1. Don't miss our 7th annual American Craft Beer Fest featuring 640+ beers from 140+ brewers this May 30 & 31 in Boston, MA! Buy your tickets now!
  2. BeerAdvocate on your phone?! True story. Try the beta now.

Dark Horse Crooked Tree IPA - Dark Horse Brewing Company

Dark Horse Crooked Tree IPADark Horse Crooked Tree IPA

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
very good

2,127 Ratings

(view ratings)
Ratings: 2127
Reviews: 831
rAvg: 3.98
pDev: 11.06%

Brewed by:
Dark Horse Brewing Company visit their website
Michigan, United States

Style | ABV
American IPA |  6.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: xlperro on 08-10-2002)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Reviewers | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Dark Horse Crooked Tree IPA Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 2,127 | Reviews: 831 | Show All Ratings:
Photo of Slipperys


1.2/5  rDev -69.8%
look: 1 | smell: 2 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 1

a: poured into a wide snifter with decent head. Dark and packed with unflocculated yeast.

s: you smell some hops, but nothing but bittering bops...zero aroma hops

t: dark bitter yeast!

M: heavy and over carbonated..

O: Maybe there was a contamination in the 6 bottles, but I will not take a chance in the future.

Serving type: bottle

Serving type: bottle

07-22-2011 01:06:41 | More by Slipperys
Photo of harrymel


1.75/5  rDev -56%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 1

You know what sucks? when you haven't invested in a dating system for your bottles...

A: Tanned copper ale with excellent clarity until suddenly an unusually large yeast cake follows thru on the last ounce or so. Two finger, loosely packed, peanut head dissipates in a minute or two and leaves a medium sheet of the same. spotty lacing.

S: Grassy, hay-like hops over malts. Yep, that's about it. The beer is not like typical IPA with aromatic hops you usually get in the mid palate and upfront.

T: Caramel malts, sweet. Bitter background. Some resiny flavors.

M: Medium body with medium carbonation.

O: I fear that this beer is old. But I can't tell. So, I have to assume it's average in freshness for the consumer. The result: this is a bland, plain IPA. More like an amber with extra early bittering hops.

Serving type: bottle

04-01-2011 16:03:26 | More by harrymel
Photo of lnashsig


2.3/5  rDev -42.2%
look: 2 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Many thanks to GordianKnot for the chance to try this beer. Poured from 12oz bottle into my DFH snifter. Ugliest IPA pour I have ever seen- pours a murky dark dishwater dirty brown color. A little bit of head, barely any retention. I can only assume that this is a really old bottle, or something has gone terribly wrong with this one. After it gets into the glass, it looks like dirty brown dishwater, pretty disgusting. Smell- applejuice, some spices from the hops. Faint breadiness from the malt. Taste- gross. this is like applesauce gone wrong. You get some sweet flavors from the malt, and some bitterness from the hops, but this does not even resemble an IPA. This is a drainpour. I can only assume this is some sort of quality control issue after reading the reviews.

Serving type: bottle

08-21-2011 23:49:19 | More by lnashsig
Photo of Crosling


2.35/5  rDev -41%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

Orange. Strange smelling, hoppy with a large emphasis on fruits, apricots and peaches in particular. Not much in the nose besides hops. Flavor is more of the same. Straight hop juice and not much else. Hoppiness brings forth various fruit notes (apricot, peach and lemon). Dry. Severely lacking malt flavor and body. Fizzy.

Serving type: bottle

03-20-2006 20:15:05 | More by Crosling
Photo of ms11781


2.35/5  rDev -41%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

12oz bottle poured into a pint glass.

Pours a hazy deep orange color with a foamy 2 finger, off white head. Decent creamy foam lacing left on the glass.

Nose is piny, resiny hops. Not very strong but they are there.
A little caramel malt to balance the hops but it doesn't take much because, as mentioned, the hops aren't all that strong.

The taste follows along with the nose except the hops are even more subdued. Slight piny hops followed by a moderate sweetness from the malt. A hint of bitterness at the finish but that fades as well.

