1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Trashy Blonde - BrewDog

Not Rated.
Trashy BlondeTrashy Blonde

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
81
good

129 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 129
Reviews: 63
rAvg: 3.54
pDev: 12.99%
Wants: 3
Gots: 10 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
BrewDog visit their website
United Kingdom (Scotland)

Style | ABV
English Pale Ale |  4.10% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: charlatan on 02-06-2009)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 129 | Reviews: 63 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of gnikola
1/5  rDev -71.8%

gnikola, Jan 17, 2013
Photo of Julian4077
2/5  rDev -43.5%

Julian4077, May 11, 2012
Photo of kojevergas
2.3/5  rDev -35%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

Appearance: Poured from a bottle into an English style (real) pint glass, in low altitude Galway, Ireland. Three finger head retains well and moderately thick. A pale yellow-gold colour that looks a bit bland. Fairly clear: you can almost see through it. Not quite inviting, but not a turn-off.

Smell: A biscuity scent, not quite pine but with a reserved freshness. It's a clean scent, but I'm already concerned about the balance of flavor.

Taste: Bland notes of weak flavours, none of which dominate the beer, followed by a bitter finish akin to an IPA. It's a clean finish, and not to my tastes, but it suits the beer. I'm not left wanting another sip, but the wetness isn't necessarily refreshing. Overall it's built without much character; a bit boring.

Mouthfeel: Chewy but coarse, a body without too much weight but also without character. Too much carbonation.

I wouldn't buy it again, but fans of IPAs may enjoy what is has to offer if their expectations aren't too high.

kojevergas, Sep 15, 2010
Photo of juju7
2.7/5  rDev -23.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

There are definitely a few chinks in the BrewDog armour and this is one of them. A totally underwhelming pale ale. Surprisingl, given that this is BrewDog, evrything about this beer is quite weak. The nose is faint tropical fruits with a strong hint diacetyl sadly. The flavours are also a bit muddled with nothing really making a statement. This leaves nothing but bitterness in the mouth and disappointment in my soul.

juju7, May 25, 2010
Photo of Mjoepp
2.73/5  rDev -22.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

A: Deep golden. Big white head, creamy foam, last long, leaves huge amounts of lacings.

S: Hops, bitter fruits, flowers. The bitternes is quite sticky for my nose.

T:Very bitter, flowers, grape, lime peel, peppery. While having the beer in the mouth it almost "attacks" the tongue. Aftertaste is a looong bitter feeling. Destroys your taste bud.

O: Good but you will have the bitternes for a long time and will destroy your tasting experience for the evening.

Mjoepp, Jul 27, 2010
Photo of Kirk
2.75/5  rDev -22.3%

Kirk, Jun 22, 2013
Photo of Rossi
2.8/5  rDev -20.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

This beer has quite a neutral taste, clean and clear. It's one of the more quaff-able Brewdog beers as it has a forgiving after taste and it reminds me of a good home brewed number. That said it is distinctly average across the board, the clean and clear taste ultimately lacks complexity and at the cost price it should offer more than just a slightly clearer generic taste. It also has a metallic taste which is not as strong as some other beers in their range, but it may put off some drinkers. I would say it is clinical in it's taste.

Rossi, Jun 02, 2011
Photo of Suds
2.98/5  rDev -15.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

I had this beer on a warm May evening, I thought something light would be enjoyable. The beer isn't bad, but it did seem a little flawed and didn't really live up to it's potential. It's a yellow-blonde color with a creamy white head. The smell first presents a solid hop flavor (ooo...American style), but very quickly the aroma of cooked vegetables (corn) comes forward. DMS wasn't front and center, but it was there enough to be really distracting. The flavor was of pale malt with a firm hop bitterness and lots of herbal and citrus hop flavor. Firm mouthfeel for the style. Reasonable, but the vegetable quality really took this one down a few notches.

