1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Pannepot Reserva - De Struise Brouwers

Not Rated.
Pannepot ReservaPannepot Reserva

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
95
world-class

941 Ratings
THE BROS
95
world-class

(view ratings)
Ratings: 941
Reviews: 344
rAvg: 4.3
pDev: 8.84%
Wants: 112
Gots: 173 | FT: 14
Brewed by:
De Struise Brouwers visit their website
Belgium

Style | ABV
Quadrupel (Quad) |  10.00% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 04-02-2007)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Pannepot Reserva Alström Bros
Ratings: 941 | Reviews: 344 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of IHyphySF
3.25/5  rDev -24.4%

IHyphySF, Jun 24, 2013
Photo of brystmar
3.25/5  rDev -24.4%

brystmar, May 12, 2012
Photo of Adamostella
3.25/5  rDev -24.4%

Adamostella, Jul 16, 2012
Photo of ArsMoriendiOU818
3.25/5  rDev -24.4%

ArsMoriendiOU818, Nov 06, 2013
Photo of uvm2003
3.25/5  rDev -24.4%

uvm2003, Sep 28, 2012
Photo of jsh420
3.35/5  rDev -22.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

2008

pours muddy amber brown with one finger head that faded to a film and left some spotted lacing

smells of sweet brown sugar and dark fruit (not very strong or complex)

taste is a little better - you get the oak - the brown sugar tastes a little burnt - nutty dark fruit malts - and a nice spicy yeast bite on the finish

mouthfeel - medium body with very little carbonation

drinkability was so so - i had high expectations for this beer after trying the regular pannepot but that was an 2007 - i still have one to age so if it gets better after a year or 2 i will change my ratings

jsh420, Jan 27, 2011
Photo of jwinship83
3.35/5  rDev -22.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

11.2oz bottle from 2008 picked up for $9 and drank from my chimay chalice.

A- this one pours out a dirty looking murky dark brown. there is also a thin beige head on top. the head quickly fizzes away into little more than a crown. small spots of lacing are left behind.

S- the smell is pretty subdued. the first thing i pick up on is a brown sugar like sweetness. after that comes some spice and a heavy blast of alcohol. the evidence that it was once in a barrel comes through very faintly with some oak/vanilla.

T- the alcohol i could smell is the first thing that comes to mind as i take my first sip. after that comes the sugary sweetness and some faint cherries, figs, and plums. the oak and vanilla are more pronounced in the taste than the nose. some spices are mixed in here as well.

M- light bodied with a high level of carbonation that is common with this style. moderate to high level of warming from the booze.

D- i was very excited to try this one, but after i did i was left with a feeling of disappointment. the original version is better and cheaper. ill stick with that one from now on.

jwinship83, Oct 12, 2010
Photo of ThisWangsChung
3.36/5  rDev -21.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.25

4 oz. served into a tasting snifter at ChurchKey. From notes; 2010 vintage.

A: Pours a dark ruby color. The head is little more than a thin khaki film. Still, it's very stout-like in appearance.

S: There are some evident tones of nuts, dark fruits, oak, and spicing here, however it's not nearly as evocative as I expected. What is here, at least, is well balanced and pleasurable.

T: The opening is mildly nutty and spicy. This will progress into a middle of earthy toffee, with a light oak finish. Solid complexity, but the flavors themselves aren't blowing my mind.

M: It's medium bodied in texture. The alcohol (seemingly in typical De Struise fashion) is well concealed in spite of its (also seemingly in typical De Struise fashion) dry finish. Very drinkable, as well.

O: Decent, but pretty disappointing. The only brew from De Struise this night that didn't wow me. Mayhaps the keg isn't in fantastic shape? This would probably be better if it were bottle conditioned, in fairness.

ThisWangsChung, Jun 30, 2013
Photo of dasenebler
3.4/5  rDev -20.9%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

33cl, 2008 Vintage.

Cap comes off with an uneventful fizzle, and the pour seems to lack carbonation. The color, however, is a beautiful and surprisingly clear ruby brown, with a small but adequate light tan layer of foam. All of the yeast and sediment sticks to the bottom of the bottle in an opaque layer. Lacing is nice.

The aroma is at first very oxidized and metallic smelling: not good. Somehow this disappears after a while, and a pleasant dark fruit character is revealed. Nice oaky notes.

The flavor is rich and malty, yet not as complex as I expected. The metallic, oxidized character is present, though not as pungent as in the aroma. Lots of caramel and dulce de leche. Oaky, woody flavors are present as well as some prune and fig. Kind of sweet, but with a dry, yeasty finish. Mouthfeel is thick and oily, though could use a bit more carb. I think the flavor would benefit from a livelier mouthfeel, too.

A lot of the Struise beers I've been getting lately have had an unpleasant metallic character. Whatever it is--cap contamination, premature oxidation--it must stop. Struise is better than this.

UPDATE 6/6/11: Second bottle was better. More carbonation, but still lacking pizazz in the mouthfeel department. The metallic, oxidized character is again there in aroma and flavor. I edited a few things in the review above, in addition to upping my numerical score (3 to 3.4). Still not as good as this beer could or should be.

dasenebler, Aug 19, 2011
Photo of tectactoe
3.5/5  rDev -18.6%

tectactoe, Jul 07, 2014
Photo of Lurkerson
3.5/5  rDev -18.6%

Lurkerson, Dec 08, 2013
Photo of jegross2
3.5/5  rDev -18.6%

jegross2, Aug 26, 2013
Photo of Anonymous1
3.5/5  rDev -18.6%

Anonymous1, Aug 26, 2013
Photo of mwbrady12
3.5/5  rDev -18.6%

mwbrady12, Jul 17, 2013
Photo of Mikeluzzjr
3.5/5  rDev -18.6%

Mikeluzzjr, Mar 24, 2014
Photo of Keananmichael5
3.5/5  rDev -18.6%

Keananmichael5, Apr 13, 2014
Photo of Lochnessmonster
3.5/5  rDev -18.6%

Lochnessmonster, Jun 25, 2014
Photo of GeoffreyM
3.5/5  rDev -18.6%

GeoffreyM, Dec 15, 2013
Photo of CityofBals
3.5/5  rDev -18.6%

CityofBals, Jan 31, 2013
Photo of duceswild
3.5/5  rDev -18.6%

duceswild, Jul 31, 2012
Photo of whartontallboy
3.5/5  rDev -18.6%

whartontallboy, May 04, 2012
Photo of madtowndmb1
3.5/5  rDev -18.6%

madtowndmb1, Dec 20, 2013
Photo of neorunner
3.5/5  rDev -18.6%

neorunner, Sep 12, 2013
Photo of hardy008
3.5/5  rDev -18.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

2008 Vintage

Chestnut brown with a one finger tan head which vanishes quickly and leaves no lacing. The aroma has pears, candi sugar, grapes, dates, oak, and a heavy amount of alcohol.

The taste is just like the aroma. Pears, candi sugar, grapes, dates, oak, and alcohol. It is also sweet and boozy. A lot of alcohol heat in this beer.

Medium to full bodied. Sweet, smooth, decent carbonation, and a lot of alcohol heat. A nice tasting Quadrupel, but far from my favorite of the style. There is too much alcohol heat for my liking.

I suspect I would like the traditional Old Fisherman's Ale better.

hardy008, Dec 11, 2010
Photo of todisht
3.5/5  rDev -18.6%

todisht, Jan 12, 2012
Pannepot Reserva from De Struise Brouwers
95 out of 100 based on 941 ratings.