Medium bodied with medium carbonation. Smooth mouthfeel. A hint of bitterness at the end but smooth nonetheless.

Body-wise this beer is fine but the hops flavors (and malt flavor for that matter) are lacking. Not really what I've come to expect from an IPA.

Serving type: bottle

01-25-2011 04:13:48 | More by ms11781
Photo of Oxymoron


2.5/5  rDev -37.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

Now who is the crook? Pours a very cloudy orange color with some lighter tan highlights. A soft wheat head with limited retention and lacing overall.

The nose is very muddled. Some piney note up front with a odd fruity hop/ester on the back end. Mostly apricots and peaches but some cherries and a almond nutty aroma. Some off yeast notes, cardboard/oxidation but not over the top. The malt is light but is really hard to pick out.

The taste is similar but not as muddled. Malt comes out with a sweet flavor but hard to really pick out distinct flavors. The hops are really off. A good bitterness up front but does not blend well/support the piney and floral hop finish. Some weird floral and apricot notes that just don't blend. There is a stronger yeast flavor that doesn't help on the back end.

The body is moderate to light. Good carbonation. Overall there is just something funky going on here. The malt is muddle and lacks the base for the hops. And the hop finish is just off with some off yeast and floral notes. Crooked for sure.

Serving type: bottle

09-03-2008 15:52:32 | More by Oxymoron
Photo of AwYeh


2.5/5  rDev -37.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

A: Pours a hazy amber-orange, with one finger + of foamy white head. Decent lacing.

S: Citrus hops stand out here: grapefruit and pineapple in particular. Notes of pine, flowers, and caramel also detectable.

T: Resoundingly bitter; little definition of any hop flavors here outside of a bit of grapefruit. Some caramel malt flavor comes through, but with little sweetness; largely unbalanced.

M: Thin body, moderate carbonation, smooth.

D: Drinkability of this one was quite low; I had a hard time finishing my glass considering the great one-dimensionality of the bitterness.

Might need to return to this in the future, if I find one that I know is particularly fresh.

Serving type: bottle

01-16-2011 07:17:55 | More by AwYeh
Photo of alysmith4

District of Columbia

2.51/5  rDev -36.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.75

Was excited to try this beer given it's high BA score, but I was so disappointed. The appearance and mouthfeel were average. The smell was musky, earthy, with some hay and straw notes. The taste was similar, with a lot of bitter citrus as well. I consider myself quite a "hophead," but this was far to bitter and unbalanced for me.

Serving type: bottle

03-08-2013 01:43:13 | More by alysmith4
Photo of ibbjamin


2.55/5  rDev -35.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

Paid $8.49 for a 6 pack of 12oz bottles from Discount Liquor in Milwaukee, WI. This is the 3rd beer I've had from the pack and it is the one I am reviewing. I pour into a standard pint glass.

Leaves just over an inch of white pillowey head. Very cloudy and opaque. A light brownish, burnt orange color. Some moderate head retention.

Nose is somewhat light for an IPA. A toned down citrus pine aroma. Nothing too impressive here.

As with the nose, this is a rather unimpressive IPA. Some raw barley hints reminiscent of a B-Level brewpub. Balancing malty background. The flavors in this one are just quite mild.

Medium body with some grittiness leaving a lasting aftertaste that is more malty than hoppy. OK carbonation.

One of the sites I remember finding out about this one from had it rated like an A- I believe. I just don't get it.

Serving type: bottle

05-17-2009 23:12:30 | More by ibbjamin
Photo of nc41

North Carolina

2.63/5  rDev -33.9%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Eh, tasted like 3 month old Hop Devil. Kinda disappointed, the best thing was it looked good, no nose at all, a malt bomb IPA. Won't buy again. So many better IPA's out there I'll give the 5 remaining bottles away. I was hoping for something kinda fruity and what I got was a mess.

