1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

BarrelHouse Boss Cox Double Dark IPA - Barrel House Brewing Company

Not Rated.
BarrelHouse Boss Cox Double Dark IPABarrelHouse Boss Cox Double Dark IPA

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
82
good

84 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 84
Reviews: 81
rAvg: 3.61
pDev: 13.02%
Wants: 2
Gots: 0 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Barrel House Brewing Company visit their website
Ohio, United States

Style | ABV
American IPA |  8.60% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Dogbrick on 05-25-2006)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 84 | Reviews: 81 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by mobyfann:
Photo of mobyfann
mobyfann

Ohio

3.68/5  rDev +1.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Paid $4.99 for the 22oz. bomber at Jungle Jim's...

The beer pours a clear, dark chocolate base, with a large foamy head, good retention and minimal lacing. The aroma is very malty, with a bot of smoke flavor, and sweet caramel tones as well.

The taste is a reflection of the smell, but the aftertaste a whee bit heavy, like a syrupy imperial stout. It feels good in the mouth due to the creamy head, and at 8.6%, I was filling up mid-way through the bomber and wanting something new towards the end.

Final Thought: Other than a syrupy feel at the end of the delivery, this Double Dark IPA earns its mark as a solid brew in Cincinnati, OH.

Serving type: bottle

05-03-2008 23:40:46 | More by mobyfann
More User Reviews:
Photo of Tyrawlings
Tyrawlings

Ohio

3.5/5  rDev -3%

02-16-2012 02:22:48 | More by Tyrawlings
Photo of brandoman63
brandoman63

Illinois

3/5  rDev -16.9%

11-28-2011 20:23:36 | More by brandoman63
Photo of jenray
jenray

Texas

3/5  rDev -16.9%

11-20-2011 03:54:43 | More by jenray
Photo of phiberoptik
phiberoptik

Ohio

3.9/5  rDev +8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Bought directly from Barrelhouse's loading dock in 22oz bottles.

My wife and I split one of these at least once a week.

Its a dark, slightly cloudy reddish brown. The aroma is not as hoppy as I would expect but no off note or anything. The taste is very nice. I am actually enjoying a Stone IPA right now and believe it to be slightly more hoppy than this double. I dont taste the roasted malts that make it "dark", but bottom line, this beer tastes good, its a local brew, and the guys really take pride in it.

I would be happy to trade this with those outside of our area!

Serving type: bottle

04-03-2010 20:49:56 | More by phiberoptik
Photo of RedChrome
RedChrome

Connecticut

3.3/5  rDev -8.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A murk body with a chestnut color to the beer. Creamy inch and a half tan head took about four minutes to sink down to a cover. Too murky to note carbonation rising. Large lace spots.

Strong blend of hops and malt up front in the nose. The aroma is a bit on the gritty grain side. Nice hops bitterness is earthy in tone. Malt is strong on dark fruit scents.

Hops are quite subdued on the tongue, and malt takes over. A bit weak in flavor. A raisin flavor with a bitter floral hop coating. Good flavors, just weak.

Decent feel on the tongue, but flavors run away quickly. Carbonation is a bit flat.

Just above average brew. Would go good with a Shepard's pie. Flavor is just a bit weak to make an above average brew a good one. Good, but not worth hunting for specifically.

Serving type: bottle

02-01-2010 04:42:41 | More by RedChrome
Photo of fightingwords
fightingwords

Kentucky

3.43/5  rDev -5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

A--mahagony and translucent. Big fluffy Belgian-esque white head. Avg retention.

S--candied sugars, raisiny, slightly bready malts. Almost no spicy or earthy hops. The nose is very floral.

T--all sweet malts w/ hints of raisin or dried prunes. The hops are present but not balanced. The tastes is unique and delcious but misleading based on name alone.

M--lighter bodied drink given the malt profile. Clean finish, and a relatively high carbonation.

D--Just too unbalanced to make this a quaffable drink.

Definately dark, and certainly unique but not what I was expecting. The hops take a full on backseat which is a let down because of the style but honestly the beer is saved by its tasty uniquness. I say try it and stay open minded.

