1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Imperial Eclipse Stout - Jack Daniels - FiftyFifty Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
Imperial Eclipse Stout - Jack DanielsImperial Eclipse Stout - Jack Daniels

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
77
okay

47 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 47
Reviews: 26
rAvg: 3.31
pDev: 21.45%
Wants: 97
Gots: 7 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
FiftyFifty Brewing Co. visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
American Double / Imperial Stout |  10.00% ABV

Availability: Limited (brewed once)

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

Yellow Wax

(Beer added by: bulletrain76 on 11-17-2009)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 47 | Reviews: 26 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Gonzoillini
Gonzoillini

Illinois

3.5/5  rDev +5.7%

02-04-2012 21:18:04 | More by Gonzoillini
Photo of jethrodium
jethrodium

California

3.45/5  rDev +4.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

650 ml bottle shared by colonelforbin. Thanks Mike. Pours a black that is cola brown at edges when held up to the light with small tan head that has good retention and leaves some light lacing on the glass. The aroma is big oak, some whiskey, caramel, marshmallow, quite a bit of alcohol, some light cherry, and a hint of plum. This one is certainly barrel heavy. The initial taste is sweet with oak and whiskey. Quite boozy. Then comes some marshmallow and a bit of plum. The finish is boozy and a bit astringent. Leaves a lingering oak taste. Light bodied for an imperial stout. Low carbonation. This is the worst out of the Eclipse series that I have had, but still wasn't a terrible beer. A bit too much barrel that drowns out the other flavors.

Serving type: bottle

01-31-2012 06:10:27 | More by jethrodium
Photo of Beerandraiderfan
Beerandraiderfan

Nevada

3.95/5  rDev +19.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

Ah, Christmas Day, a chance to enter in some of the backlogged reviews of yesteryear from the notes on the phone. I've had this beer a few times, once at the Bistro Barrel festival and once at the Eclipe release party (1st annual).

Pours the usual black, lighter around the edges as usual, decent head to it. Customary boozy bourbon aroma blended with the heavy roast of the Totality base beer. Aroma just seemed heavier handed on this barreled version than the others, but after sipping on the beer, the aroma mellowed out and was enjoyable and became smoother.

Whiskey and chocolate dominate the palate, thankfully, the boozy aroma wasn't as heavy in the taste, mellowed into a gritty experience. This beer takes some patience and willingness to let it open up, but when you do, it really settles into a decadent chocolate and whiskey tinged experience.

Seeing as JD is the most widely known whiskey, and its relative cheapness, this beer isn't going to get any rarity or spirits aficionados to clammor over it.

Serving type: on-tap

12-25-2011 19:32:11 | More by Beerandraiderfan
Photo of jophish17
jophish17

Georgia

2.5/5  rDev -24.5%

12-14-2011 21:47:12 | More by jophish17
Photo of westcoastbeerlvr
westcoastbeerlvr

California

3/5  rDev -9.4%

11-14-2011 23:09:20 | More by westcoastbeerlvr
Photo of jh1982
jh1982

Nevada

4/5  rDev +20.8%

11-14-2011 17:16:40 | More by jh1982
Photo of HopHead84
HopHead84

California

3.68/5  rDev +11.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

8/27/2011

200 day batch (2009) shared by Chris at Woodshop Classix, thanks!

A: Appears black with brown highlights and a light brown head.

S: Dark chocolate with some green apple and a light roast. Whiskey is evident but well integrated and there's a little vanilla.

T: More apple with vanilla and a lot of chocolate. Booze is evident but not inappropriate. The beer is moderately roasted and there's brown sugar. Whiskey is strong but pretty nice.

M: Full in body with moderate carbonation.

Overall: From all I'd heard about this I expected it to suck and it didn't. It was pretty good.

Serving type: bottle

09-01-2011 04:02:55 | More by HopHead84
Photo of scottfrie
scottfrie

California

3.1/5  rDev -6.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Waxless bottling. Thanks for accidentally opening this, Jeff.

A: Pours like a black hole with a thin dark brown head.
S: Sweet smelling with a bit of Jack Daniels and light cocoa.
T: Big alcohol flavor but the burn is smooth. It’s sweet, but not really from dark fruits or raisins. I get a touch of caramel, but the Jack really dominates everything. It actually boarders on nail polish, but it’s not that bad. This beer definitely tastes –bal aged.
M: Warming alcohol, a creamy mouthfeel with tingly carbonation.
O: Drinkable enough but definitely rough around the edges. Probably my least favorite of the Eclipses that I’ve had.

Serving type: bottle

07-22-2011 03:03:21 | More by scottfrie
Photo of womencantsail
womencantsail

California

2.15/5  rDev -35%
look: 4 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

Thanks to Jeff for sharing this rare tick.