Serving type: bottle

08-24-2012 02:33:44 | More by nc41
Photo of box299


2.65/5  rDev -33.4%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

To be honest I only had one bottle...
The Color was murky for sure... a Murky Yellow/Orange... Not what I expected from an IPA.
The smell was kind of sour and that is what really turned me off. The taste was as I might expect... a little Murky and Sour!
Half way though the Glass I noticed what I thought I left in the bottle... Floating Sediment. Down the Drain it went.
With the high ratings this site gives this beer I am planning to give it another shot... I will update if I have a different experience...

Serving type: bottle

10-05-2007 01:32:55 | More by box299
Photo of Bendurgin


2.7/5  rDev -32.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Poured this one into a pint glass. The pour is darker than I expected from an IPA. Dark orange and cloudy. The pour gives a thin white head and spotty lacing. The aroma is bitter through and through with hints of grass,citrus and an undertone of sweet malts. I'm really into the way this smells, especially since I don't know how old it is. The taste is bitter from start to finish with just a hint of juiciness. Not bad, but not very complex at all. The mouthfeel is thin and watery. I thought this looked heavier than it is. I'm typing this as I'm drinking it and I'm not sure that I'm going to finish. It's not the worst beer I've had but I liked the Double Crooked Tree a lot more and I've got other stuff I'm itching to have.

Serving type: bottle

08-26-2010 01:44:20 | More by Bendurgin
Photo of porcelli426


2.73/5  rDev -31.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 3

12 oz bottle poured into tumbler

A – Hazy orange. Lighter rather than darker, Half a finger head.

S – Not overall very fragrant. Hints of citrus and florals. Somewhat dank

T – For an IPA, really light on the bitterness and other hop characteristics. Has nice citrus flavors and a clean finish.

M – Has a great mouth feel. Plenty of carbonation and full bodied.

O – Overall disappointing after seeing the great reviews. Not a bad beer by any standard but I like an IPA with a great balance between different hops and malts. This beer is fairly streamlined from what I can gather.

Serving type: bottle

09-27-2012 01:01:49 | More by porcelli426
Photo of jackscrow


2.75/5  rDev -30.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

Some citrus notes to start. Not a lot.

Light mouthfeel, which I tend do like. A little more carbonation than most Am.IPAs - and I don't like a lot of carbonation.

Up-front, immediate bitterness, but fades quickly with not much backing it up. No complexity. Virtually no aftertaste - unusual for an Am.IPA.

Meh. OK. Non-offensive, but nothing to recommend a 2nd turn...

Serving type: bottle

08-04-2010 15:40:56 | More by jackscrow
Photo of johnbarrett


2.78/5  rDev -30.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Got this bottle from the wyck.

a- one finger head with a bit of sediment sinking to the bottom after the pour. bubbles rising but quick quickly made me forget about that sediment. a really nice appetizing copper color. the lace isn't too shabby either.

s- smells like mild pine nuts.

t- i was let down. there was no date on the bottle that i could find. i'm hoping that this was not fresh because i had high expectations for this IPA. there is some definite hop character but nothing to write home to the neighbors about.

m- mostly flat. there is a trace of the hops that might have been there once

d- it was easy to put this one down and i could do another two or three. but i don't want another.

Serving type: bottle

03-03-2011 04:53:02 | More by johnbarrett
Photo of JackRose


2.78/5  rDev -30.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

A customer recently dropped this off - kind of like a bolt from the blue. Did not know the guy from Adam, but he started chatting up one of my bartenders and was impressed with our beer offerings. I had high hopes for this beer when I saw other member reviews, but overall really did not like the somewhat soapy hop character. Stays in your mouth for a long time like a woman with too much perfume on her skin after nibbling on her neck. I did like the fact that the beer was quite dark for an IPA and that it was unfiltered. Looking to try other offerings from this brewery.

Serving type: bottle

10-24-2011 02:03:29 | More by JackRose
Photo of BB1313


2.85/5  rDev -28.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

No date. 12oz bottle poured into a goblet. Pours a very hazy and cloudy burnt orange, lots of sediment and floaties; nice head the slightly fades and decent lacing. Tons of orange and resin with a good amount of pine. Lots of caramel and malts. The flavors are completely one dimentional and aren't really too bold.. well for 6% the flavors are bold, just not enjoyable for my palate. Very sticky. Mouthfeel is fine, smooth but maybe a tad overboard on the fizz. Not sure if this was fresh or not, but either way the flavors just didn't do it for me.

