Stone Pale Ale - Stone Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
Stone Pale AleStone Pale Ale

Educational use only; do not reuse.
very good

2,648 Ratings
very good

(view ratings)
Ratings: 2,648
Reviews: 989
rAvg: 3.85
pDev: 11.17%
Wants: 91
Gots: 250 | FT: 2
Brewed by:
Stone Brewing Co. visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
American Pale Ale (APA) |  5.40% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: kbub6f on 06-23-2001

This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

No notes at this time.
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Stone Pale Ale Alström Bros
Ratings: 2,648 | Reviews: 989
Photo of Kendo
4.1/5  rDev +6.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Bottle says "Enjoy By 10/17/13." Consumed on 8/18/13, so I believe this one's pretty fresh.

A: Poured into a pint glass. Body is coppery amber with a half-finger ecru-colored head that leaves behind a bit of lacing on the glass.

S: Good for an APA - some caramel malt and juicy, citrusy hops. Not overwhelmingly strong in the nose, but solid for the style and nicely balanced.

T: More malty than expected - especially from Stone. Toffee, caramel malt sweet foundation; think also of brown sugar. Finishes with some citrusy hops (more oranges or clementines than grapefruit) and a spicy, earthy hop bite that at times seems metallic. Lingering bitterness - which at times seems lemony, at times metallic - on the palate is a bit of a surprise because early on it seems so malty.

M: Medium in heft, carbonation is on the lighter/finer side of the spectrum.

O: I like it.

Photo of artoolemomo
3.96/5  rDev +2.9%
look: 4.25 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Appearance- Pours up a good amount of head which appears to have excellent retention. The head is a pure cotton white while the body is a medium to dark amber which glows a medium amber when held up to the light. Considerable lacing is left behind.

Nose- Caramel and citrus from the glass. Very noticeable caramel from the bottle. This subsides rather quickly but it was nice when it lasted. Though the caramel does linger longer than any citrus notes. The citrus notes are basically undefined but present. A certain mustiness (as in an armpit/dirty socks sort of hoppiness) comes out when this beer is swirled.

Taste- Considerable malt bill for a pale ale- some aspects of a lager/pilsner. Definite cereal and grain followed by caramel. Definite citrus notes (orange and lemon) follow this with a slight finish of pine, resin, and spice. I'm guessing that the date is 09/03/13 as the hops do not seem faded. While this might be modest by today's standards, I enjoy the mellow nature of the flavor profile. There is an incredible amount of complexity and integration, that “so-called lack of presence” seems minimal. Significantly different from SNPA and Red Chair, but definitely in the same league. Stone's prices for six packs tend to run higher than Sierra and Deschutes, so I would probably still opt for those. Wood and spice comes out more and more as this beer opens up. There's a juiciness that starts to round out the entire flavor profile that really defines this beer.

Mouthfeel- Light bodied with light carbonation. The syrup in the texture makes the light carbonation work.

Drinkability- Very easygoing. Subtle complexity. Stone is a little pricier but would consider this if I were looking for something a little different from my usual IPAs.

Overall- Solid APA. Must try. It will be more amenable to those who like a stronger malt bill but it is not without its hop charm.

Photo of sfprint
3.49/5  rDev -9.4%
look: 2.75 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75

A: transparent medicinal orange with a natural soda like carbonation. basically no head.
s: not a particularly strong scent. but whats there is a bit hoppy.
T: ipaish, but with a darker almost coffee-ish aftertaste. very hoppy and bitter
M: light to medium body with a slight carbonation sparkle.
O: very solid but more like an IPA than an APA

Photo of soju6
3.64/5  rDev -5.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.75

A: Pours a dark copper color with a tan head and some lacing.

S: Aroma of some pine, malt sweetness and bit of spice.

T: Taste of caramel sweetness, some pine and grain. Nice bitterness and fairly dry finish.

F: Medium body and quite smooth, with a decent balance.

O: Nice pale ale without being in your face hoppy.

Photo of Dave1999
3.7/5  rDev -3.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.75

Pours a deep reddish amber with a foamy white head.