Suds, May 09, 2009
Photo of jisak74
3/5  rDev -15.3%

jisak74, Mar 21, 2012
Photo of djcreepshow
3/5  rDev -15.3%

djcreepshow, Oct 22, 2012
Photo of JamFuel
3/5  rDev -15.3%

JamFuel, Jun 29, 2014
Photo of Phyl21ca
3/5  rDev -15.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Bottle: Poured a bright golden color ale with a nice pure white foamy head with OK retention and some lacing. Aroma of lightly sweet cereal notes is quite refreshing. Taste is not very complex with light semi-sweet cereal notes with a light dry finish. Body is slightly fuller then average with good carbonation. Refreshing and easily drinkable with limited complexity.

Phyl21ca, May 16, 2011
Photo of Blissmo
3/5  rDev -15.3%

Blissmo, Aug 12, 2012
Photo of jaxon53
3/5  rDev -15.3%

jaxon53, Jun 24, 2013
Photo of SimonTja
3/5  rDev -15.3%

SimonTja, Jun 03, 2013
Photo of Hultkrantz
3/5  rDev -15.3%

Hultkrantz, Jan 21, 2013
Photo of Heminoolo
3/5  rDev -15.3%

Heminoolo, Sep 23, 2012
Photo of apanloco
3/5  rDev -15.3%

apanloco, May 25, 2013
Photo of charlatan
3.18/5  rDev -10.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

I'm unsure about my categorisations here: it describes itself as a pale ale and a blonde on the bottle and online respectively; the beer is not presently available according to the website although I bought a bottle at the supermarket which does not expire for a further seven months; at some point Brew Dog brewed a 4% abv beer called Peroxide Punk which it described as a trashy blonde!

Anyway it is a blonde colour, slightly darker than euro pale straw. So far so tedious but the limited head does suggest a pleasant creaminess.

The nose? Not much to be honest. A hint of lemon, some dried fruit, but nothing bold here. I don't like the feel. It is rather flat, like a pale imitation of a cask ale from a bottle. The taste is pretty good though: a very clean hoppiness not masked by cloying sweetness or understated as with so many pales. This is followed by a creaminess reminisicent of a light cask ale. A citric (with an accent on lemon) flavour lingers on the tongue.

charlatan, Feb 06, 2009
Photo of ADZA
3.2/5  rDev -9.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

I must admit im a big fan of this breweries labels and spiels on the labels and their innovations to try new things as i do like trying new beers thats for sure anyways the beer pours a pale amber hue with average carbonation that leaves a fast vanishing one finger head with sporadic lacing,the aroma is lots of hops mainly with a passionfruit hint to them,i must admit i thought the taste would be alot more complex after the smell but unfortunately i was wrong it has a pretty straightforward thin mouthfeel with a light subtle passionfruit hoppy taste that finishes very smooth but to be honest abit too smooth for my liking and i dont get too much malt taste at all just a thin hoppy taste i think if this beer was better balanced out i would like it more and have seen better examples of the style but in saying that its easy enough to drink just wouldnt hunt it down.

ADZA, Sep 11, 2009
Photo of dgilks
3.2/5  rDev -9.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Big diacetyl aroma with notes of passionfruit hop. There really shouldn't be this diacetyl.

Hazy, pale gold colour with a small, short lasting white head.

Like the aroma I get plenty of soft malts with a hit of passionfruit. The diacetyl is toned down but still present. Nice solid but understated bitterness. It is decent but the diacetyl is an obvious fault.

Medium-low boy with moderate carbonation. Crisp, clean and refreshing.

It's a decent drop but it has a serious technical flaw which lowers its score. The diacetyl is too high in the aroma and flavour (even though it tastes okay). Easy enough to drink with a nice low ABV.

dgilks, Mar 18, 2010
Photo of Satyr179
3.25/5  rDev -8.2%

Satyr179, Jan 08, 2013
Photo of Mattias
3.25/5  rDev -8.2%

Mattias, Jan 26, 2013
Photo of JensK
3.25/5  rDev -8.2%

JensK, Jul 15, 2014
Photo of petluo
3.25/5  rDev -8.2%

petluo, Sep 26, 2012
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Trashy Blonde from BrewDog
81 out of 100 based on 129 ratings.