1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Lukcy Basartd Ale - Stone Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
Lukcy Basartd AleLukcy Basartd Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.

1,425 Ratings

(view ratings)
Ratings: 1,425
Reviews: 658
rAvg: 4.17
pDev: 9.35%
Wants: 102
Gots: 189 | FT: 4
Brewed by:
Stone Brewing Co. visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
American Strong Ale |  8.50% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes/Commercial Description:
Anniversary blend of Arrogant Bastard to celebrate the 13 Year Anniversary of Arrogant Bastard.

Blend of Arrogant Bastard Ale, Oaked Arrogant Bastard Ale and Double Bastard Ale.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 10-15-2010)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Lukcy Basartd Ale Alström Bros
Ratings: 1,425 | Reviews: 658 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of woosterbill
3.63/5  rDev -12.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

On-tap at Cask Republic into a 12oz tulip.

A: Beautiful, clear ruby body with an inch of substantial tan head. Good retention and decent lacing. Quite nice.

S: Resinous, piney hops, and...wait, that's it. Maybe some faint caramel sweetness. Enjoyable enough, but nowhere near the complexity I was expecting.

T: Super hoppy, with pine and grapefruit backed up by caramel malt and a touch of fruity booze. Maybe some oaky vanilla on the bitter, hoppy aftertaste. Ok, but definitely less than the sum of its parts.

M: Sticky medium body with a ton of fine carbonation. Ok, but not great.

D: Too much going on here without adding up to anything interesting. It somehow manages to be too sweet, too bitter, and too boozy, all at once. Not the easiest to drink, although it is rather engaging in its sheer aggressiveness.

Notes: This is one arrogant beer all right, but I don't really think it has any right to be. I prefer all three of its constituent parts to it, easily. At least since I got it on tap I didn't have to read that god-awful gibberish on the bottle...


woosterbill, Jan 30, 2011
Photo of krisandajt
3.63/5  rDev -12.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Seen this around in a few places, figured I'd pick it up and give it a try.

Appearance: Poured from the bottle into my DFH Chalice, the beer is a deep, clear brown color with about a half inch worth of light tan colored head. The head fades away fairly quickly, leaving behind a thin layer of foam with sporadic bubbles across the top of the beer.

Smell: I'm getting a light grapefruit/citrusy smell, but it's not the sort of quality you get from hops. There's a sweet, bready, toffee-like quality to it too.

Taste: Got some bitterness from hops, that hits me right up front. The malt comes in a bit later, and it's not as strong as I would have thought it would be given the smell.

Mouthfeel: Medium body, good carbonation, drinks easy.

Drinkability: Not a bad tasting brew. Its got a dry bitterness from the hops, which I like, and a decent malt profile to compliment the hops. I feel like it could have a bit more complexity and oomph, but it's not a bad brew. I'm glad I tried it, and I wouldn't turn one down if I was offered one, but I don't think I'd rush out to pick up another bottle anytime soon.

krisandajt, Feb 04, 2011
Photo of bsp77
3.65/5  rDev -12.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 3.5

Serving glass: Poured from bottle into Imperial Pint.

Appearance: Rich mahogany with moderate tan head and light lacing.

Smell: Caramel, citrus and pine. Some oak and spiciness. Not as intense as expected.

Taste: Semi-sweet caramel core, with layers of citrus and pine. Finish is moderately bitter, with just a hint of oak.

Feel: Medium to full creamy body with a dry finish.

Overall: In my opinion, it is not as good as the sum of its parts. All of the flavors of the three base beers seem to be muting each other, and I am just left with a very good, but not distinctive, Strong Red Ale. Still really like it, but would rather have an Arrogant Bastard or Double Bastard.

bsp77, Nov 25, 2012
Photo of charlzm
3.65/5  rDev -12.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 3

Consumed December 1, 2010 in a standard pint glass. Stone branded, of course. Bottle claims 8.5% ABV, not the 9.2% listed here on B.A.

Beer pours a clear, deep amber/brown. A light yellow/off tan head forms two fingers high then reduces to a clingy, luxurious foam cap.

