1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Punk IPA - BrewDog

Not Rated.
Punk IPAPunk IPA

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
86
very good

1,197 Ratings
THE BROS
90
outstanding

(view ratings)
Ratings: 1,197
Reviews: 481
rAvg: 3.8
pDev: 13.42%
Wants: 48
Gots: 147 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
BrewDog visit their website
United Kingdom (Scotland)

Style | ABV
American IPA |  5.60% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
Welcome to a post Punk apocalyptic mother fucker of a pale ale.

A beer that spent its formative years Blitzkrieg bopping around India and the sub continent. Quintessential Empire with an anarchic twist.

God save the Queen and all who sail in her. Raising a Stiff Little Finger to IPAs that have come before and those it is yet to meet.
Turn up the volume Pay the man. Embrace the punked up, fucked up outlaw elite.

Never Mind the Bollocks this is the real shit.

45 IBU

(Beer added by: bark on 11-02-2007)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Punk IPA Alström Bros
Ratings: 1,197 | Reviews: 481 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of cjgator3
3.63/5  rDev -4.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

22oz bottle

A- Pours a slightly hazy golden orange color with an off-white head.

S- The aroma is malt and muted citrusy hops. The aroma is good but a little subdued, it could be kicked up a few more notches.

T- The taste features a good pale malt base with a good dose of citrusy hops in the finish. There we go, a little more attitude in the taste than the aroma.

M- The mouthfeel is light-medium bodied with a good amount of carbonation.

D- Overall, not the best IPA on the shelves but not a bad one either. Worth a shot but not worth going out of your way for.

cjgator3, Jan 29, 2010
Photo of Daniellobo
3.65/5  rDev -3.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A good IPA, not really worth exporting to the US in bottled form, but a fair brew nevertheless, attitude and marketing aside.

Presentation: 22 oz bottle. Smudged and a bit trite design of semi erased and dusty fonts displaying the brew name. Redundant side notes with a superfluous tongue in cheek "you are not worthy" style rant and a perfunctory and trite attack on macros. Ultimately more of a snob than an advocate message. Notes best before date hand written (24/11/10). Shows Alc. by Vol. (6%) Poured into a tulip glass.

A - Deep gold to pale amber pour, generous foamy head with nice retention and a persistent surface memory, great lacing.

S - Hoppy notes, citrus with a bitter nose that touches briefly on a skunky hint to fade immediately.

T - Slight citrus hops, malty backbone notes with a small grassy note. More bitter than hoppy in taste and finish.

M - Light body leaning to a medium side. Small carbonation, almost watery at times, but works relatively well with the bitterness picking up the finish with a nice bite.

D - It actually works fairly well. Nothing remarkable but pleasing. Bottles in the 12 oz range would be far more convenient than bombers for this brew. Maybe it needs the bomber to make sense of the numbers as it is shipped across the Atlantic?

Notes: It´s actually a nice IPA, nothing extraordinary but nice. It sure is a nice addition to the UK landscape and would love to have it at hand over there. An import to the US? It is quite a few marks away from being competitive in terms of quality. The hype has done the rest but should not be able to sustain it for long unless they bring it up a notch. Having said that, and while I understand that it is not such a competitive market, why not exporting this to closer European markets where craft beer is a mostly a barren landscape? Yes, Spain, Portugal, Greece etc. I would love to find it on travels over there.

Daniellobo, Jan 28, 2010
Photo of Long813
3.85/5  rDev +1.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Dated: Best Before 11/10/10, Batch 360
From LCBO, 330ml

G: Chalice

A: Hazy golden-orange body with one finger of white head. Quickly dissipates into nothing but a thin ring around the edges of the glass. Minimal lacing. I'm surprised here ... I would have thought it was a wit from the looks.

S: Grapefruits, orange are overpowering mixed with pine and floral notes. Surprised here again, usually the pine is more forward.

