1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Green's Discovery - Green's Gluten Free Beers

Not Rated.
Green's DiscoveryGreen's Discovery

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
62
poor

52 Ratings
THE BROS
75
okay

(view ratings)
Ratings: 52
Reviews: 47
rAvg: 2.39
pDev: 27.62%
Wants: 0
Gots: 2 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Green's Gluten Free Beers visit their website
United Kingdom (England)

Style | ABV
English Strong Ale |  6.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: wl0307 on 12-19-2005)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 52 | Reviews: 47 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by DannyS:
Photo of DannyS
DannyS

New York

2.73/5  rDev +14.2%

Poured from a pint bottle into a pint glass. Must be Pint day today.

A - Murky, rusty brown with a head that starts off big and frothy, but peters out into a little island of foam on top.

S - Smells almost like wine more than beer, with a slightly grainy, grape, musty backing. I'd probably mistake this for mediocre chardonnay if I were blindfolded.

T - A bit of sour taste in its absent malt profile, slightly sweet backing, and no hop bitterness. Tastes like a failed lambic mixed with half-fermented wort. Funky aftertaste.

M - Watery, with medium-low carbonation. Also not very filling.

D - The ABV is a tad high, but if this is the kind of brew that you have to drink for health reasons, it's palatable enough for a bottle. Probably not more than that though.

Overall - It's an admirable effort, and I admit that with my total lack of food allergies I'm not the target market. If you're like me and can enjoy standard beers without runing your intestines, steer clear. And hell, even a celiac friend of mine was told by her doctor that Bud and Bud Light were fine for her to drink, so one's best bet would be to ask your doctor.

09-21-2009 22:23:47 | More by DannyS
More User Reviews:
Photo of BeerAdvocate
BeerAdvocate

Massachusetts

3.25/5  rDev +36%

Beer review from BA Mag Sep 2007.

A new line of gluten-free beers are being unleashed into the US market as we write this. We have a few friends that suffer from a gluten intolerance, so to see different flavors is very exciting for all.

No worries about the head: Right out of the gate there are three fingers of foam that don't want to budge. Hazy rusty-brown color glows a bit in the light. Semi-pungent grainy aromas of raw sugar cane, tart cherry and lemon rind. Very smooth with a trained crispness that hugs the medium body. Curious grain flavors emerge with layers of complex flavors: Rice and millet give nearly neutral flavors, while the buckwheat and sorghum stomp over the taste buds with their noticeably unconventional characteristics. Nuances of ripe cherry and lemon peel from the fermentation add to the complexity. Finishes a bit on the sweet side with a lingering sorghum aftertaste.

Now we're talking. Bursting with flavor and so complex, we nearly forgot it was gluten-free. Well that might be pushing the truth a bit--either way it's a beer every beer geek should try at least once.

07-07-2010 00:05:39 | More by BeerAdvocate
Photo of generallee
generallee

New York

2.25/5  rDev -5.9%

Presentation: It was poured from a brown 500ml bottle into Imperial glass.

Appearance: The body has a deep brownish or prune like color with dark reddish highlights coming through a very murky haze. On top I got a tall quick fading off white head. It fades out completely leaving just a little light lacing at the top of the glass.

Smell: There is a light roasted sweetness with some odd fruity wine like notes. This is backed up with some mild herbal and somewhat musty hop character. Overall it’s just odd.

Taste/Palate: From the odd aroma to the odd flavor it brings some light roasted and dark grain sweets to the forefront. From there a dry and slightly tart grape or wine like character moves in with a light herbal tea like hop presence. The palate feels about medium with light carbonation.

Notes: For me this beer just does not blend together well in my opinion and I would defiantly not recommend it.

05-10-2011 22:13:35 | More by generallee
Photo of biboergosum
biboergosum

Alberta (Canada)

2.53/5  rDev +5.9%

500ml bottle, made with millet, buckwheat, rice, and sorghum.

This beer pours a clear, medium copper amber hue, with two fingers of rather puffy, somewhat rocky, and duly foamy off-white head, which leaves a decent landscape of splattered lace around the glass as it lazily recedes.

