1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Element 115 - Flat Earth Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Element 115Element 115

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
83
good

84 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 84
Reviews: 72
rAvg: 3.68
pDev: 11.68%
Wants: 8
Gots: 1 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Flat Earth Brewing Company visit their website
Minnesota, United States

Style | ABV
California Common / Steam Beer |  5.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 05-05-2007)
View: Beers (24) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 84 | Reviews: 72 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of brewdlyhooked13
brewdlyhooked13

Ohio

1.63/5  rDev -55.7%
look: 3 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

Appearance - uncaps with considerable force. A pour into a shaker pint yields six quick fingers of foam, likely a bad sign. Lots of the light mocha foamage, sticky and falling unevenly. While the orange amber is attractive enough, the volume of suds raises concern.

Aroma - not good. Light sweet grain is distant, outmatched by an acrid, dry foreboding sourness.

Taste - no. Metallic, hints of grainy goodness back there, but sadly this I believe is off. I think I can taste a flash of citrusy hops behind the first wave of sourness, but I'm not certain. How disappointing, I can taste hints of malty goodness up front and good citrus character at the end, but the middle is messed.

Mouthfeel - average body, over the top carbonation. Properly bottled, I would imagine this heavier, softer, and smoother.

Drinkability - thanks to WankerWeasal for the teaser; with any luck perhaps I can find another one of these at DLD09 to re-review.

Serving type: bottle

09-18-2008 21:14:14 | More by brewdlyhooked13
Photo of TENichols
TENichols

Minnesota

2.5/5  rDev -32.1%

07-17-2014 23:49:26 | More by TENichols
Photo of Tolnik
Tolnik

Colorado

2.68/5  rDev -27.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Poured this beer into a pint glass. The copperish wheat colour of beer gave off a fair amount of foam then reducing to wisps of beer. The aroma was that of citrus and malts. The taste however tasted of flat citrus with slight tones of malt that left a bitterness in the aftertaste. Overall I won't have this beer again just due to the unbalanced combination that it gave.

Serving type: bottle

01-30-2009 01:45:07 | More by Tolnik
Photo of OWSLEY069
OWSLEY069

Pennsylvania

2.8/5  rDev -23.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours a clean orange-ish copper color with a white head. In the aroma, a small bitterness and a small sweet malt. In the taste, a small bitterness and kind of watery. A smooth, small bitter malt in the mouthfeel and a dry malty aftertaste. Small hop/ bitter and a nice malt, balanced and easy to drink.

Serving type: bottle

01-03-2008 16:29:58 | More by OWSLEY069
Photo of Hopstout
Hopstout

Minnesota

3/5  rDev -18.5%

05-06-2012 01:11:17 | More by Hopstout
Photo of degerbah
degerbah

Ohio

3.05/5  rDev -17.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

cloudy yellow with some sediment in the glass. Has a sweet smell with lots of floral hops. Tastes citrusy, reminiscent of Sierra Nevada Pale Ale with a very clean drinkable mouthfeel. As I drink it I notice tremendous head retention with a bitter hop aftertaste. This is a

Serving type: bottle

06-27-2009 17:39:53 | More by degerbah
Photo of nrbw23
nrbw23

Ohio

3.13/5  rDev -14.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A- Pours a clear copper color with a foamy white head.

S- Pretty mild here. Tiny bit of malt and some citrus.

T- Pretty dull also. Some grassy malts, some citrus flavors and I could also pick up some sort of spice that was almost like a pepper.

M- Light to medium in body with little carbonation. Felt dry also

D- Ok I guess I don't think I would go out and search for this one.

Serving type: bottle

05-16-2008 18:51:25 | More by nrbw23
Photo of TurdFurgison
TurdFurgison

Ohio

3.13/5  rDev -14.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

I picked this bomber up for $5.99 at the Andersons store in Dublin OH. I thought it might be a German Helles lager (a style I crave always) but it turns out I was wrong, it's a steam beer clone (a style I'm not crazy for). The beer is light copper colored and clear, with a really thick wet foam. The smell is nothing special in my opinion, just biscuity malt and a hops bitterness without the good hops aromatics. The taste is sort of bland as well, well balanced but with a lingering hops bite which isn't pleasant. No flavors that really make it for me. The body's just about medium, which is just about right for the style I suppose, and drinkability is OK except for the bitter aftertaste. Not badly made but not really my choice for a summer day.