T: Wow I've been mislead, the pine is so much stronger than what I expected. Some nice malts and fruitiness come through after. The pine hops aren't as strong compared to other IPA's but the bitterness is (Doesn't make much sense, but that's what I'm getting).

M: Medium bodied and medium carbonation. Quite a weird mixture I'm getting here, but the oiliness seems to hold this together making a thicker drink. Smooth and thick down the throat leaving large amouts of bitterness.

D: Everything about this beer is odd to me compared to others in the same style. It's a good beer and if you like bitterness I think it's something you should check out. If it's a 'crisp' & 'clean' you're going for you wont get it here. Glad this came to the LCBO.

Long813, Jan 27, 2010
Photo of Reinheitsgebot71
3.65/5  rDev -3.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

LCBO winter release, a tad strange I'd finger this as more of a summer beer, none the less glad to have it on the shelves.

The beer pours a hazy honey colour and is capped off by a nice white head. This lasts reasonably well leave some lacing, eventually dissipating to a thin coating on top of the brew.

Grapefruit hits me right up front followed by some piney resinous notes. Perfumes of honey and rose make for a nice addition. Some light caramel scents can be detected but for the most part it's all resin and citrus, American hop varieties? This bouquet is pretty much on par for the style.

A resinous punch hits me right up front but not as powerful as some. This definitely has some of the British sensibility when it comes to hopping. Honey cracker malt flavours back up the hop bitterness well while not being too obtrusive, they know their role. Earthy flavours bring more than a one dimensional feel to the hopping providing some nice complexity.
The body is slightly viscous and very pleasing blending well with the hop character.

This is a good beer if not the most exciting, despite what the labeling would have you believe. The hopping is just right and you can tell they were going for the American version more than the British one stylistically. Though it isn't quite the hop bomb one has come to expect from the latter style.

Reinheitsgebot71, Jan 26, 2010
Photo of mintjellie
3.95/5  rDev +3.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Deeep gold in colour, with the slightest hint of orange showing when held to light. A big, fizzy, white head that sputters away to a solid centimetre cap that sticks around for awhile. The fizz leaves behind a patchy lace. The nose is very hop forward, showing solid notes of pine, tangerine, and flowers. Very perfumey. There's a little bit of bready malt in the background. It tastes much the same as it smells, the citrus and pine are there, maybe a hint of pineapple. Cracker-like malt character. It's very dry, with very little to balance the bitterness of the hops. Light bodied with low carbonation - it feels a bit thin, but still leaves a nice oily texture between sips. I picked up three of these - this is my last one, and I've looked forward to each one after the first. I think I can understand the mixed reviews this one gets, with it's thin body and slight malt character - even so, I still like this. I bet I'd like it even more on the back porch in August. I'd have preferred the LCBO bring something like this in as part of the summer release, rather than the winter.

mintjellie, Jan 26, 2010
Photo of foxbat2500
3.8/5  rDev 0%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

From a bottle I bought at BevMo.

Appearance = the best part of this beer. Wonderful head.

Smell = Lots of nose. Big and citrusy. Very appealing.

Taste = Citrus up front, tropical. Bit of hops to finish.

I must say that I was a bit disappointed. Maybe my expectations were too high after reading so much about Brewdog. Don't get me wrong its a fine beer, but too pricey for what it is.

foxbat2500, Jan 26, 2010
Photo of Spineypanda
4.22/5  rDev +11.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Has a golden color with a great head that has long retention time.
Smells of hops! Sweet glorious hops! Has a bit of an estery smell, but is perfect smelling for an IPA.
Tastes just like I expected but better. Has the hoppiness of a great IPA and a nice malt backbone. Delicious.

Thanks brewdog for making a great beer!