The smell is citrusy and slightly sweet. Very faint and subtle.

The taste is quite bitter, piney and citrusy.

The mouthfeel is medium bodied with medium carbonation.

Overall a decent hoppy pale ale. I would never pick it over an ipa though.

Photo of BeerDocT
3.89/5  rDev +1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 4

Appearance 3.50: Very attractive golden brown color to this beer. Not much of a head at all and I really cranked the pour. Sometimes the CO2 will bite you in the stone keister.

Smell 3.5: Pleasing bouquet with deep barley and yeast notes. I also detect a pleasant, almost perfumy, hop aroma.

Taste 4.0: Mmm. Nice. Front is smooth and somewhat reminiscent of rose water. Warm, fills the palate with a rich, pleasing fullness. Middle shocks you back to reality with a very nice malt and caramel jolt. Finish is somewhat (unexpectedly!) dry with very pleasant hop notes and a deep and dark caramel barley hint to balance things out. Aftertaste is short, dry and refreshing, given the palate workout detailed above.

Mouthfeel: 3.75: Carbonation level is a highlight for this style of beer.

Overall 4.0: As far as grades go, this is an excellent, i.e. "4.0" pale ale. It is not, I assume, an "Indian" pale ale. This means the level of hops is not equal to that which British brewers introduced to keep beer fresh on the way to the Indian colonies. Interestingly, I take this as a less hopped IPA, which is -obviously-- just a PA. Regardless, this brew is a workhorse. It is fabulous with food but is a sessionable beer that will keep you coming back for another. Highly recommended and relatively cheap: $9 for a six.

Photo of draheim
4/5  rDev +3.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

On tap into a weizen glass @ Piatti, U Village, Seattle. Pours a surprisingly dark amber color w/ a 1-finger off-white head (enough that I wonder if I was given the right beer), really good lacing as I drain the glass.

Aroma is a balance of bright floral and citrusy NW hops and a sweet blend of pale/caramel malts.

Taste, likewise, is a perfect balance between malt and hops. Neither dominates; rather, they integrate with each other perfectly.

Mouthfeel is clean and crisp, drinkable, refreshing.

Overall a solid APA from Stone. Less in-your-face than many of their beers, which I appreciate.

Photo of RonKoch
4.19/5  rDev +8.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.25

Isn't this the standard by which all other American Pale Ale's should be measured? They've been making this recipe since July 1996, according to wording on the bottle, which is to say, for eons, considering the fast changing American craft beer market. Nice caramel malt flavors are the sweet to the bitter of this hop heavy ale.

Photo of stella77artois
4.19/5  rDev +8.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 4.25

12 oz bottle poured into pilsener glass.

A - Pours a medium red-orange-brown. Dark for a pale ale. Thick head which stuck around and left plenty of residuals.

S - Very pleasant. Malt and hops, along with hints of grapefruit and melon. Reminds me of a lighter Arrogant Bastard.

T - All aromas were noted in the taste, as well. Again, tastes a fair amount like Arrogant Bastard to me, of course on a lighter scale. Could also detect hints of roasted characters and just a touch of cocoa. Interesting.

F - Like an average ale. Refreshing but leaves a bit of dryness. A very drinkable beer, could be sessioned slowly.

O - Another excellent Stone brew. As Double Bastard is Arrogant Bastard's big brother, I'd be inclined to consider this it's little brother. Has a lot of the same flavors, just on a lower level. A damn good tasting beer, highly recommended to anyone who appreciates an ale with lot's going on.

Photo of Roman5150
3.97/5  rDev +3.1%
look: 4.25 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.25

bottle into Duvel Glass

appearance: dark mahogany with a subtle amberhue, large white head with intricate lacing, good retention

smell: tropical fruity hops, emphasis on citrus, grapefruit and apple

taste: very well balanced, enough bitterness to satisfy a hop head but smooth enough to appeal to anyone, follows the nose with citrus apple and grapefruit notes. very refreshing smooth finish, bitterness doesn't linger too long.

mouthfeel: not much carbonation, surprisingly full body for a pale ale

overall: I would say this may be a benchmark for the pale ale category, alongside Sierra Nevada's classic green label. Never had a bad beer from Stone; think of this as their "light" IPA, all the flavor and awesomeness, but in a more session-able variety.

