1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Leafer Madness - Beer Valley Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
Leafer MadnessLeafer Madness

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
87
very good

208 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 208
Reviews: 132
rAvg: 3.86
pDev: 12.44%
Wants: 12
Gots: 4 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Beer Valley Brewing Co. visit their website
Oregon, United States

Style | ABV
American Double / Imperial IPA |  9.00% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: mattmaples on 04-10-2008)
View: Beers (17) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 208 | Reviews: 132 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of harrymel
harrymel

Washington

1.29/5  rDev -66.6%
look: 3.75 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1

Bottled: unk

It's a hazy amber with a billowy cream top that leaves a ton of lace. The nose is malt, resin, onion, hay, sage, plastic and turned nylon. Flavor is bitter, biscuit, astringent, shitty, shitty beer here. Medium on full bodied with moderately hi carb and a long bitter finish. I've long wondered how Beer Valley has stayed in business, tonight I tried this beer after three years of absence. My suspicion is reignited at this time. Horrible beer.

Serving type: bottle

08-21-2013 08:05:03 | More by harrymel
Photo of jbertsch
jbertsch

Massachusetts

1.83/5  rDev -52.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 1.5

Amber in color. One finger of white head poured into a tulip.

The aroma was all malt. Sweet, sweet malt with a touch of spicey hops. Seemed old.

The taste was a malt bomb with hops that seem angry and bitter. Sweetness is a little cloying on the finish. Booziness is noticeable.

Mouthfeel is prickly and finishes dry.

I could not finish this beer. Double IPAs are my favorite style but this one was a train wreck. I imagine it might be old but you never know. I have no tolerance for brewers who don't date their bottles, I will no longer give them the benefit of the doubt. This beer was a complete mess and I feel robbed.

Serving type: bottle

10-07-2012 23:55:43 | More by jbertsch
Photo of ste5venla
ste5venla

California

2.5/5  rDev -35.2%

08-12-2013 02:33:15 | More by ste5venla
Photo of jtk
jtk

California

2.75/5  rDev -28.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

A: Dark orange with a small head. Very light carbonation. Lace down the glass.

S: Light hops smell. Aroma not big at all. I had to really breath deep to get much at all. Odd.

T: Alcohol comes through too strong. Sweet citrus. Not real complex. Heavy, oily hops. Seems unbalanced. whatever the case, it's too heavy for my taste.

M: Low carb mf. Light medium body.

D: One bomber is enough in a sitting for me. Didn't actually finish it, though. Alcohol not hidden. If you like a big alcohol taste you might like it. Definitely give it a shot if you haven't already.

Serving type: bottle

12-11-2010 23:23:32 | More by jtk
Photo of sulldaddy
sulldaddy

Connecticut

2.93/5  rDev -24.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I bought this beer since I thought the label was pretty clever. Pouring at cellar temp into a pint glass the beer pours a hazy copper hue with tight lattice on the glass and eggshell white fluffy head of 1 cm resting on the surface. Aroma is floral hops with some light caramel and candied sugar. Not a hop bomb on the nose.
Firs sip reveals average body with light spacious carbonation. The body is lighter than anticipated and the texture is thinner than the nose predicts. Flavor is some fruit, white grapes and a bit of general astringency, not very robust flavors in any direction. Each sip does dry out a bit at the finish. Beer is easy to drink, almost to a fault. Kind of forgettable in this drinker's opinion.

Serving type: bottle

01-01-2011 03:14:58 | More by sulldaddy
Photo of brushtachio
brushtachio

Ohio

2.95/5  rDev -23.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

This one is just too one-sided for me. The nose is spicy and grassy hops. Maybe a hint of citrus but not much. The taste is just more of the same. Long bitter aftertaste. The taste reminds me of Bigfoot if you distilled only the grassy hops, amplified it and removed any hint of malt. This one is a bitter tongue-number- some might like that but I almost drain poured because it became so monotonous.

Serving type: bottle

03-25-2010 04:33:21 | More by brushtachio
Photo of froghop
froghop

Washington

2.98/5  rDev -22.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

pours a cloudy orange with a large off-white head, and good lacing.

smell is of earth, hops, grain, and lavender.

taste is earthy, grain, some caramel, hops, and a touch of citrus, ends a little funky, and alcohol.

overall just average, not as bitter as i would expect from an imperial IPA.

Serving type: bottle

01-22-2010 18:51:46 | More by froghop
Photo of Lobina
Lobina

Arizona

3/5  rDev -22.3%

04-27-2014 22:57:05 | More by Lobina
Photo of jophish17
jophish17

Georgia

3/5  rDev -22.3%

02-11-2012 10:32:41 | More by jophish17
Photo of Retsinis
Retsinis

California

3.03/5  rDev -21.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Had this last night, shared with some friends, 22 oz bomber into some Bruery tulip glasses.

A: The beer pours a clear light orange, with a half inch of light head, that quickly settled. No lacing.

S: Grass, mild pine, mild mango and tangerine. Some caramel as well in the background.

