a touch of herbal and citrus notes. Follows the nose quite well. There is a hint of biscuity malt shining through the perfume near the end of each swallow, but the hops pretty much overpower everything. Tangerine, cantaloupe and grapefruit dominate. Finish also has some alcohol warmth to it.
M: Medium-full body with a tingly feel from all the perfume hops. Very tingly. Soft carb.
D: I wasn't expecting as much from what others were saying, but I was pretty impressed by this beer. Very sweet and juicy. I guess some could find it too sweet though. Still, I liked this one better than last years. Great EIPA.

07-29-2010 03:11:11 | More by scottfrie
Photo of denflyr
denflyr

Texas

3.75/5  rDev -2.6%

Poured into a pint glass from a 22 oz. bottle.

Nice golden color and clear for the most part....I was expecting a little different as it seemed slightly cloudy in the bottle.

Smell was not overwhelming, but had some nice lemon notes and a slight malty overtone.

The taste was very nice! Yes this beer was the typical Stone "hoppy" IPA, but it had more to it than that! It has a nice subtle "hoppy" tone to the beer, but not like previous anniversary beers.

The mouthfeel is nice. You know for a beer that has high IBU's, this beer is not overly harsh on the palate. This is a nice touch to the beer!

Drinkability is nice, but only slightly over average. I like the "hoppy" side of this beer, but find the malt backbone lacking just a bit. So I want a bit more structure.

Nice overall, but my favorite is still the 11th Anniversary beer!

07-29-2010 00:14:17 | More by denflyr
Photo of gregmoscetti
gregmoscetti

California

3/5  rDev -22.1%

I was pretty stoked to try this beer but unfortunately, Stone has swung on and missed big. The beer goes in a three step process: Aggressive hop bitter (surprise surprise)...2...1.. hmmm that tastes interesting and not too bad...2...1... ugh gross, is that a sweaty sock?

so for those of you at home, it will taste "ok", then "not bad", then "ugh, gross."

Die hard stone fans and people who don't get to drink great IPAs whenever they want will say its good. But it isnt. Way better stuff down here in so-cal to be wasting a penny on this beer.

07-28-2010 19:26:51 | More by gregmoscetti
Photo of Casey10
Casey10

Maine

4.25/5  rDev +10.4%

I know this beer has some real mixed reviews but if you consider the style and what they were going fo here I feel Stone knocked it out of the park.

Was one thinking that they would make yet another IPA that tasted like all thier others?

Well the good news is that they didn't and what you have here is a beer unlike any other that I have had that stands out and makes a difference.

Look is golden with a nice head sediment in the bottom suggest nice bottle conditioning.

Smell light citrus some spices.

Taste - to me exceptional loved it and hope others will too because it is different don't expect a west coast style here and really don't expect a east coast either it is just different and great at the same time.

M - good stays with you a nice feel.

D - Good as well. Definately having another soon.

07-28-2010 03:55:25 | More by Casey10
Photo of MrHungryMonkey
MrHungryMonkey

Texas

4.2/5  rDev +9.1%

Nose is fruity hoppy - candied orange and some lemon - with herbs & spices - fresh cut grass, lemongrass, and something akin to cinnamon. Smells good.

Pours clear medium gold with lots of head. Looks good.

Flavor follows nose with some heavy sweetness, lots of candied orange, deeper spices - clove, slight peppermint - and a moderate tea-like bitterness. Mild grassy/leafiness and raw hop oil. Tastes good. Feels good. Very good drinkability.

Nice IPA. Stone have outdone themselves.

07-28-2010 00:42:53 | More by MrHungryMonkey
Photo of kwjd
kwjd

Ontario (Canada)

4.25/5  rDev +10.4%

Pours a pale, hazy orange colour with huge fluffy white head and tons of lacing. Nice enough head retention. Smell is strongly of herbal/floral hops. Bitterness hits hard in the taste, unlike most English IPA's. Lots of fresh herbal hop flavour with some mild citrus. Nice biscuit malt too. I wasn't quite sure what to expect with this beer, but it is a really winner for me.

07-27-2010 22:39:18 | More by kwjd
Photo of phishgator
phishgator

Florida

3.85/5  rDev 0%

Poured into a tulip glass. Medium head with good carbonation. Dark golden hue with no visible light (hazed). The nose is of strong citrusy hops and pepper. The taste upfront is almost too bitter, but that subsides once your taste buds are numbed. The flavor is big bittering hops followed by a grassy crisp finish. Not a session beer, but one that is good to have from time to time this year.

