Amstel Light - Amstel Brouwerij B. V.
Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
Ratings: 1,204 | Reviews: 461 | Display Reviews Only:
2.3/5 rDev -5%
Amstel Light pours a light yellow with a white head from a brown twelve ounce bottle. The aroma is skunky. Light body and a skunky flavor, but not as intense as I would have imagined. Doesn't taste like much really, a little skunk toward the end. Not recommended.
04-01-2007 01:20:42 | More by Drew966
2.58/5 rDev +6.6%
Appearance: Very, very pale straw color. Almost looked watery. Luckily the head was a little creamy and appealing.
Smell: Like all light beers. Adjunct malts and a corn smell.
Taste: Like many light beers, but not annoying. Not much to taste, but it goes done easy, almost like water.
Mouthfeel: Light and creamy. A nice texture.
Drinkability: If I want to drink a lot, I could drink some of these.
02-21-2007 02:28:47 | More by Schwarzbart
2.75/5 rDev +13.6%
12oz brown bottle-
Amstel Light was a pale yellow color with a white head. The head was around briefly. The aroma was typical mass-market light beer malt and grain. The taste was light and and had a dry finish. It had medium carbonation. Drinkability was average. It's very average overall for mass-market beer, an acceptable alternative if at a sporting event or bar that lacks interesting inventory.
02-18-2007 13:35:25 | More by jaydanahy
2.8/5 rDev +15.7%
A average light beer. Can you believe it retails at nearly $8/sixer? Not really worth it to me. Anyway, it is a drinkable beer with a bright white head and a skunky smell akin to Grolsch or Heineken. Mouthfeel is near water levels. Not abad for a light beer but nowhere near Sam Adams Light.
01-30-2007 19:59:00 | More by pumarocks
1.48/5 rDev -38.8%
What can I say about this one? A little malt and a little hop bite, but skunk and cooked vegetable dominate both the aroma and the flavor, and the drinkability suffers as a result. The mouth feel is a bit better than many light lagers, though not much. Honestly, you'd be better off getting a Bud Light. I'd rather have something that tastes like water than something that tastes this bad. I'd say I had a bad bottle, but the last bottle I had of this a couple years ago was just as bad. I figured my palate has changed a bit since then, so perhaps I'd re-try it. I'm glad I did, but I was not impressed with this brew (still), unfortunately.
12-24-2006 03:38:20 | More by MrHurmateeowish
2.35/5 rDev -2.9%
12 oz. bottle with no freshness date. It pours into the pilsner glass a crystal-clear pale gold with light carbonation and a finger of white head that leaves little lace. The aroma is quite light and macroish with maybe a touch of hops and the flavor is just as bland, with maybe some corn but no trace of hops.The body is light and tingly, drying, with a short finish. Overall not much more than carbonated alcohol water. Might as well drink something from BMC instead of paying for this import.
12-21-2006 08:20:32 | More by mmmbeer
3.58/5 rDev +47.9%
I typically avoid light beers, but this one I'll make an exception for. A rather typical light pale yellow color with not much of a head that lingers a bit. A light grainy smell and a hoppy grainy flavor, quite pleasant really. It's well carbonated but is clean and good. It's good with a heavy meal or when you are trying to watch your calories.
12-21-2006 04:40:57 | More by zuggy9
3.48/5 rDev +43.8%
Pale light gold clear beer with a smallish white head that is rather attractive while it lasts.
Very little aroma (just a hint of grassy malt and some hops), but the flavor is more robust than expected. A nice crisp flavor that reminds me of grass and hay with a tiny bit of floral and bittering hops. The mouthfeel is also pretty crisp. Not a terribly substantial beer, but compared to other light offerings this isn't bad at all.
I should also say that this isn't my favorite style of beer, however since I'm on a low-carb diet right now I thought I would give it a try (at 5.8g of carbs, I can afford to drink two beers in a day instead of only one regular beer). For a light lager, it is definitely above average and was a pleasant surprise. I think the ads are right. It is the "beer drinker's light beer."
12-10-2006 20:33:43 | More by jmbranum
District of Columbia
1.25/5 rDev -48.3%
To this date, this is the only beer that I simply cannot stomach. I think it tastes awful, like burnt grass and straw. The smell is horrible too, like putrid sour mash.
The beer tastes extermely watered down, and has no flavoring what-so-ever. The one I tried didn't even pour like a regular beer, had no head and very little carbonation. If you're watching your calories and drinking "light," you may as well save on taste and have a glass of water.
