Dismiss Notice
Microbrew Invitational
Join us June 3 + 4 in Boston and help us drink 300+ beers, ciders, kombuchas, meads, sakes and more!

TICKETS: beeradvocate.com/micro/

Stone 11.11.11 Vertical Epic Ale | Stone Brewing Co.

YOUR RATING = None |
BA SCORE
84
good
480 Reviews
BEER STATS
Reviews:
480
Ratings:
1,517
Avg:
3.74
pDev:
16.58%
 
 
Wants:
41
Gots:
448
For Trade:
19
Stone 11.11.11 Vertical Epic AleStone 11.11.11 Vertical Epic Ale
BEER INFO

Brewed by:
Stone Brewing Co.
California, United States | website

Style: Chile Beer

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 9.40%

Availability: Limited (brewed once)

Notes / Commercial Description:
As with any good epic, herein lies the promise of larger-than-life experiences, heroics and twists & turns as the adventure unfolds. These bottle-conditioned ales are specifically designed to be aged until sometime after December 12th, 2012. Provided you can wait that long. At that time, enjoy them in a "vertical" tasting. Each one unique to it's year of release. Each with its own "twist & turn" in the plotline. Each one released one year, one month and one day from the previous year's edition. To remind you, the remaining dates are: 12.12.12

Added by JAramini on 11-10-2011

This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

User Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Alström Bros
Reviews: 480 | Ratings: 1,517
Photo of Gmann
3.62/5  rDev -3.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours a darkish amber color with a dense khaki colored head that settles into a light cap. Definitely does not look "pale".

The aroma has a sweet candi-sugar aroma. The yeast provide some clove like notes with some flowery perfume. The peppers provide a light vegetal aroma and there is a light hint of the cinnamon. Some metal notes as well.

The taste starts off with a sweet belgian base; candi sugar and clovey yeast, medicinal & perfumey. Some overripe fruit is coupled with a peppery flavor, both vegetal and spicy. Cinnamon come through towards the end. Some hoppy grassiness as well. Not sure if all of the flavors totally work together here. Not sure if it needs the cinnamon.

The feel is moderate with very fizzy carbonation. Zesty on the palate; sweet and spicy with light bitterness. A lot going on, probably too much.

A decent beer that tries to do too much. Needs to be scaled back a bit.

 905 characters

Photo of DavoleBomb
3.79/5  rDev +1.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Poured into a snifter. This is the first VE that I've had more than a couple ounces of.

3.5 A: Minimally hazed dark amber color. Almost three fingers of foamy/frothy beige head. Retention isn't that great, but that might be a function of the Anaheims in this and little lacing is left.

4.5 S: The yeast is running the show on this brew. Lots of banana esters, bubblegum, and to a lesser extent, clove and pepper in this. The cinnamon adds a moderate contribution, which works really well with the spicy yeastiness. A small plum and apple fruitiness from the malts. The Anaheims don't contribute a lot to the nose.

3.5 T: Unlike the nose, it doesn't take much effort to find the Anaheims in the taste. Their earthy/vegetal character is easily discernible. More clove and pepper than the nose with less banana and bubblegum. The cinnamon is a bit distracting, but tolerable enough. I like what the peppers bring, but I think there's just a little too much of them, especially in the aftertaste (which is a dry, vegetal bitterness).

4.0 M: Medium body. Good spritzy carbonation. Good creaminess.

4.0 D: Definitely an interesting experiment and I'm happy to have tried it. I think the ingredient combo is a good one, but that the proportions might be a tad off.

Here's my review from a late 2012 vertical of 03.03.03 - 12.12.12.

2.5 A: Murky light brown color. Not much head formed.

3.5 S: Holy piss have the peppers gained strength. Huge Anaheim aroma. The cinnamon is all but lost. Banana and light spice.

3.5 T: Again a ton of pepper flavor and a nice vegetal spiciness from that. More cinnamon in the taste. Banana, bubblegum.

3.5 M: Medium body. Good moderate carbonation. Light creaminess. Not bad.

3.5 D: Decent overall. I like how the peppers have opened up.

 1,789 characters

Photo of Daniellobo
4/5  rDev +7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Nice offering in the epic series with a nicely spiced Belgian ale shining with chilies, more aromatic and flavorful than hot.

