1. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $14.99 (US/print only). Offer ends April 30. Subscribe now! (Because great beer deserves great stories AND readers.)

HaandBic - HaandBryggeriet

Not Rated.
HaandBicHaandBic

Educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
83
good

74 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 74
Reviews: 39
rAvg: 3.66
pDev: 18.31%
Wants: 6
Gots: 18 | FT: 1
Brewed by:
HaandBryggeriet visit their website
Norway

Style | ABV
Lambic - Fruit |  7.00% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: bark on 01-03-2011

HaandBic is our first beer in the style of a fruit lambic with added red currents and cranberries. We have naturally also added a lambic style yeast blend including bacteria and yeast of different types. Then this concoction has been aged in oak barrels for almost 18 months. The beer gets its tartness from both berries and the concoction we added. It will mostcertainly develop further given time.

16 IBU, 20 EBC
Fermented with several different yeasts and bacteria. Serving temp 8 - 10C or 46 - 50F.
View: Beers (34) | Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
to view more.
Ratings: 74 | Reviews: 39
Reviews by Liquoric3:
More User Reviews:
Photo of Mora2000
3.78/5  rDev +3.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Thanks to bu11zeye for sharing this bottle.

The beer pours an orange color with a white head. The aroma is slightly tart oranges and apples, but there is also a slight sugar note. The flavor is similar, with a lot of sour lemons as well as some wheat notes. Low to medium sourness and very drinkable. Very dry. Thin mouthfeel and medium carbonation. Glad I got to try this one.

Photo of glid02
3.46/5  rDev -5.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Bottle purchased from CBX in Charleston, SC.

Pours a somewhat hazy ruddy amber color with a half-finger slightly off-white head. The head recedes into a wispy layer on top leaving decent lacing.

Smells of medium malts with lightly tart berries and hints of phenols. Also present are very slight hints of brown sugar and lighter hints of funk.

Tastes similar to how it smells, though the funk is a bit more robust. Medium malt flavors kick things off and are joined quickly by ripe berry flavors that have a slight amount of tartness. Midway through the sip the funk comes into play and balances out the slight tartness of the berries. The funk carries through to a mildly bitter ending.

Mouthfeel is good. It’s got a nice thickness with soft carbonation.

Drinkability is OK. I didn’t have any problems finishing my glass however I’m not sure about another.

Overall I had much higher hopes for this beer after everything else I’ve had from this brewery. Hopefully their description is accurate and it will develop over time. As it stands now it’s certainly not worth seeking out.

Photo of GRG1313
2.32/5  rDev -36.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Pours a light cranberry with used brick tint in color and no head. Light orange tones or cast.

Nose is an orange/pear light sour character that is very pleasant that goes to a very light sweet smokey character.

Mouthfeel is a dull "almost" sour. There is no bright or citric character to this beer in the mouth initially. A bit like a sweetened watered fruit vinegar but without the kick and without the "real sour."

Flavors are not unpleasant - but just lacking in all respects. One keeps waiting for a citric character that does not come; waiting for a bit of a pucker factor that just never comes.

There is some light pleasant fruit in the flavor profile and at the very end, without the bright character, there is a little acid in the finish. Not a classic lambic and not real appealing or drinkable.

Photo of emerge077
4/5  rDev +9.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Been waiting awhile to try this, ever since the first mention online a couple years ago. Served at 52º in a tulip glass.

Gentle hiss as the cap is cracked, slow rising carbonation at first, accelerating to a more rapid pace and collecting in the neck of the bottle. Lovely bright reddish orange tone. Two fingers width of foam at first, sticky at the edges, leaving spotty bits of lace.

First whiff is Bretty sterile gauze, but this quickly dissipates, and the fruit shines through soon enough. Cranberry mostly, minerals, damp wood, hay, yeasty with traces of light phenols as well. Stone fruit with pits and stems altogether, as is traditional for a fruited Lambic (the whole fruit completely dissolves).