Photo of Slackerville
3.4/5  rDev -11.7%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.5

More mellow in terms of hop aroma and bitterness than many other Stone offerings this beer is still tasty with balanced flavor. Color is a nice pale amber and this beer is incredibly drinkable and refreshing while still staying in the West Coast pale ale vein.

As usual Stone uses quality ingredients in terms of both malt and hops to make one of their most balanced beers. While Stone IPA is distributed across the country Stone Pale Ale continues to have more of a niche following which is fine by me.

Photo of bnes09
4.14/5  rDev +7.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.25

Transparent amber and tons of carbonation. Rich, creamy ivory colored head with excellent retention and plenty of stickage to the glass.

Malty, bready aroma. Some spices, herbs and rye. Hint of pine.

Dense malt character, buttered biscuits and toasted rye. Subtle pine and leaf hop. Well balanced.

Medium bodied, smooth in the middle and dry in the end. Well carbonated.

NIce pale ale. Solid flavor and good balance.

Photo of Suds
4.09/5  rDev +6.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.25

This one is a clear and copper colored brew. The head is white and leaves a nice lace. The smell is clean and balanced with both malt and hop qualities. Herbal and earthy in aroma...some underlying stone fruit.m the taste is more assertive....bitter ans strong. On the dry side, but lots of malt flavor. Hop resin and flavor is prominent throughout. Full body and satisfying.

Photo of MadCat
4/5  rDev +3.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Appearance: Nice copper color, decent white head, leaves good lacing

Smell: Fruit and caramel malts, along with floral and citrus hops

Taste: Hoppy, with some bitterness, floral and citrus. Caramel malt sweetness backs it up some, with some fruit and nut flavor. Very well balanced

Mouthfeel: Light to medium body, good carbonation

Overall: Excellent example of the style. This brew always makes me happy, as I don't have it as often as other pale ales.

Photo of JRed
3.74/5  rDev -2.9%
look: 4.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Clear burning orange in body with off-white fluffy head that lasts. Aroma of citrus, dry grass, bready, caramel notes. Tastes of biscuits, dry grass, evolves into citrus notes, mild bitterness finishes it up. Medium bodied with medium carbonation. Thick and chewy. A Stone offering that has history, mild flavor profile for modern times but still a good easy drinkin' brew.

Photo of TheQuietMan22
3.77/5  rDev -2.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.75

Serving type: 12-ounce bottle. The “ENJOY BY” date printed on the shoulder is “12.24.12.” Rats! Only two months late.

Appearance: Straight pour into a pint glass. The color is hazy, orange-tinted amber. Two fingers of dense, eggshell-colored head dissipated slowly to leave a thick, spotted lacing, ring around the edge, and trails of foam along the glass.

Smell: Mild citrus intermingled with malts and faint cardboard. This bottle is showing its age. Nonetheless, there are aromas of orange, grapefruit, lemon, lime, some exotic fruit, light pine or spruce, and sweet caramel.

Taste: Despite this bottle’s age, the flavor is still pretty solid. Most of the hops may have fallen out, though. It is a mellow balance between mild citrus and the malts. Orange, lemon, pepper spice, pine, toasted malts, toffee, and caramel. It offers a floral bitterness that lingers as an aftertaste.

Drinkability: I will definitely buy a fresher bottle in the future, but this “old” one was still pretty good.

Photo of kojevergas
2.96/5  rDev -23.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

5.40% ABV confirmed. Bottle acquired at Trader Joe's. 12 fl oz brown glass bottle with standard pressure cap served into a conical Samuel Smith's pint glass in me gaff in low altitude Los Feliz, Los Angeles, California. Reviewed live. Expectations are above average; I figure a brewery with as much funding and manpower as Stone wouldn't screw up a pale ale.