Serving type: bottle

11-19-2009 00:42:02 | More by fightingwords
Photo of DanielClouser
DanielClouser

Georgia

2.8/5  rDev -22.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

22 oz. bomber into Duvel tulip

A--Above average. Dark for an IPA--almost porter-like in low light but a nice reddish amber when back-lit. Head is decent, with a fluffiness absent in many American beers, but it fades fairly quickly, leaving minimal lacing.

S--What? This is an IPA? Where are the hops? I smell some caramel malts but little else. Maybe a little tart apple or something odd that seems out of place.

T--This just doesn't taste like an IPA. There's some tartness that comes from somewhere (maybe an infection, as in the intensely infected winter brew I've reviewed from this brewery). It's bitter, but there are no hop aromatics. Admittedly, the bottle may be old (no date that I can find on the bottle), but there should be more from the hops here. I think there's a tiny tad of diacetyl in here, too. There's some astringency as well. Despite all of these flaws, I say it tastes average. While awful as an attempt at an IPA, it's really better than many beers I've had.

M--No complaints on the mouthfeel, but it's nothing spectacular.

D--Really, for a beer approaching 9% ABV, the drinkability is very high. For all it's faults, the alcohol is very well hidden.

I paid only $1.29 for this bomber, but I imagine that, given its regular price of $3.99, someone must have complained about infection (that, or someone noticed that a discount may be in order when some bottles are filled to within 1/2" of the cap, while others' level never reach the neck).

Serving type: bottle

06-02-2009 22:51:06 | More by DanielClouser
Photo of bhalter8
bhalter8

Georgia

3.13/5  rDev -13.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Pours a deep brown, maybe not double dark. Thin white head recedes quickly. Aroma, well, its very sweet smelling, I get all malt here, and no hops. Especially odd considering the barrel on the label is at the far end of the hop spectrum... The lack of hops continues to the taste, I get this is a dark DIPA, but still... I maybe getting a little bitterness at the back end, but it is very faint. Mouthfeel is fine, it rests easy, probably the best attribute in this one. It's almost chalky, not really a pleasant drink. Not a drain poor, but I forced this one down. I am normally a rather positive reviewer, but this one seems like a homebrew gone bad to me.

Serving type: bottle

05-22-2009 01:11:10 | More by bhalter8
Photo of movingtrain
movingtrain

Ohio

3.1/5  rDev -14.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A: Not as dark as I thought it would be. copper in color...just a bit darker than a barlywine style ale...1/2 finger tan head...light carbonation.

S: Hoppy...sweet...caramel...citrus...what you might expect from an IPA. Floral, but not overpowering.

T: Malty...chalky...sweet up front...hops on the back of the tongue...kind of empty in the middle. Watery...doesn't taste like and 8.6% ABV beer...the hop finish is all bitter...not much sweetness or spice...kind of stings the back of the tongue.

Overall: Decent...would be good if this were the only micro available in Ohio...not as complex as I thought it would be...Drinkable, but not outstanding.

Serving type: bottle

05-21-2009 02:10:35 | More by movingtrain
Photo of MPLS
MPLS

Minnesota

3.83/5  rDev +6.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A: Certainly dark for IPA standards, amber body with a lighter frothy 2 cm head that seemed fluffy and light. Minimal lacing, as soon as the head diminished.

S: Is this an IPA? There wasn't a big citrus of hop overload to my nostrils. Smells like all caramel malts to me.

T: Oddly the first thing that popped into my mind was, this tastes like sweet butterscotch. There was not a huge IPA element to this beer, but it seemed to make the beer sweet, although not very bitter.

M: Decent mouthfeel, but doesn't possess caramel like smoothness.

D: Good job of hiding the ABV, it poked it's head as it warmed, I wouldn't be able to drink a lot of this from the butterscotch association.

Serving type: bottle

05-07-2009 20:43:06 | More by MPLS
Photo of soundbarrier
soundbarrier

Ohio

3.75/5  rDev +3.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours dark ruby with about 2 fingers of head. Some lacing after tan head diminishes.

