1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Bah Humbug - Wychwood Brewery Company Ltd

Not Rated.
Bah HumbugBah Humbug

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
80
good

296 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 296
Reviews: 221
rAvg: 3.49
pDev: 14.61%
Wants: 6
Gots: 7 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Wychwood Brewery Company Ltd visit their website
United Kingdom (England)

Style | ABV
Winter Warmer |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Winter

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: UnionMade on 12-18-2003)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 296 | Reviews: 221 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of AlaskanYoung
AlaskanYoung

Arkansas

1/5  rDev -71.3%

02-01-2012 02:49:24 | More by AlaskanYoung
Photo of Viggo
Viggo

Ontario (Canada)

1.6/5  rDev -54.2%

Pours a clear amber/brown, huge thick off white head forms, great retention, excellent lacing. Smell is pretty powerful, vanilla and spice, caramel, very malty, sweet and heavy on the cinnamon. Taste is strange, apples and spice, tons of cinnamon, some vanilla, almost a bourbon smell/flavour to it. Mouthfeel is light bodied with low carbonation, spices coat the mouth. Not sure I like this, way too overspiced. Probably the most unappealing beer I've ever come into contact with. Could only take a couple sips before it went down the drain.

11-02-2006 00:55:48 | More by Viggo
Photo of grub
grub

Ontario (Canada)

1.98/5  rDev -43.3%

pours a nice ruby red with a full inch of fluffy head. the head is very slow to drop and leaves lots of lace behind.

aroma is nice. rye bread. a hint of spice. slightly roasty.

taste is odd. ashy roastyness. bit of malt. lots of spice, mostly cinnamon. turns lagery in the finish and leaves an unpleasant aftertaste. seems to get worse with each taste.

mouthfeel isn't great. very astringent. odd clinging unpleasant mouthfeel.

drinkability is not so good. can't say i'll be going back for more of this one.

11-22-2006 23:23:25 | More by grub
Photo of BGsWo22
BGsWo22

New York

2/5  rDev -42.7%

03-21-2013 00:19:19 | More by BGsWo22
Photo of Azpittil57
Azpittil57

Illinois

2/5  rDev -42.7%

12-31-2013 13:22:22 | More by Azpittil57
Photo of Kirk
Kirk

United Kingdom (England)

2/5  rDev -42.7%

06-23-2013 13:47:08 | More by Kirk
Photo of TheHammer
TheHammer

Ontario (Canada)

2.2/5  rDev -37%

Appearance: Good finger of head that laces and retains well. The body is a a cross between ruby red and cinnamon brown. Steady carbonation is nice.

Smell: A detect a hint of spicing, which would lean me towards them not going overboard with a bit of light caramel malt and some fruitier apple and pear notes. Nothing bad, but not quite what I would expect from a beer that would typically have a lot of spice.

Taste: Starts with a dull malt with some dry spicing that quickly turns oddly dry, bitter mashup of various spices, hops and the kitchen sink which isn't anywhere near as good as it sounds. The worst part about it is that there doesn't seem to be any really sweeter elements that would compliment the spicing. I thought maybe I served it too cold, but warming didn't help it's case at all.

Mouthfeel: That kick doesn't transition well at all, and it leaves a subtle dryness that does the beer no favours. The carbonation is there, but it doesn't really accentuate anything. Thankfully it doesn't leave too much of an aftertaste for very long.

Drinkability: Even as an occasional winter drinker, I can't see wanting to drink this again. I mean, sure you CAN drink it, it's not unbearable, but there is too much of the wrong kind of volume to this beer to make it worthwhile. Saving grace is that it sits down.

Final Thoughts: Bah Humbug indeed, this beer is a surprising disappointment from Wychwood. I mean, there isn't a lot here I can recommend other then the beer and the bottle look nice. Nowhere near as good as Hobgoblin or Fiddler's Elbow (which seems to have disappeared in Ontario and from their website). You'll want to pass.

12-09-2011 06:27:09 | More by TheHammer
Photo of FernMaster
FernMaster

Missouri

2.25/5  rDev -35.5%

Poured from a bottle into a pint glass.

Is it appropriate to say Bah Humbug to a beer titled Bah Humbug?

I opened this beer because today was a miserably cold day and a winter warmer sounded like a good idea. A winter warmer would probably be a great thing for a day like this, however this wouldn't be the beer I'd recommend.