Served straight from the fridge. Side-poured with standard vigor as no carbonation issues are anticipated.

A: Pours a 2.5 finger beige-khaki colour head of fair cream, decent thickness, and pretty good (~4 minute) retention. Body colour is a clear textbook copper. Translucent. No yeast particles are visible. No bubble show. Predictable for the style; this is what one thinks of when one thinks of a pale ale. Nothing unique or special here, but there are no overt flaws.

Sm: I like the refined caramel malt backbone; it's more evocative than in most pale ales. Light generic floral hops. No yeast or alcohol is detectable. Not a lot going on here; I hope there's more to the flavour. An average strength aroma.

T: Okay. Caramel malt and floral hops. There's a subtlety to the execution. (Stone, subtlety - what?). It's a simple beer but it's well put together. I wouldn't go so far as to call it balanced - after all this is Stone - but it's not bad. Built decently. I expected severe over-hopping in classic Stone fashion, but this is surprisingly underhopped for the style. It's kind of a malt-focused beer, actually. Still, its simplicity holds it back. Not quite refreshing. No alcohol or yeast comes through. A bit too bitter on the finish.

Mf: Smooth and wet. Too dry on the finish, killing the refreshing feel. Decent thickness. Okay presence on the palate. Overcarbonated. Suits the flavours generally at best.

Dr: Drinkable but forgettable. Rather pedestrian. Hides its ABV well. I doubt I'd get it again unless the only other offerings were macro-shite. It's by no means a bad beer; it's just mundane.

High C

Photo of jsisko01
3.81/5  rDev -1%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Appearance - Pours an orangish-copper color with an inch thick head that dissipates instantly, leaving a pretty good lacing.

Smell - Sweet but also bitter, a slight funk, and alcohol.

Taste - It has a very nice sweetness to it, kind of like grapefruit. The hops taste like pine to me. There is a slight mustiness, like the aroma. And there is a very light alcohol flavor in the finish, kind of similar to a whiskey ale. I think this might be brewed in oak barrels as well?

Mouthfeel - Has a pretty thick feel with medium carbonation.

Overall - It's pretty easy to drink on.

Photo of Fatehunter
3.63/5  rDev -5.7%
look: 4.75 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.5

Two fingers of head on a cloudy, dark straw colored body.
The aroma is a faint grain smell.
The taste starts malty then switches to moderate pine/grapefruit bitterness; finishes with a mild sweetness. Great profile.
The texture is crisp with moderate carbonation.
It's a straight up pale ale, can't lose with this one.

Photo of mfnmbvp
3.43/5  rDev -10.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

12 oz. bottle. Bottle says to 'enjoy by 04/03/13'. Poured into a Firestone Walker pint glass.

A - Pours a nice ruby copper color with about two fingers worth of fluffy off-white creamy head.

S - Light bready malts with a faint whiff of citrus hops in the background. Not a complex smell, but not off-putting either. Smells lightly refreshing and inviting.

T - Taste follows the nose, lots of nice bready malts paired with a hint of grapefruit hops and a bit of fresh lemon / orange. The bottle says it best, itself, at describing this beer claiming it is "nearly on the modest side". It is a much more tame beer than a lot of the raging hop assaults that Stone Brewing releases. A nice change of pace. Nicely balanced with a nice light body.

M - Smooth and clean mouthfeel. Just a very slight bitter hop aftertaste.

Overall, it is highly drinkable at only 5.40% abv, lightly bodied, and remarkably well-balanced. Definitely a nice take on the style by Stone, I would have it again.

Stone Pale Ale ---3.5/5

Photo of Mojo
3.92/5  rDev +1.8%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.75

12 ounce bottle -> World Market tulip glass.

This offering pours up a deep gold/medium amber with a small half finger head, no real retention, and bits of lacing. The nose is kind of pine, bread, and citrus. Taste is a very sweet almost apple juice flavor on the initial sip giving way to a grapefruitiness and finally a spicy hop finish. Mouthfeel is pleasant. This is a good one, maybe not the best ever, but solid.

Photo of Goblinmunkey7
3.78/5  rDev -1.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Best before 03/19/13.