A: The pour is just about black in color with minimal brown head.

S: To say this smells like nail polish remover would be an understatement. It absolutely reeks of it. Other than that, lots of roasted malts, booze, and whiskey. There is just a hint of vanilla and chocolate, which is really the only good thing.

T: An incredibly harsh nail polish remover/acetone flavor, too. Intense green apple and booze, along with a bit of oak, whiskey, and vanilla. Roasted malts and dark chocolate are there in the background.

M: The body is medium and the carbonation is low to medium.

O: Just atrocious stuff. Very unfortunate, since these are generally some of my favorite imperial stouts.

Serving type: bottle

07-19-2011 18:04:47 | More by womencantsail
Photo of BearsOnAcid
BearsOnAcid

Massachusetts

2.08/5  rDev -37.2%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 2

Yellow wax

Black liquid with a small khaki head.

Maple syrup, vanilla, slight bit of charred oak and cheap JD whiskey pretty much sums up the aroma. Nothing complex. The JD really doesn't integrate into the beer and covers up some of the chocolate aromas that I found in the '09 HH and EC. It stands out like a low quality ingredient.

First notice of soy sauce in taste for the '09s. Maybe it's just more prominent in this one. Again, that ugly JD barrel stands out and mutes out all the other flavors. It was really tough drinking this one. I didn't even finish the 5-6oz sample I had.

Serving type: bottle

04-15-2011 18:41:45 | More by BearsOnAcid
Photo of muttyd
muttyd

Massachusetts

2.4/5  rDev -27.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Had side-by-side with the Elijah Craig and the Heaven Hill.

Really disappointed with this beer, since the Elijah was excellent and the Heaven Hill was decent.

Pours pitch black with a thin tan head that quickly fades away. Aroma is of Jack Daniels. Not in a good bourbon barrel stout way, but in a Jack'n'Coke kind of way. Little to no roast character in the aroma. Very one-dimensional. Flavor falls flat. Sweet tangy bourbon dominates the flavor profile. Unpleasant soy-sauce flavor strong in this one as well. Little carbonation, but very sticky and chewy. Overall, not too impressed.

Serving type: bottle

04-03-2011 23:41:00 | More by muttyd
Photo of largadeer
largadeer

California

3.3/5  rDev -0.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

2009 edition barrel aged for 200 days, 22 oz bottle with gold wax:

Dark brown, hazy but clear around the edges. Pours with a small head that quickly settles to a collar.

Smells lightly of dark chocolate, whiskey and oak, along with a bit of anise and roasted malt. Fairly light and bland compared to other versions of Eclipse, but not bad.

The palate is decent. Chocolatey with a little caramel and licorice, light on the oak and with a rather simple sweet whiskey flavor. The body is medium-full, carbonation is moderate. Alcohol is very reigned-in, barely noticeable. It's easy to drink but ultimately nothing special.

2009 edition barrel aged for 300 days, no wax:

Same appearance as the 200 day version, but slightly more carbonated, better head retention.

This smells much more strongly of whiskey, though it has the same signature one-dimensional Jack Daniels sweetness. Chocolate, roasted malt. It's a little fatty and tarry too.

The palate has a lot of simplistic whiskey sweetness, caramel candy and chocolate, a little booziness in the finish. The body and carbonation are spot-on, but the flavors aren't impressive.

Having tried this beer several times both on tap and from bottles, I think I can safely say that Jack Daniels barrels and Eclipse simply don't mix well. It's not a bad beer, but it's far from great.

Serving type: bottle

01-06-2011 02:47:25 | More by largadeer
Photo of Arbitrator
Arbitrator

California

2.42/5  rDev -26.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

Re-review. There are two versions of this: the official release, which was aged in barrels for 200 days (beige wax), and a "bootleg" version given to brewery volunteers, which was aged in barrels for 300 days. We had a side by side of this thanks to the late chswimmer (RIP) and largadeer. Thanks guys.

A: Pours a nearly opaque mahogany body; it's darker than its cousins, upon first glance. A small beige head covers the brew and lingers for a while, leaving several scattered islands of film on top of the brew. No lacing, no legs.

S: The 200 days version has coconut, vanilla, whiskey, chocolate, caramel, roast, and a definite cigar earthiness (it becomes more apparent as the beer warms). It reminds me strongly of the Heaven Hill version, though it's not as balanced and is more sugary. The 300 days version is strongly sherry-like and well oxidized on top of the aromas noted above.

T: Whiskey, caramel, chocolate, vanilla. I pick up hints of coconut and roast. The finish brings out a tannic earthiness that, like the nose, reminds me of a cigar. Again, this is reminiscent of the Heaven Hill version but it is much less complex. It's also sweeter. The 300 days version is well oxidized, producing notes of sweet sherry that, when coupled with the beer's sugar, makes it fairly cloying / unpleasant.

