1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Lemp St. Louis Lager - Lion Brewery, Inc.

Not Rated.
Lemp St. Louis LagerLemp St. Louis Lager

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
68
poor

37 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 37
Reviews: 33
rAvg: 2.74
pDev: 20.07%
Wants: 1
Gots: 0 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Lion Brewery, Inc. visit their website
Pennsylvania, United States

Style | ABV
American Pale Lager |  ABV ?

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: NeroFiddled on 02-18-2004)
View: Beers (32) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 37 | Reviews: 33 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of JDV
JDV

Texas

1.58/5  rDev -42.3%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

Very clear light amber. Slight sour maltiness and a bit of yeast in the smell. Taste is earthy malt, dry, sweaty yeast. Sweet, yet drying... Not a very clean or pleasant finish. Bad even by pale lager standards, I thought. Stay away from this beer!!!

Serving type: bottle

03-15-2008 19:10:17 | More by JDV
Photo of rocketmotor
rocketmotor

Illinois

1.6/5  rDev -41.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

Bought this thinking it would be nice to have the first big name beer from St Louis, what a mistake. If you like corn/grain flavored and smelling beer go for it. I was very disapointed, as the smell and and taste reminded me of that corn crap beer Natural Light.

The beer poured with very little head which subsided quickly. The beer appeared a slightly dark straw color, the best feature it had IMO.

The smell of the beer was strongly tainted by corn and grain. I can't get past the smell, just too much for me. I know it may fit the style, but it is too strong. Very little hop scent.

I thought the flavor was too dominated by the corn/grain adjuncts. There was a light, sweet, malt flavor, strong adjunct flavor, and very little hop bitterness. The majority of the bitterness was provided by the carbonation.

I paid $8.00 for a six pack and I expected a premium type beer. This is a cheap adjunct brew for college kids. Don't get suckered into buying this beer for the history of the LEMP brewery. Just read the six pack carrier and set it down, buy a real beer instead, or buy Natural Light and save yourself about $4.00 a six pack.

Serving type: bottle

11-03-2004 22:14:50 | More by rocketmotor
Photo of jimdkc
jimdkc

Missouri

1.83/5  rDev -33.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Poured a crystal clear golden color. Fast-fading white head. Little lacing. Nose is grainy and corny. It's been quite a while since I've had a Bud... but that's the memory that stirred while drinking this! Same slightly harsh flavor... same mildly unpleasant bitterness on the swallow. Claims to be America's first lager beer, and makes a big deal of splashing "St. Louis" all over the label... but it's contract brewed in Pennsylvania! Not sure what the point is. I think "historic novelty" is a good description for this!

Serving type: bottle

05-06-2004 08:05:00 | More by jimdkc
Photo of HardTarget
HardTarget

Texas

1.88/5  rDev -31.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1

Bottle Inspection: Olde school graphics look fairly cool, but no real useful information, including a neck laser code “20407” which tells me they don’t want to tell me the date.

Aroma: Wet grain, corn, and a mild yeast element. Nothing really exciting going on here. Mild musty note.

Appearance: Light amber glass with a solid ¼ finger head that laces nicely.

Flavor: The wet grain is only amplified. Corn element is also pretty strong. It has all the bad elements of an American Marco without the redeeming qualities of a clean profile.

Mouthfeel: Medium heavy body, low carbonation.

Overall Impression: Tastes like warm Budweiser, but feels cold; I’m confused. Poor execution of a style that has been mastered by others. If you want an American Macro, just drink BMC.

Serving type: bottle

12-14-2007 06:14:32 | More by HardTarget
Photo of winomark
winomark

Missouri

1.98/5  rDev -27.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

Pours a medium gold with a vigorous bone white head that quickly fades. Darker than I expected.

Mild nose with some malt tones and slight hop aroma. Typical macro lager smell.

Almost no flavor. Some sweet malt in the finish. Carbonation dominates an othwewise bland palate. No hops noticable.

Very light and uninspiring. Disappears immediately. Quite disappointing.

As MJR mentioned, possibly a novelty beer, similar to 3 Stooges, and he was right. All this is is a historic novelty. Bills itself as the first American lager beer. Unless you have heard of Lemp Brewery in Saint Louis, no need to try it.