Aromas are resiny, piny hops with a touch of peppery spice thrown in. Medium-roasted grain also present in nose.

Flavor is strong: amber malts and a significant wash of concentrated hop flavor (herbal, pine tar and bitterness). Lightly smoky. Low sweetness. Oak flavor is subtle, verging on imaginary at times.

Mouthfeel is smooth, a touch chewy and a little creamy.

Tough to finish a whole bomber of this solo; the bitterness is beyond pleasant and verges on the unbearable.

charlzm, Dec 02, 2010
Photo of emmasdad
3.65/5  rDev -12.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Had this one on tap last night at Fresh Craft in Downtown Denver. Pours a deep red color with a significant amount of white head on top. On the nose, I get both floral and earthy hops, light wood and dates. On the palate, full bodied, good carbonation, with a pretty nice balance between the toffee sweetness, the citrusy hops and the lingering alcohol.

emmasdad, Nov 20, 2010
Photo of Jwale73
3.65/5  rDev -12.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

22oz. bottle served in my Old Stock snifter. Pours the color and clarity of unpasteurized cider with a loose, tan-colored head that quickly dissipates into a frothy band around the edges and a cluster of bubbles across the center. Nose expresses dark fruit, toasted malts, a trace of citrus and spice and a hint of alcohol and wood. Taste consistent with nose; however some grapefruit acidity and bitterness also comes out in the mix before finishing with a light, lingering bitterness. Mouthfeel is medium-light, with an assertive carbonation and some acidity that lightly stimulates the salivary glands. Decent, but not sure it's worth the hype. Flavors are a little jagged, but there might be some improvement with age on this one.

Jwale73, Jan 18, 2011
Photo of ptykozoon
3.65/5  rDev -12.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Cherry red, good lacing, but the head dissipates fast. Nice color - pretty beer.

Abrasive hops, cherry, oak.

Lots of oak, earthy flavors besides the hops, lemon. Candied sugar, almost some caramel.

Well carbonated. You can taste the ABV as well.

A very interesting and tasty beer, might be a good one to age too.

ptykozoon, Jan 15, 2011
Photo of SirRuss
3.65/5  rDev -12.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A - Rich chestnut brown with a strong two inch thick, rice pudding white head. Retention is fairly robust with some meaty lacing left in its wake.

S - Biscuitiness from the malts, a full dose of oak vanillins, and hints of hops bobbing about.

T - Great expression of the malts with the oak engaging them to produce a heavy toffee presence. The hops have a dominating bearing that manifests itself on the finish. Personally, the hops seem overdone - although cleansing, their resinous influence enters too early and too intensely creating a forced distraction from the luxurious malts that deserve to be the center of attention.

M&D - The carbonation, sugar, and alcohol all seem well balanced. However, there is a distinct puckering akin to a tannic onslaught that sucks the moisture from your mouth in an excessive and unpleasant manner. (This is a surprising character to find in this beer, and I can only wonder if there's some residual tannin resiliently hiding in some crevice of my mouth from a cab that I had an hour-or-so ago[despite palate cleansers]).

O - great potential, but a little disappointed that the off-balance hops prevent it being realized. If the excessive puckering is a standard feature (and not a personal mis-perception) then this is another major knock, but I will -for now - not include it in my overall rating. Better Lukc next time Stone.

SirRuss, Dec 23, 2010
Photo of TheDTrain
3.68/5  rDev -11.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

22oz bottle poured into a tulip
Thanks to BeerFM's own Andy for sharing!

Rich mahogany color. This basardt has some nice aromas of malts, hops, caramel, brown sugar, but there an odd plasticy smell that is pretty apparent. Drinkability is fair with the balance of hops, malts, bitterness, and alcohol. Tastes a lot like other Stone ales. For an anniversary beer, I was hoping for a little more.

TheDTrain, Dec 02, 2010
Photo of RedBrewer83
3.68/5  rDev -11.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Poured into tulip...

A: Pours a dark amber with hues of red and orange, frothy two finger head, decent retention and excellent lacing.