Presentation: 22 oz brown capped bottle. Vertical label design and narrative highlighting the year batch of the brew 2011 and as in these series reminds that each bottle is released one year, one moth, and one day from the preceding edition so officially 11.11.11. Narrative on the side, noting intent, main ingredients, and style. Shows 9.4 %Alc. by Vol. Poured into a tulip glass.

A - Deep amber/crimson pour with a nice frothy head, medium retention and surface memory, alongside good touches of lacing.

S - Spicy nose, chilies, dash of cinnamon…

T - Yeasty touches with a sweetness coated in the chilies… very prominent but as promised more flavor than heat, nice sense of it… cinnamon flows more so in the finish with the spicy yeast and its estery and spicy fruitiness.

M - Medium body, with medium/low carbonation and a smooth sense with a nice lingering finish.

O - Nice flow, distinct chilie emerges over the spiced Belgian sense but adding range and not hotness per se.

Notes: Reminds me quite a bit of…. Mad Elf with chilies? A not too dissimilar range with the extra edge of the hot peppers… I wonder if this touches will fade over time or if actually this really has potential for aging. Worth the try right now in any case.

 1,381 characters

Photo of rodbeermunch
2.86/5  rDev -23.5%
look: 3.25 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Looked darker than expected, almost brown. Cloudy, maybe chile particulate haze. Aroma was reminiscent of belgian wits. All that coriander.

Taste was spice, caramel, cinnamon, toffee, booze and citrus. Doesn't really jive together for me. Clove in the mouthfeel, less impact from any chili peppers.

These series of beers have been complex, but in a Dogfish head kind of way: you can throw shit together that maybe is unique, but hardly good drinking.

 463 characters

Photo of woosterbill
3.68/5  rDev -1.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

On-tap at Prime 16 into a 3/4 pint glass.

A: Clear, bright orange-russet body under a finger of creamy off-white head; ok retention, light lace. Nice.

S: Interesting. Piquant mixture of estery yeast and pepper. Nice and spicy, pleasantly fruity, and mildly alcoholic. Enjoyable.

T: Standardly Belgian-esque up front, with breadiness, apple/pear esters, and some mildly medicinal qualities leading up to a delightful chili finish. I love the spice, and wish it were more prevalent.

M: Solid medium body, moderate carbonation. Simple and pleasant.

O: I wasn't expecting much out of this one based on other reviews, and made a point to try a sample before ordering a glass. While it didn't really blow me away, I found it entirely pleasant. The pepper gave it some great spiciness, but never overpowered the standard Belgiany yeastiness. Enjoyable.

Cheers!

 859 characters

Photo of blackie
3.36/5  rDev -10.2%
look: 5 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

draft at Rustico Ballston around the time of release...

a: a totally gorgeous beer served from draft to tulip, a cloudy ruby-amber in color, floating a thick, meringue-thick head, off-white in color, with superb retention and heavy lace

s: the nose starts things off in intriguing fashion - a sweet toasted malt underpinning holds big medicinal phenols - band-aid and clove, cinnamon spice, yeasty esters, and hatch chiles that provide both fruity and spicy notes, lots happening here - certainly challenging, but not offensive, the combination of chile and spice does totally dominate the nose

m: smooth, creamy, lively carbonation on the medium bodied beer

t: first sip was a classic "wtf" moment - never expected the mess of flavor found, even though the nose might have hinted at it - the phenols, spice, and pepper that intrigued on the nose combine here to create a shocking disaster of a palate - reminiscent of cheap perfume, incense, and sandalwood soap, an apparently generous hop addition brings a bitterness to the finish that just doesn't match up, no chile heat noted, sure - I'm not totally down on it - the base beer seems nice and the moments of isolated hatch chile are enjoyable - but there's just way too much clashing here, for the first 1/3 of the glass I wanted to dump it in a shrub, the second 1/3 was just a chore (soldiered on, can't say I didn't give it a fair shot), and the last 1/3 not so terrible - either deadened tastebuds or an alcoholic numbness to the rescue

o: a beer that's initially inventive and interesting on the nose turns scary on the tongue - some good and bad to this one, overshooting tasteful boundaries, gonna take more than a year to mellow this baby out

5/4/4/25/35

 1,723 characters

Photo of argock
3.36/5  rDev -10.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a 22oz brown bottle into a Duvel tulip. Purchased at Wine Warehouse (Charlottesville, VA) for $7.99.