M: Thicker than its cousins, indicating more residual sugar (which you also taste). There's no heat to it, which is nice.

D: I'm a big fan of Eclipse, but this is the obvious disappointment out of the many treatments 50/50 has done. There was plenty of each bottle left and I was not enthused about finishing either one.

Serving type: bottle

01-05-2011 09:17:36 | More by Arbitrator
Photo of waltonc
waltonc

Colorado

2.5/5  rDev -24.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 1.5

Purchased at City Beer Store and tasted in a side-by-side comparison with EC, HH and PVW versions at the Colorado stoutfest. This was easily the least enjoyable of the four versions. Unlike the others, this one had a stiller appearance, less carbonation. Smell and taste were overwhelming whiskey. Extremely sweet, hot, with lots of vanilla, oak, and what seemed to me an out-of-place vinous quality as well. The JD Eclipse probably would have benefitted from a blend with some non-BA Eclipse as well to take the edge off all the whiskey. Oh well, the other Eclipses have all been great. Interesting to see how different a stout can be when aged in different barrels.

Serving type: bottle

10-24-2010 13:05:38 | More by waltonc
Photo of glid02
glid02

Georgia

4.25/5  rDev +28.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Another bottle in the series shared by Grant - thanks!

Pours black with a half-finger brown head. The head recedes into a wispy layer on top leaving solid lacing.

Smells phenomenal. Smooth roasted malt aromas are joined by solid amounts of milk and dark chocolate. Also present are large amounts of vanilla, smaller amounts of coconut, and smaller still amounts of oak tying everything together.

Tastes similar to how it smells, although not quite as well integrated. Equal parts dark chocolate and roasted malt flavors kick things off and are joined quickly by smooth vanilla flavors. Midway through the sip the vanilla fades just a bit with the addition of oak. The oak, malt, and chocolate flavors carry through to a moderately bitter ending.

Mouthfeel is very good. It's got a smooth thickness with soft carbonation.

Drinkability is also very good. I finished my glass quickly and could easily have another.

Overall this beer is smoother and a bit more refined than the Elijah Craig version however it didn't have the complexity of the Heaven Hill. Still, a great beer that's well worth a shot.

Serving type: bottle

10-06-2010 02:15:36 | More by glid02
Photo of gford217
gford217

Georgia

4.1/5  rDev +23.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

22oz bottle with gold wax.

Pours a deep, dark brown that's almost completely black except for the light showing through the edges. The head is small and tan and leaves some boozy legs along the sides.

The aroma is probably the booziest of the Eclipse variants. There's lots of vanilla and whiskey but with more than a fair dose of chocolate and caramel. Hint of roasted character, though it's not overly roasty.

Much like the aroma, the whiskey is strong, especially up front where there is lots of vanilla and coconut. The roasted malts are more prevalent and blend with chocolate and tobacco. The finish is drying and has plenty of alcohol burn.

The mouthfeel is medium bodied and boozy with moderate carbonation. It's not quite as creamy or smooth as the other variants.

All in all, this is an excellent beer. It's the booziest of the Eclipses and, I imagine, will age beautifully. These guys definitely know how to use the barrel-aging process.

Edit, additional review notes from JD 300 version, aged in Jack Daniels barrels for 300 days. Seriously heavy whiskey notes with lots of barrel character, oak as well. It's really in the same mold as the normal JD, much more whiskey than the other versions. I think I preferred the JD300 slightly but it might be because it's had more time to mellow since I tried the JD the first time.

Serving type: bottle

09-21-2010 01:13:47 | More by gford217
Photo of JWD
JWD

California

3.98/5  rDev +20.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 3.5

Had this on tap at FiftyFifty today. I also brought home a growler which was not expected!! This was the final version which i had not tried yet all of which are very different.

A- WOW this was deep dark black with a VERY nice creamy head on it that was similar to a nitro pour. Served in 8oz pours.

S & T - Smells like good old JD!! I really liked this one, i noticed that the whiskey smell was a lot stronger than the actual taste which was a nice suprise.

M & D - Very creamy, alot thicker than the base beer which i sampled side by side with less carb. I could drink quite alot of this due to the overall balance and smoothness this beer has.

Overall great barrel stout from fiftyfifty. I purchased a 64oz growler of it so i will see how that goes, I question the ABV in this beer at 9.5 as it seems more like a 12% beer to me, i have had others mention the same thing.

