1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

17th Anniversary Wood Aged Double IPA - Great Divide Brewing Company

Not Rated.
17th Anniversary Wood Aged Double IPA17th Anniversary Wood Aged Double IPA

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
87
very good

302 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 302
Reviews: 178
rAvg: 3.89
pDev: 14.14%
Wants: 3
Gots: 39 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Great Divide Brewing Company visit their website
Colorado, United States

Style | ABV
American Double / Imperial IPA |  10.00% ABV

Availability: Limited (brewed once)

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: notyourdadsbeer on 03-30-2011)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 302 | Reviews: 178 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Beerboi1123
Beerboi1123

Georgia

1/5  rDev -74.3%

03-01-2012 04:08:24 | More by Beerboi1123
Photo of gfx
gfx

North Carolina

2/5  rDev -48.6%

11-28-2011 05:42:00 | More by gfx
Photo of p-wagz
p-wagz

Minnesota

2/5  rDev -48.6%

12-05-2013 03:58:00 | More by p-wagz
Photo of Arbitrator
Arbitrator

California

2.05/5  rDev -47.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Chilled bottle into a glass.

A: Pours a clear, coppery amber with fluffy off-white head. Great retention, though nothing too sticky on the sides of the glass.

S: Toast, floral hops, caramel, oak.

T: Toast, caramel. Very oaky, with some astringency that segues into herbal bitterness and a drying close. It's not very hop-flavored; at best it's floral, but that character is reserved and understated. I really expect more from a DIPA. Very unsatisfactory.

M: Mildly sticky; the main takeaway is up-front oak that contributes astringency. Hoppy bitterness is mild.

O: I'm getting tired of these $10 sub-standard barleywine bombers masquerading as DIPAs. I almost didn't finish this, but I had nothing better to do.

Serving type: bottle

06-25-2011 05:04:06 | More by Arbitrator
Photo of Ryan011235
Ryan011235

Ohio

2.13/5  rDev -45.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Poured into a Minneapolis Town Hall flute on 8/26/11; thanks to MbpBugeye for sharing.

Bottled March 29 2011 (5 month old oak aged DIPA? Whatever...)

Rustic, browned amber; leaning toward copper, perhaps. Thin retention; scattered strands of lace.

Oak, caramel, sweet bread, orange peel, hints of grapefruit and hints of pepper, spice and spice aromas. Easily a sweet malt bomb. Flavors of candied malts, floral hops, caramel, toasted sugars, buried citrus (muted), dry wood notes and an underlying layer of alcohol. Full bodied and rather slick with booze. Lower carbonation results in a plodding feel.

Overall impression - not really my bag; it's pretty meh for a DIPA, regardless of age.

Serving type: bottle

01-04-2012 01:52:51 | More by Ryan011235
Photo of BZero007
BZero007

Virginia

2.38/5  rDev -38.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 2

Picked up this bottle at Whole Foods in Vienna, VA.

Poured a nice hazy amber color with a off white head. Aroma is nice and mild pushing a citrus and warm wood like smell through. By the look and smell I figured this would be an amazing brew. The taste carried a citrus/oak flavor through but is soon and quickly overtaken by an off wood dull medicine like taste. The particular off flavor becomes more prominent with each taste. I have had 3 drain pours in my life and this unfortunatly became the 3rd. I really enjoy Great Divide as brewery and a vast majority of their brews. I will aim to grab another bottle hoping the one I had was bad.

Serving type: bottle

05-11-2011 18:44:51 | More by BZero007
Photo of sbricker
sbricker

Illinois

2.5/5  rDev -35.7%

11-14-2011 21:02:17 | More by sbricker
Photo of GrindFatherBob
GrindFatherBob

New York

2.5/5  rDev -35.7%

12-24-2011 20:58:45 | More by GrindFatherBob
Photo of HopHead84
HopHead84

California

2.7/5  rDev -30.6%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

4/1/2011

On tap at URGE.

A: Dark reddish amber with a frothy and creamy long lasting cap. Head retains for a ridiculous amount of time. Thick sheets of lacing remain.

S: Lightly spicy (peppery?) with a strong wood profile. The wood seems to subjugate all else. That might be somewhat of a stretch, but it's not far off. Citrus notes are faint, and the malt is somewhere between bread and caramel. Lots of wood, but not a lot of anything else.

T: Bitter and dry up front with a decided wood presence. I don't know much about this beer, but I'm picking up a moderate spicy quality. I'm not sure if they used spices in this or if stems from a combination of wood and booze. Evident orange and tamer notes of grapefruit accompany pine resin and a firm caramel malt profile. There's some midpalate sweetness. Alcohol has a commanding presence in the flavor and is far too prominent for my taste. Wood remains strong throughout, and combines with the powerful booze and firm bitterness to make for a somewhat unpleasant boozy, tannic, and astringent finish. The wood adds nothing positive to the flavor.

M: Medium in body with upper moderate carbonation. Mouthfeel is sticky, dry, and astringent.

Overall: Too much booze and too much wood, with no positive attributes offsetting the negatives. Not at all recommended.

