1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Southampton Imperial Porter - Southampton Publick House

Not Rated.
Southampton Imperial PorterSouthampton Imperial Porter

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
81
good

268 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 268
Reviews: 138
rAvg: 3.59
pDev: 13.93%
Wants: 6
Gots: 11 | FT: 1
Brewed by:
Southampton Publick House visit their website
New York, United States

Style | ABV
American Porter |  7.20% ABV

Availability: Winter

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 12-18-2009)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 268 | Reviews: 138 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of wcintula
wcintula

New York

3.33/5  rDev -7.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Duvel tulip.

I enjoyed the beer, pours black/darkest brown with a thick chocolatey colored head that recedes in a bit. The smell is very malty with a strong dark dried fruit smell, and yeast. The taste is all the same with nice estery taste in there. Nice drinking beer, with good body expected of the style.

Serving type: bottle

11-15-2010 04:32:45 | More by wcintula
Photo of vande
vande

Illinois

3.33/5  rDev -7.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A ~ looks very similar to a cola....brownish-black in color with a faint hint of head along the rim of the glass

S ~ hints of coffee...light roasted malts.. touch of chocolate...but all aromatics is on the lighter side...

T ~ somewhat like the smell on this beer... coffee, roasted coco, malty...but thinner that I'd have guessed...

M ~ thinner, but carbonated...reminds me of something like a java monster in regards to carbonated, coffee flavored beverage..

O ~ decent porter

Serving type: bottle

07-22-2011 03:29:31 | More by vande
Photo of PorterLambic
PorterLambic

Florida

3.33/5  rDev -7.2%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours an extremely dark brown with a goodly sized head, tan in color. Good retention and decent lace.
Smell is wet cardboard, roasted malt and a metallic note. Not a really encouraging start.
Taste is roasted malt, hops, hints of dark fruits, peat and smoke.
Medium in body, with a slightly watery finish. Warming late. Pretty good though I wish the nose was more indicative of what is delivered to the palate.

Serving type: bottle

01-05-2011 01:37:03 | More by PorterLambic
Photo of mdaschaf
mdaschaf

Washington

3.3/5  rDev -8.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Review from notes 2/6/11. Thanks to Cuzco for this bottle!

A: Pours black with a small head that dissipates quickly to splotches of foam on top. Decent lacing.

S: Light toasted malts, a little bit of chocolate, and a hint of hops.

T: Not very strong, roasted malts, hints of coffee, chocolate and molasses.

M/D: Medium bodied with moderate carbonation. Easy drinking, but not a lot going on. Alcohol is hidden well.

Serving type: bottle

03-03-2011 03:36:46 | More by mdaschaf
Photo of metter98
metter98

New York

3.3/5  rDev -8.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A: The beer is essentially jet black in color; a little bit of amber color is visible near the edges of the glass when it is held up to the light. It poured with a thin off white head that quickly faded away and left lacy patterns of bubbles on the surface.
S: There are light to moderate aromas of toasted malts and alcohol in the nose.
T: The taste isn't very strong and has notes of roasted malts and hints of coffee.
M: It feels medium-bodied and a bit thin on the palate with a moderate amount of carbonation. There is a slight amount of dryness in the finish.
D: The beer is extremely easy to drink but nothing really stands out in the taste so I'm not sure if I would try this one again. The alcohol is well hidden so it goes down rather quickly.

Serving type: bottle

12-11-2010 15:34:32 | More by metter98
Photo of ms11781
ms11781

Massachusetts

3.3/5  rDev -8.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

12oz bottle poured into a pint glass.

Pours a very dark brown with a 2 finger light brown head. Head dissipates after a bit and leaves a half finger off white cap.

Nose is initially of dark fruit, cherries maybe. Also some dark malt detected, along with some sweetness.

Taste is more on the malt side than the fruit side, although there is still a hint of the dark fruit. Malt has more of a roasted flavor than the nose. Black licorice towards the end as it finishes with a decent amount of bitterness.