A: Cinnamon hue with tall 2-3 fingers of uniformly bubbled, oatmeal colored head with good retention and spots of lacing.

S: Heavily spiced with cinnamon, brown sugar, cloves, and then more cloves. The chiles are not perceptible. The maltiness is burnt toffee and candi sugar.

T: The spices are over the top and too forceful -- they dominate instead of accentuate. The brown sugar and rye toast maltiness and candi sugar is lost with all of the clove, cinnamon, and nutmeg flavors that add up to phenol overload. I never picked up a chile or banana flavors which I am glad about. The hops are very background with earthy, herbal tones.

M: The body is medium-full with active carbonation and but a slightly lacquered feel due to all the spices.

O: Tried it, didn't like it, glad I only bought one. I was hoping some time would mellow the spices more. It is a very intense, overdone phenolic beer. If you like cloves, you will really like this beer. If you don't, avoid.

 1,087 characters

Photo of Reagan1984
3.33/5  rDev -11%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pretty good looking beer. A couple fingers of creamy substantial head form and stay for a bit. The beer is a bright/deep rust/amber color. Perfect clarity, no visible carbonation. Just a touch of lace.

Aroma is fairly bold and a blend of spice, sweet malt notes and some yeast notably clove. Cinnamon is there, but not pronounced.

The first sip is almost overwhelming. What a thick flavor. Deep sweet malt meets cinnamon and clove. Almost more clove than the cinnamon. The Belgian yeast provides a lot of depth here. The chilis provide a touch of warmth and a slight almost smokey pepper flavor. As I worked through the glass this grew on me a bit. A bit not a lot. The sweetness with the clove wasn’t my favorite.

Fairly bold mouth feel & a bit slick.

I will look forward to trying this again in a year. Will be interesting to see what a little age will do to this beer. I think I would have preferred to drink this with some food. On it’s own, I’m not sure it’s a beer I would seek to drink.

 1,006 characters

Photo of FosterJM
3.33/5  rDev -11%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

942nd Review on BA
Bottle to Stone Pint
22oz

Purchased 11/10 and consumed 11/11/11

App- A bit of a caramel brown with some amber and reds. A mid 1 finger head to a a small bit of bubbles on the top of the beer. A small bit of cling but not much.

Smell- So this is labeled as a Chili beer but the aromatics are clearly of the Belgian origin. More yeast with a small bit of banana and clove. The chili just seems lost.

Taste- It's a tasty beer. This has a good pocket of flavor but I feel they should've stuck with the base beer. I get some nice flavors but clearly the chili is a secondary flavor. I really don't get the cinnamon on this one. More of a Belgian Pale but just different color.

Mouth- This was a medium body with a medium carbonation level. The redsidual flavors are of a Belgian beer but just a tad bit of chili.

Drink- The series is coming to a close and I feel that Stone is pushing the boundaries now. This was flavorful and subdued. I liked the base flavors and the layering. Needed more of the yeast and base flavors.

 1,042 characters

Photo of jsh420
4.05/5  rDev +8.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

pours semi cloudy dark copper with a small off white head that faded to a small film and left some spotted lacing

smells of chilies banana nutty fruity malt

taste is solid - the chilies are very present and change a very standard been there drank that beer into something interesting

mouthfeel is a medium light body with good carbonation semi dry

overall great flavor and i enjoyed every sip - doubt i will buy another one just for the fact it will not be brewed again and there are plenty of one of beers out there i have not tried plus i dont see this aging well

 569 characters

Photo of KTCamm
4/5  rDev +7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Served on tap at The Little Pub in Ridgefield, CT, in a Sierra Nevada tulip glass.

The pour is dark brown that builds to a 1/4 off white foam at the top. Good stickiness.