S: Aromas of sticky pine resin hops, boozy alcohol and heavy bready malt.

T: All the flavors of the nose but unfortunately they aren't very well balanced at the moment. I really think in a few months this will really come into its own and be a great beer, but right now the hops overpower everything in the start and the booze cleans everything up on the finish leaving a heavy flavor of malt and booze with bitter hops on the finish.

M: Medium body, slightly oily and thick but nice carbonation. Finish is a little long on the hops and not quite dry enough.

D: The unbalanced flavors and heavy booziness of this beer make it less than drinkable and while I like the beer and am really looking forward to what it will taste like in 6-12 months, right now it is off.

RedBrewer83, Dec 02, 2010
Photo of BarryMFBurton
3.68/5  rDev -11.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

I am one lucky bastard to find this on the shelves before its best-by date; I’ve seen the previous release, but fairly recently, so it must have been past its prime. Cheers to fresh beer, and to Stone for slapping a distinct “ENJOY BY JAN 31, 2013”on the side of the bottle – thank you.

A: An excellent color: pours a crystal-clear ruby red that shimmers in the glass. Short, bubbly head pops and fizzes for thirty seconds or so before it dissipates, leaving a negligible amount of tan retention. Wet lacing slides back slowly into the body.

S: There’s almost no nose on this one – is my nose just not very sensitive today, or is this not the pungent hopfest I expect from Stone? From what I can make out, there’s a sweet butterscotch backbone with notes of cherry and fig under a citrusy hop note of mango, kiwi, and some resins. Once I pour it into a glass with more of a tapered lip and let it warm up, I can make out more black ale roast, dark fruits, and bourbon – smells just like hookah smoke, oddly enough.

T: A single sip puts the hairs up on my arm and a warmth on my tongue – that’s a strong beer. Forward tastes of black malt, toasted bread, thick hop oils, and booze, mixing every one of the viscous tastes you can get from a strong ale. Decadently smooth, the sweets thicken every motion of the palate like it’s drenched in malt, so much that even the oily hops get a smoky, syrupy kick. Mango, strawberry, lime, and pine from those hop tastes, though with a sweet grape underpinning to remind me of that hookah character from before. Finishes mild like the nose: nothing but a bit of lemon zest and toasted grain lingers.

M: As said before, this is a smooth beer; not barleywine-thick, but it’s close. Low carbonation and lots of malt to the body.

O: This was a pretty good beer, but I would rather have any of the bastards individually. I don’t know exactly where it’s coming from, but there’s contradicting flavors between the blends and it shows. But the greatness that is Stone comes through every time, showing full, satisfying flavors throughout. I can’t complain.

BarryMFBurton, Nov 09, 2012
Photo of jtk
3.68/5  rDev -11.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Appearance: Very dark brown. Head disappeared quickly and there was never much of one.

Smell: Heavy malt.

Taste: Heavy, bitter. Very slight hint of a root beer taste? Hops compliment the alcohol presence that is present.

Mouthfeel: Creamy. Low carb.

Drinkability: Not sure if I will get this one again. I wouldn't have had another one if it were in the fridge that night. Pretty much overpowered my palate and not in the best way. A good beer but not their best by a long shot.

22 ounce bomber.

jtk, Dec 04, 2010
Photo of bort11
3.68/5  rDev -11.8%
look: 5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

22 oz silk screened bottle, poured into a Karmeliet tulip. A gentle pour produces a thick, custard colored head, The consistency of the foam is creamy and milky. Lacing is gorgeous, very delicate bubbles slide across the glass. The body color is the same as the brown bottle glass.

Smell is a harsh and aggressive pine hops with some alcohol back burn. There is a woody resin aroma in there around the edges. This is kind of pungeant. The taste is equally aggressive, but at least there is an attempt at balance from the caramel malts. There is just a hint of vanilla. But over all it is like fresh pine and spruce needles. It is sharp and biting. Even though it is only 8.5% ABV, there is a deffinate alcohol rub.

