1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Pannepot Reserva - De Struise Brouwers

Not Rated.
Pannepot ReservaPannepot Reserva

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
96
world-class

981 Ratings
THE BROS
95
world-class

(view ratings)
Ratings: 981
Reviews: 350
rAvg: 4.3
pDev: 8.84%
Wants: 111
Gots: 173 | FT: 14
Brewed by:
De Struise Brouwers visit their website
Belgium

Style | ABV
Quadrupel (Quad) |  10.00% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 04-02-2007)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | Likes | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Pannepot Reserva Alström Bros
Ratings: 981 | Reviews: 350 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of BrentLinkin
3.25/5  rDev -24.4%

Photo of IHyphySF
3.25/5  rDev -24.4%

Photo of brystmar
3.25/5  rDev -24.4%

Photo of Adamostella
3.25/5  rDev -24.4%

Photo of ArsMoriendiOU818
3.25/5  rDev -24.4%

Photo of uvm2003
3.25/5  rDev -24.4%

Photo of jsh420
3.35/5  rDev -22.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

2008

pours muddy amber brown with one finger head that faded to a film and left some spotted lacing

smells of sweet brown sugar and dark fruit (not very strong or complex)

taste is a little better - you get the oak - the brown sugar tastes a little burnt - nutty dark fruit malts - and a nice spicy yeast bite on the finish

mouthfeel - medium body with very little carbonation

drinkability was so so - i had high expectations for this beer after trying the regular pannepot but that was an 2007 - i still have one to age so if it gets better after a year or 2 i will change my ratings

Photo of jwinship83
3.35/5  rDev -22.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

11.2oz bottle from 2008 picked up for $9 and drank from my chimay chalice.

A- this one pours out a dirty looking murky dark brown. there is also a thin beige head on top. the head quickly fizzes away into little more than a crown. small spots of lacing are left behind.

S- the smell is pretty subdued. the first thing i pick up on is a brown sugar like sweetness. after that comes some spice and a heavy blast of alcohol. the evidence that it was once in a barrel comes through very faintly with some oak/vanilla.

T- the alcohol i could smell is the first thing that comes to mind as i take my first sip. after that comes the sugary sweetness and some faint cherries, figs, and plums. the oak and vanilla are more pronounced in the taste than the nose. some spices are mixed in here as well.

M- light bodied with a high level of carbonation that is common with this style. moderate to high level of warming from the booze.

D- i was very excited to try this one, but after i did i was left with a feeling of disappointment. the original version is better and cheaper. ill stick with that one from now on.

Photo of ThisWangsChung
3.36/5  rDev -21.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.25

4 oz. served into a tasting snifter at ChurchKey. From notes; 2010 vintage.

A: Pours a dark ruby color. The head is little more than a thin khaki film. Still, it's very stout-like in appearance.

S: There are some evident tones of nuts, dark fruits, oak, and spicing here, however it's not nearly as evocative as I expected. What is here, at least, is well balanced and pleasurable.

T: The opening is mildly nutty and spicy. This will progress into a middle of earthy toffee, with a light oak finish. Solid complexity, but the flavors themselves aren't blowing my mind.

M: It's medium bodied in texture. The alcohol (seemingly in typical De Struise fashion) is well concealed in spite of its (also seemingly in typical De Struise fashion) dry finish. Very drinkable, as well.

O: Decent, but pretty disappointing. The only brew from De Struise this night that didn't wow me. Mayhaps the keg isn't in fantastic shape? This would probably be better if it were bottle conditioned, in fairness.

Photo of dasenebler
3.4/5  rDev -20.9%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

33cl, 2008 Vintage.

Cap comes off with an uneventful fizzle, and the pour seems to lack carbonation. The color, however, is a beautiful and surprisingly clear ruby brown, with a small but adequate light tan layer of foam. All of the yeast and sediment sticks to the bottom of the bottle in an opaque layer. Lacing is nice.

The aroma is at first very oxidized and metallic smelling: not good. Somehow this disappears after a while, and a pleasant dark fruit character is revealed. Nice oaky notes.

The flavor is rich and malty, yet not as complex as I expected. The metallic, oxidized character is present, though not as pungent as in the aroma. Lots of caramel and dulce de leche. Oaky, woody flavors are present as well as some prune and fig. Kind of sweet, but with a dry, yeasty finish. Mouthfeel is thick and oily, though could use a bit more carb. I think the flavor would benefit from a livelier mouthfeel, too.

A lot of the Struise beers I've been getting lately have had an unpleasant metallic character. Whatever it is--cap contamination, premature oxidation--it must stop. Struise is better than this.

UPDATE 6/6/11: Second bottle was better. More carbonation, but still lacking pizazz in the mouthfeel department. The metallic, oxidized character is again there in aroma and flavor. I edited a few things in the review above, in addition to upping my numerical score (3 to 3.4). Still not as good as this beer could or should be.

Photo of tectactoe
3.5/5  rDev -18.6%

Photo of Lurkerson
3.5/5  rDev -18.6%

Photo of jegross2
3.5/5  rDev -18.6%

Photo of Anonymous1
3.5/5  rDev -18.6%

Photo of mwbrady12
3.5/5  rDev -18.6%

Photo of Mikeluzzjr
3.5/5  rDev -18.6%

Photo of Keananmichael5
3.5/5  rDev -18.6%

Photo of Lochnessmonster
3.5/5  rDev -18.6%

Photo of GeoffreyM
3.5/5  rDev -18.6%

Photo of AgentMunky
3.5/5  rDev -18.6%

Vintage 2009. A little assertive and astringent. Slightly sour. Otherwise, rich and spicy and magnificent. Still. Would rather have normal Pannepot.

Photo of CityofBals
3.5/5  rDev -18.6%

Photo of duceswild
3.5/5  rDev -18.6%

Photo of whartontallboy
3.5/5  rDev -18.6%

Photo of madtowndmb1
3.5/5  rDev -18.6%

Photo of neorunner
3.5/5  rDev -18.6%

Pannepot Reserva from De Struise Brouwers
96 out of 100 based on 981 ratings.