1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Stone RuinTen IPA - Stone Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
Stone RuinTen IPAStone RuinTen IPA

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
96
world-class

4,932 Ratings
THE BROS
91
outstanding

(view ratings)
Ratings: 4,932
Reviews: 733
rAvg: 4.31
pDev: 9.51%
Wants: 232
Gots: 617 | FT: 6
Brewed by:
Stone Brewing Co. visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
American Double / Imperial IPA |  10.80% ABV

Availability: Summer

Notes/Commercial Description:
We first released this decidedly indelicate beer in 2012, as Stone Ruination Tenth Anniversary IPA, to celebrate the 10th anniversary of our belovedly bitter Stone Ruination IPA. Stone RuinTen IPA uses the same recklessly hoppy recipe as the 2012 release; only the name has changed, as we plan to unleash this belligerently delicious hop monster upon the public annually from now on. We packed a whopping five pounds of hops into each barrel, and cranked up the ABV to stand up to the hop onslaught. The results are glorious, and we know you'll rejoice in tasting this audacious gem of hoppy splendor once again. You're welcome.

(Beer added by: ehammond1 on 06-14-2012)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Stone RuinTen IPA Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 4,932 | Reviews: 733 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of EliasCalistoga
1/5  rDev -76.8%

EliasCalistoga, Nov 11, 2014
Photo of TPONY51
1/5  rDev -76.8%

TPONY51, Nov 02, 2012
Photo of KingSpeedy
1.75/5  rDev -59.4%

KingSpeedy, Aug 16, 2013
Photo of kustard
2/5  rDev -53.6%

kustard, Jun 29, 2013
Photo of chippo33
2/5  rDev -53.6%

chippo33, Dec 21, 2012
Photo of muraco3
2/5  rDev -53.6%

muraco3, Jun 26, 2014
Photo of AlaskanYoung
2/5  rDev -53.6%

AlaskanYoung, Sep 05, 2014
Photo of Lochnessmonster
2.25/5  rDev -47.8%

Lochnessmonster, Feb 23, 2014
Photo of tylermains
2.5/5  rDev -42%

tylermains, Jun 30, 2012
Photo of BeezNeezy22D
2.5/5  rDev -42%

BeezNeezy22D, Aug 19, 2012
Photo of HisBoyElroy
2.5/5  rDev -42%

HisBoyElroy, Aug 04, 2013
Photo of SFACRKnight
2.5/5  rDev -42%

SFACRKnight, Sep 29, 2013
Photo of Franch
2.5/5  rDev -42%

Franch, Jan 22, 2013
Photo of SBoeckman72
2.5/5  rDev -42%

SBoeckman72, Jul 27, 2014
Photo of MikeM417
2.5/5  rDev -42%

MikeM417, Aug 05, 2014
Photo of kojevergas
2.51/5  rDev -41.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 2

10.8% confirmed. Bottle acquired at a local SoCal bottle shop on Saturday. 1 pint 6 fl oz brown glass bottle with standard pressure cap and posh etched label served into a conical Samuel Smith's pint glass in me gaff in low altitude Los Feliz, Los Angeles, California. Reviewed live. Expectations are actually high even though I despise Stone; I've heard some pretty good things about this one.

Served straight from the fridge. Side-poured with standard vigor as no carbonation issues are anticipated.

A: Pours a 2.5 finger beige colour head of nice cream and thickness, and great retention (~7+ minutes) for the high ABV. Frothy, silky, and appealing. Body colour is a surprisingly hazy murky orange-copper. Tangerine orange, if you will. No yeast particles are visible. No bubble show. Carbonation bubbles are visible in usual quantities; carbonation seems fine. Nice sticky lacing clings to the sides of the glass as the head slowly recedes. I'm actually fairly impressed with the appearance, though the lack of clarity and translucence has taken me off-guard.

