1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Lemp St. Louis Lager - Lion Brewery, Inc.

Not Rated.
Lemp St. Louis LagerLemp St. Louis Lager

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
68
poor

37 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 37
Reviews: 33
rAvg: 2.74
pDev: 20.07%
Wants: 1
Gots: 0 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Lion Brewery, Inc. visit their website
Pennsylvania, United States

Style | ABV
American Pale Lager |  ABV ?

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: NeroFiddled on 02-18-2004)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 37 | Reviews: 33 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Vancer
3.53/5  rDev +28.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

“Americas First Lager Beer” Now brewed by Lion in PA. And yeah, I thought this was just a novelty beer years ago, but it’s still arriving, so time for a try.

Hey! Not to damn bad – clear sunshine yellow / amber pour topped by a decent white head. Do note husked and cooked veggies and corn in the aroma. But a semi-malty brew in the quaff. Well balanced, crisp and dry. Yeah, this was actually refreshing and tasty. I’d have no problem popping a few of these guys.

Vancer, May 15, 2007
Photo of whynot44
2.7/5  rDev -1.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Light bodied, clear bronze gold color with a moderate white head.

Aroma is primarily grain with some biscuity tones and grassy floral notes.

Taste is also primarily grain with some light malt sweetness and, unfortunately, a hint of cardboard. There is a grassy/floral/citrus overtone as well. Slightly dry at the finish for a lager, but interesting.

This is drinkable and nicely refreshing on that basis. Flavor thins Quickly as it warms, so get it on down for best results.

whynot44, Dec 02, 2005
Photo of salukiKMO
2.7/5  rDev -1.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

I was looking forward to trying a St. Louis beer that wasn't made by AB. Although I noticed it's actually brewed in PA.

The color was that of most lagers..a darker yellow than say a Bud Light. The head quickly dissapated after the pour. I thought the taste was pretty good. A little too hoppy for my liking but overall not bad. Would recommend as an alternative to the lager macro beers like a Bud or Miller.

Hope this helps..my first review.

salukiKMO, Nov 18, 2005
Photo of ghurux86
3.75/5  rDev +36.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

first off, this is better than the other STL beers, meaning AB products.
pours a dark yellow with a hint of orange, a white head that dissipates kinda fast but not instantly and even after it stays around the edge. laces a little.
smells of corn, yeast, malt, and something sweet maybe caramel or something.
taste is pretty much like the smell, but the malt seems to come through a little more with a slight hoppiness at the rear end.
feels good going down, nice and smooth, medium bodied, and not a lot of carbonation.
very drinkable imo but i like to try new stuff so it will probably be a while before i get it again.

ghurux86, May 03, 2005
Photo of Shultzerdugen
2.53/5  rDev -7.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

12 oz. bottle with no dates.

Poured a clear, dark straw with a small white head that settled into a collar.

Crisp and clean nose, not much of anything going on here, just some faint malt sweetness.

A little thin and watery on the palate, malts are overly sweet and unbalanced in comparison to threshold hopping.

I'm glad this was offered at a friends house, I would have felt robbed if I purchased it. On par with some macro lagers, no way of telling if it just wasn't fresh and the hops had mellowed to a nonexistant state.

Shultzerdugen, Mar 20, 2005
Photo of budgood1
2.68/5  rDev -2.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

pours out a light amber colour, a bit darker than your average lager...a thin fine head, little retention and sparse lace. adjuncty corn nose...a bit grainy and grassy, too. for the most part, tastes like any other macro selection out there that uses corn as an adjunct...with the same crisp mouthfeel and lightish body. adjunct aftertaste and crisp, dry finish. if this came in thirty packs for a cheap price, it might be worth it...but i'm sure this sixer was overpriced. a marketing gimmick aimed at the the folks in the st. louis area. i'd rather drink bud or michelob or whatever from A-B than shell out any cash for this.

anyway...this was a x-mas gift (among a hoarde of schlafly stuff) from my brother who lives in st. louis. thanks, bro!

budgood1, Dec 28, 2004
Photo of rocketmotor
1.6/5  rDev -41.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

Bought this thinking it would be nice to have the first big name beer from St Louis, what a mistake. If you like corn/grain flavored and smelling beer go for it. I was very disapointed, as the smell and and taste reminded me of that corn crap beer Natural Light.

