1. American Craft Beer Fest returns to Boston on May 29 & 30, featuring 640+ beers from 140+ brewers. Tickets are on sale now.

16th Anniversary IPA - Stone Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
16th Anniversary IPA16th Anniversary IPA

Educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
86
very good

1,386 Ratings
THE BROS
75
okay

(view ratings)
Ratings: 1,386
Reviews: 392
rAvg: 3.81
pDev: 13.91%
Wants: 14
Gots: 57 | FT: 1
Brewed by:
Stone Brewing Co. visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
American Double / Imperial IPA |  10.00% ABV

Availability: Limited (brewed once)

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: CloudStrife on 08-10-2012

This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

We've been loving creating Collaboration beers with great creative brewers from all over the world these last several years-unique beers that would never have existed without the free-flowing imagination and idea generation of the collaborative process. However, when it comes to the Stone Anniversary Ales, it's all us. Yet, it is indeed still a collaboration with great creative brewers (if we do say so ourselves). We're talking about our own brewing team, of course. And while some of our beers, anniversary and otherwise, have been designed by a single person, the Stone 16th Anniversary IPA was definitely a team effort.

This year our brewing team was inspired by some exotic-ish additions of the lemony persuasion. Yes, it's a Double IPA (can you really say you're surprised?), but as we strive to do with all our Stone Anniversary Ales of the let's-take-this-IPA-in-a-new-direction variety, we've brewed up a Stone-worthy divergence from tradition. The amount of rye malt we used isn't quite enough to warrant the appellation "Rye IPA," but it still adds hints of spiciness that contrast deliciously with the tropical fruit flavors and aromas of the Amarillo and Calypso hops. Add a few European specialty malts, some lemon verbena, and three more hop varieties to the mix, and you have a highly complex brew melding both bitter and fruity hop notes with rich toasted malt character punctuated by nuances of spicy rye and subtle lemon.
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
to view all ratings, reviews and sorting options.
Ratings: 1,386 | Reviews: 392
Photo of Mark5252
3.5/5  rDev -8.1%

Photo of SDG1070
3.5/5  rDev -8.1%

Photo of Sturmthis
3.5/5  rDev -8.1%

Photo of motvi
3.5/5  rDev -8.1%

Photo of KZE80
3.5/5  rDev -8.1%

Photo of Mycescephalus
3.5/5  rDev -8.1%

Photo of mds1101
3.5/5  rDev -8.1%

Photo of kornkid8600
3.5/5  rDev -8.1%

Photo of brheuer
3.5/5  rDev -8.1%

Photo of PeterIngemi
3.51/5  rDev -7.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Poured from a 22oz bottle into a duvel glass

A: pours a slightly hazy coppery amber with two fingers of slightly off white head after an aggressive pour. The head sticks around for a bit dissapating on the slow side an leaving a ton of sticky lacing. Looks great.

S: there is a kind of lemony soapyness, citrusy orange hops, and a general herby/spicy aroma... Almost smells like potpourri, soapy potpourri with some hops. Overall it's not a horrible aroma, but that soapyness is getting to me a bit.

T: lots of lemony herby/spicyness, the soapyness doesn't seem as present, but the the herbal spicyness is, along with some deffinate citrusy hops, but I feel like they take a back seat to the lemon, overall I feel like these flavors clash a bit, not a fan.

M: medium body with medium carbonation and a nice dry finish, except for the lingering slightly bitter/ lemon rindy aftertaste that doesn't want to seem to leave my mouth.

O: not a fan, and honestly i am dissapointed, perhaps it's just the flavor profile they chose here isn't something that appeals to me. But I felt like the flavors clashed and the hops took almost a backseat.... I deffinatly would have likes to see the lemon an spicyness tones down, and the hops toned way up.... Dissapointing especially on the curtails of ruination 10 and the fact that i greatly look forward to this release every year.

Photo of CHickman
3.52/5  rDev -7.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Pours a bright hazy amber orange with a huge 2 finger foamy beige head that faded slowly and had good lacing and left a light foamy layer on top and rings as it went down.