07-27-2010 13:59:40 | More by phishgator
Photo of clayrock81
clayrock81

Virginia

3.78/5  rDev -1.8%

Pours a good but quick dying head on top of an orange-tinted gold body. Smell is extremely hoppy with citric and grape notes yet a strong sugary malt smell like maple for some reason. A really hoppy and bread/biscuit taste but is really balanced with a citric, juicy taste and finishes dry and crisp. Lemony and sour apple like taste flavors yet not sour or tart; sweetness is minimal but there and there's a tad bit of huskiness in the finish from some roasted malts. A good beer, although I found hops and dryness a little overpowering. Still a good beer.

07-27-2010 12:55:02 | More by clayrock81
Photo of charlzm
charlzm

California

3.65/5  rDev -5.2%

Consumed July 26th, 2010 in a Samuel Adams Boston Lager glass.

This "Emperial" pale ale is a mostly-clear deep yellow, sort of like morning urine. Right, anyway... there is a verrrry smooooth creamy head atop this beer, almost a cask/nitro texture due to the uniformly fine off-white bubbles that rise throughout the session with this beer.

Aroma: hoppy in the English style. Medicinal herbs, white pepper, vague dash of floral character. Not as strong as I had expected.

Flavor starts off with toffee and toasty malt which segues swiftly to a medicinal, earthy hop assault. The bitterness is there in the form of a lemon rind flavor, though it doesn't come out fully until after the somewhat tea-like finish (literally a few seconds after the swallow). There is almost an English barleywine character to the flavor, due perhaps to the copious English hops used in the brewing? While I didn't especially care for it, I'm sure it's exactly what Stone intended.

Texture is creamy with the slightest carbonation bite.

I found this one overbearing; if it had been hopped a bit less, it would have been more enjoyable but probably considered less "Stone".

07-27-2010 04:52:01 | More by charlzm
Photo of jzeilinger
jzeilinger

Pennsylvania

3.85/5  rDev 0%

A - Pours a slightly hazy, golden orange color with minimal head and a moderate amount of carbonation.

S - Moderate grapefruit and pine aroma make up the majority of the nose with biscuity malt in the background.

T - Some phenolic biscuit malt sets a foundation for a blend of sweet and bitter hop onslaught to the tongue. Mild orange citrus and a hefty dose of grapefruit and pine needles. Intertwined among the bitter fruit is some sweet pineapple. About half way through the glass the pineapple becomes more noticeable. Finishes dry and practically sucks the spit off your tongue.

M - There's some warming on the way down and the mouth is left with a cotton-like feel counterbalanced with a citrus and pine. Medium bodied, mild carbonation on the tongue.

D - Very good.

My first reaction to this beer was, "Meh". However, realizing this is an English style IPA on steroids, it's a total hop bomb for the style.

07-27-2010 03:47:59 | More by jzeilinger
Photo of Ryan011235
Ryan011235

Ohio

2.28/5  rDev -40.8%

Poured into a snifter on 7/24/10

Brightly colored tangerine with swaths of gold highlights. Quite cloudy & dense, held to the light it has an almost neon glow. Poured one finger of white foam that held for a few minutes then dropped to an island of bubbles amid a skim of foam. Ok lacing thus far. Minimal retention throughout with sporadic blobs & splotches of lacing.

The aroma is rather unconventional, if not downright odd. It's a mixed bag of good & bad qualities, in my opinion. The Good: bright citrusy notes of lemon zest, orange peel & a hint of grapefruit; juicy & floral overtones & a suitable toasty malt backdrop that doesn't seem overpowering. The Bad: said citrus notes are way past ripe; very, very soapy; a touch of solvent & though seemingly not boozy, my nose is left with a harsh chemical-like agitation after lofty sniffs.

I wish I had purchased a hazmat suit along with this beer. I was hoping the chemical burn of the aroma was quarantined in the aroma. No such luck. From the very first sip this tastes of brutal solvency. Not as bad as, say, GUBNA, but this isn't at all pleasant. Some of the citric aspects carry over from the nose, but are muddled by the solvency & bordering on rotten. The citrus zestiness doesn't last long either, as the finish is engulfed in aspirin-like bitterness. Malts are far in the background. Seems like some toasted bread notes, but the potency of the hops dominates. Starts to taste medicinal as it warms.

Emperial IPA is basically medium bodied, maybe even a few clicks toward full bodied. Carbonation starts out at the mid-point of the spectrum (though it gets low by the end). A little grittiness is to be had. Alcohol heat is pretty well-hidden; warming with a very slight slickness. Finishes with the astringent aspirin bitterness mentioned above.

