1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Red Marker Ale - AleWerks Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Red Marker AleRed Marker Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
75
okay

107 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 107
Reviews: 52
rAvg: 3.23
pDev: 15.79%
Wants: 0
Gots: 4 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
AleWerks Brewing Company visit their website
Virginia, United States

Style | ABV
American Amber / Red Ale |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Riverwarrior on 05-12-2008)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 107 | Reviews: 52 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Davepoolesque
Davepoolesque

Massachusetts

2/5  rDev -38.1%

06-05-2013 00:15:30 | More by Davepoolesque
Photo of AndrewMichael
AndrewMichael

Virginia

2/5  rDev -38.1%

01-26-2012 01:27:12 | More by AndrewMichael
Photo of StoutSeth
StoutSeth

Virginia

2/5  rDev -38.1%

08-28-2013 21:38:47 | More by StoutSeth
Photo of orcasteve
orcasteve

North Carolina

2.08/5  rDev -35.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

got as a gift from my parents trip to williamsburg so i was excited to try this one, but i am not impresed, this one poured a dark amber color with a 3 finger head on it, the taste is watery, and a bad combanation of dry sour and then rough bitter and an aftertaste that just wont quit, i taste lemon in the middle witch is the only thing that i liked in this beer at all, this is almost a drain pour but i maneged to choke all of this one down

Serving type: bottle

11-24-2008 17:43:50 | More by orcasteve
Photo of Hatchman
Hatchman

Virginia

2.2/5  rDev -31.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

Appearance: Looks good with a dark red/brownish color. No head at all, and no lacing. Appears to have no carbonation whatsoever.

Smell: A little of malts, roasted nuts and chocolate, but smells like they let it burn and scraped some off the bottom.

Taste: Sour at first, but gets better after it breaths. Looks aren't deceiving in that there is a definite lack of carbonation. They definitelly let some of the ingredients cook too long.

Mouthfeel: Feels thin and once again, lack of carbonation makes it taste flat.

Drinkability: Living close to Williamsburg in Chesapeake, I really wanted to like this beer since it is a local. But I feel I wasted the $8.50 on this 6 pack and I'm wondering how I'm going to choke the other 5 down. Strongly considered pouring it all out, but I can't abuse alcohol like that. Let's just say I won't buy it again... EVER!

Serving type: bottle

08-23-2008 21:19:15 | More by Hatchman
Photo of jereb33
jereb33

Michigan

2.25/5  rDev -30.3%

07-19-2012 18:19:24 | More by jereb33
Photo of HattedClassic
HattedClassic

Virginia

2.25/5  rDev -30.3%

11-26-2013 06:00:10 | More by HattedClassic
Photo of eljefe21
eljefe21

Virginia

2.25/5  rDev -30.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

A: Dark redish-copper color. Poured to an almost non-existent head.

S: A faint tart smell.

T: An almost ice tea flavor with a slight lemon finish.

M: Some carbonation, which is a little surprising considering the dull appearance of the beer. Fairly light bodied.

D: Not at all what I expected from an American Amber. It might make a decent summer beer because of the tartness, but nothing I'll ever buy again.

Served: in a standard pint glass.

Serving type: bottle

10-07-2008 02:13:40 | More by eljefe21
Photo of CreightonSM
CreightonSM

New York

2.25/5  rDev -30.3%

06-10-2013 17:22:08 | More by CreightonSM
Photo of bubbaoyster
bubbaoyster

Virginia

2.4/5  rDev -25.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Wish all the best for the Williamsburg AleWerks but this beer needs reworking.

Cloying, sweet, acidic aftertaste ruins what starts off as a reasonable combination of color and carbonation. What hop flavor is present is quickly wrecked by finish. Thought I might have a bad bottle , but another one confirmed the problem.

I won't buy again.

