1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Ornery Amber - Tommyknocker Brewery

Not Rated.
Ornery AmberOrnery Amber

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
73
okay

214 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 214
Reviews: 168
rAvg: 3.15
pDev: 15.56%
Wants: 3
Gots: 0 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Tommyknocker Brewery visit their website
Colorado, United States

Style | ABV
American Amber / Red Lager |  5.40% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 12-16-2001)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 214 | Reviews: 168 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of BuckeyeNation
BuckeyeNation

Iowa

2.75/5  rDev -12.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Rich rustic orange with the merest blush of red. The pale orangish ecru head isn't very large, even with a high altitude pour. Despite a rapid rate of bubble poppage, it still manages to last for quite a while. Unfortunately, very little lace finds its way to the glass.

The nose is average at best. It's sweet, somewhat caramel-like and a touch fruity. There isn't much here to praise and there isn't much to criticize. It certainly doesn't make me excited to take a drink.

The long, slow slide continues. Ornery Amber is undermalted and definitely underhopped. It has a watery constitution, a near complete lack of sweetness and lacks any flavor that might be attributed to barley malt. It also lacks hop flavor and bitterness. The only thing left is an unripe fruity sourness (peaches and apricots).

On second thought, I do pick up a little sweetness, but it's only noticeable on the back end as the sourness fades. As noted, the body/mouthfeel is light and is relatively lifeless thanks to a lack of carbonation.

Ornery Amber isn't ornery in the least. Its flavor is anything but aggressive or challenging (although it is a minor chore to get through the entire bottle). The limp mouthfeel brings a few other adjectives to mind, but ornery surely isn't among them. This is my first Tommyknocker beer and I am something less than impressed.

Serving type: bottle

06-16-2005 12:41:20 | More by BuckeyeNation
Photo of mikesgroove
mikesgroove

South Carolina

3.65/5  rDev +15.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

12oz bottle poured into a Pint Glass

A – Poured a nice and very clear amber with the slightest of orange tint to it. A small maybe one inch high head of white foam graced the top and was replenished by chains of carbonation streaming up from the bottom. Decent side glass lace.

S – Aroma was light and surprisingly hoppy with a nice bit of grain pushed up from the bottom. The blend was nice and light and had a good bright aroma. Some light fruit in the back as well.

T – A nice light flavor profile with a good amount of floral hops sitting in the finish. The initial flavor I picked up was that of a nice cereal grain with a touch of a light grass mixed in. This rolled into a nice light fruit with a touch of a pine like finish to it. It was a nice bitter finish and a surprisingly good hop profile.

M – Nice light body with a good amount of carbonation really gave it quite the pleasant feel. Nice crisp finish without a real lingering flavor, nice thirst quencher.

D – Very nice here. This was really quite drinkable as the flavor was light enough to not really distract, and the ample carbonation and light body led to something you could easily have a few of and not even think twice.

Overall this was a decent little amber. I won’t say anything really stood out to be fantastic about it but it was definitely decent and would say that it would probably be good in a pinch. Above average and you could definitely do worse then trying this one.

Serving type: bottle

11-30-2007 11:35:01 | More by mikesgroove
Photo of BEERchitect
BEERchitect

Kentucky

3.68/5  rDev +16.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Pretty typical of Ambers. A good, safe beer. Quite clear medium amber color with initial promising retention, then went flat. Smells pretty malty with a citrus hop aroma. Tastes moderately malty and lightly syrupy. Strong hops remind me of an American Pale Ale. Body is moderate with a light tacky feel. Finishes a bit sweet and bite-ey, maybe from over stressed grain. I'd like to try it again, but I'm not in any hurry.

Serving type: bottle

06-07-2006 20:28:13 | More by BEERchitect
Photo of womencantsail
womencantsail

California

3.38/5  rDev +7.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Thanks to BigDank for sending this bottle in my way. Finally getting around to typing up the review.

A: A pretty nice looking pour on this beer. A clear amber color with a thin layer of white head and some spotty lacing.

S: The smell has a citrusy sweetness and some caramel malt. Not much in the way of contrast as just about all the aromas are sweet.

T: Like the nose, this one is fairly sweet. A honey and toasted, biscuity malt flavor are present up front. The finish has a mild bitterness to it.

M: Nothing terribly exciting in terms of the body, and perhaps a bit watery. The carbonation is a bit on the low side for what I expect from a lager.

D: Definitely a more flavorful incarnation of an American lager, and for that I'm grateful. The flavor and nose are a bit one note, but certainly not bad.