Low carbonation with a a medium/full body gives way to a creamy mouthfeel. Decent bitterness at the finish but it doesn't linger.

Drinkability is ok. Usually with a beer that leans toward a heavier body I'd like it to be a bit more complex with richer flavors. A beer I wouldn't mind having again but I'd reach for a different brew right now if I was to have another.

Serving type: bottle

01-19-2011 04:17:18 | More by ms11781
Photo of Huhzubendah
Huhzubendah

District of Columbia

3.3/5  rDev -8.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A: Very dark brown, with a one inch head that leaves a fair amount lacing behind.

S: Slightly sour or lactic, roasted malt. It's a bit odd, and I am for the most part missing the chocolate and roasted malt aromas.

T: I was really hoping this would be an awesome beer, but it's pretty average. There is a slight lactic sourness that I find a bit distracting. SH Imperial Porter lacks depth and complexity. The roasted malt flavors that are present are tasty, I just wish there was a bit more to the beer.

M: Medium bodied with a slight hint of chocolate in the finish.

D: I was ready to move on to something else after one of these. Overall not a bad beer, just mediocre.

Serving type: bottle

04-05-2010 20:44:06 | More by Huhzubendah
Photo of Chaney
Chaney

District of Columbia

3.28/5  rDev -8.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A: Dark, reddish brown, but not so dark that I couldn't see through it with a prominent light source behind the glass. Fairly clear in its darkness, and with a finger or so head that stayed a fairly thick bubble formation for long after the pour.

S: Not very potent, but a decent bit of chocolate sponge cake, a bit of dark fruit, and quite a bit of malt.

T: Right away, I thought this one would have benefitted greatly from more of that barbecued roastiness that I commonly associate with porters. This one was almost not a porter at all... more like a brown ale without the brown sugar.

M: No real creaminess or texture of any kind actually. The lacing was pretty substantial and my pint glass looked like it went through a car wash.

D: As a porter, I wouldn't drink this one again, but that doesn't mean that this was horrible by any means... just kind of meh...

Serving type: bottle

02-24-2011 20:29:45 | More by Chaney
Photo of mdillon86
mdillon86

Pennsylvania

3.25/5  rDev -9.5%

03-11-2012 18:30:45 | More by mdillon86
Photo of JTomczak
JTomczak

Connecticut

3.25/5  rDev -9.5%

08-13-2013 18:09:06 | More by JTomczak
Photo of outoffocus
outoffocus

Pennsylvania

3.25/5  rDev -9.5%

02-03-2014 00:35:17 | More by outoffocus
Photo of Yabev15
Yabev15

Massachusetts

3.25/5  rDev -9.5%

02-06-2013 23:10:54 | More by Yabev15
Photo of RIKIM
RIKIM

Rhode Island

3.25/5  rDev -9.5%

12-15-2013 03:36:44 | More by RIKIM
Photo of Altoon88
Altoon88

New York

3.25/5  rDev -9.5%

03-30-2014 18:58:48 | More by Altoon88
Photo of ne0m00re
ne0m00re

Ohio

3.23/5  rDev -10%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Live review of a 12 oz bottle I picked up a weekend ago.
A: Clear dark brown with ruby hues, it poured with a one-finger cream head that died fast to a thin collar and film with lacing.
S: Toasted biscuit, nutty, but weird nutty, like pistachios, some banana and dark fruits, and a distinguishable smoked aroma. All right.
T: Hops are strong, with grapefruit citrus and pine, it starts out nutty and them moves towards a mild dark chocolate espresso with an early cleansing lack of creaminess. Mild raspberries, strawberries and pork linger. It's fruitier than expected, but the lack of that creamy mouthfeel is kind of a let down.
M: Too thin, but it has a frothiness that accents the fruit.
D: Pretty good for an imperial porter, mostly because of its lighter body.

Serving type: bottle

12-11-2010 21:53:46 | More by ne0m00re
Photo of SkeeterHawk
SkeeterHawk

Texas

3.2/5  rDev -10.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

I picked this beer up at Knightly Spirits a couple days ago and it is time now for me to leave my hotel. It is 9:30AM local time, and this beer is my breakfast today. Woo hoo! Go Beer!