Smells of fresh squeezed lemon and pine, with a big burst of hops up front, citrus hops, grapefruit, tangerine and other citrus fruit, light spices, herbs, coriander and tea leaf; a very potent and citrus filled aroma that had nice flowery hints as well. It was a cross between a citrus grove and a botanical garden and quite nice to inhale.

Taste does not match the subtle beauty of the aroma; strong citrus and lemon flavors up front, then followed by grains or wheat, yeast funk, toasted malts, spices like pepper and potpourri, herbs, grapefruit, pine cone/piney hops, tea leaf, allspice and medicine. Don’t know how there can be such a contrast here between the smell and taste, but there is. The alcohol is completely hidden by the spices, herbs and lemon zest, but this combo of hops and the lemon plants used seem to throw the whole mix off in a slightly unpleasant way.

Mouthfeel is smooth, with light carbonation, a medium to heavy body and a very bitter finish that is grainy and funky with more lemon zest like lemon shavings were in the glass. I expected this type of finish and feel based on the write up on the bottle, which lists rye as an ingredient which is present throughout this tasting.

Overall I was a little disappointed as I love trying new Stone beers and this was a let down; it was not horrible, but my expectations were so high that this just did not hit my mark as this did not match what I was hoping for and expected. Since it is Stone I’ll let some of the disappointment slide, but I won’t be running out to drink this again, especially at this price point (in NY). I’d go get a Ruination bomber over this any day.

Photo of mudboneINla
3.52/5  rDev -7.6%

Photo of hagbergl
3.53/5  rDev -7.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

I had a glass of Stone's 16th Anniversary IPA at the Salty Pig, a great restaurant in Boston's Back Bay area (check it out, especially if you like cheese, pizza, and craft beer). It came served in a Boulevard tulip glass. Review is from notes.

Appearance (4/5): 16th Anniversary IPA is a transparent copper color with some red highlights. Bartender's pour was quite good, so my beer arrived with a nice three-finger head of off-white foam (Good job, Salty Pig). Some soapy lacing coats the sides of the glass as it goes. Stone 16th is a solid looking beer.

Smell (3.5/5): Stone 16th features strong notes of lemon, a little hoppy pine and grapefruit rind, and and some malty sweetness flexes in the background. The overall impression, though, is a bit odd–the nose is a bit reminiscent of lemon tea and floor cleaner. Sounds odd, but really is decent.

Taste (3.5/5): Stone 16th's flavor follows the nose: notes of lemon, grapefruit rind, olive oil, and pine are all there, giving this IPA a very unique flavor. It is quite bitter–surprise, surprise!–and a little spicy. Some alcohol heat is there, too, but isn't obtrusive. This is a Stone beer after all.The finish is long and you're left with a lingering lemon bitterness. The complexity of the flavor profile actually does a bit of a disservice to this beer. It comes off a little muddled and unfocused.

Mouthfeel (3.5/5): For all its bitterness, Stone 16th is fairly smooth going down, and it isn't the hardest to drink. If I could characterize the mouthfeel with one word, I would call it "slick" because it has a slightly oily way about it. Like the taste, the mouthfeel is interesting and different, but I'm not in love with it.

Overall (3.5/5): I wanted to like this beer, but Stone 16th Anniversary IPA is not really up to Stone's lofty standards. I can't fault them for trying something new, and I actually like the addition of lemon verbena, but perhaps it would work better in a beer that's not as big or complex.

Photo of rdilauro
3.53/5  rDev -7.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

The actual pour and appearance to me was the best aspect of this one.
I was some what excited about this one because of the lemon that was being introduced into this beer. Problem was that I really didnt smell (like of any noticeable aroma), taste (it was crisp and malty like a double IPA and the feel (big body, but sort of flat)
I guess I was anticipating something that never came.

Photo of Vonerichs
3.53/5  rDev -7.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Clear orange-red body with a tall white head. The lacing is brief.

Smells of orange, herbal, and slight lemon. The herbal aspect seems to cover up the pleasant citrus.