Serving type: bottle

01-26-2010 01:46:26 | More by womencantsail
Photo of ChainGangGuy
ChainGangGuy

Georgia

3.5/5  rDev +11.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Appearance: Pours a clear, amber body with a smallish, bubbly, white head.

Smell: Restrained toffee maltiness with a touch of roast and toast. Some sliced pears. Minor yeast note.

Taste: Toasty toffee-tasting maltiness with a lesser bit of roast. Sugary pear fruitiness. Altogether mild floral hop character and bitterness. Slight yeastiness. Finishes crisp with a light, lingering roastiness.

Mouthfeel: Medium-thin body. Medium carbonation.

Drinkability: A decent, drinkable amber lager, but that's not really saying all that much. Still though, I'll take a generic brew over an overpriced bottle of something gack-inducing and horrendous any day of the week.

Serving type: bottle

10-29-2008 00:21:01 | More by ChainGangGuy
Photo of jaydoc
jaydoc

Kansas

3/5  rDev -4.8%

01-28-2014 04:09:23 | More by jaydoc
Photo of zeff80
zeff80

Missouri

3.33/5  rDev +5.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A - Poured out an orange/amber color with a small, short-lived head. No lace.

S - It smelled of malt and some grassy hops.

T - It tasted of roasted malt and a slight hop bitterness. Okay, but not much else.

M - It was smooth and sharp. A light to medium-bodied beer.

D - This is an okay beer. Not bad for the style and quite sessionable.

Serving type: bottle

08-23-2008 01:59:43 | More by zeff80
Photo of NeroFiddled
NeroFiddled

Pennsylvania

3.9/5  rDev +23.8%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Its clear, orangeish-copper body is capped by a thin, frothy head that drops readily to a big-bubble accented collar and leaves only spotty lace. The nose is mainly malty with a distinct note of caramel amidst its bready and lightly toasted Munich malt, with just a touch of background floral hops. The body is medium and it's fine, moderate carbonation leaves it gently crisp before warming to become slightly creamy and smooth across the palate. Everything suggested by the aroma is carried forth in the flavor with a round, gently toasted, nutty and caramelish malt that's accented by a slight floral hop flavor and a low-key bitterness. It finishes slightly sticky with malt sugars, but then dries quickly leaving the palate ready for another taste. Interestingly malty.

Serving type: bottle

11-20-2003 22:35:27 | More by NeroFiddled
Photo of russpowell
russpowell

Oklahoma

3.9/5  rDev +23.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Color is, well amber, but super clarity and a big fluffy head with nices bubbles. Head rentention is okay, no lace grabs the glass.

Smell: Sweet carmel maltiness and faint honey wiffs invites you to the glass.

Taste Caramel maltiness and light citrussy hops dance a somewhat delicate dance.

Good thick mouth feel.

All in all a good solid effort

Serving type: bottle

09-27-2005 01:52:21 | More by russpowell
Photo of WVbeergeek
WVbeergeek

West Virginia

3.4/5  rDev +7.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

This one is glowing with an orange clouded amber body. Off white orange tinted khaki head forms nicely with sporadic hit and miss specks of lacing. Aroma a nice mix of sublte bready malts and a chalky mineral yeast character going on, not much hop zing. Flavor pretty much a weird brew up front sweetness hits with caramelized sugars and fresh bread tones with some mineral slighly metallic edges. Really not a bad flavor just a bit one dimensional, backing cluster hops come out with each sip but nothing other than to balance out the bready sweentess. Mouthfeel is light to medium bodied no a watery beer definitely has some girth to it, no off flavors to be had. Carbonation is smooth and slightly creamy in texture. Drinkability overall was solid. Makes me not as scared of a mixed 12 pack from them as I used to be.

Serving type: bottle

07-11-2010 16:36:56 | More by WVbeergeek
Photo of WesWes
WesWes

New York

3.78/5  rDev +20%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

The beer pours a nice amber color with a thin white lace head. The aroma is great. It has a wonderful crystal malt scent along with some light hops and a fruity yeast aroma. The taste is decent. It has a crisp, yet dry caramel malt flavor that goes down easy and finishes bitter with some residual sweetness. The mouthfeel is good. It is a medium bodied beer with adequate carbonation. This is a decent amber lager. The aroma is great, but the flavor falls short of expectations. Overall, a good drinker.

Serving type: on-tap

03-14-2006 14:55:36 | More by WesWes
Photo of mactrail
mactrail

Washington

3.63/5  rDev +15.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Very drinkable malty beer.