The pour of Bah Humbug was something bad. There was no head, which naturally leads to no lacing. The smell is perplexing, an oddity of flavors. Multiple fruits are present as is some yeast and it kind of smells like a Brown Ale to me actually. These fruit flavors, maybe grape, oranges and the yeasts, possibly some sort nut don't blend well together at all. It's like the line-up of a drive in movie theater, both of the features may be good, but the juxtaposition is non-appealing. It looks septic kind of too. A morbid, rancid caramel color. The taste is a combination of all the flavors you get on the nose and a few others that don't work as well. I don't have a cute metaphor for how this doesn't work. The problem is all the spices in the beer are conflicting for your attention with the fruit flavors and everything else in the beer. I can't decipher everything in one drink either, each gulp seems to have a different play to it and if this was a beer where the flavor was good I could enjoy that fact, but in this it's too bad. I really like Wychwood, Hobgoblin is one of my favorite beers, Bah Humbug is not. I, for a fact, will never buy this beer again.

Ignore this entire review if it was intentionally bad and naming it Bah Humbug was some sort of avant-garde humor.

Update: Drain Pour!

12-03-2009 01:28:12 | More by FernMaster
Photo of Howlader
Howlader

Alberta (Canada)

2.25/5  rDev -35.5%

07-20-2014 15:37:47 | More by Howlader
Photo of jujubeast6000
jujubeast6000

Texas

2.28/5  rDev -34.7%

Reviewed 11/19/2007 (bottle):

Pours a clear brown color, big foamy head, big bubbles, some lacing, but quickly diminishing. Malty sweet, somewhat nutty aroma. Maybe tree bark or fruit rinds, not very pleasant. Slight bitter beginning taste, nutty middle taste, clean aftertaste. Somewhat watery. That same rind aroma is present in the taste, almost a smoky smell. Quickly diminishing in flavor. Some spices, maybe pumpkin or fall-like. Okay.

11-05-2008 04:58:26 | More by jujubeast6000
Photo of cfrancis
cfrancis

Ontario (Canada)

2.3/5  rDev -34.1%

Rather disappointed in this beer. Aroma is non-existent. Colour is orange amber with slightly off white head. Taste is fairly bland. Some spice and malt in the taste. With the flavours coming out mostly in the aftertaste the initial mouthfeel is non existent. Overall this beer is lackluster and I really won't revisit this next year.

11-19-2009 01:33:52 | More by cfrancis
Photo of CortexBomb
CortexBomb

Michigan

2.35/5  rDev -32.7%

Pours out deep red with not a lot of head, just a thin ring. On the plus side, because of the oversized bottle it does fill my Imperial Pint glass. Smell is softly hoppy and that's really it...no seasonal aspect that I'm able to pick up, which means it is knocked down.

Flavour starts out with a hop wave and then tries to dish up some slight spice action...but they are so slight that this beer should hardly qualify as a warmer. Some nuttiness in between, but nothing overly impressive. Finish is not even that hoppy, not really that much of anything. This is really not even doing it for me as a pale, and as a warmer I expect quite a lot more.

Mouth, thin, but this style of beer usually isn't that thick. Despite the lightness of them in the flavour, the hops do lend some action, so I'll leave it at average. Drinkability, well, it's decent, but I wasn't anticipating each sip.

Overall, this is horribly overpriced for what you get. Thoroughly undistinct flavour, not enough spices, not enough hops, lacking almost everywhere.

11-30-2005 23:58:59 | More by CortexBomb
Photo of beerbrains
beerbrains

Nebraska

2.5/5  rDev -28.4%

10-30-2012 06:13:50 | More by beerbrains
Photo of Kahlerbock
Kahlerbock

Kansas

2.5/5  rDev -28.4%

01-17-2012 20:37:07 | More by Kahlerbock
Photo of oriolesfan4
oriolesfan4

Maryland

2.58/5  rDev -26.1%

Got this as a joke gift from one of my Aunts last Christmas. This one was pretty disappointing to me. I see it had pretty good reviews here but I had trouble finishing it. Seemed like it was unbalanced and was hard to even finish. The taste was very bland and paltry as well. I would not want to try this one again.

10-01-2008 02:33:29 | More by oriolesfan4
Photo of jazzyjeff13
jazzyjeff13

United Kingdom (England)

2.6/5  rDev -25.5%

A 500ml bottle with a BB of Oct 2012. The rear label mentions the addition of cinammon during the brewing process.

Poured into a tulip pint glass. A bright coppery-amber hue with medium carbonation and faint visible sediment. Produces a decent head of creamy off-white foam that lasts for a minute or so before collapsing. Aroma is very sweet, with an intense hit of ripe bananas. Warm, fruity notes with cinammon and brown sugar. A whiff of alcohol in the background.