Serving type: bottle

08-03-2008 18:59:01 | More by TurdFurgison
Photo of jaydoc
jaydoc

Kansas

3.25/5  rDev -11.7%

11-16-2013 04:57:16 | More by jaydoc
Photo of AnalogErik
AnalogErik

Minnesota

3.25/5  rDev -11.7%

08-26-2013 15:44:12 | More by AnalogErik
Photo of mmulebarn
mmulebarn

Minnesota

3.25/5  rDev -11.7%

11-29-2013 02:23:49 | More by mmulebarn
Photo of mdwalsh
mdwalsh

Iowa

3.28/5  rDev -10.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A: Poured with little to no head, and was quickly a naked top but around the edges there was decent lace. A few bubbles. Amber-Golden in color. Pretty see through

S: Malty, some bitter hoppy notes as well, but those are very hidden. Not a very complex nose at all.

T: Bitter, citrusy. Very citrusy. Bitter turns to sour. Not a great taste, not much there and i don't enjoy what is there.

M: Smooth and light, just like the other FE I tried today, though this one makes itself known on the tongue a little more.

D: Goes down pretty good, no carbonation to fill you up and no single taste to make you spit it out.

Serving type: bottle

03-09-2009 00:33:04 | More by mdwalsh
Photo of mothman
mothman

United Kingdom (Wales)

3.3/5  rDev -10.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured into new belgium globe glass (only glass I had with at my buddies).

Color is a copper/carmel brown. Light tan head that is VERY fluffy. Leaves some good lacing.

The aroma is very citrus like. Some floral hops, while the malts are underrepresented. The taste is very smokey. Earthy hops and sweet carmel malts stand out the most. There is also a hint of raisins.

Mouthfeel starts out bitter then gets very smooth. The alcohol becomes present here. Leaves a dry aftertaste. Great carbonation.

Overall, this isn't my typical style of beer. It is very easy to drink, but I don't plan on buying this one again.

Serving type: bottle

12-30-2008 20:35:40 | More by mothman
Photo of ccrida
ccrida

Oregon

3.33/5  rDev -9.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Appearance is copper with a light tan head, dense, leaving foamy lace.

Smell is weird, a little aspirin like, hint of sourness, like sour mash. Hop compost?

Taste is interesting, definitely a big leafy hop flavor, some caramel from the malt, bitter sweet. The leafy hops could use cut back to let the malt poke through better.

Mouthfeel is smooth, on the dry side, medium light bodied.

Drinkability is okay, the leafy vegetable qualities of the hops just didn't work here for me. Lacking the nuance of a steam beer, I'd have never guessed by the taste.

Serving type: bottle

04-26-2011 22:51:28 | More by ccrida
Photo of KeefD
KeefD

Minnesota

3.35/5  rDev -9%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Pours a clear amber color with a small amount of foam and sparse lacing. Aroma of pale and Vienna malts, backed up by a nice hop freshness. Slightly nutty on the palate, dry as can be, some nice hop bitterness on the finish. Dry and crisp, somewhat refreshing. Needs more carbonation. I must say I'm not overly impressed with this beer. It's decent but nothing I would search out.

Serving type: bottle

08-13-2008 00:29:01 | More by KeefD
Photo of csmiley
csmiley

Ohio

3.38/5  rDev -8.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 3.5

A - Opening this beer provides a nice loud pop and then *whoooosh*. Hmmm. Pours a light amber color and quite clear. The cream colored head tops out at 3 fingers and quickly becomes rocky. It show a hefty amount of staying power. There is more lacing than expected. Looks nice.

S - Nose is clean. Starts out with some cereal and graininess. Alcohol is noted and stronger than expected which is odd for a 5.5% brew. Just a little bit of bitterness can be picked up to finish it off.

T - There is a nice piney bitterness that just keeps biting at the palate along with the overly active carbonation. Some malt is in there to back it up but not much. More cereal, grain, and a note of honey. Alcohol is hidden well behind the bitterness.

M - Lighter bodied with too much carbonation. Finish is bitter and clean.

D - Drinkability is not bad. The earthy characteristics are nice and refreshing. It could be a nice session beer if the carbonation issues could be addressed. Time doesn't seem to work this issue out. Pour it, swirl it, let it set, swirl it, let it set, and still it just has too much carbonation to truly enjoy the experience. Not bad overall though. Glad I got the chance to try this one out.

Serving type: bottle

03-28-2009 04:14:07 | More by csmiley
Photo of Greggy
Greggy

Minnesota

3.4/5  rDev -7.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A- pours a nice copper, with a non-existant head. There was no lacing to speak of either.

S- Definitely a steam beer, malty, hoppy.

T- Mostly malty with some nice hop balance. Nice dry hop finish. ; however, not a whole lot of complexity here, and a rather thin body.

M- VERY low carbonation that attributed to a very small body. More carbonation would make for a better body, resulting in a better beer.