Dark amber in the glass. Decent head and pleasant, fairly rich mouth feel. Nice nose of roasted malt and caramel. Fairly sweet at first sip, and the malty mouthful stays with you. Fruity hops give a nice edge and make the aftertasted fairly bitter.

On tap at Icelantic Skis party on a Santa Fe Drive art Friday in Denver.

Serving type: on-tap

06-04-2011 04:44:17 | More by mactrail
Photo of smcolw
smcolw

Massachusetts

2.45/5  rDev -22.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 1 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 2.5

Thick, dome head that leaves a solid blanket of lace. The color is a neutral amber. Clear.

The smell reminds me of freshly opened beef stew. Not appealing.

The taste is an improvement from the smell. It's creamy and more malty, but there's a modest level of hop bitterness. Decent body with a light level of carbonation. Leaves a sour taste in the mouth.

Serving type: bottle

01-14-2011 22:32:35 | More by smcolw
Photo of oriolesfan4
oriolesfan4

Maryland

3.49/5  rDev +10.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.5

Out of the six Tommyknocker beers I tried this was one of the better ones along with the Pale Ale. A very appealing red color in the glass and has a nice caramel malty taste to it. It was very well balanced and refreshing as well. I would not mind trying this guy again in the future.

Serving type: bottle

10-06-2008 23:44:32 | More by oriolesfan4
Photo of ppoitras
ppoitras

Massachusetts

3.98/5  rDev +26.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

12oz bottle obtained via trade with hopdog. Thanks for the opportunity... Label notched best within 4 months of Aug05. Oops.

Poured into an imperial pint glass, formed a 1/4" light tan head over the cloudy orangey amber brew. Head quickly depletes to a swirly film, with a group of big bubbles in one area, with average to good lacing. Aroma is grain pellet, with a touch of tart fruit. Taste is the same, well-balanced, sedate. Mouthfeel is soft over the tongue, maybe a bit chalky, and drinkability is very high. Didn't have too high of hopes for this brew, but was pleasantly surprised.

Serving type: bottle

05-16-2006 21:06:39 | More by ppoitras
Photo of mothman
mothman

United Kingdom (Wales)

3.35/5  rDev +6.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Poured into a pint glass. Color is a bright orange. There was little head with no retention or lace.

Smell is of a citrus with some malts and banana notes. The taste is very malty for a lager. There are some fruity notes. The smell was more pleasing than the taste.

Mouthfeel is slight bitter, but goes down smooth. A pretty clean aftertaste.

Overall, this is a very sessionable beer. There really wasn't anything to special about this beer, but it was worth a shot.

Serving type: bottle

02-02-2009 23:41:52 | More by mothman
Photo of ejimhof
ejimhof

Pennsylvania

3/5  rDev -4.8%

09-20-2013 00:34:52 | More by ejimhof
Photo of beerthulhu
beerthulhu

New Jersey

2.68/5  rDev -14.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Bottle notched 9/21/10. Consumed 2/19/11.

A: Orange cherry with a fair clarity reveals a moderate effervese of micro-bubbles clumped tightly together. On top lied a finger high tan head of moderate retention that left but a thin sticky ring for lace. Average regards here because it neither tempted me nor discouraged.

S: Fruity nose of fresh oranges, and cherries. Underlying notes of sweet toasted caramel syrup along with a light alcohol detection that was similar to cough syrup. Having trouble trying to relate to what exact style this is suppose to represent but once again a bit sweet with cherry juice.

T: The flavor was as sweet, if not more so, then the nose, almost to the point of being unbearable. Fruity with dry mandarin oranges, cherries and a trail of tropical fruitiness (mangos). More tropical and fruity like a juice you would enjoy at a beach resort rather then what one envisions as a beer. Some spicy sweet hopping that finishes off with a bit of pink grapefruit juice and citrus.

M: Light bodied, near thin, smooth with a slippery feel and a soft carbonation factor. Finishes off the tongue with a tropical fruitiness.

D: Fruity and sweet, dare I say a girlie drink?, more suited for the beaches of cancun then on the seat of a bar. Ones fine, hold the seconds, way to sweet and wouldn't waste my time or money on a repurchase.

Serving type: bottle

02-28-2011 23:26:51 | More by beerthulhu
Photo of Bighuge
Bighuge

Minnesota

2.8/5  rDev -11.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Hmmmmm. A beer that pours no head. Interesting. Scarlet red in color. Slightly chill hazed. Some sweet malt on the nose and faint hops. And a little mustiness as well. Taste is more of the same. Subtle sweet malt with traces of chocolate malt as well. And the mustiness as well. Body is decent. About medium-full. Nothing horrible here, but on the flipside, nothing good either. I thought I was getting an Ornery Amber ale and instead I got an Ordinary Amber ale.