Serving type: on-tap

05-05-2011 04:41:50 | More by HopHead84
Photo of beagle75
beagle75

Iowa

2.75/5  rDev -29.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Poured from a bomber into a tulip glass.

A: Clear, medium reddish-amber color with two fingers of diminishing off-white foam head. Light lacing remains on the glass.

S: Vanilla-accented, vinous, and spirituous--this doesn't smell like ale as much as it smells like a dry brandy. Grain is part of the equation though, appearing as caramel and almonds, and fresh stone fruit is also hinted at.

T: Begins off-dry, with oppressive chemical ethanol and puckering astringency. While spiking acidity is noted, even it is not enough to overpower these other unsavory flavors. Woody vanilla comes into focus toward the middle, softening the early harshness. Fermented grain is featured in the middle where appeal increases somewhat, but is still constrained by the phantom of alcohol. Hops encountered through the middle are mostly earthy, slightly herbaceous, and not very compelling. Astringency lingers in the boozy finish, absent of oak but accented instead by the flavor of cooked apples.

M: Medium viscosity, uncomfortably hot and astringent on the palate, with moderate carbonation.

D/O: While a well-aged IPA is generally regarded as a regrettable mistake, in this case a bit more waiting might have been preferable. With little in the way of hop aromatics to begin with, there would not be much to lose--except for the uncomfortable heat of the alcohol. The unapproachable nature of this beer makes the drinker hesitant to wish Great Divide "Happy Birthday, and 17 more."

Serving type: bottle

04-30-2011 02:34:58 | More by beagle75
Photo of charlzm
charlzm

California

2.83/5  rDev -27.2%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

Consumed July 2nd, 2011 in a standard pint glass.

Beer pours a clear, medium copper color with a minimal off-white head less than a finger tall. Uninspiring.

Aromas are agreeable: grapefruit hops, caramel, wood and vanilla.

Palate follows sinuses with the addition of substantial but still modulated bitterness. Some trace fusel alcohol notes detract from the overall experience.

Mouthfeel is slightly thick and a touch oily, but not overtly so.

Drinkability is fair, though the fusels kind of kill it. Also, gave me a wicked case of gas!

Serving type: bottle

07-04-2011 04:27:01 | More by charlzm
Photo of bballmj2k
bballmj2k

North Carolina

2.85/5  rDev -26.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Gonna be a contrarian on this one it seems.

Picked up yesterday - bottled on date of March 30, 2011

A - Clear copper/amber with a finger or so of soft soapy head. Nice looking beer.

S - Hm... double IPA? I get oak, woodiness, earthiness, maybe some vanilla. Theres malt there in the back too but hops? I understand its aged but still - a 10% DIPA should have some aroma...

T - Things going downhill quickly. Taste is dominated by the wood. Like I'm drinking wood. Hints of bitterness linger with a sweet backbone but the oak dominates the flavor along with some hints of the alcohol.

M - Creamy and sweet. Carbonation is minimal, almost flat. Again understanding its aged but this beer is pretty sweet and without some degree of carbonation to clear out the palette at the end it becomes cloying.

Really underwhelming. Can't help but think I've been burned by Great Divide's wood-aged stuff before. The base beer here has lost most of its character and acts as a canvas for the wood rather than working together to create a unique taste. Until someone demonstrates otherwise I'm thinking DIPAs shouldn't be aged...

Serving type: bottle

05-04-2011 03:09:20 | More by bballmj2k
Photo of n2185
n2185

North Carolina

2.88/5  rDev -26%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A: pours a clear copper with a finger of white head that recedes into a thin ring with no lacing.

S: lots of sweet caramel malts with some notes of citrusy hops. Smells really sweet.

T: lots of sweet caramel and vanilla with some oak notes. A touch of piny hops and bitterness in there. Strong alcohol burn on the finish.

M: Thick bodywith medium carbonation, this heer is sticky sweet.

O:way too sweet to be an IPA. A decent old ale or English barleywine, but not a good IPA.

Serving type: on-tap

05-26-2011 00:23:08 | More by n2185
Photo of dubinsky
dubinsky

California

2.88/5  rDev -26%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

22 oz bottle bottled on 4/25/11 poured into a snifter.

A – Pours a very clear, rusty amber with a nice fingers worth of off white rocky head. Decent retention for a 10% abv beer, but eventually the head receded leaving no real traces of lacing and settled to the edges of the glass.

S – This is definitely a sweet smelling beer. A faint floral hoppiness is present but the barrel smells take over and never give up. Notes of Oak, caramel, vanilla and bourbon come out huge on this beer.

T – The taste follows the nose. Very oaky and a bit boozy. The beer begins and finishes sweet with a noticeable toffee and caramel sweetness. The middle is a bit hoppy, but a tad grassy, and finish is a boozy, bourbon soaked oak taste.

M – Creamy medium body with medium carbonation. The finish is fairly slick and oily with a boozy burn in the back of the throat.