T: Initial bitterness up front just evaporates in the middle, followed by mild caramel malt sweetness, and strong notes of alcohol.

M: Medium to light mouth, and medium carbonation as well. ABV stands out more than I like.

O: Disappointing. While fresh IIPA tend to burst with hop notes, and if this one was old perhaps that's it, but from my experience, the hops still hold up pretty well in IIPA, in contrast to say a DIPA. This one was mild in both malt character, and a hop profile, and neither hid the alcohol as much as others at this price point do. For $8 a bomber, don't plan on trying this again.

Serving type: bottle

05-06-2011 18:39:31 | More by Retsinis
Photo of Drinkerofales
Drinkerofales

California

3.08/5  rDev -20.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Pours dirty golden, very cloudy, some lighter highlights, and a ton of strange sediment. Impressive sticky lacing.

Smells of some orange-tangerine hop and sweet malt, and unfortunately, a funky dirty clothes hamper.

Piney, grapefruit hops in the initial taste are a flash in the pan with hardly any flavor in the middle, and another quick bitter note in the finish.

Feel is strange, fizzy, over-carbonated, weird.

I may have an old bottle, I hadn't seen this bottle before at the store, so I thought it might be fresh, but the whacked out sediment and strange smell are very off-putting. Even withe the cult movie referenced name, I won't seek this out again.

DOA

Serving type: bottle

01-07-2012 10:06:44 | More by Drinkerofales
Photo of Arbitrator
Arbitrator

California

3.1/5  rDev -19.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

Chilled bomber into a glass. Purchased at Perry's in Livermore.

A: Slightly cloudy copper / amber hue. A vigorous pour yields a couple inches of head that recedes over a few minutes into a half-inch foam crown on the brew, continually refreshed by active bubbling up the glass. Some ragged lacing down the sides as I drink.

S: Citrus hops are clearly a favorite ingredient here, manifesting in tangerine and grapefruit aromas. I also detected some other sweet fruits such as mango and peach, along with a moderate nose of caramel.

T: I expected a total hop bomb, but this was very well balanced. Grapefruit and tangerine bitterness at first, contrasted by a sweeter mango and peach set in the mid-taste. The caramel begins to kick in, and by the mid-taste it's quite powerful, yet still plays second fiddle to a nice blend of citrus, pine hops, and honey in the finish. There's a slight astringency and tartness in the finish that I can't figure out; it gives the flavor a rough feeling.

M: Medium bodied with slightly higher than medium carbonation. Very well masked ABV.

D: I'd like to see the formula tweaked a little bit for a smoother brew. Right now it seems like it could use a little more polish. At this price point I could find something I consider better.

Serving type: bottle

04-17-2009 03:21:18 | More by Arbitrator
Photo of bbothen
bbothen

California

3.1/5  rDev -19.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

22 oz hand capped bottle.

A - Orange/rust color with a small soapy thin head.

S - Sweet matly aroma. Slight earthy piney grassy hops.

T - Sweetness dominates over the hops. The hops are there though. Hitting you with a nice spicy citrus type cut through the sweetness. Slightly "rough" and not quite perfect. That's not a bad thing.

M - Quite nice. Smooth over the tongue & nice lingering hops. Another reviewer described it as from a cask. I'd wholeheartedly agree. I like it.

D - Pretty good. It is 9%, so beware. But I could knock back a couple of these.

This was just okay. I'd happily drink it again. But wouldn't seek it out either.

Serving type: bottle

05-22-2008 02:03:53 | More by bbothen
Photo of mactrail
mactrail

Washington

3.15/5  rDev -18.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Nice aromatic mouthful of hops. Seriously bitter.

Pleasing warm amber color. There must be some malt here, but the balance is way over on the hop side. Severe bitterness comes on before I got to enjoy the hop madness. Very sharp on the tongue and hot with alcohol. Surprisingly light bodied. Aftertaste keeps getting more unpleasant.

If there was an interesting hop here, or a lesson to be learned, it might be worth it.

Serving type: bottle

03-09-2010 07:16:46 | More by mactrail
Photo of Overlord
Overlord

California

3.18/5  rDev -17.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours dark amber orange with maybe a half an inch of head. si this a DIPA? I thought it was a pale ale. Upon checking the beeradvocate.com hivemind, I see that the beer's label is misleading. The color seemed pretty bizarre for a "pale ale."

Smells like some pine, and ... spicy citrus rind? Urrr...okay.

Taste is all over the place. First, too bitter. Second, the citrus is an acrid rind-ish husk of a flavor, not bursting with freshness or any type of balancing sweetness. The malt is earthy and takes a backseat.

pretty average.

Serving type: bottle

01-05-2011 21:33:43 | More by Overlord
Photo of maximum12
maximum12

Minnesota

3.2/5  rDev -17.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Thanks to piclee for a bottle of this heretofore unknown beer from a heretofore unknown brewery. The label claims it is an Imperial Pale.