Appearance: Pours black to look at, but is a semi-clear dark brown when held to the light. There was a small head of tan bubbles when first poured, but the head faded back into the beer so quickly that I didn't really get to see the size of the bubbles. What is left are quite small bubbles, so I imagine that was what we had to begin with.

Aroma: I got some evident roast along with some fresh chocolaty notes. Other than this, there are some toasty malts in here and a very reserved floral hop bouquet.

Taste: The beer has a very clean malt profile and the overall balance is decidedly toward the malt the whole time. I get some hops in here, but they are having to coexist with the roast malts for control of the finish. The overall roast presentation is really mild for a Porter, and especially an Imperial Porter. The beer has a medium mouthfeel, and the carbonation is a tad low, so this is almost a saving grace for this beer or it would come across as weak for the style. As it is, I can feel some warming from the alcohol after I have drank about half the beer, but it is not apparent in the flavor.

Opinion: This is an OK beer. I like that it is so drinkable as it currently is, but this fact is what hurts it when compared to the style. This beer comes across to me as more of a Brown Ale than a Porter. For a Brown Ale, it isn't bad, but as a Porter it is rather lame. Take that for what you will. I will certainly drink this beer...there is nothing wrong with the way it was brewed, but just the recipe falls short of what I expect for this style.

Serving type: bottle

03-04-2010 14:46:54 | More by SkeeterHawk
Photo of donkeyrunner
donkeyrunner

Massachusetts

3.18/5  rDev -11.4%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

My girlfriend is dieting for a bikini competition so I'm stockpiling the cellar with strong, dark beers to age for a post-competition celebration. Picked up a few of these on our recent road trip to NY.

Pours dark cola brown and sits opaque black in my glass. Chunky brown eggshell head. Glass bottom retention leaves several lace rings. I couldn't ask for a much better looking Baltic porter.

Dense head doesn't let much aroma through but what's there is faint and unimpressive. Cocoa powder and cola caramel.

Flavor is as reserved as the aroma. Chocolate frozen yogurt, a very mild roast character and some dark fruit that emerges more and more as the beer warms. Very smooth and very clean.

For a big beer it doesn't flex any big beer muscles. Hope it ages well.

Serving type: bottle

08-23-2011 00:11:39 | More by donkeyrunner
Photo of gabedivision
gabedivision

New York

3.18/5  rDev -11.4%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured to a pint glass form a 12oz

A- Pours a deep reddish brown with a 2 finger off white/beige head that sits very pretty atop the beer.

S- Light toffee, caramel sweet bready nuttiness and a touch of black licorice.

T- Very sweet, overwhelming, chocolate and vanilla, coffee bean thrown in the mix, nuts and tofee. Very bitter on the finish

M- Full and heavy, drinks like a milk shake or a syrup, sweet and bitter.

O- Overall this is too sweet for me, tastes artificial. Not a fan don't think i will invest in again.

Serving type: bottle

01-20-2012 02:14:03 | More by gabedivision
Photo of Jayli
Jayli

Massachusetts

3.18/5  rDev -11.4%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

consumed 12/28

A: This beer pours a thin looking chocolate brown with some mahogany highlights. 1/2 inch of khaki sudsy creamy head and leaves some wispy lacing.

S: Nose is of cream, light chocolate and kind of wet dog...

T: Taste starts with a touch of copperness but is quickly overruled by cream, moving in to a bitter bakers chocolate, some caramel, and burnt malts. There is a slight hop bite in the finish as well.

M: Lighter side of medium body, thin feeling on the tongue and oily in the finish.

D: Ok beer, goes down relatively easily, nothing stands out, and the nose is disappointing. There are better of the style out there.

Serving type: bottle

12-31-2009 15:12:09 | More by Jayli
Photo of EkimGram
EkimGram

New York

3.18/5  rDev -11.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Appearance: 12oz bottle poured into large snifter. Colour is a dark, rich, and deep brown nearing black. Very thin head fades to almost nothing.

