1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Stone Pale Ale - Stone Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
Stone Pale AleStone Pale Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
87
very good

2,382 Ratings
THE BROS
88
very good

(view ratings)
Ratings: 2,382
Reviews: 957
rAvg: 3.86
pDev: 11.4%
Wants: 72
Gots: 114 | FT: 1
Brewed by:
Stone Brewing Co. visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
American Pale Ale (APA) |  5.40% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: kbub6f on 06-23-2001)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Stone Pale Ale Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 2,382 | Reviews: 957 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of spoonhawk
spoonhawk

Iowa

1/5  rDev -74.1%

11-23-2011 06:27:22 | More by spoonhawk
Photo of bmcduff2
bmcduff2

Georgia

1/5  rDev -74.1%

03-16-2012 05:55:53 | More by bmcduff2
Photo of wingnutz27
wingnutz27

Pennsylvania

1/5  rDev -74.1%

11-18-2012 01:50:44 | More by wingnutz27
Photo of alumley
alumley

Iowa

1/5  rDev -74.1%

10-04-2012 23:03:09 | More by alumley
Photo of jtierney89
jtierney89

New Jersey

1.3/5  rDev -66.3%

Most expensive pale ale ever. Hazy tarnished amber with a big sticky off white head. Herbal hop nose along with soap and wood. Touches of anisette or licorice somewhere beneath.

Taste is a lot of bubblegum for some reason. Initial citric sweetness, dry herbal hoppiness and coarse dry mouthfeel. Soapy and bubblegum flavors linger. Not digging this one bit. Off-flavors seem to settle out with a couple more sips, but the flavors dont meld together any better. Whats up with this one? tough to finish.

08-15-2012 02:44:05 | More by jtierney89
Photo of Alfred
Alfred


1.4/5  rDev -63.7%

I'm no English major, but to enunciate just how this beer affected my life in a positive light would be a dissatisfaction to the community at large. This Pale sucked. No need to banter.
Disagree?
It tasted like licorice that was kept in a car, during the Summer, while the sun watched Oprah.
It tasted thick, too sweet, and had no bite.
Stone blesses their own name vowing that there are no foreign adulterants within the liquid drink; If you ask me, I'd rather drink water.

08-05-2012 05:26:03 | More by Alfred
Photo of Nixon
Nixon

Washington

1.88/5  rDev -51.3%

This was my first Stone beer and I really wanted to like it but I didn't care for this beer at all.

The foamy head was rocky, showing a good fermentation. The color is good...dark amber to brown...but it was very cloudy and loaded with oversized floating particles.

It tasted as if all the body and residual sweetness had been fermented out of the beer so I didn't get much of a malty flavor.

There wasn't much, if any, hop flavor either. But there was an excessive amount of overly bitter what seemed to be hop 'punishment' in the beer.

I went ahead and drank the entire bottle and started in on a 2nd one to see if I could change my opinion. I got about 2 swallows into it and ended up dumping it.

It was a $10 6-pack and as I was pouring that 2nd bottle down the drain it felt as if the mostly naked Hellboy-type character silkscreened onto the bottle was staring at me and saying "sucker".

10-26-2009 20:49:54 | More by Nixon
Photo of HoboMoo
HoboMoo

California

2/5  rDev -48.2%

01-05-2013 02:12:53 | More by HoboMoo
Photo of plato
plato

South Carolina

2/5  rDev -48.2%

03-17-2013 17:49:47 | More by plato
Photo of subtledream
subtledream

California

2/5  rDev -48.2%

02-08-2012 07:50:34 | More by subtledream
Photo of retry4z
retry4z

California

2.1/5  rDev -45.6%

This PALE ale is overhopped and overhyped. Even for a seasoned hophead, and considering that Stone helped define the West Coast style, this beer misses it's mark by miles. This is more of a brown ale than a pale ale.

This beer is unbalanced, and I would not drink it unless it was the last beer in the planet.

10-31-2013 00:22:22 | More by retry4z
Photo of HoppyBastard
HoppyBastard

Nebraska

2.3/5  rDev -40.4%

Poured from a 12 ounce bottle into a shaker pint glass.

APPEARANCE: dark amber color with very thin head which dissipated quickly, almost no lacing, light carbonation.

SMELL: metallic and caramel.

TASTE: caramel and malty with a metallic hop profile.

PALATE: light carbonation medium body.

OVERALL: this is not a beer I would buy again. For a pale ale it was far too malty and the hops were metallic tasting, in an unpleasant way.

09-15-2013 06:39:49 | More by HoppyBastard
Photo of klewis
klewis

Ohio

2.35/5  rDev -39.1%

A: Pours a reddish copper with a frothy head. Light lacing.

S: Great aroma of floral hops and citrus

T: Mellow hops taste with a malty flavor that tastes like stale, soggy Cherrios. This just tastes off.

M: Fairly light in body with moderate carbonation.

D: This has some potential, but the flavor is just plain bad. This barely passes as drinkable.