It smells of a pale, quite thinly rendered mirror-world toasted grainy malt, sour fruity red vinous notes, a bit of bready yeast, and some rank weedy, grassy hops. The taste is semi-sweet, gritty, well, hard to describe musty, and earthy, something, but it ain't barley or wheat, that much is certain. I don't know if the spoiled red wine character is from the alterna-grains or the hops, which are kind of herbal and metallic in their own right. A soft, almost funky yeastiness sort of wafts in and out of the scene.

The carbonation is moderate, just a gentle probing frothiness, with a spiking zing here and there, the body a so-so medium weight, on the back of a sugary, barely tempered cloyingness. It finishes still kind of sweet and medicinal in a musty, ill-kept fruity manner, like stale cider.

I try, and I try, but I cannot find a reasonable answer for those celiac beer-swillin' Albertans out there. A whole different beast, this particular offering is, and despite what it says on the label, really doesn't resemble anything from any Belgian brewery that I've come across in the gluten-tolerant world. I just can't imagine being shuttered into this market segment, sorry to say.

06-22-2011 02:45:40 | More by biboergosum
Photo of elricorico
elricorico

Alberta (Canada)

1.65/5  rDev -31%

Poured into a tulip glass, it developed four fingers of foamy tan head on top of a dark brownish red body. Head starts to collapse relatively soon, but leaves some sticky lacing.

Smell has a certain candy sweetness to it, like a grape flavoured hard candy. The smell is not especially strong and doesn't have a lot of depth to it, but it doesn't smell bad.

Oh my goodness, the taste is certainly not what I expected. I think this is the worst beer taste I've had. There is a harsh, medicinal, artificially sweetened cinnamon on sour grapes taste. The description doesn't exactly match the real thing, but that is the best I could do.

Mouthfeels is thin but sticky with average carbonation. By this point I don't want to have anymore, I'm just finishing the review.

Awful, shouldn't even be called beer.

10-29-2007 03:16:06 | More by elricorico
Photo of Phyl21ca
Phyl21ca

Quebec (Canada)

3.2/5  rDev +33.9%

Bottle: Poured a deep amber and slightly hazy ale with a large foamy head with good retention and some lacing. Aroma of dry fruits such as figs and raisins, some sweet malt but alcohol ester. Taste is also dominated by some dry fruits characteristics and some sweet malt but is just too boozy at the end of the day. Body is somewhat too thin for the style with good carbonation too much alcohol was apparent.

01-14-2009 03:49:35 | More by Phyl21ca
Photo of theopholis
theopholis

California

1.5/5  rDev -37.2%

Appearance - Body is a dark, fairly clear amber with ruby highlights. Head is a large, light tan affair that settles semi-quickly and leaves some lacing.

Smell - Somewhat medicinal in aroma. Some maltiness. Lots of esters.

Taste - Strong medicinal taste/ Bleh. Barely tastes like beer. Taste like cooking sherry with a bacterial infection. I'm dumping it.

Mouthfeel - Light to medium body. Good level of carbonation. No objections here.

D - Ughghgh. Unless you are gluten intolerant, I do not recommend trying this beer.

01-24-2008 00:00:32 | More by theopholis
Photo of vickersspitfire
vickersspitfire

Texas

2.73/5  rDev +14.2%

Product of Belgium

Poured into a pint glass, it was a dark amber color and is very clear; its topped with a thick head fluffy head that quickly thinned out but had some good lacing to it; there is very little carbonation. There is a slight fruity aroma mixed in with some alcohol but not much more. It has a very light body but is very crisp and tangy overall, it reminds me of green apples and there's a slight sweet touch to it in its aftertaste. It smooth and easy to drink and really simple...

After letting it warm up a little bit the apple taste mellows out, but just a bit, the aromas were a little weaker, the aftertaste gets a bit of an alcohol kick... other than this it seemed to be the same, but I like it a lot more after its warmed up.

06-24-2008 06:54:23 | More by vickersspitfire
Photo of largadeer
largadeer

California

2.8/5  rDev +17.2%

Appearance - Dirty copper in color with a frothy off-white head. Excellent head retention.

