1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Scarecrow Ale - Wychwood Brewery Company Ltd

Not Rated.
Scarecrow AleScarecrow Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
73
okay

440 Ratings
THE BROS
78
okay

(view ratings)
Ratings: 440
Reviews: 244
rAvg: 3.13
pDev: 19.17%
Wants: 5
Gots: 23 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Wychwood Brewery Company Ltd visit their website
United Kingdom (England)

Style | ABV
English Pale Ale |  4.70% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 07-20-2002)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Scarecrow Ale Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 440 | Reviews: 244 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Overlord
1.25/5  rDev -60.1%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1 | feel: 2 | overall: 1

I'm well beyond the "Try everything" stage, so having a brew this awful is like a blast from the past.

Pours a grainy yellow. No head to speak of. Smells like earthy skunk and a bit of corn-y sweetness. Taste is abysmal. Awful seltzer mouthfeel, skunk, corn husk sweetness ... this is truly terrible.

Couldn't finish more than a third of the bottle. Down the drain.

Overlord, May 26, 2010
Photo of shapudding
1.3/5  rDev -58.5%
look: 3 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 3 | overall: 1

Poured out with no head, teensy bit of large bubbles on the side only. A little cloudy, the color of apple juice. Smells intensely like styrian hops to speak nicely, smells skunky to not speak nicely. Taste of very earthy tones. The styrian hop flavor is just too intense in this brew -I am just not a fan of them so maybe I just can't get over that...?

shapudding, Jun 03, 2004
Photo of Horsley54
1.35/5  rDev -56.9%
look: 3 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

Had a slight hop smell to it, but nothing overwhelming
Did not have much taste to the beer at all
Tasted like water with a little beer flavor added to it
Only continued to drink because i paid over $5 for a single beer
Would not recommend very little taste
Def NOT a good Golden Pale Ale

Horsley54, Mar 14, 2008
Photo of anakar
1.4/5  rDev -55.3%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 1.5

This Organic pale ale is terrible. No flavor, no richness, no creamy head or smooth liquid. Nothing. Tastes like watered down beer with added alc so you'd think it's still beer.

App - Poured a faint golden color with plenty of bubles and a fluffy head which disappeared immedietly

Smell - High alcohol smell, no depth, no hops or bread or any of the good smell you expect from a beer, just this alcoholic bitter smell which seems to catagorize bad pilsners

Taste - Well, I said it before but I'll say is againg, it's WATERED-DOWN. Maybe because it's organic and organic products tend to be a bit anemic in comparison to their boosted up counterparts. No flavor, no depth, no hops or wheat or anything. Flat out water with a bit of beer to give the illusion of pale ale

Feel - Not worth mentioning, too much carb, too little aftertaste

Overall - Avoid it, there are many better organic beers out there

anakar, Jan 08, 2012
Photo of mcss
1.5/5  rDev -52.1%

mcss, Jun 07, 2012
Photo of ralree
1.65/5  rDev -47.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 1 | feel: 2 | overall: 1

A: Copper, slightly hazy, nice small-bubbled head with decent retention and good lacing.

S: Strange smell - vanilla, caramel, hops, some more spices.

T: Watered down and off-key. It's way too sour. The bitter taste doesn't seem to be from the hops, but from the fruit esters. This one is a pour-out based on the taste. Nasty old sock taste after swallowing. All flavors destroyed by overwatering.

M: Watered down, light body, non-astringent. Under-carbonated. Dry.

D: Undrinkable.

ralree, Jun 17, 2009
Photo of windigo32
1.68/5  rDev -46.3%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

A: Pours a slightly dark amber with very little head.

S: All I got off of this beer was a slight smell of hops. The faintest pale ale smell.

T: I expected a hoppy pale ale taste from the smell, but it wasn't delivered at all. This beer hardly has any taste except for a slight bitterness of hops.

M: Watery and carbonated are two words that quickly come to mind.

D: I didn't like this beer and it was honestly difficult to keep drinking it, except for the fact that I paid for it.

windigo32, Feb 10, 2008
Photo of FeDUBBELFIST
1.68/5  rDev -46.3%
look: 4 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

500mL bottle to pint glass. Batch 1BCD. Sampled 11/1/11.