Tastes of sweet, fruity malt with a dominant banana note. A subtle warming hint of cinammon/spice along with toffee/caramel and yeast. A harsh stewed hop bitterness upon swallowing, and a background note of alcohol. Mouthfeel is smooth and tingly, but thin. Pretty astringent; dries the palate thoroughly. Aftertaste of fruity bananas and a harsh bitter note.

Bah! Not good at all - this could ruin your Christmas! A vile, cloying aroma of bananas pervades this ale. Too sweet, with an unbalanced fruitiness that lacks balance from the malt. Finishes with a harsh stewed bitterness that is equally unpleasant. The spice is also rather lacklustre. In short, not much to enjoy here. There are other beers out there - give this a miss. Bah Humbug indeed!

12-29-2011 23:34:55 | More by jazzyjeff13
Photo of Vancer
Vancer

Illinois

2.7/5  rDev -22.6%

Quick notes: Semi-hazy amber / orange with tan head, some lacing. Malty aroma with some spice notes, manly cinnamon. But the taste, what a letdown – ya have earthy notes, along with some phenolic aftertastes, not real good.

Dry and medium bodied, just not heavy enough, needs more malt and spices. Way to expensive for what you get. One 500ml bottle will do it for me.

01-13-2006 13:54:16 | More by Vancer
Photo of JoeyBeerBelly
JoeyBeerBelly

New York

2.73/5  rDev -21.8%

served in a tall glass.

A - murky brown color with a small off-white head that flattened out, leaving very little lace.

S - sweet malt and spiced aroma.

T - sweetness of caramel malt with a hint of spices, very slight bitterness on the finish.

M - medium bodied and somewhat flat.

D - I had a difficult time with this one, as it wasn't anything special to me, just another English Ale.

12-24-2007 13:33:23 | More by JoeyBeerBelly
Photo of CRJMellor
CRJMellor

Arkansas

2.75/5  rDev -21.2%

Pours a dark amber hue with some copper tinges and a medium tan head with litle staying power.
Aroma of sweet, deep caramel candy and a spicy almost hazelnut kind of note. Odd aroma here can'tquite place it, maybe lime or something, very strange
Flavor has a hint of nutmeg with some bready tones a a sweet but decidely dull caramel note. A bland bittering plays on the home stretch but just doesn't have any oomph or really redeeming qualities.
Mouthfeel is thin and watery with no kind of real ale body in the mouth. Slightly off-putting and out of place spiciness really makes this a rather strangely constructed brew.
Drinkability is below average. I wish these breweries would just leave ths beers in their markets on draught but I guess if folks like me keep buying and trying they can mae money, but this beer was a real snoozer, nothing offensive just completely bland and rather odd.

03-19-2006 22:22:35 | More by CRJMellor
Photo of SandS
SandS

Ontario (Canada)

2.75/5  rDev -21.2%

12-13-2012 02:18:20 | More by SandS
Photo of Jotora
Jotora

Ontario (Canada)

2.75/5  rDev -21.2%

01-19-2014 23:52:53 | More by Jotora
Photo of fizzyted
fizzyted

Ontario (Canada)

2.75/5  rDev -21.2%

11-23-2013 23:14:43 | More by fizzyted
Photo of CRObighit2
CRObighit2

Ontario (Canada)

2.75/5  rDev -21.2%

03-03-2014 00:33:51 | More by CRObighit2
Photo of 1759Girl
1759Girl

California

2.83/5  rDev -18.9%

Appearance>The beer poured a nice red colour, with a gorgeous haze, and a light head that lingered a spell, with not too much lacing.
Scent>Very sweet aroma, honey and pears, perhaps?
Taste> applecider start, that was followed by a mouthful of hops and cloves, with a cinnamon and pine hang.
Mouthfeel> light bodied, not overly carbonated; felt like a cask ale, and very british ale mouf-feel.
Drinkability> too clove and piney for my liking, but a fellow taster thought it was divine, so I guess I have to give it average drinkability.

01-14-2008 18:40:53 | More by 1759Girl
Photo of shamus
shamus

Ontario (Canada)

2.85/5  rDev -18.3%

A Christmas ale? Bah. Humbug! this tastes like cough syrup. I think it's supposed to taste like liquefied Christmas cake. if that is true then it is a raging success. It's alright. I don't hate it. It's a novelty beer. The label said it had cinnamon in it but that particular spice doesn't come through enough for my liking. Maybe this would taste good mulled. I bet it would. Mulling

11-08-2007 23:58:16 | More by shamus
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Bah Humbug from Wychwood Brewery Company Ltd
80 out of 100 based on 296 ratings.