Serving type: bottle

07-29-2008 00:46:23 | More by bubbaoyster
Photo of Kmlund
Kmlund

Massachusetts

2.5/5  rDev -22.6%

10-02-2013 15:46:08 | More by Kmlund
Photo of ygtbsm94
ygtbsm94

Virginia

2.5/5  rDev -22.6%

09-15-2013 02:49:35 | More by ygtbsm94
Photo of jscottku21
jscottku21

Pennsylvania

2.5/5  rDev -22.6%

03-05-2012 16:59:47 | More by jscottku21
Photo of yourefragile
yourefragile

District of Columbia

2.58/5  rDev -20.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

12 oz bottle poured into a nonic.

Maybe I had a bad bottle of this (though I doubt it), but this was bad. Appearance is an average brown copper color, hazed with an un-retentive tan head that leaves no lace a thin crown. Aroma is the worst part of this, very sweet, slightly medicinal, I don't want to think much more about this, but whatever it was, it's not natural. Flavor is average, bready and malty with a mild, dry hop flavor throughout, but my mind might being playing tricks on me on distinguishing how sweet the flavor is compared to the aroma. This was hard to finish the bottle, blindly I never would have called this an amber, I probably would have pegged the style as an American drain pour.

Serving type: bottle

12-29-2009 03:03:40 | More by yourefragile
Photo of afordney
afordney

Tennessee

2.58/5  rDev -20.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

The pour was a deep amber reddish color, very pretty and clear. The head was about a thumb thick and left pretty tight lacing on the edges of my glass.

aromas of hop spice, nothing overwhelming and very smooth.

taste is sharply bitter and a little sour, the bitterness drowns out anything else that might be going on.

very light and very bitter

This beer looked and smelled better than it tasted. I don't think I'd go for another.

Serving type: bottle

08-09-2010 22:27:02 | More by afordney
Photo of chinchill
chinchill

South Carolina

2.6/5  rDev -19.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 2.5

12 oz bottle (no date but purchased 2 days ago) served in a snifter.
An unusual amount of ressure released by uncapping. Pours dark and murky red-brown in color, hazy and with an over-sized, creamy tan head that has excellent retention and leaves the glass well coated with lacing.
Aroma: infected?
Flavor: better than the nose and drinkable, but still poor.
Feel: soft and smooth with high carbonation.

O: possible infected, making 2 out of 3 (all different beers) for me from this brewer. Should re-visit but the lack of quality control discourages that.

Serving type: bottle

02-02-2014 19:13:52 | More by chinchill
Photo of Chaney
Chaney

District of Columbia

2.6/5  rDev -19.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

A: Crystal clear, red color, with a nice tight bubbled (ala. nitro-tap) head that lingered throughout the session.

S: Melted "Astro Pop," with a bit of hoppy fruit in the mix as well.

T: The front part of the beer is great. Candy sugar, hops, and even a bit of vanilla. The aftertaste borders on tragic - bitter, rusted metal and then some.

M: Bitter, bitter, bitter.... on the aftertaste (which ruined the whole experience for me). The carbonation was fine and dandy, but I honestly didn't care.

O: This is one of those rare beers that a small tweak would make all the difference in the world. Here's to hoping...

Serving type: bottle

04-24-2011 20:03:38 | More by Chaney
Photo of avalon07
avalon07

South Carolina

2.65/5  rDev -18%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A: Poured from a bottle to a pint glass. Had a light amber color and a clear consistency. There was a small amount of foamy head that quickly dissipated. Very little lacing.

S: A weird, slightly off-putting aroma of malt, hops and a soapy quality.

T: Tasted of some malt, piney hops, and that same soapy quality. Not a very appetizing flavor. Unfocused and a bit on the thin side.

M: A good amount of carbonation with a dry finish. Medium-bodied.

O: This is definitely not a very memorable beer. Could have been better than it was.

Serving type: bottle

09-24-2011 12:11:33 | More by avalon07
Photo of jordoo
jordoo

Pennsylvania

2.68/5  rDev -17%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

12oz bottle poored into a pilsner glass.