Distinctive berry notes... cranberry and lingonberry, some phenols present, dry tannic oak finish. Finishes clean with appropriate crisp acidity for a Lambic. Dry aftertaste of damp oak, saddle leather and hay, subtle traces of Brettanomyces lending wild complexity. Overall pleasant and enjoyable. It has more complexity than many wild ales in the US these days, seemingly modeled more after traditional Belgian fruit Lambics. This is highly cellar worthy, and I hope to re-visit years down the road.

2011 vintage, tasted 10/14:
Aged well, reddish color remains, a few bubbles. Lots of oaky tannins, creamy cheese rind funk, slight tang of yogurty lactobacillus. Slight fruitiness though not as distinct as it once was, though still very enjoyable. I'll continue to buy this on sight.

Photo of tendermorsel
4.53/5  rDev +23.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

I am gonna be upfront in saying that I love the Haandbakk.. but I really liked this beer and highly reccomend it to someone who is into sour beers.

Golden colored with minimal carbination. Kinda like a flat lambic. What little head was on the beer after the pour fizzled away almost immediately.

Whoa! This is a sour one for sure. Pretty intense actually. Tons of lactic tartness. Very vingary. Little funk almost straight lactic sourness. I found this very simular to the Haandbakk. What ever wild yeasts they used with the Haandbakk they are using with this beer
too. Same biting vinegar taste. Is there such a thing as a house wild yeast? In many ways I would say that this is a blonde verision of the Haandbakk.

I can totally see why this might get low reviews. It is not for the faint of heart. About as intense as a sour can get. I loved it both times a tried it. I plan on storing a few bottles in the cellar to see where it goes. I can completely understand why some poeple would not like this one despite the fact that I did.

Photo of NittanyBeerFan
4.17/5  rDev +13.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

I have to give a big thanks to callmemickey for sharing this rarity. After haandbakk, I was really excited to try this one.

The color is orangey with pinkish hues. It is a little bit murky, but I imagine that the transportation to the tasting probably stirred it up some...well, that and the second pour that I went back for... Not much carbonation evident here, as a little bit of fizz rises from the bottom but doesn't produce any head.

The fruits used in this sour are clearly evident from the outset. Aromas of cocoa powder accompany a dominant aroma of cranberries. I thought that there were dark currants, but apparently they were red ones, in there as well. There is a light funk and a clean citrusy lactic sourness that comes through to round everything out. Exceedingly dry on the palate in the finish, though there is a nice fruity sweetness up front, the flavor is a somewhat surprising departure from the aroma. Smokey notes from the aroma do not manifest themselves at all on the palate. In the aroma, there was only lactic sourness, but once I am tasting this, I find that there are some acetic vinegar notes as well. Interestingly enough, these play nicely with the other bugs, and the acetic sourness doesn't own this beer yet.

Dry in the finish, but medium in texture, this is quite an interesting beer. Compelling and complex, Haandbryggeriet has created another great sour, though this one doesn't quite reach the level of its sister Haandbakk.

Photo of GONZALOYANNA
3.76/5  rDev +2.7%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

500ml bottle. ½ Pint glass. Enjoyed on jul´12. Pours inviting to drink red ruby in color. Foggy with yeast & fruit in suspension. Wild yeast, acid berries & moderate maltiness to the nose. Increasing sourness at first sip slightly balanced by malty texture & subtle sweetness. Light body, soft carbonation. Funny champagne-like palate. Red currents, cranberries & grapefruit wedge hues in the middle provide a long, citric & high astringent finish. Refreshing, drinkable & quite different from boring & cloying regular Lambic fruit- style beers. Excellent pairing with Blue, Rochefort & Cabrales cheeses.

Photo of wethorseblanket
3.5/5  rDev -4.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

No offense to first reviewer, but I think you might have had a tuckered ticker.