Ugh, not exactly what I was expecting. It's overly bitter and tastes like sucking on a stale tea bag. There's some redeeming orange flavor, but I keep coming back to the heavy herbal taste. The lemon is almost non-existant.

I don't like the mouthfeel much, either. It's dry and bitter, but in a cottonmouth kind of way. It almost leaves me parched.

Unfortunately, this one was a disappointment to me. I absolutely love Stone and this one was a detour from their usual path. It just didn't work.

Photo of bum732
3.53/5  rDev -7.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

S: Big lemon and grapefruit notes, slightly spicy, fresh cut grass, bright citrus. Some melon as it warms.

L: Hazy, reddish-orange, off-white head that dissipates slightly. Decent lacing.

T: Smooth malt character with a backbone of lemon sweetness. Medium lemony bitterness with a smooth, fairly clean maltiness. Background flavors of grapefruit, lemon and other citrus hop flavors.

M: Medium bodied, medium carbonation.

Ok, your typical Stone beer. An intersting experiment, but pretty mediocre. Why they just don't concentrate on something like Ruination 10th anniversary is beyond me.

Photo of OTB
3.53/5  rDev -7.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Copper rust pour with a huge tan head. Yup, there's no hiding the lemon extracts used in this brew. A huge lemon infused nose greets you immediately then the citrus fruit appears again as you take your first sip. I pick up zero influence from the Rye addition, it's a citrus fruit bomb for sure. It's a tad sweet and you can pick up the heat from the high ABV. Not worth seeking out again.

Photo of colforbin73
3.53/5  rDev -7.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

i am reserving ultimate judgement on this brew. i bought 2 and will just save one. this is VERY bitter and has a medicinal peppery bite that is more DFH than STONE.

the pour is very good, nice clear dark golden brew with a consistent foam cap. the aroma, like the taste, is totally reliant on the temperature -- this beer is not done. it's better VERY COLD. closer to room temp you get too many spices and off flavors. the aroma cold is more hoppy, but as it warms the medicinal creeps in.

the taste follows suit -- go cold OR put some age on this beer. i am getting killed by CARDAMOM here.... i like the malts and overall sturdiness of this beer, but the spice is too much. very bitter, palate wrecked. i can report no more at this time.

the booze was masked by spice. AGE THIS BEER FOR SIX MONTHS. AT LEAST.

Photo of elgiacomo
3.53/5  rDev -7.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

22oz bottle, served at around 45F.

Pours clear copper with a three finger off-white head that leaves good clumpy walls of lacing and holds a good cap.

Aroma is citrus, lemon, apricot, some fruity hops, a bit of pine, grass, can pick up the rye and some caramel malt, bread, toffee. Good to very good strength.

Flavor is lemon, citrus rind, pine, resinous hops, strong malt backbone of caramel and rye, moderate sweetness, moderate bitterness, strong alcohol bite on the finish. Pretty boozy.

Mouthfeel is medium-plus bodied, pretty sticky, good carbonation.

This is one big beer. Bigger than I prefer my Double IPAs, bordering more on the American Strong Ale or even Barleywine style. Good, but far from my favorite Anniversary brew from Stone.

Photo of HarrySTruman
3.53/5  rDev -7.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured goldish orange, A tyical IPA/DIPA look.

Smelled of hops in a big way. Grassy and floral. Some citrus popped out as well. As many others have mentions, the citrus was close to a lemon smell. It wasn't really that appealing as a smell, a bit to big, and if the nose were the flavor I would call in unbalanced.

The taste was goood. It had a citrus flavor, but the alcohol and the malt backbone did a good job of balancing the flavor. I thought the flavor made this 10% abv very drinkable. A bit much on the citrus flavors, but it did a good job in balancing some of the more mudane flavors.

Medium with a moderate amount of carbonation. Not thin, not thick, just right on a DIPA.

This beer will get you drunk, plain and simple. It's easy to drink, it has a high ABV, and it tastes pretty good. I'm very glad I had the opportunity to try this on draft, but it isn't one of the best examples of the style. I think Stone had big dreams for this beverage and they fell just a bit short, but it was still a high quality drink and one that I would certainly drink again if I found it on tap.

