1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Bah Humbug - Wychwood Brewery Company Ltd

Not Rated.
Bah HumbugBah Humbug

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
80
good

303 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 303
Reviews: 221
rAvg: 3.49
pDev: 14.9%
Wants: 7
Gots: 7 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Wychwood Brewery Company Ltd visit their website
United Kingdom (England)

Style | ABV
Winter Warmer |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Winter

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: UnionMade on 12-18-2003)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 303 | Reviews: 221 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of AlaskanYoung
1/5  rDev -71.3%

AlaskanYoung, Feb 01, 2012
Photo of Viggo
1.6/5  rDev -54.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1 | overall: 1

Pours a clear amber/brown, huge thick off white head forms, great retention, excellent lacing. Smell is pretty powerful, vanilla and spice, caramel, very malty, sweet and heavy on the cinnamon. Taste is strange, apples and spice, tons of cinnamon, some vanilla, almost a bourbon smell/flavour to it. Mouthfeel is light bodied with low carbonation, spices coat the mouth. Not sure I like this, way too overspiced. Probably the most unappealing beer I've ever come into contact with. Could only take a couple sips before it went down the drain.

Viggo, Nov 02, 2006
Photo of grub
1.98/5  rDev -43.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 2

pours a nice ruby red with a full inch of fluffy head. the head is very slow to drop and leaves lots of lace behind.

aroma is nice. rye bread. a hint of spice. slightly roasty.

taste is odd. ashy roastyness. bit of malt. lots of spice, mostly cinnamon. turns lagery in the finish and leaves an unpleasant aftertaste. seems to get worse with each taste.

mouthfeel isn't great. very astringent. odd clinging unpleasant mouthfeel.

drinkability is not so good. can't say i'll be going back for more of this one.

grub, Nov 22, 2006
Photo of BGsWo22
2/5  rDev -42.7%

BGsWo22, Mar 21, 2013
Photo of Azpittil57
2/5  rDev -42.7%

Azpittil57, Dec 31, 2013
Photo of Kirk
2/5  rDev -42.7%

Kirk, Jun 23, 2013
Photo of TheHammer
2.2/5  rDev -37%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

Appearance: Good finger of head that laces and retains well. The body is a a cross between ruby red and cinnamon brown. Steady carbonation is nice.

Smell: A detect a hint of spicing, which would lean me towards them not going overboard with a bit of light caramel malt and some fruitier apple and pear notes. Nothing bad, but not quite what I would expect from a beer that would typically have a lot of spice.

Taste: Starts with a dull malt with some dry spicing that quickly turns oddly dry, bitter mashup of various spices, hops and the kitchen sink which isn't anywhere near as good as it sounds. The worst part about it is that there doesn't seem to be any really sweeter elements that would compliment the spicing. I thought maybe I served it too cold, but warming didn't help it's case at all.

Mouthfeel: That kick doesn't transition well at all, and it leaves a subtle dryness that does the beer no favours. The carbonation is there, but it doesn't really accentuate anything. Thankfully it doesn't leave too much of an aftertaste for very long.

Drinkability: Even as an occasional winter drinker, I can't see wanting to drink this again. I mean, sure you CAN drink it, it's not unbearable, but there is too much of the wrong kind of volume to this beer to make it worthwhile. Saving grace is that it sits down.

Final Thoughts: Bah Humbug indeed, this beer is a surprising disappointment from Wychwood. I mean, there isn't a lot here I can recommend other then the beer and the bottle look nice. Nowhere near as good as Hobgoblin or Fiddler's Elbow (which seems to have disappeared in Ontario and from their website). You'll want to pass.

TheHammer, Dec 09, 2011
Photo of FernMaster
2.25/5  rDev -35.5%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Poured from a bottle into a pint glass.

Is it appropriate to say Bah Humbug to a beer titled Bah Humbug?

I opened this beer because today was a miserably cold day and a winter warmer sounded like a good idea. A winter warmer would probably be a great thing for a day like this, however this wouldn't be the beer I'd recommend.