Spineypanda, Jan 21, 2010
Photo of benclimbs
3.95/5  rDev +3.9%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

first night back in the UK, decided to pop a brewdog

pours very light yellowish pale...not bad looking but looks like a blonde or an american wheat, too light to be an IPA in my opinion. also, hardly any head, and hardly any lacing

smell is subtle - nice citrus and flower hops are the dominant character, but not too intense, very clean smell.

taste is sooo floralish hoppy, along with yellow grapefruit juice character...with a very bitter finish, crisp and leaves the mouth feeling dry.

the look is really the only downfall of this beer...who cares though really, it tastes and smells very good - a brewdog classic, would order it above some of my favourite american single ipas.

benclimbs, Jan 18, 2010
Photo of elniko
3.8/5  rDev 0%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Poured from bomber into Stella glass.

A: Lighter golden glowing amber with quite heavy lacing and decent sized head. Good looking brew.

S: Quite fruity nose, hint of tropical notes. Nice but a little on the light side.

T & M: Strong fruity, tropical notes come through quite strongly. Hop presence is somewhat apparent in the finish. Mouthfeel pretty thin bodied with carbonation apparent.

D: Drinkable, a different take on the IPA style. With the price I don't think I'll be seeking out again but glad I had it.

elniko, Jan 16, 2010
Photo of ludachris
3.05/5  rDev -19.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Pours a slightly hazy light marmalade hue with a 1 finger quickly dissipating white head that leaves suddy patchy lacing down the sides of the glass. A bit lighter than the standard AIPA and with the carbonated bubbles hanging out on the sides of the glass after the pour, it looks more like carbonated fruit juice.

Strong presence of pineapple, pine, and hop resin in the nose with light strawberry, biscuit, and subdued bready malts in the background which become more pronounced as the beer warms. There's a decent amount going on, but I think the nose can be amped up a bit.

Tropical fruits, grapefruit rhine, and pine take center stage like the nose with hints of strawberries, biscuit, and bready malts, all of which come to an end with an underpronounced hop finish (in terms of the style). I like everything that's going on, it all just needs to be more pronounced.

Mouthfeel is light, watery, and decently balanced at best; almost the opposite of what I look for in an AIPA. It's still crisp and somewhat refreshing, but not something I really enjoy drinking.

Overall, a less than decent IPA. After reading the back of the label, I was under the impression that this beer was really going to deliver, but if anything, this turned out to be one of my least favourite IPA's I've had to date. The fruity presence, especially the strawberry infusion was quite interesting, but again, the whole experience was somewhat bland. I don't think I'll be buying this one again.

ludachris, Jan 13, 2010
Photo of JohnnyBarman
3.35/5  rDev -11.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

The LCBO got a bunch of individual bottles of this, so I picked up a couple to try. First time having anything from BrewDog, so we'll see how it goes.

Poured a surprisingly light golden hue, slightly opaque. Almost like a pilsner or Belgian blond. A very thin layer of head, not much to speak of. Lacing is evident, patchy.

Light hop to the nose, with a bit of honey, spice and bread in there as well. Not overpowering.

A solid IPA taste, certainly smooth and drinkable. Citrus and spices, with a touch of bitterness to the finish. Not bad at all.

A bit undercarbonated, but other than that it feels on the mark.

Does what it sets out to do, but nothing really to write home about. With so many IPAs available around here, perhaps I'm expecting too much. Still, I'd drink it again.

JohnnyBarman, Jan 13, 2010
Photo of phillipzayas
3.33/5  rDev -12.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A - pretty light for the IPA category, but well within SRM range. The only poblem is I would have liked a nice foamy head on my beer and I didn't get one. For a hoppy beer it is really really odd to not have head but this one just didn't. Maybe their bottling machine didn't pre-force carbonate their beer prior to capping or maybe the cap was loose at some point. Who knows.

S - Again, maybe it was something wrong with the bottle, but I didn't get really any hoppy aroma at all. Maybe just a slight tiny bit of aroma, but that is it. Could benefit from back-hopping or dry hopping with more hops or further addition of aroma hops.