Smell - Fruity, medicinal, mineral. Odd and not entirely pleasant, but not bad either.

Taste/mouthfeel - Dry, a bit tart. Granny smith apples, apricots, husky grain. Medium-bodied with very high carbonation. A touch astringent in the finish. Decent for gluten free beer, but I think I'd rather have a cider.

03-20-2008 23:09:37 | More by largadeer
Photo of metter98
metter98

New York

2.5/5  rDev +4.6%

Bottle at Tony Roma's, EWR Terminal A, Newark, NJ

A: The beer is rather clear dark amber in color and has a moderate amount of visible carbonation. It poured with a finger high beige colored head that has good retention properties and consistently left a short head covering the surface.
S: Light to moderate aromas of acidic fruits are present in the nose along with some hints of sourness.
T: The taste mostly follows the smell and has flavors of acidic and sour green apples. The acidity lingers through the finish.
M: It feels light- to medium-bodied on the palate and has a moderate amount of carbonation.
O: This beer definitely isn't watered down, but the acidic nature seems like it is an acquired taste.

10-26-2013 00:30:13 | More by metter98
Photo of IronDjinn
IronDjinn

Alberta (Canada)

2.3/5  rDev -3.8%

Pours out a deep cloudy walnut hue. The head retention is amazing, it will probably outlast you if given the opportunity. Dense light nutmeg coloured head, chunky as it settles, forming shapes like hoodoos.

The aroma is almost completely nondescript, except for some faint musky spice emanating from it in intermittent clusters.

I'm not quite sure what to make of my first sip. The subsequent ones remind me of another ale I'd tried years ago made of millet and buckwheat. Yeasty, with tart acidic grains that more than make up for any bitterness whatever hops were involved could provide. The hops in this ale don't really settle in until well into the aftertaste, leafy and herbal. The initial taste is clean, then picks up a grainy sourness, which rounds out somewhat on the finish. Wow, my gut is not accepting this flavour profile very well, very acidic, almost lends a caustic, corossive feeling. If you were gluten-intolerent I'm not sure you'd want this biting into your stomach lining either...

The mouthfeel is thin yet rounded, most of the texture comes from the flavour.

Well then, it's been a while since I've encountered a beer that has come across so hostile. Perhaps it is a lack of familiarity with these particular ingredients, both regarding the palate and digestion, however I am not feeling the love. In fact I'm only halfway through the bottle and I'm still on my guard, and ready to toss it overboard at the slightest sign of trouble. An expensive niche market ale, and I am not in that particular demographic.

03-07-2008 01:54:38 | More by IronDjinn
Photo of erosier
erosier

Connecticut

1.78/5  rDev -25.5%

Pours a nice brown color with a short but kind of thick tan head that laces the glass a bit on the way down. The aroma is very strange, mainly of sour berries. The taste was not that unlike the aroma. It was very lambicy and very sour berry flavored. The mouthfeel was very sharp which made for not a very drinkable beer. If this beer tastes like what all gluten free beers taste like, then bring me the gluten.

05-15-2008 05:08:59 | More by erosier
Photo of Zorro
Zorro

California

1.75/5  rDev -26.8%

An odd beer selected mostly just because it is odd.

A clear cola brown colored beer with a decent rocky head.

Persimmon wine is the first thing I smell here. Yeast and fruit scents persimmon and a little apple, REALYY smells more like fruit wine than beer.

The taste begins sweet and a little astringent and stingy, like a slightly green persimmon. Beery aftertaste with a fruit flavor. Carbonation really attacks your tongue here like a soda machine WAY out of adjustment. This is pretty piss poor beer and tastes closer to watered down BAD cider.

Mouthfeel is light and pretty much seltzer water.

SUCKS that sums this beer up in on easy to use five letter word. It doesn't taste like beer and frankly it is worse than that damn Babycham cider I drank. I would like to cut this some slack and grade it on a curve but... 1+1 doesn't equal 3 period.