Pours a hazy reddish orange with large bubbles exclusively from the pour. This is essentially still. The nose is at first off-putting, being dominated by old, dusty wood, and moldy somewhat rotten fruit. The taste is equally shocking at first. Cranberry tart and sour with a slight metallic taste. I can understand why some think this is medicinal, but it is actually the red currants and the various strains of yeast which lend to the "old barn" flavor. Did not seem syrupy or watery at all. There is some vinegar notes present and a dried berry finish. I found the mouthfeel somewhat spicy and tinged with juniper-like qualities. Lots of tannic-bite from aging over 18 months. What can I say other than I kind of liked it in a numbing way.

Photo of allouez86
3.78/5  rDev +3.3%
look: 4.25 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

This particular beer was bottled on June 30th, 2011, making it a year and a half old. Poured into my Duvel tulip.

Pours a pretty orange/red color with minimal head. Not surprised there.

The smell is your typical sour funky horse-blanket smell that you get with lambics and other sour beers. Definitely getting some tart cherries as well, maybe s slight hint of cranberry as well.

The taste is not near as sour as the smell would have you guess. The bottle states that this beer was aged 18 months in oak barrels and I'm definitely getting some of that oaky vanilla flavor. The cherries are some what muted, much like a well done kriek, minus the sour power that some krieks have. The cranberries are there too but this beer is just missing that little something extra. There is a slight bit of oxidation which might isn't really doing this beer too many favors.

The mouthfeel is medium with a decent carbonation level and a proper level of acidity for the style.

Overall this was a decent attempt at a lambic. Wasn't the best I've had and definitely wasn't the worst I've had. With that being said, I'm always one to give this brewery a try and was glad I tried this brew. I'd recommend trying it at least once. Probably better when a little more fresh.

Photo of GbVDave
4/5  rDev +9.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Poured from a 50cl bottle into a Struise snifter.

Bottled: 26.02.10 (KEEPS FOR MANY YEARS)

A: Pours a tarnished copper/autumn leaf orange, with a tiny outcropping of fast disappearing, bubbly, off-white foam on top. Hazy clarity with a few lazy bubbles and a few small flakes of suspended sediment.

S: Tart, acidic cranberry mixed with mint and/or menthol, sodden earthy oak, sweet dark fruit, and bright tangy citrus.

T: Taste mirrors the smell with perhaps a bit more oak that leaves a suggestion of belt leather and cigarette ash in the finish.

M: Acidic vinegar/unripened berry and oaky astringency nicely compliment the slowly developing fruity sweetness. Starts tart and acidic, turns slightly juicy and (somewhat) sweet during the middle, and finally finishes with some obvious dry, oaky tannins. Interesting smoky residue on the tongue when it's all said and done.

D: Pretty mild, as far as sours go, and I was pretty ok with that. The further I got into this (and certainly after I swirled and dumped the sediment into the last pour) the more apparent its' musty funk/smoky/belt leather qualities became.

Photo of donkeyrunner
2.94/5  rDev -19.7%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

My second beer within the last few weeks brewed with lingonberries. Didn't see that coming.

Rusty, peach fuzz red color with no head, no fizz, nada. Left some sediment on the bottom of my glass.

Aroma is cranberry and cinnamon (or nutmeg, I can't tell the difference sometimes). Not exactly an invitation to funkytown.

Tastes like cinnamon graham crackers and cranberries without any tartness. Very mild steely "wild" character.

Overpriced and underwhelming.

Photo of jlindros
2.55/5  rDev -30.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

OH nos! I was excited for this one, but looking at the other two reviews, maybe not so much anymore. Well, gotta judge for myself so here goes.

Pours pretty much no head, just bubbles stirred up by my aggressive pour, over a murky watery looking rosy orange copper colored beer.

Nose has lots of sour cherry and tart cranberry, some barnyard funk but not overpowering, sweet cherry syrup, very light acetic acid, light cough syrup, well actually the more I nose it the more the other aromas disappear and turns into a cherry cough syrup.

