Saison 1900 - Brasserie Lefèbvre SA
Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
Ratings: 63 | Reviews: 53 | Display Reviews Only:
2.45/5 rDev -31.9%
11.2 oz thanx to phil from canada
gold and super carbonated with active bubble life from the bottom-center up. majestic 1-finger foam dissipating slowly, leaving a thin lace. smell is an even mix of butterscotch and lemon. more tripel than saison, and not a good tripel smell either. tastes light with the lemon shining thru like lemon merengue pie, perhaps or maybe pledge wood cleaner. wheaty lightness to the body. crisp but flavorless in its finish. this came as a bonus bottle in a trade, and for that i am thankful. would not seek this beer out, plainly average and sure to offend some folks.
06-14-2005 22:23:47 | More by goodbyeohio
2.58/5 rDev -28.3%
Sampled the 75cl bottle...
Appearance: pale golden color, very slight haze, a narrow layer of bubbly off-white foam w/ OK head retention, vapid looking
Aroma: wheat, malt, cotton candy, green pears, almonds
Flavor: toasty malt flavor, peanut shells, slight tang, passion-fruit in the background, mild hop flavoer and a nonexistant bitterness, not much here, malty aftertaste
Mouthfeel: medium body, tepid carbonation
Overall Impression: Pretty disappointing even considering that I had a pretty low expectation for it. A bit watery and one-dimensional. Not fit for inclusion in one of my favorite Belgian beer styles. Even after swirling up the dregs and dumping it in, the beer is still quite boring.
02-10-2004 18:29:55 | More by GreenCard
2.66/5 rDev -26.1%
Olive colored 11.2oz bottle. Freshness dated 09:12
A: Pours a hazy dark yellow with 1 and 1/2-inch white head. Floaties of yeast and clumpy lace.
N: Rancid sour grain and yeast. I know, this "expired", but come on, only 8 months passed the date. Really???
T: Yeasty and grainy and fruity (green apples).
M: Light body and medium carbonation. Grainy and yeasty finish.
O: Do not drink if past the bottle date - NOT PLEASANT! Drain poured this one.
05-31-2013 02:14:29 | More by wethorseblanket
2.68/5 rDev -25.6%
On the verge of expiration. Bought from Bier tempel in Brussels and it was less than two weeks from expiration when I bought it. :( 9/4/11
A: Poured into my Chimay chalice, healthy 3 finger head, even seafoam, murky tan/olive. A little rising carbonation visible at the base of the glass.
S: Sweet and sour mix but less sweet and heavier. Certainly has a whisky sour quality to it plus a sweeter ice creamy yeast on top. Lemon,
T: Relatively bland. Difficult to describe. Very mild sourness and bitterness, yeast is very apparent. Well blended and it has a flavor, but it's quite neutral, earthy but unexciting. Old apple, honey. But not bad or gross.
M: Slight astringency, little carbonation.
O: Not bad but quite unexciting.
08-29-2011 23:22:25 | More by sfprint
2.9/5 rDev -19.4%
Poured into a goblet from 330ml bottle producing a voluminous bright white very thick head which had good stability and retention. The nose had a fruitiness to the hop character that was of raspberries becoming more malty with warmth. The color was pale amber with more of a orange-clover honey hue to it that gave it a slight turbidity; also rather carbonated almost effervescent.
The beer started out with a complex bright but simultaneously tart taste with just a touch of sweetness, best described as sour cherries. This melds to a spicy clove sourness with fruity hints to it- granny smith apples with cloves and cinnamon. Overall sour and bitter tastes dominate but enough spice and fruitiness is present to complement. A sparkling beginning to mouthfeel fades to dry-powdery sensation on tongue. The general taste, as well as mouthfeel, somewhat remind me of Lambic.
My first taste of this style and while I appreciate it I am not a big fan. Under the right conditions I think I could enjoy this beer more, (reviewed in Brazil on warm summer evening) like a chilly autumn day. I did enjoy the complexity but this beer, and I guess the style as a whole, has low drinkability for me. Defiantly a beer to try, which I will do again for its rarity of style, however not a favorite in my book. I was very surprised to see cane sugar listed as an ingredient on the label. Interested to know why this is employed and what it brings to the overall character of the beer.
11-20-2006 18:29:50 | More by Beeryce
2.93/5 rDev -18.6%
A-light cloudy gold with a huge white head.
S-Light honeyed malt with an almost skunky hopiness. Slight cardboard. Not too much saison type yeast aromas.
T-Again, light sweet crackery malt. More cardboard (age). Very low bitterness, could use more. Very low hop flavor. Again, very little Saisonness.