The mouthfeel is medium bodied with lots of active carbonation. The body itself is smooth where flavors are harsh. That creates an interesting contrast. Stone is not afraid to challenge their drinkers, and that is why so many craft beer fans love them. I have had all three of the base beers for Lukcy Basartd in the past. Blended together, I feel that the Double Bastard is the dominant beer. Since Lukcy Basartd is a one shot anniversary beer, I doubt it will be part of the Missouri launch. However I do anticipate picking up the other Bastards.

bort11, Jan 19, 2011
Photo of Chico1985
3.68/5  rDev -11.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

On-tap at Sierra Grille last week, reviewed from notes. Listed as 8.5%.

Pours dark red, off-white head turns to a thick ring leaving decent lacing.

Smell/taste/mouthfeel - HUGE oak, fresh dark fruits, caramel, pine, a little bit of chocolate. Smooth, lowish carbonation, alcohol very hidden, doesn't feel near 9.2%. Seems extremely malty with low hoppiness (maybe overly smoothed out from the oak), unusual for Stone.

For a blend this tasted pretty different than what I expected, it's good but I'd reach for any of the other Bastards before this one.

Chico1985, Dec 08, 2010
Photo of BarrelO
3.68/5  rDev -11.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

22oz bomber poured into a pint glass. 8.5% ABV.

A: Deep ruby red body. Decent white head with some lacing.

S: Caramel and herbs, maybe come citrus.

T: Big herbal notes from the hops. Strong bitterness. Fruits and caramel from the malt. I'm not really picking up any oak.

M: Somewhat thick but not syrupy, medium carbonation.

D: I've realized that I don't really care for big herbal hops like Chinook and Columbus. My tastes definitely tend more toward the pine/grapefruit varieties. If you like that herbal spiciness, though, you'll probably really like this beer.

BarrelO, Dec 01, 2010
Photo of nova009
3.68/5  rDev -11.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a bomber into a snifter

A- pours a dark reddish brown, a one finger tan head appears and slowly dissipates down to a ring, head clings to the glass well and leaves some nice lacing

S- super hoppy smelling, citrus notes particularly grapefruit, malty, slight sweet caramel smell present as well

T- very very hoppy even more so than most stone brews, slightly woody, partially sweet with a small amount of caramel, finishes pretty bitter

M- medium body with a nice balance of carbonation, smooth and creamy

D- the hops are a little overwhelming in this one, i can drink this but it's not really something that i want drink a lot of, okay to drink once but i probably wouldn't pick up another one of these

nova009, Jan 02, 2011
Photo of warriorsoul
3.7/5  rDev -11.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Thanks to sitarist for the generous LIF...this is one of the 4 offerings sent.
Pours a rust color w/ a generous two fingers of light tan head. Lacing is thick and lasts for the entire glass.
Decent aroma. More biscuit malt than hops which surprises me when it comes to Stone. With a lingering nose, some nice fruity notes shine through and things start to balance out.
Taste is more balanced up front. The good news is I like the hop profile and there is a solid bitterness that accompanies the fruitiness.
Not a thin beer, but does not feel very heavy for a strong ale. ABV is well hidden. I believe the body will thicken with a short time in the cellar, so I will look to pickup a bottle personally to age for 6 months. Stone's beers have proven themselves to age quite well, with the exception of their hop bombs.

warriorsoul, Dec 19, 2010
Photo of Rhettroactive
3.7/5  rDev -11.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

From 22oz bomber to Bruges hybrid glass on 3/25/11
*From notes

A: It presents like rich molasses - hazy, dark brown and thick. A massive three finger head on a simple pour - Jesus. Residual lacing is impressive.

S: A badass mix of alcohol and hops. On a deep inhale, black cherries come out to play.

T: Sweet, rich toffee and caramel, followed by an über dose of malt. Bitter hop residue finishes this one off. Alcohol is quite apparent and doesn't hide one bit - it is a clear player here. As it warms, I get traces of pimento on the back palate.

M: It's voluptuous and rich, but it fades away a bit on the finish. It's properly carbonated, which is much appreciated.

