1. Rating beers by attributes (look, smell, taste, feel, overall) is back! Read the latest update ...
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Stone 11.11.11 Vertical Epic Ale (Red Wine Barrel Aged) - Stone Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
Stone 11.11.11 Vertical Epic Ale (Red Wine Barrel Aged)Stone 11.11.11 Vertical Epic Ale (Red Wine Barrel Aged)

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
86
very good

94 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 94
Reviews: 11
rAvg: 3.84
pDev: 13.28%
Wants: 3
Gots: 33 | FT: 2
Brewed by:
Stone Brewing Co. visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
Chile Beer |  10.00% ABV

Availability: Limited (brewed once)

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

Our Stone 11.11.11 Vertical Epic Ale proved to be an eccentric diversion from our previous lineup of innovative Belgian-inspired brews. And considering we're Stone, that's really saying something. This unprecedented beer was brewed with cinnamon stick and Anaheim green chiles, giving it an amazing flavor profile unlike anything that came before it. It certainly didn't need any enhancement, but we just don't know when to leave well enough alone (and we've demonstrated before that you can, indeed, improve upon perfection). So we decided to tinker with it a bit and laid a small portion to rest in wine barrels. Not wanting to limit our experiment to only red or white wine barrels, we chose both. Treat yourself to a bottle of each and compare. All in the name of science, of course...

(Beer added by: FosterJM on 12-18-2012)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 94 | Reviews: 11 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of eulerthegrape
1.5/5  rDev -60.9%

eulerthegrape, Aug 25, 2014
Photo of dmsohyea
2/5  rDev -47.9%

dmsohyea, Jul 03, 2013
Photo of NYSPHophead
2.75/5  rDev -28.4%

NYSPHophead, Jan 29, 2013
Photo of Mattco
3/5  rDev -21.9%

Mattco, Aug 19, 2013
Photo of Therisse
3/5  rDev -21.9%

Therisse, Feb 26, 2013
Photo of kojevergas
3.05/5  rDev -20.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Almost gagged in disgust reading the pretentious description on this one. Ah, Stone - congratulations, you've succeeded in matching your desired market image. You are indeed a bunch of arrogant bastards - only there's no hint of cheeky self awareness in the actuality of the situation. Why then, did I buy this beer? Because I respect anyone who creates for a living and Every Beer Gets A Chance. 500ml brown glass bottle with hood and wire cap over a cork served into a conical Samuel Smith's pint glass in me gaff in low altitude Los Angeles, California. Acquired within the last couple months at a local SoCal beer store. Bottle conditioned. ABV is 10.6% according to my bottle. "Ale brewed with Anaheim Chilies & Cinnamon Aged in Red Wine Barrels."

Served cold, straight from the fridge. Allowed to warm over the course of consumption. Side-poured with standard vigor as no carbonation issues are anticipated.

No satisfying pop upon removal of the cork. Just a weak-ass "psh."

A: Pours a 3.5 finger beige-light khaki colour head of nice cream and thickness and quite good (9+ minute) retention for the high ABV. No real lacing as the head recedes. Overall, I'm rather impressed with the head. Body colour is a terribly ugly caramel-light brown colour; that's one of the worst body colours I've observed in the last year. Wow, that's unappealing. No yeast particles are visible because it's nontransparent and opaque. No bubble show. Dig the head, despise the body.

Sm: Surprisingly not terrible. Light tart sour character. Light hints of lacto. Cinnamon and earthy hops. White grapeskin; I'm actually confused - why are the dominant wine notes redolent of white wine rather than red wine? Caramel. Stale cereals/grains. I dig the light sour aromatics, but the rest is underwhelming. A mess of an aroma, but not necessarily a bad one. Deeply buried orange rind when I look for it. Not getting any chili peppers from the aroma. A mild strength aroma overall.

T: Hm. It's a mess - in classic Stone fashion. There's just no balance or even seemingly any attempt to balance the flavours. I get light sourness, which lacks flavour depth or interest. Murky caramel, earthy hops, and biscuit malt. Bland cinnamon. I'm not getting any chili pepper at all; however they handled the peppers, the execution is poor. Nutmeg spice. Some other unwelcome spices. I get some grapeskin, but it's mainly suggestive of white wine grapes, not red wine. I get no red wine notes at all, really. The red wine barrel aging was poorly handled. Lacks creamy character. I can't emphasize the lack of balance and cohesion enough; it feels like a mess of random flavours jumbled together, not a masterfully brewed and balanced beer. What did I expect from Stone? Built okay, I guess. Why is this classified as a chili beer?

Mf: Smooth and wet. Lightly acidic. Overcarbonated. Way too much body. Too thick. Bad presence on the palate. Doesn't feel at all tailored to the flavour profile, nor is it all that complementary. Lacks deliberation. I'm unimpressed. Thank God it's not watery.

