1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Alpine Glacier Lager - Tommyknocker Brewery

Not Rated.
Alpine Glacier LagerAlpine Glacier Lager

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
75
okay

204 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 204
Reviews: 162
rAvg: 3.25
pDev: 16%
Wants: 2
Gots: 0 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Tommyknocker Brewery visit their website
Colorado, United States

Style | ABV
American Pale Lager |  4.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: kbub6f on 02-06-2002)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 204 | Reviews: 162 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of t0rin0
t0rin0

California

3.25/5  rDev 0%

03-03-2013 16:01:18 | More by t0rin0
Photo of BuckeyeNation
BuckeyeNation

Iowa

3.9/5  rDev +20%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Lightly pollenated goldenrod capped by a quality head of pearl-colored foam. The large lid is tight-bubbled and displays a sandblasted surface of tiny pits and a few larger craters. A respectable amount of finely pocked lace has found its way to the upper few inches of the glass and gives this all-malt lager an attractive craft beer appearance.

The nose is far from earthshattering or avalanche-producing or whatever happens when an alpine glacier gets all riled up. It's mostly barely toasted pale malty with a meager whiff of earthy-musky hops. There's also a mild spiciness in there that is so mild as to probably be a figment of my imagination. Gotta be the hops.

It's hard to make a beer of this style stand out. I'm not prepared to say that Alpine Glacier Lager is a stand out, but it is a more than decent offering. The things that I like most about it are that is uses a sufficient quantity of malt, it uses more hops--and more flavorful hops--than one usually sees in the style and it's slightly sweeter than the average, yet without a trace of corniness.

I don't know what it is about this brewery, but they brew 'tangential' beer and I'm glad of it. I just invented that term on the spot so allow me to explain. I have certain preconceived notions about some of the more common styles and the only thing that's a mystery is whether a particular beer will be a good version of that style or a not so good version.

Tommyknocker beer is easily identifiable as an American Pale Wheat, an English Brown, an All-Malt Lager, etc, but then they thrown in an additional ingredient--sometimes listed on the label, sometimes not--that makes it taste different and usually taste better. They won't cop to doing that with this beer, but it tastes different and better than the dozens of other all-malts that I've had to date. In other words, it heads towards the accepted and then veers off on a pleasant tangent.

The body gets the job done and then some. It has enough heft to be enjoyable in the mouth and enough lightness to be an easy drinker. In fact, as I approach the final few ounces, I'm impressed with how well it's holding up and how perfect the low level of carbonation has remained throughout the bottle. I have no trouble whatsoever nudging the mouthfeel score up to something more fitting.

This is one of those times when I've chosen to judge a beer more in relation to its style peers than in a vacuum. AGL is one of the best all-malts that I can remember drinking and for that it deserves praise. No need to pull this one out of an ice bath. You'll want your palate in full working order to appreciate what Alpine Glacier Lager has to offer.

Serving type: bottle

06-19-2006 18:48:21 | More by BuckeyeNation
Photo of metter98
metter98

New York

3.1/5  rDev -4.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

A: The beer is hazy pale yellow in color and has a high amount of visible carbonation. It poured with a two finger high off white head that has excellent retention properties.
S: There are aromas of grassy hops and lemon citrus in the nose along with some notes of grainy malts.
T: The taste is similar to the smell and has a bit of lemongrass and metallic flavors with a slight amount of bitterness.
M: It feels medium-bodied on the palate and has a moderate amount of carbonation. A little dryness is present in the finish.
O: There’s nothing very appealing about the smell or taste of this beer to make me want to try another.

Serving type: bottle

04-14-2012 21:30:28 | More by metter98
Photo of mikesgroove
mikesgroove

South Carolina

3.83/5  rDev +17.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

12oz bottle poured into a Pint Glass

A – poured a very light pale yellow, somewhat hazy and cloudy it had a decent look about it, almost white in color. A nice two finger high head of frothy and fizzy white foam formed on the top and fell rather quickly leaving the top clean and the sides coated in a light layer of lace.