M-fairly dry. Medium high carbonation.
D-This beer (i think) must have had a rough time getting here. A stale bottle. For a saison, it could use a bit more hopping (flavor and bitterness) and more saison yeast character.
06-30-2010 23:45:46 | More by organicbrewer
2.95/5 rDev -18.1%
Appearance: Somewhat like a continental Pilsener, although more orange-hued and hazy. A frothy white head forms some lacework on the glass and is refreshed by a consistent stream of fine bubbles. The lace is persistent and attractive; it provides a nice contrast to the color of the ale.
Smell: The aroma is not very pronounced, and while some hop character is perceptible, something smells of cardboard. The brew smells yeasty, although some care was taken to leave most of the sediment in the bottle. Something about the odor is unpleasant, but I can't put my finger on what exactly it is.
Mouthfeel: The beer would have a softer texture, if not for the high level of carbonation. It has a bit more body than I initially expected.
Taste: Sweet. A bit skunky. Bitter in the finish, with a lingering aftertaste of coriander and some citrus. Not at all dry.
Drinkability: It may just be this bottle, but I feel like one of these would be enough. The sweetness would be cloying after a while, and the aftertaste seems to last longer and longer as you finish the glass. There's something vaguely honey-like about it, and not in a good way. The skunky hop bitterness isn't balancing out that taste well either.
I was hoping for more with this one, I really was. While I'm grateful I ran across another saison to try, I can't recommend this except to folks who want to try every example of the style humanly possible. It may have just been a bad bottle, but if this is how saisons were brewed in 1900, I'm glad we're living in a new age.
07-07-2009 02:43:58 | More by kylesobrien
3.15/5 rDev -12.5%
11.2oz brown bottle with a freshness date.
Hazed over dull golden color, bubbly lacing barely stays around. Smells of apple skin, taffy, lemon zest, light honey and kiwi. Smooth moderate sized body. A little spicy, a little fruity and a little tart. Mild biscuit malt flavor within, light on the hops. Dusty yeast in the dry finish.
Decent, there are others that are not so much of a mess ... or perhaps better put together. Glad I tried it though.
08-02-2011 01:31:06 | More by Jason
3.15/5 rDev -12.5%
The beverage is clear light amber, has a small off-white head that leaves little lacing.
The smell is sour and earthy, stable (hay, dust, leather, and horse).
The taste starts with a small honey sweetness, some dried peas and stable - the lower regions ....
Medium high carbonation, small intense bubbles, a slightly dry finish.
An average saison, not bad but not extraordinary.
06-05-2011 20:50:00 | More by rarbring
3.18/5 rDev -11.7%
Had a bottle in The Dovetail, Clerkenwell. Strawish body under a small white cap with good retention. Nose has some noble hop spice, pretty simple with pale malt presence, wouldn't have guessed this was a saison. Palate is a bit sweet, not very distinctive. Too friendly for me.
08-07-2008 20:14:28 | More by Antilochus
3.2/5 rDev -11.1%
Fairly mediocre for a saison. The beer pours a light yellow-orange color, fairly clear, with a big puffy white head. Actually, the beer is a pretty good gusher even cold. The aroma is a bit lacking in intensity, particularly. What's there is a fairly simple sweet malt, lightly phenolic character. The flavor is similar. There's just not a lot to love. It's not awful, just mild and not terribly interesting. It's fairly refreshing, really, with a light, sourish lemony hop note. The flaws are more of a comparison to the style than to any particular problem with the beer. Mouthfeel is a tad thin, again, for the style. Overall, I just want more out of a relatively expensive saison.
09-17-2009 01:59:26 | More by popery
3.33/5 rDev -7.5%
Pours a dark golden color, yet it is crystal clear. There is a ton of carbonation that creates a huge white head with a very nice amount of retention that laces all the way down.
Smell is failry non-existent. There is a bit of a sweet malt smell and a good hop bite also.
Taste is slightly off from what I expected. There is a bit of a sweet caramel malt taste and a sharp hop jump at the end of the sip. Neither is very prominent, but they are there.
Mouthfeel is the best part of this beer. There is a very sharp carbonation bite that one would think is too harsh, but it smooths out nicely pretty quick.
Drinkability is good for a 6.7% beer. There isn't a ton of taste, so that makes this beer go down well. Nothing special at all about this beer. Don't go out of your way to get it, but drink it if handed to you.