09-21-2007 04:00:43 | More by Zorro
Photo of geexploitation
geexploitation

Indiana

2.6/5  rDev +8.8%

Pours a very dark amber, with limited, dull-wood highlights and a muted head that leaves some thick lace on the glass. Very faint aroma -- just some mild, maple-like sweet notes, sour fruits, and savory spices. On the palate, the beer balances between sweet and tart, with pronounced thinness, especially toward the finish. Some grainy flavors and fruity sourness round things out. The bitterness toward the end is substantial and has some good length. The feel is a bit hot. Overall, this is certainly nothing to shout about as a beer, but it is an OK gluten-free beer with a touch of Belgian influence.

05-20-2008 01:43:46 | More by geexploitation
Photo of cdizinno
cdizinno

South Carolina

2.6/5  rDev +8.8%

500ml brown bottle with expiration date of 05/04/09

A: Cloudy dark mahogony and slight head

S: Very medicinal and a bit like apple cider

T: Apples amid slight citrus flavor. Very bland.

M: Light bodied and it does remind me of a decent cider.

Notes: It's decent but I wouldn't get another for the price.

02-24-2009 23:35:38 | More by cdizinno
Photo of Hopheadjeffery
Hopheadjeffery

Illinois

2.5/5  rDev +4.6%

08-03-2013 22:33:50 | More by Hopheadjeffery
Photo of CWiggins
CWiggins

North Carolina

2.65/5  rDev +10.9%

This free sample bottle was provided by a local distributor, and since I work in the beer/specialty foods retail business, it only seems fair to taste this product to describe it to customers.

It pours a dark, hazy amber, with an ecru head that just doesn't let up. Seriously, the foam on this beer began one-inch thick and continually covered the surface of the brew until it was fully consumed. Pretty impressive. The smell is mainly of fresh fruit, particularly apple, but there is a grainy aroma as well as a hint of alcohol. The flavor is dominated by a grainy sweetness, followed by a slight sourness. A bit of dry hops is noticeable at the finish, and the sweet fruit-like essence is still tasted through the aftertaste. It's a little to carbonated for my taste, but the medium body is nice enough.

Not as bad as I imagined it might be, I still don't have any room in my beer diet for a gluten-free brew. If you have to partake only gluten-free beers, I would there are much worse products on the market.

07-14-2008 02:42:50 | More by CWiggins
Photo of maddogruss
maddogruss

New Jersey

2.8/5  rDev +17.2%

Got a bottle of this from the Cloverleaf Tavern.

A: Pours a dark brown body with slight reddish hues. A decent, off-white head with fairly decent retention and lacing until the finish.

S: A sweet, toasted malt smell; slight roasted toffee notes, but also some slight sour and winey notes that were not that pleasant, but nothing too overbearing.

T: A bittersweet, slight roasted toffee and malty taste. A slightly earthy aftertaste that was meant to balance but almost seemed like a slightly different beer in the aftertaste.

M: A fairly smooth mouthfeel; slightly overcarbonated, but nothing overbearing on the overall experience; could have been a little bit smoother.

D: A decent mouthfeel and taste combination; nothing really substitutes the experience of a sweet, barley backed pale ale, but this one some close. Overall. fairly drinkable, but I'm not sure if the gluten-free ingredients quite get you to the desired style.

12-27-2010 18:54:24 | More by maddogruss
Photo of Sjokvistarn
Sjokvistarn

Sweden

2.25/5  rDev -5.9%

A: Pours medium dark brown into the glass with a small lingering head, pretty hard to see through and you can almost "see" the acid.

S: Pretty interesting smell with loads of yeast and dried grapes that almost gives you a sense that it's champagne in the glass in front of you.

T: Can't really live up to the smell, or perhaps it lives up to it a bit too well? Very bitter with heavy tastes of yeast, dried fruits, peach and prunes. In my opinion this tastes more like a cider than a beer?

Not to impressed with this really, I was hoping for more as I have heard good things of it, but it really tasted and felt like a cider to me. Sorry, not for me.