11-14-2006 03:22:00 | More by alysmith4
2.23/5 rDev -7.9%
12oz brown bottle
Amstel Light was a clear pale yellow color with a white head. The head stuck around a little while with a little spotty lace. The aroma was light malt and grain. The taste was light and grainy with a dry finish. It was light bodied with medium-high carbonation. Drinkability was below average. I won't be wasting money on this one again.
11-10-2006 21:57:29 | More by afinepilsner
3.2/5 rDev +32.2%
12oz bottle into pilsner glass
Ultra mega clear light hay color. Relatively large head considering the style. It also had good retention, and sticky lacing.
Very light smells, almost completely clean. Hints of husky malts, almost no hop smells.
Very light malt flavors. Only a bit of hop flavor to compliment the bit of malts. Watery, but not bad for a light beer. No aftertaste.
Pretty much your standard Light Lager. Not bad for the style, no bad flavors or aftertaste. If you like the style then you can probably settle with this, however it is a little pricey, so a similar domestic would probably be the better path.
10-14-2006 04:27:40 | More by BeerSox
1.58/5 rDev -34.7%
I had to go to a baby shower this afternoon. First, it's a baby shower and second, there were two good music festivals in the Los Angeles area. At least they had Amstel Light.
The pour is the only part of this beverage that resembles beer. It's a watery amber with a cream colored head. The nose has a faint scent of grain and a hop aroma that would be overpowered by a Pliney the Younger resting fifty feet away, up wind. The taste has much more in common with soda water than beer. Have you ever tried one of those vitamin waters? This tastes like pilsner-flavored sparkling vitamin water, only with less flavoring.
All and all, the shower wasn't so bad.
10-08-2006 07:01:25 | More by goschool
2.6/5 rDev +7.4%
A- Straw colored yellow, a light version of a pale ale. Lacing is low.
S- Typical import lager smell. Has a touch of cooked veggies.
T&M- Malt is thin with some grain and husk flavors. Hop bite is okay and leaves a crisp, clean finish with minimal aftertaste.
D- For a light beer, it is okay but I would just stick with a light, crisper style before moving to this on a regular basis. A good kolsch or helles is a better choice. This can be expensive so just go for the good stuff.
09-28-2006 13:20:20 | More by teg8612
2.9/5 rDev +19.8%
I think this beer is getting poor ratings in part because of the thinking that since it is well-advertised, it must suck. It is definitely a light beer with little aroma, and a thin body, but has an okay taste and leaves a pleasant finish. While I have had many beers that are better, this is not a bad beer, especially when a wide variety is not available.
09-20-2006 00:44:04 | More by kimcgolf
1.8/5 rDev -25.6%
What can I say about this beer. It's expensive, has hardly any taste at all, and the mouthfeel has to be one of the thinnest beers I have ever had. The real drawback to this beer is the price. Honestly, I would drink other mass produced lagers out there that are half the price any day over this, as there are brews that are half the price that taste a whole lot better.
The only thing I tasted in this brew was a slight grain flavor with just a hint of hops. Not much really there. The only bright side is the beer doesn't really have any off flavors; again, there really isn't much flavor there at all. The worst part is the mouthfeel. Way too watery and thin, even for a light beer. This beer actually reminds me of a watered down cocktail. Not recommended.
09-17-2006 04:48:23 | More by AustinBeerLvr
1.68/5 rDev -30.6%
Had this froma can yesterday at a golf tournament. Beer is a living thing. We just can't have reviews that center only on a beer in its own exact glassware in the perfect season in the perfect mood wearing that beer's logo t-shirt within 2 miles of the brewery... etc.
Anyway, I poured it into a plastic cup, it had no noticeable head, it was pale and orange. The first taste was super thin, watery, and tasted light bitter carrots. The bitterness was not hop bitterness, mind you, but some ungodly funk that is supposed to make the beer feel BIGGER.
This tasting confirms my previous suspicions. This beer is sold to yuppie types under the false pretense that it is a "classy" alternative to american macro lite beers, but in fact- it tastes far worse in my opinion, and does not quench the thirst. This is not to slam this beer. just to erase a terribly false perception.
(THis beer was so bad that a draft michelob afterward tasted great by comparison.)