Comes off a hazey brown almost icetea like color with some red tints when held up to the light. Small quickly dispersing head that left some patchy foam floating around the top. Smell is of a toasted sweet malt hint of grassy hop and possibley candied plump. Taste has some malt sweetness slight hop bitterness and a poor fruit tone. It also has a slight chemical/acidic aftertaste. On the thin side for a red ale, and with everything considered it wasn't the easiest beer to finish.

Serving type: bottle

07-25-2008 16:20:19 | More by jordoo
Photo of MayLattimore
MayLattimore

North Carolina

2.68/5  rDev -17%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Okay, I got this bottle with the White Ale that was sent to me from a friend. I was very hesitant to drink it after my experience with the White Ale from the same brewery. So here goes... The pour is a reddish color, very pretty and clear. The head isn't much with not much lacing. Aroma is caramelly and maybe a little spice. Taste is that great. Kinda sour. This beer looked and smelled the part but ultimately it didn't taste great.

Serving type: bottle

02-02-2011 22:50:04 | More by MayLattimore
Photo of JamesS
JamesS

Indiana

2.83/5  rDev -12.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Pours a decent slight copper color with tinges of orange; has a bit of initial head, but no lacing. Decent scent, some malt sweetness, but nothing sticks out. Same with the taste, a very bland, although not bad, flavor; some decent sweet malt grains and notmuch else. Went down fine. I would not turn this beer down, but I would never buy it myself. The lowest of the AleWerks brews I've tried.

Serving type: bottle

05-05-2010 17:20:10 | More by JamesS
Photo of msubulldog25
msubulldog25

Oregon

2.83/5  rDev -12.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

A new red ale (for me) from a new brewery (for me), a 12 oz. bottle sent by Metalmonk - a local for him, but certainly not one I'd find out here in Oregon. Batch code: '087037', for whatever that's worth.

A: Hmmm... well on the 'amber' side, it's almost crimson - a ruddy brown, that's exceedingly muddy-looking. One of the LEAST-filtered beers I've seen. A little carbonation hugs the nfringes, but I have no idea what's going on inside the murky core. Nice head, a light khaki 1/2-finger topping of cream

S: Sweeter and fruitier smell than I expected, quite malty and almost dessert-like. A glazed doughnut or citrus/sugar encrusted scone, maybe some 'breakfast cereal', too. Not sure that this was the point, but not a 'turn-off', truth be told...

T: Definitely on the malty/sweet side, tea-like and seemingly 'aged'... or just pedestrian tasting. A 'fresh' send from Virginia (arrived mere days ago), but who knows just how 'fresh' this really is. Flavors of red apple, baked (slightly dark) wheat, toasted walnuts and a little orange-citrus.

M: Really weak feel: seems to be 3/4 ale, 1/4 water. Carbonation seems scarce, but the feel still holds some 'crispness', thanks to a gentle hop spiciness.

D: Despite the muddy, unfiltered appearance, not a bad beer to look at, nor to smell. Taste and feel are definitely 'off' though, and so it's with some hesitation I'm even posting a review. If someone knows what the batch code means -and it proves to be well past due -I'm happy to rescind or modify my review. As such, though, not very good.

Serving type: bottle

02-21-2011 00:37:26 | More by msubulldog25
Photo of civicm87
civicm87

New York

3/5  rDev -7.1%

05-01-2013 23:05:51 | More by civicm87
Photo of hef
hef

Maryland

3/5  rDev -7.1%

05-24-2013 01:33:18 | More by hef
Photo of rdub
rdub

Pennsylvania

3/5  rDev -7.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured from the brewery fresh bottle into my new Williamsburg AleWerks pint glass. Side note: I tried all the brews from the Alewerks and they all shared a common taste, even between styles. Must be te water. Anyway, poured a murky reddish brown. Aroma of mostly malt with just a touch of hops. I'm thinking like a 4:1 ratio. Kind of reminded me of old school Killians. Just your basic red.

Serving type: bottle

08-12-2011 02:09:37 | More by rdub
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Red Marker Ale from AleWerks Brewing Company
75 out of 100 based on 107 ratings.