T - Wow. It suprised me. I didn't think it would be as good because of the appearance and smell, but it was nice and gentle. I traditionally like double/imperial IPAs, but this one was a good traditional IPA. Citrusy flavor, which I love and a smooth finish.

M - Could have been much better with the carbonation, but overall FG was good and provided a decent mouthfeel.

D - As far as drinkability, it definitely has potential. I could see myself drinking this beer just all by itself. I just think I need to try another bottle. Maybe with improved head retention and carbonation this one would get a better score from me.

Go out and try it. Its pretty enjoyable.

phillipzayas, Jan 11, 2010
Photo of Xul
3.38/5  rDev -11.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

A: Pours a hazy golden with a two finger white head that is slow to recede. The beer leaves a tight, persistent lacing down the glass as its consumed.

S: Predominant scent is of biscuity malts, with some citrusy hops (think lemon) and hints of spice coming through. The spice and hop smells meld together quite a bit, to the point where differentiating the two can be difficult.

T: A lot more upfront bitterness than the nose would indicate. Biscuity malts comes in midway and sticks through the backend, with a balanced hoppy aftertaste. The hop profile is very English in nature...a spicy hue to the hops, but not in the piney west coast style. As the beer warms, the bittering aftertaste takes on a bit of an rough form.

M: A little bit low on the carbonation for the style but not to the point of being unpleasant. Coats the mouth with hop oils and finishes well.

D: Not something I'd want to drink more than one of in a sitting, I'm fond of aggressive hops and bitterness, but this beer's hop profile just didn't do it for me. Seems a bit misplaced being categorized as an American IPA.

Xul, Jan 10, 2010
Photo of uno99
3.83/5  rDev +0.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

Bottle from Summerhill LCBO.

A: Poured into a tulip. Cloudly straw color. some soapy lacing. on par with whats expected for the style

S: hops deffinity come alive. this is a fresh bottle, I can tell that much. Citrus hops, but also buttety smooth. alchohol on the finish

T: Im definitly not a hop head, and I think this IPA hits a nice balance, however I do notice a slight soapy quality. I wondered if my glass was soapy but its not the case.

M: comes a live in the mouth, However a litte oily.

D: Gotta agree with many previous reviews here - this is an easy drinking beer. Normally I cant stomach most modern IPA's but this one is enjoyable enough to consider opening another one.

uno99, Jan 09, 2010
Photo of ThatWineGuy
3.65/5  rDev -3.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pale yellow on the pour, half finger white head. Strands of medium size bubbles drift upwards, some lace that remained in strands and spots. Smell is hops, white grapefruit. Not a bad IPA taste-wise, decent hop forward presentation, citrusy with lemon and mostly grapefruit. Sharp bitter finish, malt, citrus fruit rind aftertaste, balance tilts to the hop side. Not overly aggressive for an IPA but has medium body, cleansing mouthfeel, sharp enough to distinguish it as on the American side of the IPA spectrum. One of the better UK hop beers in my local area (although that's not saying a lot). Still, while not a great IPA, this is decent and sessionable and I'd pick it up again.

ThatWineGuy, Jan 05, 2010
Photo of brewdlyhooked13
4.08/5  rDev +7.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 5 | overall: 4.5

Appearance - a hazy straw color, the head forms up watery and wispy. Poor retention but a few nice strands of lace.

Aroma - nice blend of grain, citrus and hop spiciness. Mild but with good balance.

Taste - nice light crackery malts. the hops are light and orangey, like children's aspirin. Light hoppy balance, good level that matches the hop bite. Finishes a little juicier than most IPAs due to the sustained citrus presence. Some drying at the end, but it's fairly light.

Mouthfeel - great smoothness, I was inclined to take a deep draw at the outset, very quenching. Restrained carbonation adds to the smoothness.