08-12-2010 12:50:35 | More by Sjokvistarn
Photo of shadow1961
shadow1961

Minnesota

2.5/5  rDev +4.6%

Green's Discovery Amber pours a stiff two fingers of tan foam over a dark amber brew. It's ruby when you hold
it up to the light. The nose is odd- a bit funky and winey as well. Carbonation is hard to guage, but the head
eventually collapses to a disk of foam. The taste is interesting- there's quite a bit rich tartness up front with a
very firm grassy and herbal hop finish. The aftertaste is intense, grassy and medicinal. Mouthfeel is a bit
astringent as well- it may be due in part to my buckwheat allergy, but there's also a very strong cleansing
effect as well. I could not finish this brew, but if you do have a problem with gluten, and you like that grassy
hop flavor, you might like to try this one.

10-10-2007 07:25:57 | More by shadow1961
Photo of bbarrows
bbarrows

California

2.42/5  rDev +1.3%

Served from bottle into a wine glass at ~45 degrees.

Appearance- Dark brown and cloudy, no head

Smell- Reminds me of apple cider

Taste- Very light sour apple, no other distinctive flavors

Mouthfeel- Thin, little carbonation

Drinkability- I wouldn't want another

01-30-2009 02:52:12 | More by bbarrows
Photo of froghop
froghop

Washington

2.3/5  rDev -3.8%

pours a cloudy dark amber with a small light biege head, good lacing.

smell is alcohol, malt, touch of caramel, and some hops.

taste is thick, funky, and malt, with a strange aftertaste.

overall i would stay away from this one. i am not impressed at all.

09-14-2008 14:53:59 | More by froghop
Photo of avalon07
avalon07

South Carolina

2.48/5  rDev +3.8%

A: This beer had an amber color (though it was a little browner than most beers of the style) and had a cloudy texture. There was a decent amount of head that lasted awhile.

S: Didn't really have that much of a smell, though I did get a whiff of malt and a bit of hops.

T: This is where it lost me. The alcohol taste is overwhelming. It's not masked well at all. There's a hint of malt, but mainly it's just very difficult to drink.

M: There's an OK amount of carbonation, but the finish (predictably) is harsh. Medium-bodied.

D: This beer is not without its good qualities, but with everything, it comes down to the taste. Green's is simply too rough on the palate.

05-15-2008 14:33:32 | More by avalon07
Photo of BEERchitect
BEERchitect

Kentucky

2.68/5  rDev +12.1%

Billed as a non-malt brew, derived from millet, rice, buckwheat, and sorgum. I'm always game to try a non-malt beer, but have yet to find one that competes with malt counterparts in any serious manor. This beer fares well; bringing a deep amber, brown color with nice carbon dioxide and head retention. The aromas bosted raw syrups (sorgum) with a lack of substantial maltiness. Lowly hopped, but has a fermetation twang, which leaves the beer very one-dimensional. Tastes cola-like sweet, with just a hint of hops, but not enough to offset the caramel, cloying taste. The texture is light, evaporative, airy, but a bit un-refined. A residual sweetness persists through the aftertaste, and cannot be overlooked. Not an unpleasant experience, but lacks a lot of fundimental solidarity that beer lovers love in beer.

09-18-2007 04:15:33 | More by BEERchitect
Photo of Suds
Suds

Pennsylvania

2.65/5  rDev +10.9%

This one is a murky, deep brown color with a frothy tan head. The aroma is laced with fruit and a malt-like edge. There's also a little sharp twang, and a little alcohol. The smell is actually quite pleasant, if not inviting. The only distraction is the acidic, sour smell that accompanies these gluten free beers. The taste has a bit of the acidity as well, but not as intense. There's a nice sweetness that's present. Not much in the way of hops here. A fruit (apple and pear?) quality is present throughout the flavor. I would have liked some roasted qualities in this beer, but they never really show up. The mouthfeel is sharp, but substantial. The finish is sharp and distinct. The beer is certainly different, but could be pretty refreshing. Not great, and 'good' may be pushing it, but it's better than I expected.

04-12-2008 20:25:25 | More by Suds
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Green's Discovery from Green's Gluten Free Beers
62 out of 100 based on 52 ratings.