Very different smell/taste. From the notes I am looking for the cinammon and the chilis - the former is very faint, and I definitely get the peppery backbone. Theres a dark layer throughout, with that semi-sweetness you'd expect in Belgian style. A stiff but deeper hop awaits the close. The alcohol is noted, but not dominant.

Overall a very interesting beer. Not sure I'd love 22ounces of this bad boy, but the draft tulip made for an interesting dinner accompaniment.

 644 characters

Photo of TheBeerAlmanac
3.38/5  rDev -9.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Bottle poured into a tulip

A: Pours a dark, caramel brown with a light, beige foam head and resilient bubbles.

S: Spicy jalapeno-like spiciness is coupled with moderate hop bitterness in the aroma, a bit of flora and a sugary sweet reprieve, but it’s mostly spicy.

T/M: For as spicy as the aroma was, you’d anticipate something along the lines of Cave Creek Chili Beer, but this one is pleasingly well balanced. Earthy hops introduce the forefront followed by a mellow tang akin to banana peppers and rich, caramel maltiness. The cinnamon portrays more of a Belgian like spiciness and compliments the rest of the ensemble well.

Everything is well balanced, but it’s still a pepper beer in the end and you have to really enjoy that style. I’d drink it again, but not if choices were more abundant. I wonder what date they’re going to release 12.12.12…

TheBeerAlmanac.com

 889 characters

Photo of EgadBananas
3.52/5  rDev -5.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

From notes:

Slight bronze, clear light tan head plenty lace. Belgian yeast meets mild cinnamon and back end pepper. Similar taste, more Belgian yeast and slight caramel notes. Creamy medium in Body. Better than it sounded. Glad I got to try on tap instead of buying bottles. I was satisfied with this one pour.

 311 characters

Photo of KYGunner
4/5  rDev +7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

This exceptionally different ale, presented itself with a deep, rich yet cloudy mahogany color. The aroma is of sweet malt, prunes or dates, cinnamon and yes, chiles. This combination should not work but does quite nicely. The cinnamon is not as present but the sweet malt is at the front. The chilis are more forward at the end of the bottle and I really enjoyed the second half more than the first. The completely different nature of this ale makes it succeed and I recommend it for anyone experimenting.

 506 characters

Photo of MattyG85
4.35/5  rDev +16.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Poured from a 22 oz. bottle into a Surly Darkness Chalice. Consumed after aging past the recommended date of 12/12/12.

Appearance: Pours a very hazy brownish copper orange with a moderate amount of bubbles. Solid three fingers of light tan head which slowly fade into a thin creamy layer. Leaves a good amount of lacing around the glass.

Smell: A bready and fruity aroma with a sharp mix of spices. Toasted malts with good hints of biscuit, yeast, toffee, and a little caramel. Big hint of bananas with some apple and dark prune. Sharp hints of chili peppers along with some clove and cinnamon spices. Also a slight hint of citrus fruit and brown sugar. A little scent of alcohol comes through. A nicely complex and interesting aroma.

Taste: Like the aroma hints, a complex mix of bready malts, spices, and fruit esters. Sweet bready malts with a taste of biscuit, yeast, toast, toffee, and caramel. A little brown sugar sweetness. Good taste of bananas and apples. Also some dark prunes and dates along with a little citrus. Notes of spices including chili peppers, cinnamon, and cloves. The spicing is quite noticeable but doesn't overwhelm the other flavors, they blend in nicely. Tastes similar to a dark Belgian ale with a good dose of added pepper and cinnamon.

Mouthfeel: Medium bodied with a moderate amount of carbonation. Creamy, spicy, and fairly smooth. Alcohol heat is felt a little.

Overall: A really good take on a Belgian style ale. The spices added are just enough to add a interesting profile without making it too hot.

 1,547 characters

Photo of prototypic
3.65/5  rDev -2.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Vertical 11.11.11 pours a darker copper color. It’s mostly clear, but has a really nice crimson tint when held to light. An off-white head covers the top. It rises to about a finger in height before falling to a surface covering. It holds there for quite a while. A nice, sticky web of lace trails behind.