S – Aroma also was very light with a touch of grain and a light earthy grassy sort of smell. The smells itself were very bright, and very clean smelling. A hint of some kind of light yeast in the foreground as well.

T – Very light and clean, almost non existent in terms of profile. This was not like your non tasting macro, but it did have a very very light, almost nothing taste to it. It just tasted very clean. Some light grain and yeast, and maybe just the slightest hint of some hops in the finish, not bad, just very very light.

M – Super light bodied and with ample carbonation this really was a very light beer. It almost felt as light as water and the flavor was close to it as well.

D – Superb on a hot day, this actually was refreshing in much the same way a glass of ice water would be. I barely noticed that I had finished this it was so light.

Overall this was not bad, just not really up my alley. It was a hardly there light ale, that did its job in not tasting like stale macro garbage and really having a different vibe to it all together. I could see myself having one a hot day as refreshment. Not terribly bad, but again just not my style.

Serving type: bottle

12-05-2007 00:12:23 | More by mikesgroove
Photo of BEERchitect
BEERchitect

Kentucky

2.8/5  rDev -13.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Well, it's beer. That's about it. Certainly prefered over many other American Lagers, but I do expect more from dependable microbreweries. It has a solid malt base that shows weakness in flavor, aroma, and mouthfeel. Lack of decernable character allows the grain flavor and husk bite to dominate. A little too watery into the finish. Light Noble hop spiciness helps out a little. Wouldn't go out of my way for this one.

Serving type: bottle

02-27-2006 16:19:22 | More by BEERchitect
Photo of ChainGangGuy
ChainGangGuy

Georgia

3.88/5  rDev +19.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

Appearance: Suspicious explosive head formation going on here. What a fucking mess. And we're within the best before time line. The drain is on stand-by! Clear, yellow body with, again, a monstrous, foamy white head.

Smell: Pale malts with a mixture of floral and sweetish honey notes.

Taste: Pale maltiness with a honeylike sweetness to it. Floral, lightly spicy hop character with a rather mild bitterness. Sip of cold spring water. Finishes crisp and a bit sweetish.

Mouthfeel: Medium-bodied. Medium-high carbonation.

Drinkability: It's OK. A rather acceptable lager all except the mess and subsequent clean-up. Would make for refreshing summertime drinking or a good candidate for a lawnmower beer, in that I will drink it out on my porch while the apartment's landscaping crew maintains the grass. Work on, workers!

Serving type: bottle

10-27-2008 23:14:14 | More by ChainGangGuy
Photo of jaydoc
jaydoc

Kansas

3/5  rDev -7.7%

01-28-2014 04:06:41 | More by jaydoc
Photo of spycow
spycow

Illinois

3.75/5  rDev +15.4%

03-11-2013 07:02:57 | More by spycow
Photo of JAHMUR
JAHMUR

Connecticut

3/5  rDev -7.7%

11-03-2013 17:26:25 | More by JAHMUR
Photo of zeff80
zeff80

Missouri

3.1/5  rDev -4.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A - Poured out a golden-yellow color with a small, foamy, white head. No lace.

S - It smelled of grains and light caramel malt. There was also a subtle floral aroma.

T - It tasted of sweet grains. There was a bitter aftertaste that mellowed as the beer warmed up.

M - It was crisp and smooth. A light-bodied beer.

D - This is an okay lager. Nothing to rush out and stock up on but it is worth a try.

Serving type: bottle

08-28-2008 01:29:44 | More by zeff80
Photo of russpowell
russpowell

Oklahoma

3.48/5  rDev +7.1%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Poured a nice gloden/straw color with great clarity. Head was fluffy and white with average retention.

Smell: Good malt presence, but ca'nt smell any hops.

Taste:Good slighltly toasty malt on the tounge and throat, probably this beer's best quality. ome resin-like hops bitterness shows up on the finish.

Mouthfeel: Nice carbination and good body

Drinkability: Good crisp clean lager that is nothing special.