Photo of uustal
3.53/5  rDev -7.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours a mid-orange with a nice lacing, bright white head. Herbal aroma. Lemons, spice, hints of grapefruit and a bit of rye. Sweet, herbal flavor profile to begin. Really slight lemon notes, before a spicy, bitter pine and rye finish. Interesting flavor combinations, but doesn't seem to work all that well together. Flavors mesh to form what seems like an old IPA taste, even though this one is very fresh.

Photo of barnzy78
3.53/5  rDev -7.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

22oz bottle poured into a 25oz snifter, pours a deep copper color with a full beige head that holds good retention and leaves some nice lacing on the glass. Aromas are somewhat odd with lemon rind, pine, earthy and spicy from the rye. Tastes are dank, oily hops, lemon, caramel, rye, earthy, almost reminiscent of pinesol, alcohol is well concealed however (I was surprised to see 10% as I was half-way through the bottle). Mouth-feel is medium bodied, resiny, and sticky on the palate, while finishing semi-dry. Overall, I was a a little disappointed in this one. It wasn't bad, just not what I was expecting for an anniversary IPA from Stone.

Photo of nimrod979
3.56/5  rDev -6.6%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

22oz bomber. August 2012. Poured into a DFH snifter.

Appearance: Pours a bright copper color with a two finger slight off white frothy head. Long retention and amazing lacing that covers all sides of the glass.

Aroma: Lemony citrus and pine cones. Just hops.

Taste: Big ol' lemony citrus blast with some pine resin notes that are sure to let you know this one is hopped up. Some sweet malt backs it up a bit but i think there is just too much lemon for my liking.

Mouthfeel: Oily and medium bodied. Low carbonation. Lingering bitterness but so does that lemon and I'm not so sure I'm digging on that.

Photo of beagle75
3.56/5  rDev -6.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Poured from a bomber into a tulip glass.

A: Clear, light amber color with one finger of off-white foam head. Heavy lacing remains on the glass.

S: Volatile herbs are intense and lemony, but also quite green. After lemon comes mint, then something more savory like thyme (in order of intensity.) Malt is extremely nuanced--just a bit of bread and caramel--and hops are practically unidentifiable. No alcohol is detected.

T: Begins off-dry, with immediate aromatic flavors of medicinal mint, artificial citronella, and other spicy herbs. Acidity is mild into the middle where the early herbaceous flavors persist and even become more intense. Bitterness is strong, yet easily overcome by other flavors. There is an overall aura of hops--Centennial or Columbus, perhaps--but just like in the smell, there is no instance where they define the sensory profile. No alcohol is detected.

M: Medium viscosity, slightly acidic and sticky on the palate, with moderate carbonation.

D/O: Very experimental, which is wonderful because there has never been another beer like it, but not as fine of an example as the Stone anniversary beers from the last few years. Its qualities are interesting yet cloying, reminiscent of fresh Saison du Buff in the very in-your-face way they are presented. Still, if a brewer is going to produce a one-off beer--an IPA in particular--it should be memorable, which this one is.

Photo of TheSixthRing
3.58/5  rDev -6%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 3.5

Appearance - Pours a fairly clear deep amber color with an off-white, 2 finger head. Good retention. The resulting lace is thick and sticky.

Smell - Notes of citrus; sweet grapefruit, subtle pine and a touch of mild lemon sitting beneath.

Taste - Strongly herbal with big notes of lemon and pine. Sweet malt undertones. Hints of grapefruit pith. Sharp hop bitterness on the back end, eats away at the palate well into the aftertaste.

Mouthfeel - Medium bodied with silky carbonation. Goes down smooth despite the ABV and the aggressive flavor.

Overall - A well crafted brew, but I'm not sold on the strong herbal character. Reminiscent of their collab beer Saison du BUFF, only with a serious bump in citrus hoppage. Does well to hide the hefty 10% ABV; easier to drink than it should be.

to view all ratings, reviews and sorting options.
16th Anniversary IPA from Stone Brewing Co.
86 out of 100 based on 1,386 ratings.