The nose is good. It’s a nice, strong spicy scent up front. Smells like it’s a product of Belgian yeast. Clove and pepper are easily noted. There’s a hint of banana in the mix. It complements the spicy notes well. Cinnamon is definitely in the mix. It smells alright. I can’t say it adds a great deal, but it’s not bad either. Alcohol is a little noticeable, but isn’t overbearing. Smells pretty good.

The flavor is alright. Belgian yeast comes through loud and clear initially. It definitely adds a spicy jolt to the flavor. Clove and pepper are the strongest flavors. Banana is noted, but is somewhat subtle and light. It’s a nice touch nonetheless. Works well with the yeast. Cinnamon is definitely noted. It’s alright, but seems to conflict just a little with the other spicy flavors. Perhaps it’s just a little too strong. Alcohol is noticeable, but isn’t warm or hot. Finishes spicy and cinnamon-y.

The body is light-medium. Carbonation is somewhat active, but the bubbles feel light. It goes down somewhat easy, but could use a little more body. It won’t be confused with an authentic Belgian. For what it’s worth, the flavor grows a tad tiresome and slows things down a little about halfway through the bottle.

Vertical 11.11.11 is an interesting addition to the Vertical Epic series. The results are pretty good, but could’ve been better. Its biggest problem is that it’s just too spicy. The strong cinnamon flavor conflicts a little too much with the other spices. It’s really not bad at all though. I do admire the ambition and creativity. It’s definitely worth picking up.

 1,929 characters

Photo of MDDMD
3.33/5  rDev -11%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A-deep amber color with an off-white head and minimal lacing

T-caramel malt, cinnamon, pepper, coriander, slight yeasty funk, minimal bitterness in the finish. The flavors just don't seem to blend well and not well-balanced.

F-medium body with moderate carbonation

O-awkward flavor profile, not my favorite in this series so far

 331 characters

Photo of Brent
2.06/5  rDev -44.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Did I get a bad bottle? That is the first thought that crossed my mind. Some editions of this beer I've liked more than others, but this is the first of the series that I have simply disliked. Some Belgian yeast notes and perhaps some Belgian candy sugar, but hovering at the surface was a dusty, acrid bitterness, like cheap dried spice that has languished too long in the spice cabinet. Drying at the end with an unpleasant woodyness.

 436 characters

Photo of Boto
2.32/5  rDev -38%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Draught @ Mikro: This one poured a hazy, dark amber color. There was a small tan head on it. I’m not to sure about the aroma. Peppers are predominate. They tend to mask much of anything else. There is a blended aroma besides the peppers, but it isn’t really compelling nor offensive. The taste is different. I get a Belgian yeasty, bready beer with some hops, but then the light peppery taste manages to overwhelm it, and not in a good way. Maybe the peppers will mellow over time, but right now this beer isn’t that good.

 528 characters

Photo of mfnmbvp
4.2/5  rDev +12.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

22 oz. bottle, with a more than obvious vintage date. This is my first beer in the series of Vertical Epic beers that Stone did, although I will review the Stone 12.12.12 Vertical Epic Ale soon enough, to see how they compare.

Due to the lack of a snifter, I'm pouring this into a Firestone Walker pint glass.

A - Aggressive pour manages to conjure a finger of tan off-white foamy head on top of a dark cherry / chestnut colored body. Some bubbles lazily floating to the top. Virtually no lacing on the glass. Second pour yields an entirely different, darker, hazier, dark orange / brown hybrid color, with massive amounts of dark and light sediment floating around.

S - At first, what is more apparent is the Belgian yeast and funk. As the head dissipates, herbal spice rack notes begin to emerge, not cinnamon, almost more like oregano or thyme. Very strange, it must be the chile smell. Also a sweetness buried in there, which could also be from the Anaheim chiles. Faint muted hops come through, as well. As the beer warms, dark fruit smells begin to emere; plum, fig, & raisin with some nutty wine-like characteristics.