Sm: Hop character is generic floral with light grapefruit, some nectary notes, and some pine. But what catches my attention is not the hops; it's the overdone milky sweetness. Nectary and sticky and too prominent for the style. They definitely doubled the malt to compensate for the hops, but I don't know that they did it well judging by the aroma. I don't detect any yeasty notes or alcohol. A messy aroma of moderate strength. The emphasis is in the wrong place and there doesn't seem to be any balance - but hey, it's Stone.

T: Some wretched grapefruit with an overly sweet malty foundation that really destroys all balance - especially in the third act, where I'm left with a milky rotted tangerine character that lingers off the finish. Blech. Some nice juicy citrus up front, but it's quickly destroyed by the poor malt build. I don't know which pale malts they selected, but they're not doing it for me here. Amarillo or columbus would have been much better hop choices. Hop character lacks diversity, depth of flavour, or evocative quality. Overdone caramel contributes to the third act nightmare. Butterscotch. Cream. It's like it becomes a crappy saison in the third act, but without the accompanying spice - just milkiness and caramel malt. Alcohol does come through, but it's well hidden for the most part - and besides, it's the least of the problems here. To be honest, the flavour isn't that bad in the opening act; the grapefruit is a bit more overt and the maltiness hasn't gone rogue yet. But the balance - both structurally and in terms of flavour - is wretched. Another mess from Stone brewing. Pineapple hits on the climax. Maybe some clove? Who cares. It's complex without any balance or subtlety; any homebrewer can dump a bunch of ingredients in, but it takes a master to control them. This tastes like a homebrewer got control of some fancy toys.

Mf: Smooth. Wet. A bit creamy - a strange and out of place attribute for an Imperial IPA. Good carbonation - a highlight of this beer. Presence on the palate is poor; it overwhelms. I wouldn't say it ruins; it's just a mess dumped on your tongue.

Dr: Another mess from Stone that fails to impress. I wish I loved this like others do, but to me it's just more testament to the ineptitude of Stone's brewers. Why I keep buying their beer I don't know. I guess I keep hoping I'll come across one that's great. I definitely wouldn't get this again; more for all of you. I'll be sticking to Alpine's IPAs. To this beer's credit, the ABV doesn't come through as much as you'd expect; I'd peg it for about 8% if it were a blind taste. I wouldn't call it drinkable, but I won't have any trouble killing this bomber alone. Disappointed. I hope the Enjoy By waiting in my fridge is better.

Low C-

kojevergas, Feb 27, 2013
Photo of TheBigBoy
2.75/5  rDev -36.2%

TheBigBoy, Jul 18, 2012
Photo of CDCNAM
2.75/5  rDev -36.2%

CDCNAM, Aug 07, 2013
Photo of John_Squires
2.75/5  rDev -36.2%

John_Squires, Sep 14, 2014
Photo of chadwicktorres
2.75/5  rDev -36.2%

chadwicktorres, Sep 15, 2014
Photo of Nhersom40
2.75/5  rDev -36.2%

Nhersom40, Jul 16, 2014
Photo of Nichols33
2.75/5  rDev -36.2%

Nichols33, May 18, 2014
Photo of djrn2
2.75/5  rDev -36.2%

djrn2, Jun 30, 2012
Photo of rderedin
2.75/5  rDev -36.2%

rderedin, Aug 16, 2014
Photo of lostinfla
2.76/5  rDev -36%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.75

Bottle to a Sam Adams glass. Had high expectations from the reviews of the 2013 bottle and Arrogant Bastard was quite impressive.
This ones not my cup of tea though. Great color and head , but the smell was actually spicy to my senses. Product was orange opaque, but the solids were very fine ad and did not take way from the mouthfeel.
The spice flavor was present in the first several sips, with a bit more sweetness than I care for in a beer.
Well made - just not one for me...

lostinfla, Nov 23, 2013
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Stone RuinTen IPA from Stone Brewing Co.
96 out of 100 based on 4,932 ratings.