Serving type: bottle

02-18-2004 15:45:18 | More by winomark
Photo of Pegasus
Pegasus

Texas

2.1/5  rDev -23.4%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 1.5

Appearance: Clear and deep reddish-golden color, with a massive, coarse white head, which retains rather well. Thin, scattered lacing adorns the glass walls. Little carbonation is evident.

Aroma: Rather pronounced aroma of musty, wet grain, with some yeast notes.

Taste: Opens with a wet grain note, rather like a non-alcoholic beer with the addition of harsh medicinal bitterness. The bitterness intensifies as the taste progresses, and lingers on well past the end of the taste. There is also a state bread note late in the taste. As another reviewer astutely noted, even when consumed cold, Lemp has a taste profile similar to over-warm lager.

Mouth feel: Smooth and fairly full, soft and pleasant, with just a hint of carbonation.

Drinkability/notes: While Lemp is purported to be a craft-brewed beer, it does not compare well to commonly-available macro lagers. I really wanted to like this beer, with its 19th century-style label and the sobriquet of "America's First Lager Beer". But alas, Lemp did not live up to its promise, or to my modest expectations.

Presentation: Packaged in a twelve-ounce brown glass long neck bottle with a twist-off crown, served in a standard pint tap glass.

Serving type: bottle

06-28-2008 03:02:34 | More by Pegasus
Photo of hwwty4
hwwty4

Missouri

2.42/5  rDev -11.7%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Poured a 12oz bottle into my Chimay chalice. Poured a highly carbonated orangey-brown, with a big white head that disappeared into nothingness. There is absolutely no head retention at all. Aroma is odd. It almost smells like the water out of a minnow bucket. Not nearly as fishy, but that earthy smell is in there. This beer also has a slightly yeasty aroma with a sharp sourness from the malts. The taste isn't much better. This beer is oddly yeasty, which makes up the majority of the taste profile. There is also a slight sour twang to it. Mouthfeel is surprisingly dry. This beer isn't nearly as crisp as I thought it was going to be. I definitely will not be seeking this one out again.

Serving type: bottle

04-01-2008 20:31:00 | More by hwwty4
Photo of skeetermoses
skeetermoses

Oklahoma

2.42/5  rDev -11.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

I always wanted to try this beer, I finally got a sample pack of beer with this one in it. I am not impressed with this beer at all. It is not the worst by any means but I think I was correct in not picking up this beer for the longest time. I don't think I will be trying this one again.

Serving type: bottle

12-07-2008 02:30:24 | More by skeetermoses
Photo of GeoffRizzo
GeoffRizzo

Texas

2.45/5  rDev -10.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Opaque yellow, thin, well standing white head. Some perfumy, grainy aromas, initially thought to match the macro-adjunct nose, yet these seem to be a little more pleasant, but not by much. Hangs on the fence of a light bodied beer; some spicy hops are quickly detected, then quickly fade away, sweet and a harsh twang bitterness throughout; grassy and some corn notes in the body. Becomes quickly carbonated and lacks any decent qualities, even for a 'standard lager' as the label claims. This is boasted as the 'first American lager'; America has made some great strides! Don't spend time looking for this one.

Serving type: bottle

06-05-2004 02:41:59 | More by GeoffRizzo
Photo of BuckeyeNation
BuckeyeNation

Iowa

2.45/5  rDev -10.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Bright tangerine with minimal visible carbonation. The toasted bagel colored cap was about a bagel thick after the pour and doesn't look too shabby. In the end, a respectable amount of lace sticks to the glass.

The aroma is sour and musty and ale yeast fruity. Most all-malt lagers smell like grain with a handful of German hops. It isn't bad, it's just unexpected and isn't consistent with the style (note: since changed to American pale lager). Warming ushers in a hint of nastiness.

The flavor is pretty much a carbon copy of the nose, which means that it isn't any good either. Lemp St. Louis still strikes me as an estery ale, with all manner of strange flavors competing for attention. Clean it is not.

Let's see... lightly toasted sour grain mixed with old peach skins and soaked in mineral water. It isn't nearly that bad, but I'm struggling to come with words that capture the flavor profile accurately. It's both sweet (early) and bitter (late), though neither one dominates at any point along the way. Yep, this is an strange one.

Lemp isn't quite limp, but it's damn close. That's what happens when a light body is coupled with too few bubbles. A better mouthfeel would be nice, but it wouldn't change the scores on either side of it.