Drinkability - not too pricy at $6 for an import bomber. Tasty too, one to check out.

brewdlyhooked13, Jan 04, 2010
Photo of CHickman
3.98/5  rDev +4.7%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

On tap at Mahar's in Albany, NY. Pours cloudy yellow gold with the most insanely cloudy / creamy / foamy off white head which was a 1 inch thick and stuck around for a few minutes; smells of floral hops, lemon, grapefruit and faint malt; excellent lacing and a very pleasant overall hoppy odor.

Tastes of floral hops, piney hops, light sweet malt, grapefruit or orange peel, yeast, grassy, mild spices and a hint of coriander. Light to medium carbonation, with a nice feel from start to finish (which is on the dry side).

A very good IPA with a smooth creamy feel and great flavor throughout that was well balanced. This is an easy drinking IPA that I recommend.

CHickman, Jan 04, 2010
Photo of demcorhip
4/5  rDev +5.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A very pale IPA, light straw coloured. A vigorous pour produced just over a finger of fairly tight white head, and the brew is displaying nice retention. As the head slowly fades intricate strands of lace stick to the sides of the glass. Quite nicely laced.

An interesting aroma. Slightly sulfurous, will assume its related to the electrolyte profile in the water, and it helps to kick the hop profile up a notch or two. Nice citrusy aroma, as well as some grassiness. Some pale malts try to assert themself, but without much success, white grapefruit and pine sit atop more grassy and floral hop aromas. Not your typical american IPA, but certainly not the typical british ipA either.

Some bready and biscuit malt notes are overwhelmed by the hops. Assuming amarillo and some EKG? But a look at the website shows me im quite wrong... Anyways it has a nice grapefruit character with some pine, as well as some less aggressive, woody and floral hop essence, with a slightly resinous feel.

Fairly light bodied, and hop forward. Works quite nicely. Crisp malts, with long, drawn out hoppiness that lingers well into the finish, along with the sulfurous quality.

Quite drinkable, and an interesting hybrid. Thanks to the competitive pricing at the LCBO i could see myself enjoying this one again. This would serve as a great intro to the realm of hoppy brews, and has enough interesting hop flavour to make it easy enough to have more than one. A great IPA, perhaps, and perhaps not. Bu this is a good and interesting beer that i would enjoy again. Im a real fan of the profile of the water used to make this beer, and how it brings out the punk in the hops...

demcorhip, Jan 01, 2010
Photo of Mit
3.78/5  rDev -0.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A-Straw coloured much lighter in colour than other IPAs. Minimal head.

S-Hoppiness in the nose...some grapefruityness coming through. Very little in the way of any maltiness coming through in the smell.

T-Very hoppy especially considering it comes from the UK. Has some of the grapefruit like taste from an American IPA but also some of the smoky/spicy hops one would expect from a more traditional IPA. Almost like an English IPA on steroids. I liked it but recognized that it seemed unbalanced with very little in the way of maltiness coming through.

M-def in keeping with it's ABV of 6%.

D-Very much so...I imagine the hoppiness may get to me after a night of drinking these though.

I would keep buying this if it was available. Will look for it again.

Mit, Dec 30, 2009
Photo of MasterSki
3.28/5  rDev -13.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

Was desperate for an IPA in the hops wasteland that is Ontario. Found a bottle of this at the LCBO - best before October 11th, 2010, so I'm guessing this is 2 months old? Served in a pint glass.

A - A half finger of soapy white foam that dissipates quickly to a light haze and ring. Decent thing lace pattern. One of the palest IPAs I've ever seen - slightly hazed straw color with a few bubbles lazily making their way upwards.

S - Floral hops over a strong sugar cookie malt backbone. Maybe a touch of citrus as well. Pretty dull, but not unpleasant.

T - The taste is oddly enough much more vibrant, with some nice sweet citrus and tropical notes to complement the sugary dough malt character. Not much bitterness here. ABV is well-hidden.