The beer poured with very little head which subsided quickly. The beer appeared a slightly dark straw color, the best feature it had IMO.

The smell of the beer was strongly tainted by corn and grain. I can't get past the smell, just too much for me. I know it may fit the style, but it is too strong. Very little hop scent.

I thought the flavor was too dominated by the corn/grain adjuncts. There was a light, sweet, malt flavor, strong adjunct flavor, and very little hop bitterness. The majority of the bitterness was provided by the carbonation.

I paid $8.00 for a six pack and I expected a premium type beer. This is a cheap adjunct brew for college kids. Don't get suckered into buying this beer for the history of the LEMP brewery. Just read the six pack carrier and set it down, buy a real beer instead, or buy Natural Light and save yourself about $4.00 a six pack.

rocketmotor, Nov 03, 2004
Photo of GeoffRizzo
2.45/5  rDev -10.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Opaque yellow, thin, well standing white head. Some perfumy, grainy aromas, initially thought to match the macro-adjunct nose, yet these seem to be a little more pleasant, but not by much. Hangs on the fence of a light bodied beer; some spicy hops are quickly detected, then quickly fade away, sweet and a harsh twang bitterness throughout; grassy and some corn notes in the body. Becomes quickly carbonated and lacks any decent qualities, even for a 'standard lager' as the label claims. This is boasted as the 'first American lager'; America has made some great strides! Don't spend time looking for this one.

GeoffRizzo, Jun 05, 2004
Photo of jimdkc
1.83/5  rDev -33.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Poured a crystal clear golden color. Fast-fading white head. Little lacing. Nose is grainy and corny. It's been quite a while since I've had a Bud... but that's the memory that stirred while drinking this! Same slightly harsh flavor... same mildly unpleasant bitterness on the swallow. Claims to be America's first lager beer, and makes a big deal of splashing "St. Louis" all over the label... but it's contract brewed in Pennsylvania! Not sure what the point is. I think "historic novelty" is a good description for this!

jimdkc, May 06, 2004
Photo of NeroFiddled
3.75/5  rDev +36.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours a crystal-clear bronze with golden highlights beneath a short but creamy head of bright white foam. The head retention is average, and it drops shortly to an average collar but does somehow manage to leave some minor splashes of lace about the glass. The nose offers some sweetish, grainy, and delicately caramelized malt that's laced with lightly spicy and floral hops. In the mouth it's medium-light bodied with a fine-bubbled, median carbonation that leaves it nicely crisp. The flavor offers a surprisingly nice amount of floral and spicy hop flavor amidsts its lightly sweet and delicately caramelish malt. A firm bitterness balances it quite well, and it finishes drying with some residual spicy hops that fade to reveals a bit of sticky malt left underneath. Quite clean, and very well made; this is an interesting lager that offers a good balance of character and drinkability. An excellent cross-over beer for persons looking to move forward from basic, lightly hopped macro brands.

NeroFiddled, Mar 13, 2004
Photo of Bighuge
2.78/5  rDev +1.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Medium gold color. Thin and weakly toned white. Retention is average at best. Lacing is minimal. Aroma is decent. Hay and lemongrass notes as well as some clean malt tones. The taste seems "macro-ish" to me. I'd be surprised if adjuncts weren't used in substantial quantities in this beer. There's a corny sweetness. A dry, grainy finish. A thin mouthfeel. And fizzy carbonation. Some macro lagers taste better than this. But I should preface that statement by saying that this is a beer I would drink if somebody handed it to me at a party.

Bighuge, Mar 01, 2004
Photo of winomark
1.98/5  rDev -27.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

Pours a medium gold with a vigorous bone white head that quickly fades. Darker than I expected.

Mild nose with some malt tones and slight hop aroma. Typical macro lager smell.

Almost no flavor. Some sweet malt in the finish. Carbonation dominates an othwewise bland palate. No hops noticable.

Very light and uninspiring. Disappears immediately. Quite disappointing.

As MJR mentioned, possibly a novelty beer, similar to 3 Stooges, and he was right. All this is is a historic novelty. Bills itself as the first American lager beer. Unless you have heard of Lemp Brewery in Saint Louis, no need to try it.

winomark, Feb 18, 2004
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Lemp St. Louis Lager from Lion Brewery, Inc.
68 out of 100 based on 37 ratings.