D- Because of the thin body, the style suffer and thus, the drinkability suffers.

Serving type: bottle

03-29-2008 04:24:44 | More by Greggy
Photo of ChopperSmith
ChopperSmith

Minnesota

3.45/5  rDev -6.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a large 22 oz. brown bottle into a chilled standard pint glass.

Appearance - Pours a nice amber/copper color with a decent orange/tan head that doesn't last long and leaves a little sticky lacing behind.

Smell - Very hoppy with a grapefruit citrus tang. Slight malty scents underlying the aggressive hops aroma.

Taste - Very crisp and hoppy. The floral citrus hops are right up front and a little malt on the finish. very little hop bitterness on the finish. A crisp and smooth drinking beer.

Mouthfeel - A little overly carbonated, but not too bad. Light-to-medium body.

Drinkability - It's a good representation of the American Steam beer style. I could see having more of this one if I run across it again.

Serving type: bottle

08-19-2009 21:42:44 | More by ChopperSmith
Photo of ckeegan04
ckeegan04

Texas

3.45/5  rDev -6.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A - Claer medium to dark amber with a large head consisting of lots of little bubbles. Head slowly fades leaving good lacing a thick foam cap on the beer.

S - Lightly toasted malts dominate the nose. There is a faint hint of fruity hoppiness, but the breadines dominates. A little tropical fruit.

T - Very fruity with a light breadiness as well. The fruitiness is a little off and just not that good. Hints of berries as well as a little lime. Not a bad taste, just a weird mix of tastes.

M/D - Light to medium boided, excellent carbonation. Easy drinking but the flavor does not leave me wanting more.

Serving type: bottle

05-19-2009 20:23:57 | More by ckeegan04
Photo of jwc215
jwc215

Wisconsin

3.48/5  rDev -5.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Thanks to morimech for this!
22 oz bottle:

Pours copper with a thin white head that stays. Trailing, slowly vanishing, lace stays.

The smell is bready, with caramel, sour, with an herbal, metallic undertone.

The taste is tangy at first. Caramel grows as it progresses. It leans towards sour, with a rusty, metallic finish. As it progresses, it becomes more balanced and the various flavors come together more neatly, with caramel maltiness bringing things together. Finishes sweet, sour, bitter.

The feel is light-to-medium, with smoothness and a lasting aftertaste.

According to label - American pale, Victory, Crystal and wheat malts. Cluster, Mt. Hood and Northern Brewer hops. An odd brew. Mixed feelings, though I "like" more than "dislike" as a whole... seems over-hopped...which is odd in itself, coming from me - or just hopped in a "different" direction than I would like. The sourness is a bit much... I'll put this in the "interesting" category...

Serving type: bottle

02-10-2010 00:47:29 | More by jwc215
Photo of Kemperfi
Kemperfi

Minnesota

3.48/5  rDev -5.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

The color was a shade of copper. I was very disappointed to see almost no head or lacing. I could pick up on the strong hops and also some malt on the taste and smell. It was a little bitter and had dry finish. It had very little carbonation, nothing to write home about.

Serving type: bottle

03-29-2008 04:27:52 | More by Kemperfi
Photo of djschnabel
djschnabel

Minnesota

3.5/5  rDev -4.9%

04-20-2012 01:46:52 | More by djschnabel
Photo of morimech
morimech

Minnesota

3.5/5  rDev -4.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a bomber into a chalice. It is light ambered in color with almost no head. Very little lacing. The beer appears to be lifeless. This is a bad sign.

I get a little musty funkiness and sweet malt in the aroma.

The taste is a bit weak. The malt character is not that complex. It does have a nice hop bitterness on finish. It feels thin and totally flat. It is not a bad tasting beer but the poor condition of the bottled product makes it very hard to drink. There must be some QC problems with the bottling process as I have had one of their Belgium ales that was in the same sad condition. I will have to wait a few months before I revisit Flat Earth's beer and hopefully things improve in their bottling process.

Another bottle sampled Date 08/15/08
This bottle has carbonation. A small head with moderate sticky lacing. Much better tasting as well with a nice toasted malt and hop bitterness. Nice carbonation adds to the enjoyment of this beer. Overall I will raise the score 1 point in each catagory.

Serving type: bottle

12-08-2007 21:36:24 | More by morimech
Photo of Mdodge8837
Mdodge8837

Minnesota

3.5/5  rDev -4.9%

12-01-2013 22:07:26 | More by Mdodge8837
Photo of Chucker17
Chucker17

South Dakota

3.5/5  rDev -4.9%

05-30-2013 23:32:32 | More by Chucker17
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Element 115 from Flat Earth Brewing Company
83 out of 100 based on 84 ratings.