A: Pours with a 2 finger light brown head, airy and foamy and audibly deflating. The body is exceptionally clear and light golden orange in color. More than adequate lacing ensures a solid appearance.

S: Light bread and grain, barely recognizable. No distinguishable hop character. Neutral yeast.

T: "Traces of beer character." Metallic notes. Uninspired and flawed. The bitterness on the finish outlasts and overshadows all other flavors. No indication of ABV on the bottle but mid-4's seems right.

M: Light, thin, fizzy. Like sparkling water.

O: Uninteresting and unappealing. Traded the calories remaining in the glass for calories awaiting in the fridge. (READ: did not finish)

FeDUBBELFIST, Mar 18, 2012
Photo of TheBrk
1.75/5  rDev -44.1%

TheBrk, Sep 18, 2013
Photo of Ieatlambfries
1.75/5  rDev -44.1%
look: 3 | smell: 1 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

All I can say is that the bottle and label are certainly the high points of this ale. The appearance wasn't bad, golden, thick head, big bubbles that disappeared rather quickly. Lacing was scant and also disappeared. The smell was hops and skunk, with the skunk being more prevalent. Not to my liking at all. The taste was a bit hoppy, grains and watery/alcolhol. But I still couldn't get over the skunk aroma enough to try to enjoy it. Mouthfeel was thin and watery also. Drinkability was hampered by the bad smell and so so taste. I don't know if the skunked aroma was inherent to the product or if I happened to get a bad bottle. If it was the latter than I would say this beer wasn't horrible, just nothing great, barely a step above domestic macros. If however it wasn't a bad bottle and that skunkiness is normal, then it's a whole different ball game.

Ieatlambfries, Jan 05, 2004
Photo of TheLongBeachBum
1.75/5  rDev -44.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

Presentation: 12 fluid ounce (355ml) brown glass bottle, cool rather unique shape which is embossed on the shoulders and base. No freshness, best before date or strength – nothing except a picture of a Scarecrow, the words ‘Golden Pale Ale’ and a USDA Organic sign.

Appearance: Golden orange with a little amber in there for depth. Off-white head forms easily and produces good lacing and a decent ½’ collar. Fine carbonation.

Nose: Dull and dank. Sweaty malts and some sulphur with a faded Shandy smell to it. Not very inviting I have to say.

Taste: Well I thought the nose was bad enough, but the tastes are worse. Mineral laden pastel metallic feel had me confused. The dumpy-frumpy tone is set deep. Damp and musky with a “skunky” feel, though this is definitely not “skunked”, it seems to exhibit many characteristics that are equally as off-putting. Painful to evaluate at times.

Mouthfeel: Moderate body with a reasonable feel, but the cardboard dank feel just sinks this one. Ashtray like finish. Not good.

Drinkability: Unconvincing offering that fades quickly after only a couple of mouthfuls and the horrible dawn of reality that this is not going to get better. I decided not to finish the bottle.

Overall: What possessed me to event think this would be worth a try? Well I guess I was fooled by the brown bottle. It just goes to show that not all crap “skunky” beer comes in clear glass bottles!!! A big miss.

TheLongBeachBum, Mar 06, 2006
Photo of BeerManDan
1.83/5  rDev -41.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

Scarecrow was exactly how I felt when I took my first sip. In fact that's how I felt after the second and third sip. The bitter taste was so over powering that I couldn't make it go down the fourth time and threw it down the drain. On one of my worst list!

BeerManDan, Aug 02, 2002
Photo of AlexJ
1.85/5  rDev -40.9%
look: 3 | smell: 1 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

This is my second encounter with Scarecrow and let's just say, well, I'm scared! Impossible bright yellow color with a thick 3 finger head of pure white that settles into a foamy ring, leaving zero signs of lace.

Aroma is sweet, corny malts, some light hops, and skunk. This is exactly how it smelled last time around. How long can this stay fresh is a clear glass? Two weeks is my guess, less if stored under lights.

Flavor shows hints of pilsner malts, coarse grains, bitter hops, and freshly squeezed skunk juice. Mmm. I would ditch this review, but it sounds like every review is basically the same here so I know it's not just this bottle.