Smell: Roasted malts, coffee, bitter hops, and some alcohol.

Taste: Wow, this was disappointing. Initial flavours are weak in general, pretty much all hops. Malts are the aftertaste primarily. These flavours are not blended together very well. They are nice but so divided.

Mouthfeel: Medium-bodied, sticky, and chewy with a mild amount of carbonation.

Overall: Unfortunately, weak and confused. Not very interesting save for the roasted malt aftertaste.

Serving type: bottle

01-12-2012 07:48:18 | More by EkimGram
Photo of Overlord
Overlord

California

3.18/5  rDev -11.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Thanks for the extra!

Pours a muted ruddy brown. A surprisingly small off-white foam head. Smells like roasted malts. That's about it.

Taste is mostly roasted malts, with a hint of chocolate and vanilla, and a kind of weird cereal roastiness to it. Like someone toasted up some cornflakes, or something. Weird.

A bit thin. Leaves a bitter aftertaste.

Serving type: bottle

01-30-2010 09:26:21 | More by Overlord
Photo of WeezyBoPeep
WeezyBoPeep

Florida

3.15/5  rDev -12.3%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Poured from a bottle into a standard pint glass.

A: Looks almost like a Pepsi. Deep, dark, clear amber with a black hue. Tan, foamy head that fades into a thin, lacy layer of islands. Looks pretty good.

S: Hard to detect much here. Smells toasty and roasty. Some coffee detectable, but rather mild for an "imperial" anything.

T: Decent taste. Again, I wonder what makes this an "imperial" porter. Tastes weaker than Sierra Nevada porter. I'm no expert on these, but it seems a little bland. I get some coffee malt, a little white sugar and a faint trace of black cherries. A little popcorn on the finish is hinted. Watery mouthfeel for the style. Not thick enough.

D: Maybe a good introductory porter. An easy drinker.

Value: For the real price, it's beaten by Anchor Steam porter and SN, which are easy to find and equally priced. But for what I paid, $3.99, I cannot complain.

Serving type: bottle

02-24-2011 05:13:17 | More by WeezyBoPeep
Photo of stephens101
stephens101

Oklahoma

3.15/5  rDev -12.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A huge, thick dark tan head tops off a dark brown (bordering on black) brew. Some crimson hues line the bottom of the Sam Adams specialty glass. The head begins to recede fairly quickly, broken apart by some large bubbles, and finally leaving a craggy lace behind. Smells of caramel malts and burnt sugar with some maple syrup in the background. Some malts are noticed on the palate at first, with some cherry sweetness, some vinegar and a few hops in the back. Fairly nondescript with a pure medium-body and airy mouth-feel. Maybe the word "imperial" is used loosely here.

Serving type: bottle

02-28-2010 22:39:09 | More by stephens101
Photo of DrJay
DrJay

Massachusetts

3.15/5  rDev -12.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Very dark with ruby highlights. Fine off-white, light tan bubbles coated the surface while a thin collar left spotty lacing on the glass. Decent head retention. Malty and fruity aroma, chocolate and raisins, plums, light roast, faint alcohol. Quite sweet, a lot of fruit up front, bitterness in the finish. Cereal grain and roast. Medium bodied, with soft carbonation, some astringency and alcohol warmth.

Serving type: bottle

02-26-2011 01:04:47 | More by DrJay
Photo of sbauer
sbauer

Massachusetts

3.13/5  rDev -12.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

A:Black, deep, dark brown.
S: Surprisingly weak aroma. Light caramel, chocolate, but mostly kerosene and alcohol.
T: Immediate sour cherry and chocolate (see chocolate rum cordials), fruit esters prominent with underlying bitter cocoa, tart finish.
M: Light and minearly.
D: A good session beer, despite being an imperial porter. Flavorful and light for the style. Expect more (taste and kick) out of an imperial.

Serving type: bottle

12-15-2010 05:24:09 | More by sbauer
Southampton Imperial Porter from Southampton Publick House
81 out of 100 based on 268 ratings.