Dr: Stone once again makes me question why I keep buying their beers. I want to like them as much as others seem to, but the quality just isn't there. And it's overpriced as hell, even in L.A. Why is this brewery so well regarded? This is a poorly executed barrel aged beer, and a missed opportunity - and if it's supposed to be a chili beer, it's crap - frankly. A mess of a beer in a gimmicky-as-hell series. This one should be skipped, especially at its ridiculous price point. Why did I buy this? What's wrong with me?

Low C+

kojevergas, Mar 27, 2013
Photo of Gonzoillini
3.25/5  rDev -15.4%

Gonzoillini, May 05, 2013
Photo of Trilogy31
3.25/5  rDev -15.4%

Trilogy31, Apr 05, 2013
Photo of thebouch01
3.25/5  rDev -15.4%

thebouch01, Oct 13, 2013
Photo of rudzud
3.25/5  rDev -15.4%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 3.25

Shared with BPK59, poured into a Kate the Great tulip.

A - Poured a nice clear ruby brown hue with a fluffy tan head that fades to leave nice lacing.

S - Aromas of red wine, some nice malty sweetness, chilis are hidden unfortunately.

T - Tastes of red wine, malty sweetness, and super faint chili. It's not bad, but where the Fuck is the chili?!

M - Mouthfeel is nice, lightly carbonated, not bad, alcohol hidden.

O - Overall I was, yet again, disappointed by a stone 500mL beer. Sigh.

rudzud, Dec 06, 2013
Photo of t0rin0
3.25/5  rDev -15.4%

t0rin0, Apr 09, 2013
Photo of DIPAFAN
3.25/5  rDev -15.4%

DIPAFAN, Feb 18, 2013
Photo of Alieniloquium
3.4/5  rDev -11.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

500 mL bottle poured into a snifter.

Appearance - Deep red, a little murky. Small khaki head. Thin collar.

Smell - Wine aroma and some acidity. Caramel malt. Hint of pepper.

Taste - Pepper right up front. Caramel malt. Some wine and a bit of funk.

Mouthfeel - High carbonation. The peppers are cut a bit. Medium bodied.

Overall - A lot going on, but not sure I really enjoy what's going on.

Alieniloquium, Aug 20, 2013
Photo of fishmich
3.5/5  rDev -8.9%

fishmich, Jul 18, 2013
Photo of n2185
3.5/5  rDev -8.9%

n2185, Dec 12, 2013
Photo of Canada_Dan
3.5/5  rDev -8.9%

Canada_Dan, Jun 15, 2014
Photo of Ant4711
3.5/5  rDev -8.9%

Ant4711, Jun 06, 2013
Photo of Hopstout
3.5/5  rDev -8.9%

Hopstout, May 13, 2013
Photo of phishbone23
3.5/5  rDev -8.9%

phishbone23, Jan 23, 2013
Photo of zestar
3.5/5  rDev -8.9%

zestar, Jul 19, 2014
Photo of beernads
3.5/5  rDev -8.9%

beernads, Aug 21, 2013
Photo of Amp
3.5/5  rDev -8.9%

Amp, Jun 04, 2013
Photo of scottfrie
3.64/5  rDev -5.2%
look: 4.25 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75

500ml bottle into tulip.

A: Pours a deep iced-tea brown with a fluffy dark tan head that faded into a thick fuzzy film and collar that left chunks of sticky lace down the glass.
S: Straight after the pour the vinous red wine barrel comes through more than expected and imparts almost berry-like notes to the nose. Once the head fades down a bit, the cinnamon and roasted chilies comes through and create a spicy, chipotle pepper scent. Notes of belgian yeast and raisin are mixed in there as well.
T: Lightly bitter woody notes of red wine barrel mixes well with the base chili, cinnamon, raisin, and Belgian yeast flavors. I get powdery notes of chocolate, grapes, and musty barrel in the finish, with hints of peppery spice, chili and cinnamon in the aftertaste. Chili is (obviously) way more subtle than the original was fresh, but there is a very faint tingly in my mouth after each swallow.
M: Medium-full body, slick, fairly sweet and slight astringent mouthfeel, with some drying oak and a few gritty tannins.
O: A decent beer, nothing crazy. Red wine barrel added an additional layer of complexity to the base beer, but I’m not I would call it an improvement. Different I guess, definitely not worse though. I’d drink this again but wouldn’t seek it out.

scottfrie, Apr 21, 2014
Photo of Sammy
3.75/5  rDev -2.3%

Sammy, Aug 15, 2013
Photo of claspada
3.75/5  rDev -2.3%

claspada, May 26, 2013
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Stone 11.11.11 Vertical Epic Ale (Red Wine Barrel Aged) from Stone Brewing Co.
86 out of 100 based on 94 ratings.