I really like what Dark Horse does, but I personally just don't like these kind of IPAs. I'd much rather have a Double Crooked Tree IPA.

Serving type: bottle

08-13-2011 01:37:11 | More by BB1313
Photo of vfgccp

New York

2.88/5  rDev -27.6%
look: 3 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

A – Huge amount of sediment in the bottle made it difficult to decant without catching some (not necessarily a bad thing though). Orange and brown body with a low white head.

S – Very nice. White bread malt character overlaid with bright pine and highlights of orange zest.

T – Aw, a let down from the nose. Light wart with a watery mid profile. Pine bitterness lingers throughout the drink, but it’s relatively sharp and unbalanced; imparting an almost cleaning-fluid like character.

M – Light and watery. A rolling pine bitterness carries through between sips.

O – An ambivalent brew with a great nose but a real let down for me on the actual flavor and mouthfeel. I’d be willing to try this again to see if it was just the bottle I had.

Serving type: bottle

05-01-2011 23:01:20 | More by vfgccp
Photo of zeledonia


2.88/5  rDev -27.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Sadly, no date on the bottle, so no idea how old it is. Need to stop buying un-dated IPAs.

Pours a very dark amber, with a big fluffy yellowish cream-colored head. Great retention and loads of lacing. But the downside, it has a massive amount of sediment in it. So much that, despite a careful pour, my glass still looked like my one-year-old had backwashed in it. I generally like bottle conditioning, but this stuff has more crud at the bottom of it than my homebrew. Unfortunate, as it would be a very pretty beer without all the floaties.

Smell is pretty faint, rather malty, honey sweetness. A bit of fruity citrus and piney hops, but faint enough that it's hard for me to pull them out.

Taste is quite malty and sweet. In fact, if I tasted this without knowing what it was, I wouldn't peg it as an IPA. Malts carry the flavor throughout, with a nudge of bitterness on the back-end the only real indication there are hops in it. It's not even what I'd call balanced, it's got a gaping hole where the hops should be. Finish is slightly bitter.

Mouthfeel: medium-light body, a little sticky, with not enough carbonation.

I'm not impressed. Very malty, and not very flavorful. And doesn't taste at all like an IPA. It's quite possible that this bottle is past its prime. But without a date on it, who's to know? I suppose that's the risk the brewer and the buyer take.

Serving type: bottle

07-30-2011 19:14:42 | More by zeledonia
Photo of HardTarget


2.9/5  rDev -27.1%
look: 1.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Bottle Inspection: Simple cartoon looking tree, no information at all.

Aroma: Slightly worty malt base spiked with a floral grassy hop perfume with a hint of tea.

Appearance: Thick flakes of… something make the rounds in a dark cloudy orange glass. Solid finger of meringue head laces heavily. Flakes are dark, they don’t look like protein coagulation, a bit disturbing. As the head settles, there are dark particulates suspended in it like dirty snow.

Flavor: Heavy bittering hop, firm tea flavor, mild malt base. There’s a heavy orange peel element and some earthy tea flavors that make me think English hops. As it warms up a bit, some of the worty under-attenuated malt flavor comes out.

Mouthfeel: Heavy carbonation, over carbonated really, medium body, fairly clean finish.

Overall Impression: Too many off elements here to really enjoy this one. The unidentified floating objects don’t help, the dark dusting in the head is a new one for me, the heavy use of bittering hops rather than flavor or aroma hops is counter to the way I prefer my IPAs, and the English rather than American IPA profile has me confused.
Looking at other reviews, it’s possible I got a bad bottle, but no date on the label has me wondering if it is possibly old. In my book, no date = brewer takes the hit. It’s sad, after all that, the basic flavor is pretty good, but everything else really brought down my score.