I would be inclined to go outside & fling this into the air but I'm afraid it would fuel the chemtrail conspiracy theorists & kill the grass, vegetation & any neighborhood animals that came across it. I will say it's less painful whilst cold, as well as the second pour (which is probably just a desensitization from the first pour). I will likely check this one out as time goes by, however; it's strangely alluring despite its flaws.

07-27-2010 01:53:00 | More by Ryan011235
Photo of cavedave
cavedave

New York

3.53/5  rDev -8.3%

It pours a finely cloudy golden topped by a thin off white head which relaxes to a lively cap and leaves some spotty lace.

Not a strong smell, but full of vegetal, citrus, and some herbal bitter hop notes, nice light tart and neutral sweet behind it.

Taste is a medium/full flavor. It starts surprisingly bitter, even for Stone, wends its way through citrus pith, vegetal, hints of tart yeast, neutral sweet, picks up some floral, and ends very citrus bitter with dark herbosity accompaniment. As it warms, the sweet almost disappears in this, and a hint of drying pine enters the scene. Sounds pretty good to read this, but it isn't the best flavor profile for an IPA, not even the best flavor profile for a Stone IPA.

Mouthfeel is not all that great, even for a IIPA wannabe. It is low carb., good, but could be even lower, highly viscous, but would benefit by being lighter in mouth, and a dry finish that isn't complex nor clean enough, and way too astringent. Good? Yes. Stone usual quality good? No.

Drinkability is average, and that is being kind. In a land of fine IPA I can instantly think of ten easier drinkers I would rather be drinking right now.

Impression: Where is the crazy complex hop artsitry Stone usually achieves? At this price think I'll stick to better, more affordable alternatives.

07-27-2010 00:39:25 | More by cavedave
Photo of lordofthewiens
lordofthewiens

Maine

4.6/5  rDev +19.5%

I really, really liked this beer.
In a tulip glass the beer was a gold color with a copious white head that was very sticky.
Peppery aroma, floral, sweet malt.
The taste was peppery up front, followed by some very sweet malt, with a late hops finish.
Incredibly smooth and balanced, great to drink.
Hope it likes my cellar.

07-27-2010 00:34:17 | More by lordofthewiens
Photo of thagr81us
thagr81us

South Carolina

4.15/5  rDev +7.8%

Served from tap into a standard pint. Pours a hazy golden yellow with a one finger white head. Maintains excellent lacing throughout. The aroma was comprised of fruit, hops, and malt. The flavor was of massive hops, grapefruit upon sitting on the palate and swallowing. It was medium on the palate with high carbonation. Overall this was a very interesting brew. Usually I will get the hops on the followthrough but they came upfront in this one and were balanced/counteracted nicely with the refreshing fruit followthrough. Very nice touch for a very good beer.

07-26-2010 20:31:50 | More by thagr81us
Photo of Brent
Brent

Kentucky

3.35/5  rDev -13%

To describe a Stone beer as "heavy handed" could easily mean the drinker is not a hophead and unaccustomed to Stone's embrace of the power of the hops. I happily list myself among the ranks of hop devotees, but, even for me, the heavy-handed description of this beer applies. Big malt body to carry the hops and abv. Assertive hopping that seemed brash and unrefined, with rough edges that rasp the tongue. Finish is a bit hot as the hops join force with the ETOH for a discordant finish.

07-26-2010 15:07:07 | More by Brent
Photo of jwinship83
jwinship83

Illinois

3.85/5  rDev 0%

22oz bottle drank from my stone ruination pint glass. picked this one up and drank it as soon as it landed in chicago.

A- this one pours out a lighter than expected golden yellow colored body with a pretty large and thick bright white head on top. the head has excellent retention and leaves large spots of lacing on the sides of my glass.

S- my initial thought is that this is very hoppy, and just what id expect from stone. lots of earthy and spicy hops. some pine and grapefruit as well. a faint odor of pale and caramel malts. a little bit of bread.

T- the caramel and bready malts i could smell are barely evident in the taste. the earthy and spicy hops come through strong. theres more grapefruit and pine than i could smell. a little bit of pineapple too. some alcohol is detectable.

M- medium bodied and highly carbonated. slight warming from the booze.

D- definitely not my favorite stone beer. something i probably wont be having again. i think they should stick to the american styled IPAs that theyre so great at.

07-26-2010 15:03:13 | More by jwinship83
Photo of JustinA1
JustinA1

California

4.47/5  rDev +16.1%

A - Gorgeous wheat gold color, Ivory white lacing. I'd look more but the aroma is everywhere.

S - This beer is all about the smell. Once the bottle is opened: Candy. It's everywhere. Floral, Light, Sugary, like a sweet scented candle or incense. It's nothing like any Stone beer you've had before, yet it still retains that bright hoppy characteristic of a solid IPA.