Serving type: bottle

09-24-2005 15:41:14 | More by russpowell
Photo of Slatetank
Slatetank

Pennsylvania

3.85/5  rDev +18.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

I picked this up as part of a mix-a-six from Al's of Hampden, poured chilled into a mug.

The color is dark golden with good clarity like apple juice with 1/4 inch of smooth white cap w/ tight beading. The smell is decent with malty odors and a slight hop essence which has a light herbal quality. The scent is mildly sweet with the hops accenting the malt with gentle floral aromas. The feel is crisp and lightly sweet with a moderate bitterness level for the style and slight resinous edge with gentle spice and semi-dry finish.

The crisp malt begins the flavor portion with mild toasted grain and slightly noble tasting hops which give subtle lemony pith elements to the taste with a subtle herbal mild flavor. The citrus edge adds to the flavor since it gives a contrast to the sweet elements in the malt and the hops seem slightly spiced which gives the impression of a pilsner at that level almost since the yeast flavor is dry as it finishes it could go either way. I liked this since I found it to be a good american pale lager with some nice hop flavoring. This lager is good quality since there are flew noticeable flaws and it finishes rather smooth and quaffable.

Serving type: bottle

07-25-2011 22:37:26 | More by Slatetank
Photo of WesWes
WesWes

New York

3.53/5  rDev +8.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

The beer pours a gold color with a thick frothy white head that fades to lacing. The aroma is decent. It has a light and grainy, pale malt scent along with a dry, yet fruity lager yeast aroma. The taste is decent also. It has a light, pale malt flavor that goes down easy and finishes dry and slightly bitter. The mouthfeel is fine. It is a low bodied beer with adequate carbonation. This is a pretty good beer. It's a bit grainy, but it's all malt and easy drinking.

Serving type: on-tap

02-28-2006 19:19:33 | More by WesWes
Photo of jwc215
jwc215

Wisconsin

3.83/5  rDev +17.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours hazy golden with a large white foamy head that descends slowly and leaves plenty of lacing.

The smell is of crisp fruitiness and earthy yeast.

The taste is of sweet malt with crisp citrus - lemon and orange peel. There is a sour yeast flavor that almost interferes, but the hops and malt, which are well-balanced, keeps it in check until the finish. Not a whole lot going on, but what is there is nice - plenty of unexpected citrus.

The solidly light-feeling medium body holds up well. There is a certain tart astringency that makes it a bit drying.

Overall- not bad at all. Thanks to BuckeyeNation for this one!

Serving type: bottle

10-12-2006 22:23:53 | More by jwc215
Photo of oriolesfan4
oriolesfan4

Maryland

3.28/5  rDev +0.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4.5

Well, it's pretty drinkable, that's for sure. I mean, it's a bland tasting lager with little flavor but if it's cold it will go down and smooth and give you a buzz if you're looking for one. If you're looking for a lager with taste I'd look elsewhere.. a little lackluster, but still better than a Bud or Coors.

Serving type: bottle

10-06-2008 23:35:44 | More by oriolesfan4
Photo of jdhilt
jdhilt

New Hampshire

2.68/5  rDev -17.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours a five finger white head that fades quickly leaving some lace. Cloudy amber color. Medium carbonation and medium bodied. Piney nose. Starts sour and yeasty, never tasted a lager like this, hints of sweeter lemonade but finish is piney. $1.49 for a 12oz bottle from Chalet Party Goshen, In.

Serving type: bottle

12-06-2006 23:32:36 | More by jdhilt
Photo of ppoitras
ppoitras

Massachusetts

2.95/5  rDev -9.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

12oz bottle from aracauna via trade. Thanks for the opportunity.

Poured into an imperial pint glass, formed a 4" off-white head above the cloudy light golden amber brew. Head fades slowly, leaving almost solid lace as it recedes. Aroma is minimal and non-descript. Taste is light malts upfront, with a slight hops bitterness for balance. Really neutral overall. Mouthfeel and drinkability are of "ok, but why bother" genre. Not something I would look for again, disappointed with this one.