09-12-2006 12:06:42 | More by andjusticeforale
1.9/5 rDev -21.5%
Container Volume: 355ml
Container type: bottle
Purchased @: anywhere
Color: pale yellow
Palate: curls the tongue
Taste: They managed to get a light beer to taste more like watered down pale American lagers than watered down pale European pilsners.
Mowing/Working on car- n
With Friends- n
Get my buzz on- n
09-12-2006 07:01:15 | More by TechMyst
3.38/5 rDev +39.7%
This is hands down the best of the bunch when it comes to macro brew light beers. If you close your eyes it almost feels like you are drinking a 'regular' beer. The appearance, smell, and taste are all average. But compared to the other light beers Amstel Light has the highest drinkability. It seems like you are drinking a beer not a watered down version of one.
08-25-2006 22:26:59 | More by cbros
3.1/5 rDev +28.1%
This is a better alternative than most domestic macro light lagers. It is light across the board in aroma, taste and mouthfeel, but the drinkability is better than average. Heineken is far from a favorite of mine, but Amstel is reasonably drinkable especially in hotter climes. A decent option if you find yourself with no other alternatives, but not much more than that.
08-18-2006 03:28:33 | More by veech
2.9/5 rDev +19.8%
Drinkability is good, specially for those hot days.
A golden colour of course. You can see right throught it but that is expected of a light beer. Little head and no lacing.
It didn't wow me in the smell judging. It smelled like every other beer like it. Hops and barely. Wow. I'm so exicited to drink this. Not.
It tasted like I just had a spoon full of bread. Corn, barely and hops of course but that was it. For a light beer it was actually pretty heavy. But other then that it was a light beer.
In my mouth it was refeshinting, just like water which is what it tasted like. Water. It would be refeshing after I just mowed the lawn or somethign like that but nothing special.
This is one you would just have for the hot, long days. Maybe if you didn't want to break the bank.
Overall, barely passed. Good for partys in your colllege days. Not so good now.
08-12-2006 07:28:02 | More by ghostmech007
3/5 rDev +24%
Into the pilsner, clear yellow-gold with a few bubbles beneath a thick white spit head that fades quickly leaving no real lacing. Pretty mundane appearance. Nose is typical Euro-lager: citrus, yeast, and mild malt. Taste dominated by citrus and bready malt. Finishes up dry with a bit of mild hops. Mouth is watery with mild carbonation. Drinkability is very average, in the lawn-mowing beer realm.
Overall: This is your typical, garden variety light Euro lager. No need to bother.
Edit: Oops, this beer is so forgettable that I reviewed it twice in a month and didn't realize it. That should speak volumes.
08-12-2006 00:12:37 | More by jettjon
2.9/5 rDev +19.8%
Amstel is better than most macro's light beers, but it honestly just tastes like a watered down Heineken. Maybe its the yeast, who knows. Anyways, appearance is actually quite good for a light beer. It looks like a Czech pilsner somehow. The smell is all malt, a little on the adjuncty side, but not American-like. The taste is watery, malty, and not pleasing. This beer has no hope presence at all. The mouthfeel is on the watery side, but much better than the other light beers out there, sans Beck's and the new Hein light. Drinkability is great. Definitely beats the Rodney King out of American light beers, however, it is watery and low in alcohol.
08-10-2006 04:31:15 | More by MusicmanSD
3.4/5 rDev +40.5%
Poured into my pint glass a clear amber color, with a small head. Smelled a hint of sweet. Taste was not too shabby. The drink ability of this is good. It would be great to chug one or two of these down with a brat. Overall for a Light Lager it wasn't half bad.
08-08-2006 23:57:49 | More by robocrouch
2/5 rDev -17.4%
This beer pours a clear golden color, medium sized head, no lacing; Smell is of light hops and little bit skunky; Taste is grainy, some corn, and hops; Mouthfeel weak and watery; Refreshing but not very flavorful; Drinkability is good, specially for those hot days.
07-29-2006 03:22:47 | More by fido
2/5 rDev -17.4%
Was on special at Friday's, figured I'd give it a shot.
Pours light piss colored, slight swirls of head. Lightly carbonated. Smell is immediately skunky with light notes of 'beer', but not much else. Taste is also rather like bitterish seltzer, but the taste isn't so bad as to not be drinkable. Mouthfeel? It's a light beer and goes down like one. All in all, I've had better light beers, but it could be worse.
07-12-2006 03:35:33 | More by aquatonex
Amstel Light from Amstel Brouwerij B. V.
58 out of 100 based on 1,204 ratings.