T - Good, dominated by spicy/peppery hops for sure, but with hints of sweet caramel deep within. The taste parallels the aroma, a feature so often missing in a good IPA.

M - Couldn't ask for more, light yet smooth body. Perfect condition, slightly more bubbly than one expects for an IPA but it works.

D - More, please. I hope, I beg, Stone's exercise in the 'Emperial' is a sign of more to come and not just that: an exercise. This beer shows refinement, care, and class. Rock on.

07-26-2010 08:09:38 | More by JustinA1
Photo of sunkistxsudafed
sunkistxsudafed

New Mexico

3.53/5  rDev -8.3%

poured into a Sam Adams' perfect pint

A- a beautiful gold with a haze of white and silver. retained a white head through the whole drink.

S- a slight letdown. somewhat hot and sterile.

T- not bad at all. can tell the water used is mineral (salt?) heavy. also surprisingly dry and spicy. reminded me of Saison du Buff.

M- dry and thin.

D- not very drinkable. the combination of the spice, heat, and hop (not to mention the added imperial depth.) makes this beer a good one, but not a session brew.

07-26-2010 05:18:23 | More by sunkistxsudafed
Photo of Duhast500
Duhast500

Rhode Island

4.6/5  rDev +19.5%

Poured from a 750ml bottle into a stemmed glass.

The color is a cloudy light orange with two fingers of foamy white head and some thick lacing left on the glass.

The smell is hoppy, big surprise, but there seems to be a fruity flavor that seems to be a little like lettuce. There are some citrus fruit flavor in the nose but no grapefruit like expected but more toward a tangerine.

The taste is full of surprises, there is some grapefruit for just a moment that goes into nice malt flavor and establishes the balance of this beer. Toward the end there is a real pop of bitter hop flavor that stays for a short moment then disappears.

This beer was a real surprise, still a west coast IPA but was a bit more balanced than hopped till you fall over. The feel is a little more balanced than most Stone IPA's but was still hoped quite well. This beer goes down with a nice crisp feel and is pretty smooth. It goes down well and is a really drinkable.

07-26-2010 03:40:50 | More by Duhast500
Photo of Gosox8787
Gosox8787

New Hampshire

2.6/5  rDev -32.5%

Presentation: Split a bomber of this with a friend. My half was poured into a pint glass and served slightly chilled.

Appearance: Really light, straw yellow in color. Clear with absolutely no haze. I'm not used to an IPA with less little color. Two finger pillowy head head with good retention saves this from resembling an adjunct lager.

Aroma: Really heavy pine pitch. Not balanced pine, but really heavy, bitter pine pitch. So much herb and medicinal flavor. Not much in the way of malt to speak of.

Taste: The pine here is overwhelming and, frankly, unpleasant. I usually enjoy IPA's with some citrus rind and pine flavor, but this is more medicinal and woodsy. I would equate this to licking pine sap, and I don't find that pleasant.

Mouthfeel: It has a nice medium bodied mouthfeel and some good crispness, but I don't find it easy to sip on for some reason.

Drinkability: The ABV really is not that noticable, but the flavor is unrelenting. I had trouble finishing my half of the bottle and I know my friend had similar trouble.

Overall, this is was lackluster showing from Stone in my opinion. I almost always love their beers, but this was borderline undrinkable. Just consider me completely and utterly unimpressed by this. I hope they take a different direction for the next anniversary ale.

07-26-2010 03:39:22 | More by Gosox8787
Photo of andrewinski1
andrewinski1

New Hampshire

4.08/5  rDev +6%

Poured into a tulip glass with a decent head on top of a light orange color. Smells very herbal; almost no sweetness detected; very excited by the smell. The taste is very dry and spicy. Orange zest dominates the taste. Yum. This is a very nice take on an "emperial IPA" and is quite drinkable. I like it.

07-26-2010 01:46:53 | More by andrewinski1
Photo of zeff80
zeff80

Missouri

3.78/5  rDev -1.8%

A - Poured out a hazy, orange-gold color with a two-finger, white head of pillowy foa,. It left sudsy sheets of lace on the glass.

S - It smelled of grapefruit, orange and other citrus fruits. There were mild bubblegum notes, too.

T - It tasted of sweet citrusy hops - grapefruit and orange mostly. There was a sweet caramel maltiness.

M - It was crisp, sharp and smooth. A medium-bodied beer with a dry finish.

D - This is a tasty beer but seems a little sloppy. I really couldn't get a feel for what it was.

07-26-2010 01:36:16 | More by zeff80
Stone 14th Anniversary Emperial IPA from Stone Brewing Co.
87 out of 100 based on 751 ratings.