Serving type: bottle

08-09-2006 22:52:22 | More by ppoitras
Photo of ejimhof
ejimhof

Pennsylvania

3/5  rDev -7.7%

09-20-2013 00:33:28 | More by ejimhof
Photo of beerthulhu
beerthulhu

New Jersey

3.25/5  rDev 0%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A: When backlighted a turbid, almost pastel orange shows a strong effervesce. The head is bready, cream in color, with a good stay of retention. Lacing is thick, of concentric rings running down the glass. The coloring is a bit strange for a typical lager.

S: The nose is fresh wet grass, wet oranges and light straw with a bit of maize. Appeared fairly hoppy at first but quickly quieted down.

T: The flavor seemed grainy, almost like pilsner malt, with dried orange grinds with a strong floral hopping. Warm oranges on the hold, with herbal notes and wildflowers. There are instances of flour on the close with some dry sour grapefruit peel and dry wheat and corn mash.

M: Mouthful was good enough on the hold, tingly form the strong carbonation, light, tart with a light medium weight to it, perhaps a bit more so body (more wheat like)then your typical lager. Playful grapefruit notes linger gently after the swallow. Lacks a crispness factor though.

O: Overall not bad, after several lackluster beers from this brewery Not as crisp as one expects and certainly not mug/pitcher worthy. Drinks like a wheat or pilsner body with just enough show of hops to let you know its there.

Serving type: bottle

09-26-2011 23:02:47 | More by beerthulhu
Photo of Bighuge
Bighuge

Minnesota

3.25/5  rDev 0%
look: 2 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

This beer is a very pale light golden with slight haze and no head. Clean malt aroma with subtle notes of grain. The taste is a notch up from your typical marco lager, but not that much better. Some grain notes are present. Fairly smooth maltiness. Minimal amounts of hop contributions. It goes down rather easily. Almost like water, but with more taste. It's not bad by any means, but not one I'll purchase again anytime soon.

Serving type: bottle

10-29-2002 19:39:59 | More by Bighuge
Photo of Beerandraiderfan
Beerandraiderfan

Nevada

2.6/5  rDev -20%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

That dark gold color, noticeable haze, white head. Nothing to speak of in the smell department.

Taste, not a whole lot going on there either. Light, refreshing etc. . . all the usual buzzwords with a beer that lacks discernable character. Slight bitterness, but not from an appreciable hop content, bitterness and a metallic aftertaste.

This beer was mild back in the 90s, and thesedays, it seems even more tame. I can't really figure who or where I would recommend this. Its light in every way, so I guess I'd recommend it to people who don't drink beer, or people who need to drink beer when its over 100 degrees out.

Serving type: bottle

05-09-2011 22:13:52 | More by Beerandraiderfan
Photo of Latarnik
Latarnik

New Jersey

3.25/5  rDev 0%

06-01-2014 03:12:31 | More by Latarnik
Photo of sendbeer
sendbeer

Georgia

3.5/5  rDev +7.7%

01-02-2013 22:28:41 | More by sendbeer
Photo of Tone
Tone

Missouri

3.78/5  rDev +16.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pours a clear, yellow color. 2/3 inch head of a white color. Good retention and good lacing. Smells of some tart malt, sweet malt, slight hops, some slight pine notes, and some slight yeast cleanliness. Fits the style of an American Pale Lager. Mouth feel is smooth and crisp with a high carbonation level. Tastes of lager cleanliness, slight hops, some sweet malt, and some hints of pine causing a little dryness. Overall, a great improvement over an American Adjunct, though still lacking in body for my taste. This would be a good beer to enjoy in quantity, though.

Serving type: bottle

03-27-2009 04:44:05 | More by Tone
Photo of dmorgan310
dmorgan310

Panama

3.75/5  rDev +15.4%

11-21-2012 04:53:07 | More by dmorgan310
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Alpine Glacier Lager from Tommyknocker Brewery
75 out of 100 based on 204 ratings.