The pour of Bah Humbug was something bad. There was no head, which naturally leads to no lacing. The smell is perplexing, an oddity of flavors. Multiple fruits are present as is some yeast and it kind of smells like a Brown Ale to me actually. These fruit flavors, maybe grape, oranges and the yeasts, possibly some sort nut don't blend well together at all. It's like the line-up of a drive in movie theater, both of the features may be good, but the juxtaposition is non-appealing. It looks septic kind of too. A morbid, rancid caramel color. The taste is a combination of all the flavors you get on the nose and a few others that don't work as well. I don't have a cute metaphor for how this doesn't work. The problem is all the spices in the beer are conflicting for your attention with the fruit flavors and everything else in the beer. I can't decipher everything in one drink either, each gulp seems to have a different play to it and if this was a beer where the flavor was good I could enjoy that fact, but in this it's too bad. I really like Wychwood, Hobgoblin is one of my favorite beers, Bah Humbug is not. I, for a fact, will never buy this beer again.

Ignore this entire review if it was intentionally bad and naming it Bah Humbug was some sort of avant-garde humor.

Update: Drain Pour!

FernMaster, Dec 03, 2009
Photo of Howlader
2.25/5  rDev -35.5%

Howlader, Jul 20, 2014
Photo of jujubeast6000
2.28/5  rDev -34.7%
look: 3 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Reviewed 11/19/2007 (bottle):

Pours a clear brown color, big foamy head, big bubbles, some lacing, but quickly diminishing. Malty sweet, somewhat nutty aroma. Maybe tree bark or fruit rinds, not very pleasant. Slight bitter beginning taste, nutty middle taste, clean aftertaste. Somewhat watery. That same rind aroma is present in the taste, almost a smoky smell. Quickly diminishing in flavor. Some spices, maybe pumpkin or fall-like. Okay.

jujubeast6000, Nov 05, 2008
Photo of cfrancis
2.3/5  rDev -34.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Rather disappointed in this beer. Aroma is non-existent. Colour is orange amber with slightly off white head. Taste is fairly bland. Some spice and malt in the taste. With the flavours coming out mostly in the aftertaste the initial mouthfeel is non existent. Overall this beer is lackluster and I really won't revisit this next year.

cfrancis, Nov 19, 2009
Photo of CortexBomb
2.35/5  rDev -32.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours out deep red with not a lot of head, just a thin ring. On the plus side, because of the oversized bottle it does fill my Imperial Pint glass. Smell is softly hoppy and that's really it...no seasonal aspect that I'm able to pick up, which means it is knocked down.

Flavour starts out with a hop wave and then tries to dish up some slight spice action...but they are so slight that this beer should hardly qualify as a warmer. Some nuttiness in between, but nothing overly impressive. Finish is not even that hoppy, not really that much of anything. This is really not even doing it for me as a pale, and as a warmer I expect quite a lot more.

Mouth, thin, but this style of beer usually isn't that thick. Despite the lightness of them in the flavour, the hops do lend some action, so I'll leave it at average. Drinkability, well, it's decent, but I wasn't anticipating each sip.

Overall, this is horribly overpriced for what you get. Thoroughly undistinct flavour, not enough spices, not enough hops, lacking almost everywhere.

CortexBomb, Nov 30, 2005
Photo of beerbrains
2.5/5  rDev -28.4%

beerbrains, Oct 30, 2012
Photo of Kahlerbock
2.5/5  rDev -28.4%

Kahlerbock, Jan 17, 2012
Photo of oriolesfan4
2.58/5  rDev -26.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Got this as a joke gift from one of my Aunts last Christmas. This one was pretty disappointing to me. I see it had pretty good reviews here but I had trouble finishing it. Seemed like it was unbalanced and was hard to even finish. The taste was very bland and paltry as well. I would not want to try this one again.

oriolesfan4, Oct 01, 2008
Photo of jazzyjeff13
2.6/5  rDev -25.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

A 500ml bottle with a BB of Oct 2012. The rear label mentions the addition of cinammon during the brewing process.

