1. American Craft Beer Fest returns to Boston on May 29 & 30, featuring 640+ beers from 140+ brewers. Tickets are on sale now.

Imperial - Cerveceria Costa Rica

Not Rated.
ImperialImperial

Educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
65
poor

442 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 442
Reviews: 176
rAvg: 2.75
pDev: 22.55%
Wants: 4
Gots: 29 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Cerveceria Costa Rica visit their website
Costa Rica

Style | ABV
American Adjunct Lager |  4.60% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 05-31-2002

No notes at this time.
View: Beers (10) | Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | Likes | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 442 | Reviews: 176 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of PositivePest
2/5  rDev -27.3%

Photo of AnalogErik
2/5  rDev -27.3%

Photo of CoryR
2/5  rDev -27.3%

Photo of Notninja
2/5  rDev -27.3%

Photo of Bubbawilly88
2/5  rDev -27.3%

Photo of TX-Badger
2/5  rDev -27.3%

Photo of Budinetz
2/5  rDev -27.3%

Photo of CoolEthan
2/5  rDev -27.3%

Photo of Samp01
2.03/5  rDev -26.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

12oz bottle pours a pale yellow with a thin short lived white head. Aroma and Taste of grassy grain, some fruity notes. Palate is a light body with low carbonation. Finish is grassy, grainy with a somewhat funky aftertaste. Not much else. Overall aroma and taste quickcly fades and is quite bland, would not drink this again.

Photo of Knapp85
2.03/5  rDev -26.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Pours out clear but the head vanishes quickly, smells bland. Nothing exciting.

Photo of Phyl21ca
2.05/5  rDev -25.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Bottle (this is going to be the first of a long list of rating for some pale lager form Costa Rica). Poured a bright golden color lager with a small bubbly head with minimal retention. Aroma of of lightly sweet adjunct and not much else is bland. Taste is also quite bland with balanced sweetness originating form adjunct. Body is medium for style with OK carbonation. Not gross in any way and I guess it is just what it intended to be.

Photo of DoubleJ
2.08/5  rDev -24.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

It's a warm night, which makes it an ideal time to drink a lager born in the tropics. On to the beer:

Pale straw yellow in appearance with a clean body and display of bubbles. The head forms high, and very bubbly, which then drops to a thin lace. The aroma seems a bit processed. Processed hop aroma with sweet cereal grains. Tastewise, it is...meh. It's unbalanced. Soaked cheap grain sweetness is the dominant flavor in this beer. I can feel the alcohol in this one, which hints gum with most of the flavor sucked out of it. Faded cereals linger into the aftertaste with its sweetness.

On a warm night like tonight, this isn't going to cut it. But in Costa Rica, that's every night. There must be better national brands from there to enjoy, right?

Photo of teamizm
2.08/5  rDev -24.4%
look: 1.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

It's your typical Latin American beer - light, watery, lacks flavor. Although, I have to admit, after trekking through the forests of Manual Antonio for 5 hours, the Imperial was quite refreshing (much more so, then say, an Abyss). I do like it better than Corona though, so I give it that.

Photo of TheLongBeachBum
2.1/5  rDev -23.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Presentation: A rather eye catching yellow, black and red label attracts me to a very standard looking 12 ounce brown glass bottle. Sealed with a yellow crown cap which simply has the word ‘Imperial” below a black silhouette of a spread eagle. The neck label sports a similar presence. The main label enlarges all the designs previously described, and adds some red to the black & yellow colors….Hmmm….in fact I have to say that my initial thoughts were that this was German. But it’s Costa Rican!? OK. Even so, the main label has incredibly strong Teutonic parallels, sort of a mix between the German Eagle Cross WWI Black & White Flag Banner of the Kaiser Army & Navy and also that of the current German Military. It’s an eerie looking Eagle I have to say, are there many ex-Nazis in Costa Rica I wonder!??! Listed at 4.6% Alc./Vol., the neck has an inkjet printed date of ‘30JUN06-09 FRDM 14F’….guess its fresh then!!? LOL. Imported by the Fourth Reich.