Serving type: bottle

11-01-2002 19:06:46 | More by Bighuge
Photo of Beerandraiderfan
Beerandraiderfan

Nevada

3.1/5  rDev -1.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured out equal parts orange and amber, maybe a little brown thrown in to round things out. Aroma was a nice sweet lightly bready malt aroma, with the slightest hop tickle, pretty nice, especially considering the usual way to get me to rate aroma higher on an amber is to just dump a bunch of dry hops in.

Taste, back to ordinary, no off flavors, no depth, but pretty standard crystal and caramel malt presence. Hopping is average and fair. Easy enough to drink, but not going to impress your hardcore beer nerd friends, this one is more geared towards others, maybe waiting to make the leap.

Serving type: bottle

02-07-2012 18:35:30 | More by Beerandraiderfan
Photo of smakawhat
smakawhat

Maryland

2.95/5  rDev -6.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Poured from the bottle into a nonic pint glass.

A tight foamy light caramel head is formed with about two fingers in size. Body is a light and cloudy amber very doppelbock looking. Some decent lacing on places also.

Looks like a doppelbock, smells like one. Toffee sticky malts, and small banana with a fruity estery sense also. Kind of unexpected sort of a red lager/doppelbock mix.

Taste is lacking in some sort of direction. Wet malt presence, and watery toffee. Then a weak grain sense reminiscent of an Irish Ale but without the grass kick. Taste improves a bit as the beer settles and warms up slightly.

Overall this is a beer that is just a mess and smacks of having an identity crisis. I don't get this beers angle at all. Where is the basic malt presence, it smacks of both doppelbock and Irish red ale only to give no justice to those styles. Kind of a lost cause here not impressed.

Serving type: bottle

09-29-2011 23:12:27 | More by smakawhat
Photo of Tone
Tone

Missouri

4/5  rDev +27%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Pours a slightly hazy, dark golden color. 1/4 inch head of an off-white color. Decent retention and decent lacing. Smells of yeast cleanliness, slight hops, some fruity aromas, and some sweet malt. Fits the style of an American Amber / Red Lager. Mouth feel is very smooth and slightly thick with an average carbonation level. Tastes of sweet malt up front, some earthy malt comes through as well, a good hop background, some pine notes come through faintly, and a slight dryness is present in the finish. Overall, a pretty decent beer with a good blend of flavors; the appearance is lacking, though. Worth a try and definitely deserves a better rep than it has received so far.

Serving type: bottle

04-02-2009 01:47:46 | More by Tone
Photo of chinchill
chinchill

South Carolina

3.33/5  rDev +5.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

12 oz bottle served in a pint glass.

Pours a nice amber color; hazy with a 1+ finger off-white head that has good retention and lacing.

The aroma is pleasing. As expected, it features light and medium malt but with a touch of spicy hops. The promise of hops is mostly unfulfilled in tasting, where we have an unflawed but rather tame and mediocre amber lager that could pass for a good macro-brew.

O - aroma borders on 4 but taste falls short.

Serving type: bottle

09-13-2011 23:07:52 | More by chinchill
Photo of Dogbrick
Dogbrick

Ohio

2.73/5  rDev -13.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Since when is being Ornery a good thing? When I think ornery, I think of the smart-ass kids you find on network TV sitcoms. I hate those kids. Luckily I will not hold the adjective against this beer. Pours a dark orangish-brown with a medium thin bone white head. Aroma of malt, caramel and maple. Medium-bodied and kind of syrupy, with flavors of caramel, malt, honey and hops. More hops would have helped this beer, as it almost OD's on the sweet/syrupy aspect. The finish is sticky too. Another forgettable beer from Tommyknocker.

Serving type: bottle

06-30-2003 09:44:15 | More by Dogbrick
Photo of DrDemento456
DrDemento456

Pennsylvania

3.18/5  rDev +1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A - Pours a nice amber brown with a bit of head that turns to a slight ring of lace.

S - Smells of a typical amber lager. Some sweet malts and caramel. Nothing too exciting.

T - Sweet but on the reverse side of of neutral with no bitterness from grains or hops. Pretty good though.

M - Light to medium, pretty easy drinking.

Overall I have three more and they are not that offensive but not that exciting either. Pretty standard amber lager.

Serving type: bottle

07-27-2011 23:26:03 | More by DrDemento456
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ornery Amber from Tommyknocker Brewery
73 out of 100 based on 214 ratings.