Poured into a tulip pint glass. A bright coppery-amber hue with medium carbonation and faint visible sediment. Produces a decent head of creamy off-white foam that lasts for a minute or so before collapsing. Aroma is very sweet, with an intense hit of ripe bananas. Warm, fruity notes with cinammon and brown sugar. A whiff of alcohol in the background.

Tastes of sweet, fruity malt with a dominant banana note. A subtle warming hint of cinammon/spice along with toffee/caramel and yeast. A harsh stewed hop bitterness upon swallowing, and a background note of alcohol. Mouthfeel is smooth and tingly, but thin. Pretty astringent; dries the palate thoroughly. Aftertaste of fruity bananas and a harsh bitter note.

Bah! Not good at all - this could ruin your Christmas! A vile, cloying aroma of bananas pervades this ale. Too sweet, with an unbalanced fruitiness that lacks balance from the malt. Finishes with a harsh stewed bitterness that is equally unpleasant. The spice is also rather lacklustre. In short, not much to enjoy here. There are other beers out there - give this a miss. Bah Humbug indeed!

jazzyjeff13, Dec 29, 2011
Photo of Vancer
2.7/5  rDev -22.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Quick notes: Semi-hazy amber / orange with tan head, some lacing. Malty aroma with some spice notes, manly cinnamon. But the taste, what a letdown – ya have earthy notes, along with some phenolic aftertastes, not real good.

Dry and medium bodied, just not heavy enough, needs more malt and spices. Way to expensive for what you get. One 500ml bottle will do it for me.

Vancer, Jan 13, 2006
Photo of JoeyBeerBelly
2.73/5  rDev -21.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

served in a tall glass.

A - murky brown color with a small off-white head that flattened out, leaving very little lace.

S - sweet malt and spiced aroma.

T - sweetness of caramel malt with a hint of spices, very slight bitterness on the finish.

M - medium bodied and somewhat flat.

D - I had a difficult time with this one, as it wasn't anything special to me, just another English Ale.

JoeyBeerBelly, Dec 24, 2007
Photo of CRJMellor
2.75/5  rDev -21.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Pours a dark amber hue with some copper tinges and a medium tan head with litle staying power.
Aroma of sweet, deep caramel candy and a spicy almost hazelnut kind of note. Odd aroma here can'tquite place it, maybe lime or something, very strange
Flavor has a hint of nutmeg with some bready tones a a sweet but decidely dull caramel note. A bland bittering plays on the home stretch but just doesn't have any oomph or really redeeming qualities.
Mouthfeel is thin and watery with no kind of real ale body in the mouth. Slightly off-putting and out of place spiciness really makes this a rather strangely constructed brew.
Drinkability is below average. I wish these breweries would just leave ths beers in their markets on draught but I guess if folks like me keep buying and trying they can mae money, but this beer was a real snoozer, nothing offensive just completely bland and rather odd.

CRJMellor, Mar 19, 2006
Photo of SandS
2.75/5  rDev -21.2%

SandS, Dec 13, 2012
Photo of Jotora
2.75/5  rDev -21.2%

Jotora, Jan 19, 2014
Photo of fizzyted
2.75/5  rDev -21.2%

fizzyted, Nov 23, 2013
Photo of CRObighit2
2.75/5  rDev -21.2%

CRObighit2, Mar 03, 2014
Photo of 1759Girl
2.83/5  rDev -18.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Appearance>The beer poured a nice red colour, with a gorgeous haze, and a light head that lingered a spell, with not too much lacing.
Scent>Very sweet aroma, honey and pears, perhaps?
Taste> applecider start, that was followed by a mouthful of hops and cloves, with a cinnamon and pine hang.
Mouthfeel> light bodied, not overly carbonated; felt like a cask ale, and very british ale mouf-feel.
Drinkability> too clove and piney for my liking, but a fellow taster thought it was divine, so I guess I have to give it average drinkability.

1759Girl, Jan 14, 2008
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Bah Humbug from Wychwood Brewery Company Ltd
80 out of 100 based on 303 ratings.