Taste, <shiver> ug, not so great, a watery almost putrid bitter funk underneath a river of cherry cough syrup, a light metallic flavor that almost shocks my teeth (like biting on aluminum foil), a sticky syrupy and semi sweet mess that still somehow finds a way to be watery. Some cranberry flavors, a bit of the currants, and other weird spices. Very light funk, tons of cranberry skin, they somehow found a way to get the cranberries to lose their typical flavor and most of the tartness, and sour cherry juice blended with cough syrup pretty much sums it up. The finish just gets super sticky and flemmy, lingering sweet syrups and cough syrup, as well as cherry galore and very light bready toasty funk at the end finally.

The mouth is medium bodied with a watery feel somehow but super syrupy and sticky, and almost no carbonation.

Drink is somewhere between drain pour and just enough to find a way to get this down cause I paid $10 for it. As womencantsail added, Haandbryggeriet makes some decent beers, but from what I've tried of the sours they fall quite short of finish line.

Photo of crossovert
3.51/5  rDev -4.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

500ml bottle.

It pours a clear red with a small foamy white head. Very nice looking.

The smell is pretty powerful. Tons of that sourness that almost makes you cringe. A good cranberry/currant mix. There is a light sweet smell that mixes with the berry making a strawberry scent and some lemon acidity. There is also an herbal spiciness to it. The funkiness is light and it smells mostly bretty.

The flavor is pretty nice. Lots of berry flavor. Not too much sourness or funk but there is a noticeable bretty presence with this medicinal sort of flavor. A bit of vinegar in the flavor but not over the top.

The mouthfeel is thin and smooth, not a real thick carbonation in this one.

Overall it is tasty but not world class.

Photo of crusian
2.39/5  rDev -34.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Bottle from Dan at stein deli, thanks Dan!
Pours a murky brownish red to dark amber color with a tiny ring of head around the edge of the glass. Not looking good on the carbonation front.
Nose is mildly tart, cherry, vanilla, oak... smells pretty good, but the tartness seems really toned down.
Taste is disappointing. I love the haandbakk, love it. This one... not much. The sour is very toned down, and to be honest, it tastes watered down. Currants are noticeable, for sure. Pretty strong actually. But a real disappointment. I had high hopes after the haandbakk.
Mouthfeel is thin and watery... and there is almost no carbonation, which is a huge killer for me.

Photo of womencantsail
1.39/5  rDev -62%
look: 3 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 1

First rate...alright. I hate you, Bobby.

A: The beer pours an amber color with a minimal off-white head to it and minimal carbonation.

S: Smells like aspirin, Vick's Vapor Rub, alcohol, and harsh oak. A big menthol and eucalyptus type of aroma that is just overwhelmingly medicinal and awful. Strangely spicy and very astringent.

T: Holy hell. If you wondered how putting a flaming log in your mouth would taste, drink this beer. Intensely charred/smokey wood with a big time medicinal menthol flavor. Astringent cranberry flavors and just bad all around.

M: The body is medium with a low to medium carbonation.

D: This is putrid stuff. So far the sour beers from these guys (with the exception of Haandbakk) have been pretty bad.

Photo of avalon07
4.04/5  rDev +10.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A: Poured from a bottle to a tulip glass. Had a reddish color and a cloudy consistency. There was a small amount of foamy head that quickly dissipated. Average lacing.

S: A big, aroma of cranberries, yeast, and some malt.

T: Tasted of cranberries, yeast, malt, and a slight oaky quality. This beer kind of tastes like a mild lambic, minus the sourness. An interesting and vibrant flavor.

M: This is a beer in need of carbonation, but it does have a smooth finish. Medium-bodied.

D: While it is uneven, Haandbic is still a drinkable beer.

Photo of kojevergas
3.29/5  rDev -10.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.25

Acquired at a local SoCal beer store for $12.00. 7.00% ABV confirmed Bottled 10/10/12. 50 cl brown glass bottle with standard black pressure cap served into an Oskar Blues pilsner glass in me gaff in low altitude Los Feliz, Los Angeles, California. Reviewed live. Expectations are fairly high; I'm in the mood for a good sour but I had one from HaandBryggeriet last night and wasn't horribly impressed. Brewed with Lambic style yeast and aged in oak barrels for 18 months.

Served cold, straight from the fridge. Side-poured with standard vigor as no carbonation issues are anticipated.