Lion Brewery's Lemp St. Louis Standard Lager Beer is supposed to be a recreation of the first lager brewed in America, by Adam Lemp, in St. Louis, in 1840. The brand was brought back to life by a group of investors in 2004. This is either a lousy recreation of the original or the original died for good reason. Some things are best left on the scrapheap of history.

Serving type: bottle

03-01-2008 13:48:22 | More by BuckeyeNation
Photo of jharris0624
jharris0624

Missouri

2.5/5  rDev -8.8%

11-17-2012 17:55:51 | More by jharris0624
Photo of ejimhof
ejimhof

Pennsylvania

2.5/5  rDev -8.8%

09-07-2013 23:27:10 | More by ejimhof
Photo of Shultzerdugen
Shultzerdugen

Missouri

2.53/5  rDev -7.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

12 oz. bottle with no dates.

Poured a clear, dark straw with a small white head that settled into a collar.

Crisp and clean nose, not much of anything going on here, just some faint malt sweetness.

A little thin and watery on the palate, malts are overly sweet and unbalanced in comparison to threshold hopping.

I'm glad this was offered at a friends house, I would have felt robbed if I purchased it. On par with some macro lagers, no way of telling if it just wasn't fresh and the hops had mellowed to a nonexistant state.

Serving type: bottle

03-20-2005 18:30:28 | More by Shultzerdugen
Photo of Cresant
Cresant

Kentucky

2.55/5  rDev -6.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured this 12 oz. brown bottle into a pils glass. No date. The murky body was a dull golden brown. The head was bright white and persistent.

Smell was slightly vegetal. No hints of hops.

Taste was sweet vegetables, carrots or corn. There was some tart counterbalancing. Fruity, more like an ale than a lager.

Mouthfeel was smooth with a medium body.

Serving type: bottle

04-07-2009 03:02:42 | More by Cresant
Photo of BeerZack
BeerZack

North Carolina

2.6/5  rDev -5.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Clear amber one-finger fizzy head that quickly fades to spotty thin foam.

Smells like sweet light and carmalts with spicy carbonic whiffs.

Slightly roasted sweet malt with a metallic finish. Watery impression on finish. Small step from your average macro lager.

Aggressive carbonation bites the tip of my tongue. As the beer warms and loses all that fizz it gets a bit sticky, sweet, which makes the drinkability not so good.

Serving type: bottle

12-06-2007 18:10:44 | More by BeerZack
Photo of ttu94
ttu94

Texas

2.63/5  rDev -4%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

After reading about the original Lemp brewery and how prohibition killed them and Lemp Jr put a bulllet in his heart I was suprised to find a beer called Lemp still being made. Well this is not the original Lemp it comes from PA and just uses the name but I bought it so I might as well review it. Looks ok clear yellow with a decent head. Smell is malty, a nice start. The taste has a very disticnt flaw. Cooked, make that overcooked vegie taste. This really needs to be reworked. It is not the worst lager beer I have had but could be o so much better and that is dissapionting.

Serving type: bottle

11-25-2007 03:43:57 | More by ttu94
Photo of ChainGangGuy
ChainGangGuy

Georgia

2.63/5  rDev -4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Appearance: Pours a clear, orange-hued body with no more than a thin ring of white bubbles on top. Swirl - swirl - nothin'.

Smell: Sweetish, lightly bready nose with a vague estery fruit hint and touch of floral European hops.

Taste: Upfront is a sweetish, stale bready (bordering on grainy) taste. Touch of fruit. Faintly floral, lightly spicy hops, though the bitterness is a bit lacking, leaving you with a semi-dry finish and some bleak flavors lingering into the aftertaste. You're lifeless and a tad unclean, Lemp.

Mouthfeel: Medium-thin body. Medium carbonation.

Drinkability: Though it paired well with the Johnny Cash song "Ring of Fire", it's not one to stand on its own really. Sadly, Lemp is one to skip. I dare say it'd even come up short when compared to some of the macro lagers.

Serving type: bottle

05-30-2009 18:42:34 | More by ChainGangGuy
Photo of budgood1
budgood1

Minnesota

2.68/5  rDev -2.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

pours out a light amber colour, a bit darker than your average lager...a thin fine head, little retention and sparse lace. adjuncty corn nose...a bit grainy and grassy, too. for the most part, tastes like any other macro selection out there that uses corn as an adjunct...with the same crisp mouthfeel and lightish body. adjunct aftertaste and crisp, dry finish. if this came in thirty packs for a cheap price, it might be worth it...but i'm sure this sixer was overpriced. a marketing gimmick aimed at the the folks in the st. louis area. i'd rather drink bud or michelob or whatever from A-B than shell out any cash for this.

anyway...this was a x-mas gift (among a hoarde of schlafly stuff) from my brother who lives in st. louis. thanks, bro!