Appearance: Hmmmm……..which of the generic descriptions should I use for this Review….pale yellow, sun faded straw, diluted gold…..pale stale piss……yeah I’ll go with the latter. Nice bleached white head rises from the body on the pour. Fizzle stick head, springs big, but pops small, and sinks faster than a Californian Surfer with both his legs munched off by a Great White….come on I’m trying to describe things in a new light, its hard after a 1000 or so reviews.

Nose: Nothing to smell here, move along….or you’ll be shot.

Taste: I think if I dig a tunnel North I could escape the sour faded hops, the feint sweet malts and lingering sweet corn. Stinky lingering sweaty Fish n’ Chips done Greek style in clean vegetable oil, Bloody Hell….the fucking worst way, do ‘em in Lard or fuck off home Zorba….geez this one is not good…..

Mouthfeel: Fizzy UK brewed pseudo-lager…..Carling Black Label, Fosters, XXXX, dare I go on….Holsten…..follow the bear…..not.

Drinkability: Crisp, clean, unfettered and a quarter-decent enough offering but ultimately watery-yawny-borey. If I ever go to visit Costa Rica, surely by accident, but hey just in case I do, then I guess I will enjoy a few of these, most probably because I have no other choice.

Overall: Imperial!!?! Black, Yellow and Red colored label. A Spread Eagle main design that would do the Kaiser proud. I’m trying not to think of World domination here, really I am….but I keep looking at the bottle….I cannot help but think that is a rather nasty-Nazi Costa-Rican Bud, oh I’m sorry I mean it’s rather generic and mass processed….for Costa Rica that is…..hey, Anheuser Busch….well the name does have a Germanic ring to it though…..the red, yellow & black label….the Teutonic Eagle……it’s all too much……it must be the rerun of the Odessa File Movie this afternoon; Nicht Gut…oh I mean, erm not bad….but not good either…did all the Germans go to Milwaukee I wonder!??! Scary….

Probably OK for those Ex-SS members avoiding Simon Wiesenthal but not recommended for the rest of us. Says “La Cerveza Pura Vida” on the neck label…..oh yeah; Vhell veee haz Vayyz uv mayhking u dtrinken……but not this crap I hope……

Photo of TheManiacalOne
2.13/5  rDev -22.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Poured from a 12oz bottle into a US tumbler pint glass.

A: The beer is a light yellow color, with a thin white head that fades quickly and leaves a thick lace on the glass.

S: The aroma is very faint but contains adjuncts, light malts and a even less hops than most beers in the style.

T: The taste starts out with mildly bready flavors of grain and adjuncts. Then some sweetness comes in from a light malt character. The hops presence is weak even for the style and as a result there isn't much balance. The after-taste slightly bready.

M: Crisp but not very smooth, light body, medium-to-high carbonation, finish is clean.

D: Not very flavorful, goes down easily, not too filling, mild kick, even considering the style it's a bit subpar, I've certainly had much worse but this still isn't a beer I would choose unless my choices were severely limited.

Photo of DV8HARD
2.15/5  rDev -21.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

I live in Costa Rica and this is, by far, the beer people drink most. I usually drink Pilsen, which comes from the same brewery. This beer reminds me of Bud light, which doesn't say much.

I poured it in a Pilsener glass which gave a two finger head that quickly dissipated. It has very light golden color. The most prominent taste is that of malt. It is a very thin beer. After, one or two bottles, it starts to taste like water.

I don't recommend this beer.

Photo of Finite
2.15/5  rDev -21.8%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 1.5

A - Light Golden colour, little head retention, light lacing. Very flat looking with little to no carbonation to speak of visible.

S - Cooked vegetable, light;y skunked with a sweet malt aroma that is common among An America Adjunct Larger. Some floral hop aroma detectable, nothing big but for an America Adjunct Larger I was surprised.

T - Corn adjunct and unfermented wort is prevalent. Some light bitterness. Not to bad, pretty standard and expected flavours.

M- Thin and light, fine carbonation, pretty standard again but the softness of the mouthfeel really hampers its drink-ability.

This brew grew on me quite a bit, this is not a style that I particularly enjoy but this is a pretty standard example, doesn't really put a foot wrong, not that its going to set the world on fire either.