Serving type: on-tap

05-01-2010 00:47:57 | More by JWD
Photo of femALEist
femALEist

California

3.63/5  rDev +9.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Had this on tap at City Beer Store's FiftyFifty event:
On the nose, you get a bit more caramel and sweet flavors coming out, along with the roasted and alcohol notes. It tasted the most bitter out of all of the 3. You get the roasted espresso flavors, caramel & toasted malts. You definitely feel the alcohol the most in this one. It seems like it should be 12% for the flavor of the alcohol, not 9.5%. It's a little rough around the edges still, which is probably why you couldn't buy this bottle to go- you could only buy the other 2. This one just needs some time to mellow out a bit.

Serving type: on-tap

03-25-2010 20:42:01 | More by femALEist
Photo of Chambic
Chambic

California

3.6/5  rDev +8.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

01.23.10 at City Beer Store

A: sreved in a wine glass, it looks like a deep, dark wine with some tiny bubbles; got some legs, too

S: some sweetness, like caramel and molasses

T: tastes like coffee, and the sweetness is more bourbon than the scents listed above

M: defnitely fizzier than it look

D: quite nice. It's like having an iced Irish coffee

Serving type: on-tap

01-25-2010 19:04:38 | More by Chambic
Photo of nickd717
nickd717

California

3.83/5  rDev +15.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

On tap at City Beer for FiftyFifty day. What do you know - I swore that morning that I wouldn't drink that day, then a couple guys convinced me to go to this, and by 4pm, I was about 5 beers in. FML. This was definitely the least of the three -bal aged Eclipse varieties, which is pretty much like calling someone the dumbest quantum physicist at CERN.

Pours jet black and viscous with a small brown head that fades to some brown bubbles. Not too much lacing to speak of, but you get some "legs" on the glass.

Whiskey and barrel notes really stand out on the aroma in this one, really dominating more than in the other versions. Some chocolate and roast smells hide behind the Jack.

Flavor is also somewhat whiskey-heavy and very good, but not quite as balanced as in the Pappy, Elijah Craig, and Heaven Hill versions. Jack Daniels gets all up in yo' grill, sort of like the person Missy Elliott was referring to in the "all in my grill" song. Hey, a chick gotta live, right? Besides the whiskey, the flavor is somewhat complex. Chocolate, roast, coffee, caramel, oak, vanilla, and booze.

Medium-full bodied, and not quite as smooth as the other varieties. A bit hot - age could probably benefit this quite nicely.

Drinkability is decent but not great. Overall a very solid RIS, but not an elite level one.

Serving type: on-tap

01-25-2010 07:35:27 | More by nickd717
Photo of Jmoore50
Jmoore50

Nevada

3.88/5  rDev +17.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Drank this on-tap at FiftyFifty in Truckee. This is by far the worst of the three versions.

Poured into a great little 8 oz snifter, this thing looks as good as the others. It is dark black in the heart and lighter on the edges. It holds a quarter finger tan head. No real lacing to speak of.

The smell has a very faint chocolate malt and roasted grain characteristic, like all the other versions. The problem with this one is that the smells are backed by a far lesser quality of whisky, Jack Daniels. The type of whisky is so obvious in this that it brings down the overall score for this. Just shows again what a barrel can do. This was also my first taste of any version of Eclipse, and I was a little worried that I was going to be disappointed.

The taste is still really good, for the base beer is a great Imperial Stout. The Jack Daniels brings a more present flavor than the other versions. This does not back the malts, but instead interrupts them. I am going to say that I would rather of had the base beer un-barreled, just to see what it tastes like. I think it also might be a little too fresh. A little age might calm down the JD.

The mouthfeel has a grainy JD flavor. The drinkability is still good, but JD compared to the other versions falls very short. I believe it goes Heaven Hill, Craig, and then JD on terms of rank.

Gotta try it still just to see the contrast in flavors.

J

Serving type: on-tap

01-05-2010 00:53:01 | More by Jmoore50
Photo of bulletrain76
bulletrain76

California

4.03/5  rDev +21.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Draught at Bistro's 2009 Barrel Aged Festival. Tried this back to back with the 2008 version, and while it is still very good, was not quite up to it's predecessor. Whether this is purely due to the difference in barrels (Jack Daniels vs. Pappy van Winkle) or the additional age, I can't be sure, but I have a feeling that the barrel treatment on this version just didn't come out as smooth as last year. Pours black with a small head of frothy tan bubbles. Oak and whisky are a bit more prominent on the nose than the 2008 version, with a sweet caramel and dark chocolate richness underneath. Decadent chocolate and oak flavors with some whisky bite that dries out the finish a little. The oak lends a light spice that blends in well, and a touch of vanilla. Full bodied and smooth with lower carbonation. Great stout, but I think the original bourbon aging used last year worked out better.

Serving type: on-tap

11-17-2009 22:27:26 | More by bulletrain76
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Imperial Eclipse Stout - Jack Daniels from FiftyFifty Brewing Co.
77 out of 100 based on 47 ratings.