03-12-2009 02:26:39 | More by BDIMike
United Kingdom (England)
3.5/5 rDev -2.8%
Nice one. Yeasty, peppery, orangey, lemony, spicy, marzipan. Nice lightly creamy mouhtfeel. Dry, with a mild bitterness on the finish, tasty saison. To add to the fact that it tasted good, the mouthfeel was sharp, yet soft and at the same time, went went my steak and frites.
10-03-2003 14:13:07 | More by rastaman
3.5/5 rDev -2.8%
Bottle: Poured an yellow color beer with a huge head with super great retention (head even stick to side of glass after each sip). Aroma is malty with some sweetness and some yeast in the background. Taste is very refreshing with some good malt surrounded by a light spice mix and some yeast in the finish. Would probably have enjoyed it even more if there had been more spices in the mix it king of ends up being a light saison. Still very refreshing and enjoyable though.
12-22-2004 19:57:24 | More by Phyl21ca
3.5/5 rDev -2.8%
Pours a murky light orange with a 1 inch puffy white head that settles to a film on top of the beer. Foamy rings of lace line the glass on the drink down. There is a lot of sediment floating around in the glass after the pour. Smell is of grains and some white grape juice aromas. Taste is of grains, honey, and some grape-like fruity flavors. This beer has an aggressive level of carbonation with a very prickly mouthfeel. Overall, this is a pretty good saison but it's much fruitier than other saisons I have had in the past.
03-16-2012 02:50:39 | More by UCLABrewN84
3.53/5 rDev -1.9%
This brew was a part of the NEPA Beer Club's latest Stockertown AKA Shangy's Split...
Appearance: Poured from the bottle into my DFH glass, the beer is a cloudy, dull amber color with a huge, overflowing amount of bone white bubbly head. Retention is good, and the lacing is most plentiful. There's also bits and pieces of sediment floating around.
Smell: Light, sweet, and mildly fruity. It really doesn't have much in the way of funk, which is a quality I've come to look forward to in my saisons. Still, it's not bad.
Taste: Similar to the nose, the taste is light and sweet with some mild fruit thrown in, mainly an apple sort of taste. Again, not much in the way of funk which is a little disappointing, but otherwise a decent brew.
Mouthfeel: Light, plenty of carbonation, crisp.
Drinkability: Overall this is not a bad drinking beer. The flavors are mild, and I think this beer is lacking some of the big flavors that make a saison what it is. I'm glad I had the chance to try this beer, but I'll be honest...I don't foresee myself running to the store to pick up more.
01-22-2011 21:30:22 | More by krisandajt
3.55/5 rDev -1.4%
11.2 ounce bottle poured into a tulip glass. Pours a hazy dark gold color with a big rocky off-white head. Carbonation is fed by the etching at the bottom of the glass, helping lead to a ton of retention and lacing. Aroma is lightly citric with some yeast and bubblegum. Flavor is sweet, plenty of vanilla and banana esters. Nice honey note on the finish but this is a little flabby and sweet. Finish is dry but in an astringent way. Pretty enjoyable but not exactly a thirst-quencher.
06-22-2010 08:32:46 | More by illidurit
District of Columbia
3.55/5 rDev -1.4%
(From notes - share from a kind RB)
A - Hazy straw yellow color with a pretty thin white head that dissipated quickly
S - Lemony citrus; touch sweet verging on candy sugar
T - Lightly yeasty; touch of spice - cinnamon and vanilla?
M - Thinner to medium body with very fizzy carbonation
D - Not bad, but not great. Wasn't digging the heightened spiciness
Overall, not a bad brew, but not what I would look for in the style and not overwhelmingly tasty.
08-26-2009 02:15:14 | More by Nickls
3.55/5 rDev -1.4%
Pouted into a Tulip.
A: Hazy peach, with a fair amount of carbonation. A dense lemon tinged head has nice retention and leaves a small amount of lace.
S: Without the yeasty funkiness, this would be a fairly nondescript beer. Straw like malt aromas are to be had, plus just a touch of pepper and black tea.
T: The taste follows suit. A sourdough bread flavor dominates. It's doughy, and has a sour and tart lemon bite. That's about it. Bitterness is quite mild, and the malts add a cracker flavor. Finishes with just a bit of a pear fruit flavor that becomes more noticeable as the beer warms.
M: The grainy body has a nice level of tingling carbonation.
D: I honestly wasn't really taken away by this. The sourdough flavors are the only that really kept this interesting. The others are a little too mild for my tastes. Pretty much a mid-pack Saison.
01-12-2010 01:17:46 | More by Rayek
Saison 1900 from Brasserie Lefèbvre SA
82 out of 100 based on 63 ratings.