Photo of DenverHopHead
2.19/5  rDev -20.4%

Photo of JEdmund
2.2/5  rDev -20%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

Appearance
Striking label! Extremely light hay yellow; lots of carbonation going on; inch tall, white, fizzy head that reduces quickly but leaves some lacing

Smell
Very little to detect, but it has the familiar grain and slight malt so commonly found in these Central American beers.

Taste & Mouth Feel
Like the aroma, there's very little here to dissect. It's got just a tad bit more flavor than water. Typical C.A. macro lager taste, but very subdued. Nothing skunky or sulphury to offend, thankfully.

Overall
Super, super boring and bland, but it's not offensive, and therefore could be drank without problem if you're stuck with it.

Photo of AltBock
2.2/5  rDev -20%
look: 1.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

12 oz. bottle with a bright yellow and red label that has a serious looking black eagle brewery crest in the middle. They really like this eagle because it's everywhere on the bottle, even the cap. On the bottle neck is an inked best before date, I guess. My bottle read 30Set-09. I'm guessing they meant Sep instead of Set.

When poured into a Lagunitas pint glass, "Imperial" was a clear as crystal straw yellow color. The head of foam wasn't anything to write home about. I failed to see how tall the head of foam was because it quickly faded into oblivion in a blink of an eye. Maybe there wasn't any head of foam because there was absolutely no trace of it. There wasn't any rings or even a tiny spot of lace around the glass. Nothing!

The aroma was all about the malted aromas. No hops of fruits, just malted aromas. The aroma was filled to the top with the scent of regular malts and plenty of malted corn and rice.

The taste was also all about the malted tastes until my taste buds reached the tail end of the taste. The taste was crispy and carbonated with malts, corn, and rice. After the malts had passes, in comes a brief and I mean brief floral hop bitterness. As you can tell, it was the hops that saved this taste. The hops couldn't perform miracles, but it did make the taste a little better.

This was a light bodied beer with loads of carbonation and a quick malted aftertaste filled with malts, corn, and rice. Where are the hops when I need them?

Let me just state that I have had worse beers that this one. It's just another standard macro Lager that you can buy for about $1.25 a bottle.

Photo of Rackerman
2.2/5  rDev -20%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 1.5

While drinking Imperial while on vacation may suffice for a week (at most), having to consume the flagship beer of Costa Rica's monopolistic beer industry on a regular basis makes me wish I liked hard booze more.

It looks good, it's certainly clear, and when it's 98 degrees out and it's chilled bottle is in your hand everything seems right... but that's as good as it gets.

The smell is the beginning of the end for me. The beer smells skunky. By my best estimation I've consumed between 700 and 1,000 of these stink-bombs and they all smell bad.

The taste is watery. I think of a very watery Miller Lite with less carbonation and more alcohol. Imperial smacks of mass production and general indifference with its flat start and finish.

I choke down Imperial simply because there are few alternatives.

Photo of Beerandraiderfan
2.23/5  rDev -18.9%
look: 1.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Yellow macro lager, very thin white head, less than 1/4" I'd say, nothing to look at by any means. Aroma was cooked corny, a little bit of sweetness, not terrible by any means.

Taste, bland watery, lightly sweet, nothing in terms of hops, fizzy, highly carbonated. Total hot weather beer, nothing going for it otherwise really, had worse, had much much better.

Photo of Suds
2.23/5  rDev -18.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 1.5

350 ml brown bottle with a black peacock on the label. Pours a golden, clear color with a thin, creamy head. Highly carbonated. The aroma is uninspiring: seriuos corn and adjuncts with a jagged, rough graininess. Dry and crisp, light to medium body. Decent hop finish, but it doesn't make up for the beer's other shortcomings.

Photo of Billolick
2.25/5  rDev -18.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

12 ounce bottle. Pours the expected light, clear yellowy amber. Minimal near white head, zip retention and very minor bits of lace sliding down the sides of the glass. perhaps a hint of powdered sugar in the nose. Light fairly taste less beverage. A hint of dryness in the finish. Lawn mower beer. On a very hot day, at the beach, by the pool,this would be enjoyable with a burger. Otherwise pass it by

Photo of beersdmf17
2.25/5  rDev -18.2%

Imperial from Cerveceria Costa Rica
65 out of 100 based on 442 ratings.