11-05-2006 00:44:13 | More by klewis
Photo of brewbattles
brewbattles

California

2.4/5  rDev -37.8%

We conducted a blind taste test between this beer and 4 other popular American Pale Ales: Sierra Nevada Pale Ale, Deschutes Mirror Pond Ale, Stone Pale Ale, Firestone Double Barrel Ale, and Boulder Hazed & Infused.

Check it out: http://youtu.be/DHis2L_OBdg

09-09-2013 23:14:26 | More by brewbattles
Photo of bonbini26
bonbini26

New Jersey

2.5/5  rDev -35.2%

01-06-2012 16:24:05 | More by bonbini26
Photo of dmsohyea
dmsohyea

California

2.5/5  rDev -35.2%

06-22-2012 23:48:00 | More by dmsohyea
Photo of rypkr
rypkr

Pennsylvania

2.5/5  rDev -35.2%

10-12-2012 00:55:36 | More by rypkr
Photo of Hellpop65
Hellpop65

Kansas

2.5/5  rDev -35.2%

08-24-2013 22:36:10 | More by Hellpop65
Photo of Kyrojack
Kyrojack

Indiana

2.5/5  rDev -35.2%

03-09-2013 23:14:49 | More by Kyrojack
Photo of SoCaliC8
SoCaliC8

California

2.5/5  rDev -35.2%

01-18-2014 20:53:54 | More by SoCaliC8
Photo of brew3crew
brew3crew

Ohio

2.55/5  rDev -33.9%

Had at jungle jims tasting with 1arrogantbastard

A-orangish in color with white head.
S-slight hops and malt. Not really much else there.
T-stone does a lot of great things, but pale ales are not one of them. Very faint hops taste. Balanced and ends hoppy
M-light and crisp
D-drinkable, if I would want to drink it...

02-19-2011 04:39:56 | More by brew3crew
Photo of goochpunch
goochpunch

Texas

2.6/5  rDev -32.6%

Pours out a hazy copper amber with a thin head and minimal lacing. Head lasts hardly a minute. Over-browned toast is all I could pick up for my first few sniffs of this beer, but then I was able to make out a weak hop presence. Flavor starts off with a lot of bready toastiness (natch), with light citrus, and a solid finishing bitter. Decent enough, but an odd, almost "homebrew-like" yeastiness prevails in the aftertaste. Mouthfeel is definitely the strong point of this beer. Very smooth with a moderate body. Hardly any stickiness left on the palate. Really disappointed in this pale ale.

03-25-2007 03:54:23 | More by goochpunch
Photo of asabreed
asabreed

New York

2.63/5  rDev -31.9%

12 oz. bottle into a pint glass.

Appearance: Hazy orange yellow from the yeast that actually went into the pour, as there's still a bit on the bottom of the glass.

Smell: Mild hop aromas without much malt at all. And some alcohol. What's going on here?

Taste: All bitterness without much balance. Mild malt flavors come in with the finish.

Mouthfeel: Watery and slick with throughout with a weird sudden burst of carbonation at the end. Weird.

Drinkability: I'm not sure if I got an old bottle or what (because it was a single bottle purchase in a mixed 6-pack in a store), but this just isn't good. It doesn't taste bad necessarily, but just very bland, boring, and oddly balanced. I won't be trying this again unless someone else buys it, because I don't want to make the same mistake twice if it's not just the bottle. A disappointment from Stone overall.

02-27-2008 22:40:10 | More by asabreed
Photo of madvermin
madvermin

California

2.68/5  rDev -30.6%

Pours a darker reddish orange than expected, with translucent innards and a thick foamy white head that laces well and dissipates fairly quickly. Leaves behind a collar of white that remains throughout the drink.

Smells of grapefruit, rind and all, and has a very bitter spin on the citrus. Isn't particularly pungent though - this is a confused smell to be sure. You don't get much malt or alcohol sweetness out of this on the nose. Hops are leafy aside from the grapefruit barrage.

Taste follows, with some grapefruit that doesn't really assert itself to go with grainy, uncooked malt. This one tastes a bit more like an English Bitter than a traditional pale ale. Citrus fades away the further into the glass you get, but the malt profile doesn't come in to save the day either. Sort of hurts the drinkability.

Mouthfeel is light, while being lively thanks to the strong carbonation. May be a bit too light at times though, and could have benefited from an increased body, as this is more and more like an English Bitter the more I drink it. Unfortunately, rating to the style, this falls short a bit, but that doesn't mean I wouldn't have this again.

03-02-2011 08:43:45 | More by madvermin
Photo of seedyone
seedyone

New York

2.73/5  rDev -29.3%

04/05/13 On tap. Once again something tagged a "pale ale" hits my taste buds with a solid shot of hoppiness. This time I'm disinclined to forgive. Why is this not an IPA? The IBU is in the 25-50 range (if you believe in such things) but my tongue says "Bull-Donkey". Something's gotta give. So glad to have notes at BeerMenus & Beer Advocate so I don't make this mistake again.

Mind you, I'm just not that fond of hops so this may appeal to those that are. Go figure!

06-17-2014 17:54:27 | More by seedyone
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Stone Pale Ale from Stone Brewing Co.
87 out of 100 based on 2,382 ratings.