Aroma of roasty caramel with a smidge of alcohol. Taste is caramelly, malty and citrusy with hop bitterness on the finish.

Medium-heavy body, moderate carbonation. Sweet, bitter, long aftertaste.

May be a tad unbalanced for some tastes. Pretty high ABV at nearly 9%

Serving type: bottle

03-24-2009 00:53:19 | More by soundbarrier
Photo of mrquartetman
mrquartetman

Illinois

4.72/5  rDev +30.7%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

A: Deep, dark amber, pours with a very good head

S: Big malt nose, no noticeable hop

T: Huge malt right up front, surprisingly little hop anywhere, stays robustly nutty and caramely all the way through the finish.

M: Very dense, chewy, strongly malty.

D: A most highly drinkable beer

Double Dark, I'll buy. But IPA? How is this beer an IPA? It is a very tasty beer, ignoring the style issue, so I didn't mind at all.

Serving type: bottle

03-13-2009 05:34:14 | More by mrquartetman
Photo of bamadog
bamadog

Kentucky

3.75/5  rDev +3.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Just had this on tap over at The Comet and it wasn't quite was I expecting for an IPA - double dark or otherwise. Not much of a hop profile.

Appearance: Dark brown and amber in color. Thin lacing on top and a firm ring of it around the edge of the glass. Fairly clear and didn't see a ton of carbonation in it, but it was definitely present in the mouthfeel.

Smell: A bit of a vinegar essence to the smell - strong malty scent right up front as well. A smidge of hoppy bitterness is buried somewhere in there, but as mentioned above, not as much as I would have expected or hoped for.

Taste: Intersting to say the least - very carmelly sweet, reminiscent of a Scottish Ale, but the vinegar presence is there as well and it made it slightly awkward to drink. There is also a mild fruity sweetness in there as well, but I couldn't pin down exactly what kind of fruit it is. Again, a very slight hoppy bitterness is at the end as it goes down.

Mouthfeel: Stronger carbonation than I would have expected, not as sticky as I would have wanted but not bad either. Didn't "wow" me.

Drinkability: Not something I see myself going back to enjoy. I think if I see something with "double" and "ipa" in the name, I expect something considerably more hoppy and upfront.

Serving type: on-tap

02-17-2009 17:06:30 | More by bamadog
Photo of MasterSki
MasterSki

Illinois

3.45/5  rDev -4.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Thanks to Dave Schuster for tossing this into a Darkness Day deal. Poured into one of my trusty steins. I suppose it's appropriate that this is a Dark IPA...

A - Huge tan head, tons of lacing, excellent retention - so why only a four? The color is hideous, a kind of drab murky brown, with only nice cherry wood coloration at the fringes.

S - Sweet citrus hops with a bit of lemon and pine, but also some caramel & toffee flavors. Smell is rather understated and doesn't leap out of the glass.

T - Taste is...not what I expected. There some toffee-like sweetness, some smoke character, a bitter hop aftertaste, and a boozy flavor in there for which I don't care much. It's not bad, but not great either, and definitely doesn't taste like an IPA (American or British).

M - A little chalky, thin, and over-carbonated for my liking. Minor complaints as it's otherwise smooth, creamy, and solid.

D - It's OK - I finished a bomber by myself. It tastes like an 8.6% beer. Kind of interesting as a novelty, but not something I'd seek out again.

Serving type: bottle

01-14-2009 22:26:40 | More by MasterSki
Photo of hopdog
hopdog

Pennsylvania

3.58/5  rDev -0.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

22oz bottles acquired in a couple of trades.

Poured a deeper mahogany color with an averaged sized off white head. Aromas of caramel, citrus, butterscotch candies, and some pine. The caramel and butterscotch dominate. Tastes of caramel, citrus, and a little earthy. Malts dominate with the hoppiness taking a back seat. Alcohol well hidden. Weaker body.

