Boag's Draught - J. Boag & Son Brewing

Not Rated.
Boag's DraughtBoag's Draught

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
67
poor

36 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 36
Reviews: 20
rAvg: 2.67
pDev: 24.34%
Wants: 0
Gots: 1 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
J. Boag & Son Brewing visit their website
Australia

Style | ABV
American Adjunct Lager |  4.60% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: brewdlyhooked13 on 10-30-2004)
View: Beers (13) | Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | Likes | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 36 | Reviews: 20 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by doktorhops:
Photo of doktorhops
2.35/5  rDev -12%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

Today we journey to a far distant island where trees grow like titans on the banks of cool mountain streams, where unspoiled nature combines with urban sprawl and people marry their cousins (apparently): Tasmania! In Tasvegas (which is what I will call this place from now on) there are two main breweries; Cascade and Boag's. One is better than the other but I won't tell you which, you'll just have to read and cross-reference my reviews and find out for yourself.

Poured from a 375ml stubbie into a 500ml Stein glass.

A: Clear amber body with a 0.5cm white head. Interesting fact: in Tasvegas all the water is amber coloured so there is no need for brewers to colour their beers.

S: Sweet malts define this beer, with a hint of grassy hops.

T: Yeah I'm not a big fan of Aussie lagers as you may have guessed and this one isn't much of a departure from the others; the sweet malt grain is the main actor in this theatre of brews, with supporting actors hint of honey and slight bitter hop twang. If anything this beer tastes more like a European lager than the other macro Aussie lagers (which is a good thing).

M: Big and belchy carbonation, as typical for an Aussie lager; it's as if we love feeling bloated when we drink down here.

D: It's OK. Not winning any awards for "spectacular Aussie lager" but certainly not getting a gong... I would place it mid-field if anything and we'll see how well my stubbie of Cooper's goes as that's next on the menu. Better than VB and XXXX for sure.

Food match: For an Aussie lager I recommend BBQ fare; sausages, hamburgers, steak or for something really Australian: Kangaroo steak, with a side of the usual BBQ suspects (potato salad, coleslaw, beetroot and corn).

More User Reviews:
Photo of schoon
3/5  rDev +12.4%

Photo of Vanz
1.75/5  rDev -34.5%

Photo of Andrewziggy
2.94/5  rDev +10.1%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

light, enough bubbles to please, sour apple and soggy cereal linger

Photo of Kulrak
2.25/5  rDev -15.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Pours a darkish gold color with crumbly white head that takes a while to fade away and laces the glass. Smells mostly of yeast, and a little of aluminum (yeah yeah, from the can.. but I call 'em as I smell 'em). There's also a very faint hint of flowers. The taste is very coppery but without a lot of hop flavor. There's a bit of sour bitterness though. Mouthfeel is very heavy, and not very fizzy or harsh. Just real heavy. Overall, it's not my favorite aussie macro, but it's nowhere near my least favorite, either.

Photo of Gametym39
4.25/5  rDev +59.2%

Photo of norwichboy
2.13/5  rDev -20.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

I compared Boags Draught with Cascade Draught during a moment of poor beer options on holiday in Tasmania.

On appearance alone, the two look absolutely identical, light yellow hue with a slight head. I can hardly smell anything with the Boags, a little more (hops) with the Cascade but still minimal. As others have said there is the usual Aussie macro beer taste with both of them, although Boags has a heavily carbonated mouthfeel which Cascade seems to manage better. There's very little in the way of the finish with Boags, but a bit more with Cascade. Overall, Cascade clinches it with a better mouthfeel and finish.

Photo of foles
3.13/5  rDev +17.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Not as bad as you would think. For its class - boring draught aussie macro, its better than the rest. A slight flavour and freshness comes through where it wouldnt with the others.

I'm convinced the pride of ringwood hops are very poor for flavouring.

Photo of pin
1/5  rDev -62.5%

Photo of joecast
2.15/5  rDev -19.5%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

pours a crystal clear deep gold color. forms a smallish white head of large sized bubbles. after a minute or so, the head disappears leaving a sticky looking lace on the glass. and not that good type lace either. the kind that makes you wonder what formed it in the first place.

very slight buttery aroma. not enough to be ofensive but its all i could pick up.

taste is, well...there is some bitterness that comes through, but not much malt sweetness to go with it. maybe a bit of diacetyl, but not heaps or anything. pretty bland outside of that.

mouthfeel aint so bad. kind of tingly going down, and leaves a trace of butteriness. drinkability is pretty obvious after all that.

Photo of WHROO
2.55/5  rDev -4.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Poured from a stubbie...