A: Pours a half finger milky white colour head of nice cream, below average thickness, and poor (~40 second) retention. Body colour is a murky vibrant copper. Nontransparent; translucent. No yeast particles are visible. No bubble show. The abundance of visible carbonation bubbles suggests potential overcarbonation. Doesn't look great for a lambic, but there's nothing overtly wrong here other than the poor head retention. I'm reserving judgement.

Sm: Quite nice. Tart cranberry and other berries. I'm tempted to say cherry as well. Grape skin. It's definitely fruity, and the sourness comes from the tart fruit, not from lacto yeast. Light underlying sweetness. It's really pleasant and appealing. I'm rather impressed, to be honest. A very good lambic aroma; I'm excited to try it. Moderate to pretty strong. No alcohol is detectable. No hop aromatics.

T: Strong oak up front with some weird cardboard-y bitterness. Gets better towards the finish, with the tart fruit and berries I was expecting. Grapeskin. Still, that rough cardboard off-flavour up front is tough to get over. If only the dominant flavours were the tart sour berries/fruit like I want them to be. Little floral character, if any. No alcohol comes through. The cardboard flavour kills the balance, but there's still a lot of good flavour here; this feels like a missed opportunity. There's potential here, but the off flavours really destroy the beer. Too bitter for a lambic, which should be exclusively tart.

Mf: Acidic, with a bit of bite. Smooth and wet. Weak, thin, and even a bit watery. There's body, but just not enough. The mouthfeel misses the mark. Carobnation is adequate.

Dr: Hm. I see a lot of potential here. It has some things that really work - the tart fruit, the sour lambic yeast , the acidity - but it also has severe flaws, including an off flavour and a watery mouthfeel. Overall, I can safely say I do like it in spite of what's wrong with it, but if they resolved the issues it could be a truly great beer. Maybe with more experience, HaandBryggeriet will nail sours down, but for now it's obvious they're still novices. Love the experimentation and the attempt, but the execution wasn't quite up to par.

Low B-

Photo of joshclauss
3.94/5  rDev +7.7%
look: 5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Brewed 6/30/11. Dranked on 4/7/12 right after a Weyerbacher Rapture.

Cool beer - very tart, but not enough wildness or farmhouse element for me. Bright, bright red and beautiful to look at. I disagree with the reviews that say this beer needs more carbonation on it to be good, I think that's part of the beer and adds to its uniqueness. The fruit dominates along with some barrel tannins. I'll keep the other one awhile and see if the yeast builds up a presence, but it's already pretty old, so I'm a bit skeptical. Drink the yeast at the end if you like that kind of thing, I felt it enhances the experience.

Photo of BARFLYB
3.42/5  rDev -6.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Split with oglmcdgl.

Haandbic goes into the glass a dark shade of red/mahagony with some shoepolish brown. Hard pours yielded dismal fading soda fizz brown foam leaving no lace. This becomes still. Smell is bright with berries, that is up front. Some dank old wood scent along with faint vanilla and a touch of vinegar with warming. I get some brine scent with further sniffs. Taste is all well pretty decent. Acetic with some berry mixing in with oak. Cherry/cranberry, oak, wood, vinegar and some wine characteristics. Feel is kind of lacking with bubbles not giving any life to this. This comes off dead to the palate, except for the slight burn from the acidic nature. Feel is lightish and needs a jumpstart for real. 500ml of this would of been tough to tackle. An interesting beer from a brewery I respect, I just don't see myself getting this again. Seeing as I never see it anywhere.

Photo of lacqueredmouse
4.07/5  rDev +11.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Uncaps with nary a fizzle, and pours a light rose-red colour, with a very insubstantial, but very fine head that sits in a ring around the edge of the glass. Body has a big of weight behind it, despite looking clear and fluid. Carbonation forms in a fine storm when the glass is tilted. Looks pretty good.