O: Stone's Lukcy Bastard is a reasonably nice brew. It's different then most other offerings I've had recently, and provided my palate a nice change of pace. I don't feel that this is something I'll return to often, but I certainly respect Greg Koch and his blended one-time one-off.

Rhettroactive, Mar 30, 2011
Photo of samie85
3.7/5  rDev -11.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A-Pours a dark amberish brown with a really thick, dense head.

S-Really dank pine, orange, grapefruit, pineapple some light notes of alcohol and some caramel.

T-Really big on the grapefruit and pine from the nose with an almost spicy, lingering bitter note on the finish.

M-Medium bodied with low to medium carbonation and a slickness with a drying finish.

D-A pretty solid beer and one that I'm glad I got to try. The spicy bitter note was a little much for me personally, but I could see how many people would enjoy it.

samie85, Dec 16, 2010
Photo of ShogoKawada
3.7/5  rDev -11.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

22oz for about $8, poured into snifter.

A- Nice caramel/ruby brown beer with a huge sticky tan head. Laces nicely.

S- Hoppy! Nice WC fruity citric hop blast. Malty, caramel. Hops are center stage.

T- Caramel, mild malty goodness, a bit of molasses. The hops cut right through that stuff though and assault the tastebuds. In a good way... For the most part. Perhaps a bit too much pine for my taste.

M- Not as heavy as DB, more around the mouthfeel AB or OAB. Carbonation is suitable. Intense bitterness, it'd be interesting to see how this is in a month or two.

D- Moderate. An enjoyable beer, although one I won't rush to revisit. Tasty, though. I'd like to see it under $5-6, honestly.

ShogoKawada, Jan 06, 2011
Photo of artruism
3.73/5  rDev -10.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Brown Sugar nose with caramel color and nice head and lacing.

Tastes extremely sweet and light with slight pepperiness from the hops, It's light on carbonation and heavy on malts.

Very drinkable, but not the most AMAZING thing I've ever had, which is what I hear alot of people say about Stone. I thought this was simply a good beer.

artruism, Jan 02, 2011
Photo of gregshead
3.73/5  rDev -10.6%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A: Cloudy red with a half finger of head.

S: Belgian yeast. Faint smells. Nothing too strong.

T: Sweet caramel taste. Sweeter than the other bastards. Nice bitter taste at the end. Some belgian yeast funk.

M: Smooth and decent carbonation

D: An enjoyable drink. I had a hard time reviewing it because of it's similarities to the other Bastards. I prefer the double bastard the most of the four.

gregshead, Dec 08, 2010
Photo of GallowsThief
3.73/5  rDev -10.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

Poured out of a bomber into a Duvel.

A - Pours a deep brown with a creamy brown head. One inch head.

S - Fruity smell with some definite citrus. Has a bit of an acidic smell as well. Hoppy of course. Has some pine in there as well.

T - Tangy to me for sure. Hops all over this one. Runs a little bit bitter at the end.

M - Medium bodied. Bitter. Has good carbonation.

D - Solid.

GallowsThief, Dec 08, 2010
Photo of andrewinski1
3.73/5  rDev -10.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Thanks to Bendurgin for sharing. Nice medium-dark amber in appearance with a decent half inch off white head.

The smell is very very hoppy. No malt sweetness is detected. The hop aromas are full of tropical fruit flavor and a hint of orange.

Nice taste that reminds me immediately of the oaked variety of Arrogant Bastard in the balance of hops and malt. There is a nice malt sweetness to balance out the hop flavor. I get a lot of melon flavor from the hops. It's enjoyable, but not the greatest thing ever.

The mouthfeel is nice and sparkling; not too aggressive. This could either be a sipper or a quick drinker, depending on the mood. I actually like it a lot.

andrewinski1, Dec 18, 2010
Photo of Cynic-ale
3.75/5  rDev -10.1%

Cynic-ale, Aug 01, 2013
Lukcy Basartd Ale from Stone Brewing Co.
93 out of 100 based on 1,425 ratings.