M - Medium-thin, watery, burning carbonation - not much to like here. The residual feel isn't bad, and has some nice oily and resinous character.

D - Other than the unpleasant carbonation there's not much to prevent me from having a few of these. However, for the price there are much better options out there.

MasterSki, Dec 30, 2009
Photo of Mora2000
3.15/5  rDev -17.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours yellow with a small white head. Aroma is grassy, earthy hops. I didn't get any of the citrus or pine that other people have mentioned. The flavor is mainly hoppy, with lots of earthy hops. Quite a bit of bitterness and not much of a malt backbone. Thin mouthfeel. Decent beer, but nothing special.

Mora2000, Dec 30, 2009
Photo of Jeffo
3.65/5  rDev -3.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Got this at Bert's Bierhuis in Utrecht.

From a bottle into a snifter.

APPEARANCE: Pours a one finger thinner looking white head with decent retention. Minimal carbonation evident, clear, and amber orange in color. Head quickly fades to a thin film and bubbly ring. Small splotchy film patches remain, leaving some splotchy lacing down the glass.

SMELL: Pale malt, toasted biscuit, as well as some piney and flowery hops. Some slight citrus notes, but more piney than citrusy. Decent strength nose for a 6% IPA.

TASTE: Pale malt and some biscuit again up front, followed by a good dose of pine and floral hops as well. A good hop bitter punch introduces a long lasting, strong aftertaste of bitter floral hops and some grapefruit citrus notes. A very bitter finish on this one, which was quite enjoyable.

PALATE: Medium-thinner body with medium carbonation. Creamy on the palate, goes down smooth and finishes slightly mouth-coating.

OVERALL: A pretty good effort by BrewDog here. This one smells and tastes great, but the thinner head and body held its score back some. I've had this one a few times and will go back to it again. Probably my favorite BrewDog offering. Well done.

Jeffo, Dec 29, 2009
Photo of EatsTacos
3.63/5  rDev -4.5%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Pours a bright straw yellow with a fizzy, light head and leaves some lacing on the glass.

Fresh grassy hop aroma. Citrusy, piney, with a lot of lemon and grapefruit.

The flavour begins with a lemony hop punch and fades into a bitter, dry and quenching finish. This is a relatively one dimensional beer and lacks any kind of a remarkable malt profile.

Thin to medium bodied. Carbonation is high and sharp. Good drinkability and a good IPA.

EatsTacos, Dec 29, 2009
Photo of TerryW
3.5/5  rDev -7.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

By gosh, it does look like a pilsner. Very plain looking in terms of its colour. Moderate head settles to a long lived heavy film that gives up steady lace throughout.

Smells of pears straight out of the bottle, but comes around to grapefruity citrus.

Tastewise its all about bitterness, Fairly one dimensional. Lingering bitterness on the palate, somewhat light mouthfeel.

Its okay, but not as interesting or lip smacking as some IPAs I've had.

TerryW, Dec 28, 2009
Photo of MeisterBurger
2.83/5  rDev -25.5%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

This is easily the palest and least impressive IPA I have ever poured. Very clear and straw-like with a decent head. Looks like a pilsner.

Some good c-hops in the nose. Really nicely dry-hopped.

The taste is...n't that great. Piney, resinous bitterness with barely enough malt present to do much about it. It's really just about the bitterness and not in a pleasant way. The malt leans towards bready. There's a slight grape aspect to it. The citrus in the aroma which is nice enough on its own, clashes with the taste as I drink this. A soapiness lingers in the aftertaste. Overall there's just not enough malt sweetness or depth going on to make the bitterness overly palatable.

Mouthfeel is crisp, high carbonation.

According to brewdog's website this contains Marris Otter Extra Pale Malt. And that's the entire grain bill. Which explains the light color and body as well as the lack of depth or complexity.

MeisterBurger, Dec 28, 2009
Punk IPA from BrewDog
86 out of 100 based on 1,197 ratings.