T - Taste is very pleasing at first, thankfully not overly hot with chiles and spice. What little heat there is can be attributed to the alcohol. Taste is of caramelized malts and tea leaf like sweetness, with a fair amount of lively carbonation, and a warm finish, which I assume is from the chiles. Aftertaste is of brettanomyces. I am actually really enjoying this. Again, not really getting any distinct cinnamon out of this, though. As the beer warms, the bretty aftertaste fades, giving way to a sweet tea leaf finish & sticky hop presence, with a faint subtle warmth from the chiles.

M - Feel is sweet, lightly bitter, light hotness. Ends somewhat sticky & dry, beckoning the palate for another sip.

Overall, having no prior knowledge of any of the other beers in this series, I would say that this is a good worthy beer, considering this beer was aged for year and a half, and also considering I'm not the biggest fan of Belgian style ales. I would definitely be interested in seeing how others in this series have held up, and I will be getting myself a bottle of Stone 12.12.12 Vertical Epic Ale soon, to see how that one fares as well. In the meantime, if you're holding down a bottle of this, I would recommend opening it now!

Stone 11.11.11. Vertical Epic Ale ---4/5.

 2,412 characters

Photo of n2185
3.37/5  rDev -9.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

A: Pours a clear mahogany with two fingers of beige head that fades into a thin layer with little lacing.

S: Some Belgian spice, candy sugar, and bubblegum aromas at first followed by lots of chili pepper aromas. Cayenne and jalapenos come to mind.

T: Similar to the aroma, some Belgian spice and candy sugar notes at first followed by cayenne and jalapenos. The finish is dry and slightly yeasty.

M: Medium-lowish body with lowish carbonation, this beer is a little watery.

O: A unique and decent beer. The chile isn't overwhelming, but I'd like more presence from the Belgian aspects along with a lighter and crisper body.

 628 characters

Photo of Tucquan
3.55/5  rDev -5.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Had this on 2011-11-25 in Pittsburgh, PA at Smokin' Joes

A - Fairly clear mahogany with a short head and light lacing.

S - Fruity/Belgian yeast, green chilies, rasin and cinnamon.

T - Similar to the smell with green chilies, sour cherry, banana, earthy cinnamon, roasted grain. There's just a touch of residual heat from alcohol and the chilies and a dollop of moderate bitterness. Quite a complex smorgasboard of tastes

M - Medium body and carbonation. Surprisingly smooth yet crisp.

O - Never had anything like this beer. I'm glad to have tried it but wouldn't seek it out again.

 587 characters

Photo of Oakenator
4.41/5  rDev +17.9%
look: 5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Pours brown-amber in color and does have a slight unfiltered look to it. Good head at pour but savored in a small glass. Good vertical lacing on the glass. I expected more from the nose of this beer given the flavor - still smells good but doesn't reveal much more than a string Belgian style ale with maybe some clove coming through. Taste is complex and wonderful - subtle chilies that builds over time. Other pleasant spices with a nice malt balance.

 453 characters

Photo of peensteen
3.46/5  rDev -7.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Amber brown colour, 1.5 fingers of offwhite head, quite a great deal of lace here as well. Smell is loaded with pepper and spice, cinnamon, malt is there as well, some alcohol and some light belgian yeast influence. Taster is very spicy, chile is there in a big way, some cinnamon with a mid palate malty flavour. Medium carbonation, med-full body, good weight. Interesting stuff but this didn't do it for me, it became more drinkable after about 30 min or so but still mildly put off by this, wouldn't come back to this I dont think.

 534 characters

Photo of arizcards
3.67/5  rDev -1.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Picked up a bomber from BevMo in mid-November for $5.99.

Beer poured a garnet color with an OK head.

Nose is light fruits and hints of cinammon.

Taste starts with classic belgian pale ale malt backbone, candied sugars ratchet up the booziness factor, light fruits, cinammon, and then the funky chilis. The cinammon plays well but the chilis that detract from what is a very solid beer.

Mouthfeel is well carbonated and lively on the palate and smooth.

Overall this is an interesting beer but the chilis take away from a good beer. The Vertical Epic series has taken a turn towards the experimental in recent years and have not been as solid as in the past. But i give Stone credit for changing it up!

 706 characters

Stone 11.11.11 Vertical Epic Ale from Stone Brewing Co.
84 out of 100 based on 480 ratings.