Serving type: bottle

01-25-2008 07:09:56 | More by HardTarget
Photo of blackenmn


2.9/5  rDev -27.1%
look: 2 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

Poured from a 12oz. bottle into a pint glass:

Appearance and Smell-Poured a deep orange and left a thick 1/2 head with dissipated quickly. Settled a very opaque orange with little carbonation. Some particle presence in the glass. It smelled mainly of pineapple and citrus with some malty sweetness behind it.

Taste and Mouthfeel-Tasted as it smelled like an abundance of pineapple, very fruity. Left pretty strong hop bitterness which threw a nice counter at the sweetness, just not enough to balance this.

Drinkability-I don't think i could drink alot of this, just wasn't too exciting. Became very flat very fast.

Serving type: bottle

09-18-2009 04:29:10 | More by blackenmn
Photo of Ricochet


2.9/5  rDev -27.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

Poured with a caramel colored remainder out of the bottle to a decent head, sticky lace and a cloudy, dark, almost apple cider like appearance. Subdued hop scent was about it. Maybe a little sweet scent at the back. Mouth was creamy, with a nice not overpowering burn. Undefined aftertaste of just a hoppy burn. Hmmm.

Taste was subdued hops, with a bitter edge but a hole in the middle. There was a little malt to hold up what seems like sugary water that had hops floated in it.

An extremely average IPA. Last weekend I had some of the best IPAs I have ever tasted, so there is a high bar set for me. This one was well under.

Serving type: bottle

09-19-2009 04:22:18 | More by Ricochet
Photo of glazeman


2.9/5  rDev -27.1%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Poured from a 12oz bottle.

A: Pours a dark amber, darker than most any other IPA that I have come across. Nice two finger white head with excellent retention and lacing.

S: I don't really know what to make of the smell, not very pleasant in my opinion. Smells fairly medicinal, with only a hint of citrus.

T: Somewhat lack luster for me. It was ok, but nothing special. The hop flavor was not very pronounced and was covered up a lot by the high level of carbonation. Some malt on the finish, but not much.

M: Very light and soft on the tongue, way too much carbonation.

D: Ehhh, this beer has potential, but overall was a let down and has some major flaws. The double crooked tree is done much, much better and would be my go to beer from dark horse. It's amazing that simply "doubling the ingredients" can make such a drastically different and better beer.

Serving type: bottle

06-11-2010 04:04:04 | More by glazeman
Photo of match1112


2.93/5  rDev -26.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

pours into my glass lookng like a water sample taken from a river. dark murky with lots of floaters. the only thing i liked about the look was the two finger head. smells like pine, cut grass and citrus. taste is kinda sweet at first than turns slightly dry and bitter. mouthfeel is pretty nice. crisp, clean and smooth with a dry finish. overall it's alright. dont know if i'll buy it again.

Serving type: bottle

05-19-2011 01:03:06 | More by match1112
Photo of BDLbrewster


2.95/5  rDev -25.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

Pours a hazy, sediment ridden sappy orange-amber color. Quite a bit of floaters and a huge fluffy white head that is fairly slow to dissipate, leaving thick lacing everywhere.

The smell is full of unripened orange and resiny pine sap. The hop profile melds wonderfully with the limp, sugary sweet, faint carmelized malty notes.

The taste, the heavy citrus in the nose does not come through much at all in the taste. The malt backbone is there, but not very pronounced. Some weak toffee and faint burning sugar. A very non aggressive hop profile adds some grapefruit pith and very mild pine flavor. This one ended up too sweet with a shocking lack of heavy IPA bitterness I expected.

Watery mouthfeel with ample carbonation. Light bodied and very little coating.

This would be a good one to introduce to the non-converted. Loved their DIPA, but maybe I was expecting too much out of this one. It is a solid brew, very non-offensive.

Serving type: bottle

07-17-2009 00:07:59 | More by BDLbrewster
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Dark Horse Crooked Tree IPA from Dark Horse Brewing Company
89 out of 100 based on 2,127 ratings.