Nose is great. Definite lambic notes, giving a clear, direct vegetative note, like fresh olives. This mingles with a fruity acidity and a cranberry tartness. There's peppery, slightly dusty notes on the back as well. It doesn't capture some of the more subtle complexities of a rich Belgian gueuze, but it's a cracking approximation.

Taste is also good, but a little flatter and less expressive than I thought it might be. Cranberries certainly come forward here, with a big sweet-tart bite that seems to provide most of the acidity on its own. On the back we have some mild peppery and slightly vegetative characters, a little like roquette. Actually minimal lambic acidity, and it's missing a lot of funk, but it's still pretty interesting stuff.

Feel is flat, but crystal clear and bright.

Overall, this is pretty good stuff. It's no Cantillon, and perhaps it suffers from the comparison, but it's nice stuff well done, and they seem to have captured something of the classic style.

Photo of DmanGTR
4.47/5  rDev +22.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Shared this with my gf tonight for Christmas eve.

Poured burnt orange and a scant bubbly head that didn't last at all. Looked almost still, but some bubbles were seen. Beautiful when held to the light, no haze or sediment.

Cranberry, hints of cherry, and a nice sourness that is like a combo of lactic and acetic. The fruity sweetness prevents the sourness from overtaking the entire experience. The oak is prevalent towards the finish and lends a wood and vanilla overtone. Extremely well balanced, extremely tasty. Alcohol is not noticeable at all. Tiny bit of effervescence to complete the package. I am a huge fan of this despite the steep-ish price tag.

Photo of rudzud
3.38/5  rDev -7.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.25

Cracked in honor of surviving the 2013 Blizzard. Been holding onto this, for some reason, for a while. 2/26/2010 vintage.

A - Poured into my Duvel tulip a clear berry juice like hue with very little carbonation. A super thin head that fades to leave a very very subtle halo.

S - Faint faint fruits, cherries, light sour. Almost like a dulled down kriek. Barrel notes are faint. Quite faint oak and vanilla.

T - Bit of a let down here. The barrel notes are alright, solid oak and light vanilla. The fruits are there, on the fainter side again like a duller kriek. Its alright. Nothing to write home about.

M - Mouthfeel is on par for the style. Lowly carbonated, a bit thin.

O - Yeah, not too happy I wasted fridge space on this guy. Unfortunate.

Photo of OtherShoe2
3.75/5  rDev +2.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Pours reddish brown with a slight ring of bubbly foam from the pour. No lace. No retention.

Odd aromas. I get the yeast, a little funk, some cranberry. But, I really get currant and even some raw honey. Not strong, but there.

Good sour up front. Some acidic tart fruit, but not sure what kind of fruit. Maybe some bitterness associated with cranberry. Acid and a little alcohol in the back of the palate as the mouth clears. Medium bitter in the finish. Acid, sour, bitter, light fruit. It kinda works.

Lighter bodied. Oddly moderate carbonation. Needed to be this way, as this has a bit of an acidic feel too.

Overall, a decent if non-traditional limbic. I think we are so saturated with hyper-fruity/sugary versions that we forget what this style can be like. A good job with this one.

Photo of GuzzLah
2.67/5  rDev -27%
look: 3 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 2.75

A - pours a hazy amber with no head. No bubbles.

S - oak, currants, cranberries. Bandaid. Wet cardboard. Hint of lacto.

T - weak flavor that is similar to the aroma. Watery and unimpressive.

M - thin body. watery. Very low carbonation. Barely tart for the style.

O- not impressive in any regard. The aroma was almost OK, even with some defects and the flavor was sub par for the style. Wouldn't buy again.

Photo of dansmcd
3.49/5  rDev -4.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A - Cloudy burnt orange with a collection of black particles floating about then settling at the bottom. No head or lace.

S - Cherry, dark berries, oak and brown sugar.

T - Very fruity, sour and funky. Cranberries, cherry and dried apricot. Vinegary sour.

M - Sour and tart, highly carbonated and thin.

O - Quite enjoyed this, a nice mix of flavours. Lambic fans should appreciate it.

to view more.
HaandBic from HaandBryggeriet
83 out of 100 based on 74 ratings.