Notes from 8/30/07

Serving type: bottle

11-23-2008 02:39:45 | More by hopdog
Photo of DrJay
DrJay

Massachusetts

3.9/5  rDev +8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Bottle courtesy of mikesgroove. Thanks!
Clear, light brown in colour with a bit of a reddish hue. The pour produced a two finger cap of dark beige bubbles that settled very slowly. Chunky clumps of foam clung to the glass. The initial aroma was a combination of brown sugar and mild pine. As it warmed, notes of honey, cereal grains, and a bit of fruit appeared. Bitterness was solid, but not overbearing, with a bit of a kick towards the end along with some piney hops. The flavour was mostly malt, some toffee and grain, apples, maybe a hint of cherry in the finish. Just a bit of alcohol was also apparent in the finish, along with some warmth. Medium bodied with average carbonation, but nicely integrated. This is really an odd duck. There were things I really liked about it and things that I couldn't put my finger on that didn't quite sit right. Definitely an interesting beer.

Serving type: bottle

08-15-2008 00:35:06 | More by DrJay
Photo of naproxen
naproxen

District of Columbia

3.93/5  rDev +8.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

What sucks is that this is listed as an American IPA, and there is no category for, let's say, American Indian Brown Ale or Indian Dark Ale. So style wise, this loses points, but I was never one to follow the rules...

More head from this beer than your normal street walker, that is for sure. Nice thick taupe head about an inch or two thick that took more than a minute to settle. The body is a deep caramel brown with a small reddish glow. The smell is definitely reminiscent of a hoppy barleywine, dark and malty and mildly sweet. First, caramel hits the palette, replaced slowly by the dark malt and hop bite, which is thankfully not overpowering. I can't get the taste to leave my mouth after a few sips but I am not complaining, this beer is right up my alley. After letting the last few oz's warm up a bit, the alcohol really comes to the forefront and I am reminded of a very boozy tasting strong ale I had which escapes my memory (probably due to the alcohol, whoops)

8.6%, in a bomber, you are in for a sweet night.

Glad I picked this up in my travels earlier this year, I have been putting off cracking it for awhile.

Serving type: bottle

07-24-2008 02:27:54 | More by naproxen
Photo of tronester
tronester

Oklahoma

3.55/5  rDev -1.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Pours a dark amber/brown with a big, tan head. Smells of raisins, alcohol, and toasted barley, a lot like a Barleywine. Taste is very malty, sweet, with a hint of earthy hop aroma. There is a slight acidicness as well. Bitterness levels provide a nice balance. Just like the smell though, this tastes exactly like a Barleywine. Mouthfeel is super creamy, smooth carbonation. Drinkable, but with the very sweet taste it would be hard to drink more than one 22oz bottle in one night. This is a good beer, but IMO is not an American IPA, it tastes much more like an American Barleywine, or American Strong Ale

Serving type: bottle

07-19-2008 00:36:31 | More by tronester
Photo of roadhouse
roadhouse

Florida

3.58/5  rDev -0.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Poured from 22 oz. bomber bottle into a pint glass.

Appears a dark reddish brown with an off-white, almost tan, one and a half finger head. No lacing.

Aroma is quite malty overall. Notes of caramel, raisins, some chocolate, and piney hops. Good, but a bit too malty for an IPA.

Taste is similar to the aroma. Caramel, piney hops, figs, and dark chocolate on the finish. Again, not quite enough hops.

Mouthfeel is good. Medium body, perhaps a bit too much carbonation for my liking.

Overall I found this to be pretty tasty, but it seemed to lack the characteristics of an IPA that I really enjoy. It was more malty than hoppy I think. It did taste good though, just not so much as an IPA.

Serving type: bottle

07-15-2008 03:36:08 | More by roadhouse
Photo of MuenchenerKindl
MuenchenerKindl

Germany

4.83/5  rDev +33.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 5

Poured from a 22 oz bottle to a pint glass the liquid is dark capper brown with good carbonation, The head is very nice light caramel 3 fingers and it leaves nice lace.