Body barely above light with a coarse, grainy mouthfeel and a thin, watery texture. A definate drainpour. Deja vu!

AlexJ, Dec 21, 2005
Photo of spdyfire83
1.88/5  rDev -39.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

204th Review
500mL bottle poured into Fuller's half pint glass
Best before: 28 Feb 13

A: Light apple juice. Barely 0.25 (soft white) fingernail head on vigorous pour.

S: Blah - just loads of bitterness here with a touch of white bread. Sad.

T: Follows smell, but a bit worse. Dry cracker with a touch of butter. Not much else. Bummer!

M: Light body with soft carbonation.

O: Not enjoyable and unimpressed. Such goes life...time to move on. It happens!

spdyfire83, Mar 25, 2012
Photo of RoyalT
1.95/5  rDev -37.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Appearance – Murky orange in color with a decent head.

Smell – How did I end up with skunk in an English Ale? I don’t know, but this one smells horrible. There’s a dull malt aroma with a slight hop balance, but mostly skunk to this one.

Taste – This tastes worse than it smells. The skunk is in high profile, drowning out the smallish malt flavor.

Mouthfeel – Lightly carbonated, medium in the body, and a tad refreshing.

Sinkability – This British skunkorama is dedicated to the porcelain Gods.

RoyalT, Oct 31, 2003
Photo of R_Kole
2/5  rDev -36.1%

R_Kole, Nov 01, 2014
Photo of SickNukes
2/5  rDev -36.1%

SickNukes, May 29, 2012
Photo of DogFood11
2/5  rDev -36.1%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1

Super clear pale yellow with what looks like forced carbonation as its friggin huge bubbles. White head is very loose and falls to a little island and minimal lace left behind.

Hops are subdued but there is an herbal quality that pulls through. It carries a yeasty smell that doesn't come out in the taste. Light sweet malts with a bit of tobasco on the backside. Grain and inklings of light fruits.

Notes: One and done. Another English Pale that is completely unimpressive and boring. The only thing of interest was the smell but it ends there as not much from the nose comes through when the rubber hits the road. Oh, and the bottles that I've seen around are now brown and they are advertising this brew as organic. Neato.

DogFood11, Oct 11, 2006
Photo of Brad007
2/5  rDev -36.1%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Pours a pale yellow color with a thin, one-finger head. Aroma is rich and smooth, malty like a typical version of this style. Taste is sort of buttery upfront with a smooth maltiness in the back and alcoholic harshness showing through. Not quite as good as the other offerings from Wychwood. Not enough pale ale goodness here.

\rant

What the UK breweries should do is focus on one GOOD version a style and stick to it. Making several different beers of the same style, just for the hell of it, just won't cut it. I can't think of many American breweries that make two versions of the same style at once, marketed at once (and if they do, they're usually distinctive and successful enough to do so).

/end rant

Brad007, Nov 24, 2007
Photo of kvnstfrd
2/5  rDev -36.1%

kvnstfrd, May 23, 2013
Photo of Artjsantos
2/5  rDev -36.1%

Artjsantos, Jul 11, 2014
Photo of HOPHEADNATIONMATT
2/5  rDev -36.1%

HOPHEADNATIONMATT, Apr 11, 2014
Photo of gcotts
2/5  rDev -36.1%

gcotts, Feb 27, 2012
Photo of PivaTzar
2/5  rDev -36.1%

Im just going to assume they call it scarecrow because it will scare you away from ever buying it again.

PivaTzar, Sep 06, 2014
Photo of TexIndy
2.03/5  rDev -35.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Poured from a 500ml bottle (now dark brown - earlier reviews mention old clear bottle) with no freshness date. Had a golden color with decent head and tons of carbonation. Really didn't have much of a smell, little hoppy. The taste was very bland and mouthfeel was very watery. Unless I had a bad sample, this is not worth having again or recommending. (2, NA, ML, N)

TexIndy, Aug 11, 2006
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Scarecrow Ale from Wychwood Brewery Company Ltd
73 out of 100 based on 440 ratings.