O – This definitely a unique take on this style. I found it to be overly sweet and boozy. I don’t expect bourbon to be the dominate flavor in anything other than a stout. I found it to be utterly lacking in hops and wish it had more of those and less of everything else. At 10% its a definite sipper and at times I felt like I had to choke it down especially as it warmed up. Come to think of it, this would have been better qualified as a barley wine. I don’t think I would drink this again.

Serving type: bottle

09-18-2011 01:28:34 | More by dubinsky
Photo of champ103
champ103

Texas

2.93/5  rDev -24.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

On tap at Anvil in Houston.

A: Pours a clear reddish/orange color. A one finger white head forms, but recedes to nothing in a second. Plenty of lace is left behind though.
S: Citrus, floral, hops and a lingering grapefruit bitterness. Some oak/wood aromas as well. The hops are very sharp and work at odds with the wood.
T: Follows the nose. Plenty of hops ranging from floral to a lingering grapefruit bitterness. Some light sugary sweetness with a burnt wood flavor. Again the hops and the wood to not mesh right. Plenty of alcohol lingering as well.
M/D: A medium body that has good carbonation. Sticky and oily on the tongue. Lots of alcohol and just a strange mesh of flavors makes this hard to drink.

Pretty much like the other Anniversary beers for Great Divide. Nothing meshes right for me, and not something I would recommend.

Serving type: on-tap

06-19-2011 23:29:27 | More by champ103
Photo of mjtiernan
mjtiernan

New York

3/5  rDev -22.9%

11-15-2011 04:49:25 | More by mjtiernan
Photo of JamFuel
JamFuel

Sweden

3/5  rDev -22.9%

08-11-2012 07:32:17 | More by JamFuel
Photo of TexAggie011
TexAggie011

Texas

3/5  rDev -22.9%

01-31-2012 02:07:38 | More by TexAggie011
Photo of jbertsch
jbertsch

Massachusetts

3/5  rDev -22.9%

12-11-2011 04:32:19 | More by jbertsch
Photo of jenray
jenray

Texas

3/5  rDev -22.9%

09-19-2012 02:22:26 | More by jenray
Photo of TimH
TimH


3/5  rDev -22.9%

05-19-2012 17:51:07 | More by TimH
Photo of Sinewave
Sinewave

Texas

3/5  rDev -22.9%

12-18-2011 20:51:07 | More by Sinewave
Photo of sharpski
sharpski

Oregon

3/5  rDev -22.9%

02-15-2012 22:08:39 | More by sharpski
Photo of dmsohyea
dmsohyea

California

3.08/5  rDev -20.8%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured from 22 oz bomber dated 3/18/11 into an IPA glass

A - Dark orange with 3 finger think soapy, slightly orange tinted head. Lacing is good down the side of the glass.

S - Weak hop smell which is disappointing in a double IPA. All of the hop aroma is masked by the strong oak flavor from the barrel aging. Some sweet malts play a background to the oak.

T - A lot of wood flavor up front, to be expected from something with "WOOD AGED" all over the front of the bottle. Lots of bready malt and sweetness is counteracted by a pretty bitter backbone. Not extremely bitter, but good bitterness balanced by the malt. I think earthy also fits the bill for this beer.

M - Mouthfeel is average for the style. A little too much alcohol flavor and carbonation on the finish.

O - It's good for what it is, but DIPA guidelines specifically say that "wood aging is not appropriate for the style". Plus, at $10 for 22 oz, I won't be trying this one again.

Serving type: bottle

04-18-2011 04:15:49 | More by dmsohyea
Photo of kzoobrew
kzoobrew

Michigan

3.1/5  rDev -20.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Poured from bomber into New Belgium globe
Bottle date 03/30/11

Crystal clear golden orange body. The clarity is quite impressive. Soft two finger vanilla creme colored head is set atop. Head works its way back in short order leaving a slim cap. Spotty lacing left clinging to the glass.

Strong dry oak aroma is very dominant up front. This does throw me off a bit, I did not expect this much intensity from the oak. Citrus, pineapple and floral aromas settle in just behind. Toasted bready malt provides a clean sweet base but remains planted behind the stronger hops and oak.

The flavor is interesting. I believe they nailed the flavors but they are not present in the proportions. The dry oak flavors are very strong up front and bordering dangerously on off putting. Sweet, caramelly malt and a sizable dose of floral hops follow just behind. The sequence of flavors just to not help subdue the strong oak up front. The flavor sees improvement on the back of the palate when a bright citrusy flavor emerges.

Medium bodied beer. Carbonation is moderate. The finish is kind of odd. The oak really lends a dry quality but there is some residual caramel and citrus flavors linger on the tongue. I would like to call it dry but it may be closer to moderate.

Decent but not a great beer. The oak flavors are dominant where I feel they should be complimentary. Perhaps this beer would be best enjoyed super fresh though I can see it mellowing out and drinking well with age. At this point the beer seems awful disjointed.

Serving type: bottle

05-05-2011 23:12:36 | More by kzoobrew
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
17th Anniversary Wood Aged Double IPA from Great Divide Brewing Company
87 out of 100 based on 302 ratings.