Serving type: bottle

12-28-2004 01:51:11 | More by budgood1
Photo of salukiKMO
salukiKMO

Illinois

2.7/5  rDev -1.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

I was looking forward to trying a St. Louis beer that wasn't made by AB. Although I noticed it's actually brewed in PA.

The color was that of most lagers..a darker yellow than say a Bud Light. The head quickly dissapated after the pour. I thought the taste was pretty good. A little too hoppy for my liking but overall not bad. Would recommend as an alternative to the lager macro beers like a Bud or Miller.

Hope this helps..my first review.

Serving type: bottle

11-18-2005 05:17:09 | More by salukiKMO
Photo of whynot44
whynot44

Missouri

2.7/5  rDev -1.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Light bodied, clear bronze gold color with a moderate white head.

Aroma is primarily grain with some biscuity tones and grassy floral notes.

Taste is also primarily grain with some light malt sweetness and, unfortunately, a hint of cardboard. There is a grassy/floral/citrus overtone as well. Slightly dry at the finish for a lager, but interesting.

This is drinkable and nicely refreshing on that basis. Flavor thins Quickly as it warms, so get it on down for best results.

Serving type: bottle

12-02-2005 05:52:33 | More by whynot44
Photo of Bighuge
Bighuge

Minnesota

2.78/5  rDev +1.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Medium gold color. Thin and weakly toned white. Retention is average at best. Lacing is minimal. Aroma is decent. Hay and lemongrass notes as well as some clean malt tones. The taste seems "macro-ish" to me. I'd be surprised if adjuncts weren't used in substantial quantities in this beer. There's a corny sweetness. A dry, grainy finish. A thin mouthfeel. And fizzy carbonation. Some macro lagers taste better than this. But I should preface that statement by saying that this is a beer I would drink if somebody handed it to me at a party.

Serving type: bottle

03-01-2004 04:04:39 | More by Bighuge
Photo of zeff80
zeff80

Missouri

2.85/5  rDev +4%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A - Poured out a clear, orange color with gold highlights. It had little to no head retention and left no lace.

S - Aroma was a little weak. Some grainy, bready aroma. No hop or floral aromas.

T - It was sweet and bready with some nice caramel flavors. A touch of bitter hops - really quite mild.

M - It was crisp, sharp and fairly smooth. A light lager that is good but lacked the dry finish I expect from a good lager.

D - This is an okay lager. Not something I'd regularly pick up or recommend to anyone.

Serving type: bottle

04-14-2010 03:20:16 | More by zeff80
Photo of GossageBrewery
GossageBrewery

Missouri

2.89/5  rDev +5.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured this Pale Lager from a 12 oz bottle into a pint glass Poured a golden orange color, produced an average white head , featured poor retention and left little lacing on the glass. The aroma contained some malted grain and a wee bit of hops. Light in body, there is some sort of a mineral taste that overshadows the malted grain- Im not sure if this is the original recipe for Lemp Lager, (which was the nations first lager beer.) - That said its decent, worth a try but not something I would go back too.

Serving type: bottle

01-27-2013 00:30:29 | More by GossageBrewery
Photo of MTNboy
MTNboy

Germany

2.9/5  rDev +5.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I felt that this was a very good interpretation of the English style. It strongly resembled a lot of the common British name brand ales. It brown body with great creamy tan head and lace. The aroma was very roasty and malty The taste was about the same just a little more bitter than the smell with minimal wood and nut tones. The mouthfeel is creamy and full.

Serving type: bottle

11-21-2008 13:33:57 | More by MTNboy
Photo of colts9016
colts9016

Idaho

2.93/5  rDev +6.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

A dark golden yellow pour that is slightly clouded. The head quickly disappears.
Citrus, wheat and a hint of malt gives it a pleasant aroma.
The taste of this beer is unbalanced. The first sip give way to a malt but the finish has a hint of citrus. There is no body to the beer. It is mediocre attempt at a beer.

Serving type: bottle

12-06-2008 20:08:11 | More by colts9016
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Lemp St. Louis Lager from Lion Brewery, Inc.
68 out of 100 based on 37 ratings.