The smell is good, the hops are strong and good smelling, plenty of pine and earthy notes all around however the malt seems to be big as well with some nice lightly roasted notes.

The taste is very good, very hoppy front to back pine and earthy notes are very good. The malt is the real deal and really backs this brew up with all kinds of nice complexity, toasty caramel and a few chocolate notes really stand out.

The mouthfeel is good nice close to full body and great carbonation.

The drinkability is excellent this brew really struck me as one I would love to get more of. Prosit und Zum Wohl, MK

Serving type: bottle

07-07-2008 05:24:19 | More by MuenchenerKindl
Photo of corey0212
corey0212

Connecticut

3.75/5  rDev +3.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

One of the seemingly endless extras received in a trade from dschuster03!!

What the heck is a Double Dark IPA?!! Lets find out!

Pours kind of a murky mahogany color, but takes on a beautiful ruby tone when held up to the light, tan head fades pretty fast, and leaves decent lacing on the glass. Aroma seems timid, some sweet caramel malt, and a touch of citrusy hops, but it's all pretty subdued, considering the flavor that follows. Malty madness! Wow, there's just a lot of sticky sweet malt taste, doughy, somewhat boozy, but it works. I'm getting a ton of raisin taste as well, not something I expect in an IPA. Some spicy piney hop taste as well, but definitely a malt-heavy IPA, tastes more like an Imperial IPA. It's really creamy and chewy, nice active carbonation. I like it...really something different, and it's always cool to try something from a brewery you've never even heard of. Thanks for the opportunity, Dave!!

Serving type: bottle

06-30-2008 23:23:05 | More by corey0212
Photo of dsa7783
dsa7783

New Jersey

3.48/5  rDev -3.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Single, 22 oz bomber copped from New Beer Distributors on Chrystie Street in Manhattan...
First-ever beer from this Ohio brewery...
In terms of appearance, this brew poured very dark for an IPA... Color was a ruddy, ruby-red with a copper tint that left no head and very minimal lacing...
Aroma was hoppy with hints of alcohol that pervaded from the hefty 8.6% ABV...
Taste was dominated by slight hops, caramel, vanilla and balanced out by a hint of malts... The finish was very sweet and not at all bitter, leading me to question the assertiveness of the hops in this brew...
Medium-bodied, subdued hop flavor with slight alcohol on the tongue...
Loose, slightly watered-down mouthfeel...
Not the best depiction of the style...

Serving type: bottle

06-30-2008 11:34:07 | More by dsa7783
Photo of stephens101
stephens101

Oklahoma

3.43/5  rDev -5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours a burnt copper with a resultant two-finger tan head that reaches above the rim of the tulip and starts to recede slowly before it overflows, leaving a streaky and pocked lacing. Smell is quite promising with sharp citrusy hops up front followed by a very subtle matly and bready sweetness. The taste is not as robust as the smell, and doesn't quite live up to the big hop kick we have grown to expect from the so called "hop-bombs". That being said, it is tasty enough to make it somewhat interesting, with some subdued citrusy hops being present that are balanced by some sweet malts and caramel with a sour essence after it sits awhile. Some alcohol heat in the end leaves you satisfied with this medium-bodied and tasty, yet somewhat underperforming brew.

Serving type: bottle

06-28-2008 21:36:41 | More by stephens101
Photo of blitheringidiot
blitheringidiot

Pennsylvania

3.75/5  rDev +3.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

Pours a mighty rouge red russet pour with a craggy khaki dimpled head cap settling to a respectable wafer thick coating.

Nose is caramel and floral with scotch-ish notes. Candy notes as well. Plenty of toasted malt.

First swigs: Candy cherry lolipop malts meet a mingle of creamy vanilla and some cake like aspects.

Feel is soft and cushy. Easy going with a slightly cloying finish.

Last swigs: Delicate cherry and floral.

Beer is good. Happy beering.

Serving type: bottle

06-27-2008 01:40:42 | More by blitheringidiot
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
BarrelHouse Boss Cox Double Dark IPA from Barrel House Brewing Company
82 out of 100 based on 84 ratings.