This followed a Tasman Bitter & then Boag's St George, & this was definately the least interesting. Appearance was the best, golden froffy, good lacing, gentle carbonation. Aroma was average, little sulphury, little citrus & maybe apple. Taste was soooo average, just so bland...would've even gone a bitter kick to give it something. Got only a honey hint to give it some sweetness.
Nothing to make me go yuck, but nothing to make me go yum either!!!

Photo of Bobhoya
2.5/5  rDev -6.4%

Photo of soju6
3.35/5  rDev +25.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A: Served a golden color with a full head and nice lacing.

S: Clean aroma of fresh grain and a bit of fruit sweetness. Nothing fancy.

T: Taste has a mild sweetness up front with fresh grain and bit of bitterness and a clean finish.

F: Fairly light body. Nice crispness, smooth and quite refreshing.

O: Goes down easy, not bad at all. A nice casual beer that seems good for session drinking as it does not fill you up.

Photo of Squancho
1.25/5  rDev -53.2%

Photo of adityashekhar
2.5/5  rDev -6.4%

Photo of magpieken
2.75/5  rDev +3%

Photo of djbx
2.5/5  rDev -6.4%

Photo of starlight37
2/5  rDev -25.1%

Photo of vancurly
2.98/5  rDev +11.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Tastes at new Belrose Hotel in Sydney.
This is a typical Aussie macro; it sits somewhere between the ordinariness of VB and the next tier e.g. Boags Premium, Cascade Premium etc.
Certainly a session lager, with subtle sweet malt notes and medium bitterness.
Will stick to Coopers Pale next time in that pub.

Photo of BeerNutta
2.45/5  rDev -8.2%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Inoffensive beer. Standard canon fodder. Beer you drink when ya mates are over and you dont want to fork out a fortune. Pours light amber with minor head. Taste is your standard cannon fodder taste, of chemicals followed by a hop bitter finish. Not bad. Just not great.

Cheap beer. Can't knock it too much. If I had a choice between VB, Boag's Draft, and Carlton Cold. Ill get the Draft.

Photo of wordemupg
2.38/5  rDev -10.9%
look: 4.25 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.25

Pint at some random bar, 19/3/14 from notes

A clear golden liquid with plenty of bubbles, a finger of foam falls in no time but manages to leaves 4 thick distinct rings and lots of random patches deep down the glass

S cabbage, sweet and sour malt, some honey, and stinky feet, smells like a wet shoe

T less cabbage and wet shoe but adjuncts and rotting hay are somehow an improvement

M feels the part, light, enough bubbles to please, sour apple and soggy cereal linger

O not sure what I was expecting but I got what I deserved ordering cheap pints at a pokie bar

I liked this beer when I lived in Australia 8 years ago, I think my palate and taste for beer might've changed since then

Photo of rowey77
3.88/5  rDev +45.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Tried this beer at the boags brewery in tasmania on tap and thought it was alot better than drinking carlton draught or
victoria bitter..

Was smooth and resfreshing and could definately drink alot of them with feeling bloated..

Overall: Good Draught (Recommend)

Photo of lacqueredmouse
1.8/5  rDev -32.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

Pours a clear but bright golden yellow colour, with an initial firm and frothy head of white. Lacing is good, leaving some honeycombing and worm-trail patterns down the glass. Carbonation is vigorous but restrained. Overall, it's a pretty decent looking lager, truth be told.

Minimal character on the nose, just a thin light grain note, and perhaps something slightly acidic - not much different from carbonated water. Very weak indeed.

Taste is cloying with a vague honey sweetness on the front that degrades to a musty grain flavour on the finish, like bread that has been soaking in a puddle. Thin for all of this, with little depth or resonance; neither does it have a crispness or a level of refreshment that would in general aid a pale lager.

Very unimpressive. I try to review beers without any presentiment, but I know I really shouldn't be shocked that this is terrible. And yet every time I take a sip of a bland Aussie macro lager, I'm always surprised at just how bad they can be.

Photo of xylophonica
3.45/5  rDev +29.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A - Pale golden colour with a good finger of head. Some decent lacing appearing as the head subsides.

S - Rich honey malt with a touch of wheat.

T - Quite vibrant at first but with a lower than expected level of carbonation so the taste doesn't quite hit as hard. Smooth and malty with a touch of spice and some honey.

M - Very smooth but with little carbonation and a slightly more harsh aftertaste.

O - Having had the previously from a bottle the lack of carbonation is quite notable. Overall though it's a decent beer to throw back on a summer's day without being overly complex.

Photo of hopnerd
3/5  rDev +12.4%

« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Boag's Draught from J. Boag & Son Brewing
67 out of 100 based on 36 ratings.