Bomber split with my wife, my half poured into my brand-spanking new Foothills pint glass (thanks mjmadden). Pours a very light, pass-through orange, with a half-truckload of floaties in suspended animation in the still liquid. Smells like a pale, not an IPA, with the pale malts, unburnt grass, & summertime. Bare network of hoppage.

Leafer Madness tastes like a pale, not an india pale ale. The pale malts are waltzing with a crack of razored, bitter hops; unfortunately, not a lot of flavor from the hops. Other contributors include damp soil and...well, that's about it.

Very average beer. Simple is good, but this is too high in ABV to be sessionable & too lacking in flavor profile to be downed with impunity.

EDIT: I downed this with impunity, raising the drinkability score...I think I drank it 3x faster than my wife did...

Serving type: bottle

09-08-2010 02:26:08 | More by maximum12
Photo of GRG1313
GRG1313

California

3.25/5  rDev -15.8%

08-13-2013 06:58:23 | More by GRG1313
Photo of Smurf2055
Smurf2055

Washington

3.25/5  rDev -15.8%

07-20-2013 04:24:01 | More by Smurf2055
Photo of mab_pro
mab_pro

California

3.25/5  rDev -15.8%

04-01-2014 03:26:23 | More by mab_pro
Photo of jdhilt
jdhilt

New Hampshire

3.25/5  rDev -15.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Pours a one finger cream head that fades slowly to a thin layer leaving a good lace. Light-medium carbonation and medium bodied. Cloudy amber color. Nose is faint hops. Flavor is caramel and grapefruit hops. Dry, lingering grapefruit finish. $7.99 for a 22oz bottle from Liquorama Upland, CA.

Serving type: bottle

08-14-2010 22:25:36 | More by jdhilt
Photo of rby3iii
rby3iii


3.25/5  rDev -15.8%

04-01-2012 02:42:26 | More by rby3iii
Photo of roan22
roan22

New Jersey

3.3/5  rDev -14.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

22 oz. bottle, not sure how old it is. 9% Imperiel Pale Ale

Appearance is an orange color, typical to style. nice head but not a lot of lacing left on the glass.

Aroma: a semi-spicy juicy grapefruit, solvent/cleaning chemicals, alcohol hotness

Taste: pungent grapefruit bitterness hits you right away. The bitterness lingers for a minute..the finish is numbing and I don't care for it. There is no piney bitterness or maltiness to give this beer anymore flavor other than booze.

Mouthfeel: Terrible. After drinking half of this bomber, my mouth is completely numb and I am starting to feel comatose.

Drinkability: My roommate, a huge DIPA and barleywine fan, drank the rest of it and he concurrs the drinkability is low. We both never would want to drink this again.

Serving type: bottle

05-29-2009 23:50:09 | More by roan22
Photo of GClarkage
GClarkage

California

3.33/5  rDev -13.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

04/24/08- Purchased at Ledger's in Berkeley, CA.

Presentation- 22oz bottle with no freshness date to be found. Poured into my Duvel tulip.

Appearance- Clouded rust colored color with some murky yeast particles. Maybe a 1/5 of an inch head on pour leaving a slight creamy rim. Really no lace to speak of. Looks flat, or like cask style.

Smell- From the crack of the bottle it had a nice pine hop nose. But after the pour it literally had no scent at all. Very minor hop notes and that's about it.

Taste- It actually grows on you. At first I thought it was mind of lacking, but as you drink it, a really nice pine sap flavor rev's up. If like like pine you may like this. Some light toasted malt as well, but mostly pine bitterness.

Mouthfeel- Pretty flat, as in cask, but it's not a cask brew, so not that grand in this dept. Mild bitterness in the aftertaste.

Drinkability- I'd give it another try. I really like pine hops, so we'll see down the line. But, the $6.99 tag was about twice as much as it should be.

Serving type: bottle

04-26-2008 15:03:50 | More by GClarkage
Photo of thecarster1
thecarster1

Pennsylvania

3.4/5  rDev -11.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

a- bomber poured into a snifter, hazy honey gold coloring, one finger fades to a layer of lace, minimal carbonation.

s- not overly aromatic, some light orange, malt, floral notes.

t- some floral/herbal hops, orange, lemon, grapefruit rind, decent bitterness, not overly so, some flowery notes.

m- medium body, slick.

d- good, not a traditional hop bomp dipa, but still drinkable.

Serving type: bottle

08-15-2010 00:43:55 | More by thecarster1
Photo of SShelly
SShelly

Oregon

3.4/5  rDev -11.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

On draft at the Surly Goat.

Pours nice medium gold, crystal clear with decent white poofy head.

Aroma is super subdued citrus hops with a light edge of malt.

Flavor is a bit of a disapointment, lightly hoppy, a little bit of alcohol, what makes this a triple IPA?? seriously lacking in the bitterness and hop flavor character that I was expecting, a little bit of dirty mettalic hop edge to the back of the sip.

While this is a fairly drinkable beer I think it falls down flat in the IIPA category.

Serving type: on-tap

05-12-2010 15:36:36 | More by SShelly
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Leafer Madness from Beer Valley Brewing Co.
87 out of 100 based on 208 ratings.