Appearance: Slight chill haze on a straight up copper colored beer. Head is off-white, rocky, and massive. Drops to a small cap and big chunky collar. Sheets, splotches, and spots of lacing mark the glass with each sip.

Smell: A nice balance of leafy, slightly earthy notes and citrus. Some grapefruit with a touch of pine lingering in the back. Solid malt backbone is biscuity with a good amount of caramel malt sweetness. A bit of caramelized sugar. Backing floral notes. A touch of ale yeast. Light toasted element.

Taste: Leafy flower. Drink the meadow. Raw hop leaf with a backing punch of citrus zest, pith, and oily pine. Some straight backing bitterness. Malts are nicely balanced, sweet, but not overbearing. Slightly toasted with a great caramelized malt sweetness. Finishes on the hoppy side (surprise!).

Mouthfeel: Smooth. Body runs medium with a moderate carbonation. Clean.

Overall: Are you sure Stone made this?

A nicely hopped APA. A bit restrained for Stone, but it's appreciated here. Drinkable and still carries that distinct Stone finish. I need to remember to drink this as a go to APA.

Photo of Groomsy
3.86/5  rDev +0.3%
look: 3.75 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 4

12 oz. bottle poured into a nonic. "Enjoy by" date is 02.18.13.

This APA pours a very attractive light amber color and is topped by a frothy off-white head of two fingers. Per the style, the head sticks around for a while and leaves some nice lacing down the glass. Some yeast particles (and hop residue?) lingers in the body of the beer, giving it some haze.

Definitely a West Coast style nose on this one - the first thing I notice is a sweet grapefruit/citrus character. There's some floral freshness behind that. The malt hangs in the balance and provides a nice, caramel contrast to the very apparent hop aromas. For some reason, I also think of orange rinds when smelling this? A well-balanced American pale ale. Not totally citrusy, as some others are.

Some strong malt sweetness hits the front of the tongue with flavors of freshly milled grain, but this is quickly balanced by some juicy fruity flavors mid-palate - citrus, predictably. Some floral, slightly pine-like bitterness finishes out the beer, with some of the citrus character still hanging out. Nice bitter and strong finish of this one.

The mouthfeel of this beer is excellent and refreshing. Mildly carbonated, it has a dry finish and the body is a medium consistency. The dry finish leaves some of the hoppy flavors lingering behind.

A great American pale ale. This is by all means a "go to." While not as outrageous as some of Stone's other beers, this shows that they can indeed make a very good "standard" ale.

Photo of Moose90
3.35/5  rDev -13%
look: 4.25 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Best By: Sept 26 2012
Tasted: Feb 3 2013 . . . oops

A – Medium/Dark amber color. Strong 1" head stays around and leaves lacing, nice cream white foam.

S – Malt, lots of it, crystal malts, biscuity and thats about it. The hops have obviously faded considerably.

T – Some bitter hops here, but the biscuity and heavy malt character comes through and dominates. This is almost sweaty on the malt level.

M – Seems over-carbonated. It is crisp enough, but it has a sticky lingering malty aftertaste.

O – Just average, may be due to the date of the bottle, but the major notes on this one are malts and more malts. Its not bad, but not sure I'd seek out a freshie.

Photo of browniewithnuts
3.18/5  rDev -17.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.25

A: Dark amberish color, kind of murky in the glass. 1/2 inch head which dispersed pretty quickly with a circular white foam remaining around the glass. Decent carbonation.

S: Not much coming through in the smell for me. Mostly smelling biscuity malts coming through with slight hop presence in the smell.

T: Hop bitterness comes through at first but the taste changes quickly. The maltiness comes through quickly and takes over the palate. There is a little more bitterness on the back end before the taste fades with a crisp, clean finish

M: Light clean body, slightly over carbonated but not overwhelmingly so. Decent mouth feel.

O: An average Pale Ale. Nothing really stood out with it but nothing really offended the senses.

Stone Pale Ale from Stone Brewing Co.
87 out of 100 based on 2,648 ratings.