1. BeerAdvocate on your phone?! True story. Try the beta now.

Bashah - BrewDog

BashahBashah

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
87
very good

542 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 542
Reviews: 429
rAvg: 3.89
pDev: 11.57%


Brewed by:
BrewDog visit their website
United Kingdom (Scotland)

Style | ABV
American Black Ale |  8.60% ABV

Availability: Limited (brewed once)

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

A collaboration brew by BrewDog and Stone Brewing Co.

(Beer added by: PartyBear on 10-14-2009)
View: Beers (120) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Reviewers
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 542 | Reviews: 429 | Show All Ratings:
Photo of unionturf
unionturf

North Carolina

2.17/5  rDev -44.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Paid $6.00 for a 12oz bottle...after drinking this I wondered how I go scammed so badly. Imagine $64.00 USD a gallon...for beer.

I'm reviewing this as a "black belgian IPA"....so I'm trying to keep an open mind as to what a black ale and a IPA would be like.

Pours stout black, little head and little lacing.

Smells...being honest here the smell reminds me of a tire store, it has a rubberish smell (very slight but there) that seems more on the black ale versus the IPA side. Taste is strange, has some hops (nothing like some people are saying) and as if I had in fact licked a tire.

Mouthfell is ok...if you like the taste of a tire.

Drinkability is LOW on this for me, struggled to get this $6.00 bottle down the pipes. But again at this price for this beer I forced it down.

Might I ask why this beer cost $6.00?

Damnit.

Serving type: bottle

11-25-2009 07:57:22 | More by unionturf
Photo of champ103
champ103

Texas

2.25/5  rDev -42.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

A: Pours a pitch black color. At first a bubbly tan head slowly rises to a finger. The foam recedes in an instant, with little lace.
S: A little odd in the nose. Sweet malt that is lightly toasted. Charcoal and leather, maybe rubber? Really strange. Dank nondescript hops.
T: Sweet malt and a strange nondescript hoppy bitterness. Some charcoal that leaves a really bad aftertaste, and alcohol.
M/D: A medium body and carbonation. A little thin and watery though. Hot alcohol and a strange bitterness makes this hard for me to drink.

I am not a big fan of this. There is not much here, just an odd mesh of flavors. I would not recommend this, and am not that interesting. Another sub par offering from BrewDog.

Serving type: bottle

12-29-2009 20:12:24 | More by champ103
Photo of armock
armock

New York

2.38/5  rDev -38.8%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 1.5

A - Poured a black color with a tan head that leaves lacing behind

S - The scents do not come together to create an overall good smell there's roasted malt that smells like rubber and hops

T - Things don't get any better in the taste department it's like I'm drinking my shoe with some citrus hops added

M - This beer has a watery body with medium carbonation to it

D - I am not impressed at all with this beer the hype train had me really wanting to like it but I'm having trouble drinking my glass of this stuff because it tastes so bad I say say away from this one

Serving type: on-tap

01-19-2010 20:54:31 | More by armock
Photo of RonfromJersey
RonfromJersey

New Jersey

2.45/5  rDev -37%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

A black Belgian Double IPA? What, we couldn't fit an imperial stout in there too?

Black yes, but tranlucent enough to allow ruby highlights in multiple areas. Topped by a light beige ball of micro bubbly foam.

A deep sniff pulls out some roasted coffee, and maybe a hint of candy sugar. That's the black Belgian portions, where is the DIPA?

Rich roasted coffee with some melted dark chocolate coats the tongue. There is a general hoppy buzz riding the wave. But I'm not getting anything that says, much less screams, DIPA.

Enjoyable thick lush mouthfeel. Good drinkability.

A nice little imperial stout. A black Belgian Double IPA? The pieces just aren't there. A major victim of its own hype. At $6.99 for 11 ounces, it will not be revisited. And between this and Hardcore, I think I'm done with Brewdog.

Serving type: bottle

02-01-2010 22:17:12 | More by RonfromJersey
Photo of WhiteOak
WhiteOak

Connecticut

2.45/5  rDev -37%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

A- Pours a black-olive color with a chestnut edge. The dark tan head and lacing is moderate, and fades to a persistent 1/8".

S- Roasted malt and chocolate are equally mingled with grapefruit/piney hops.

T- Dark over-roasted malt and oily fragrant hops. The finish is bitter and lacking in sweet balance. The char and big hops are an unappealing combination.

M, D- Medium bodied with a bitter, drying effect. For the simple reason that this beer conveyed little pleasure, I found it accordingly limited in drinkability.

Serving type: bottle

01-22-2011 21:50:13 | More by WhiteOak
Photo of olympuszymurgus
olympuszymurgus

California

2.6/5  rDev -33.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A sunny day on campus, quiet sneaks of a bottle while the kids rage about budget cuts. Someone hits the fire alarms, building by building, a forced walkout. We make our way to the roof and watch the dougfir sway in the sun.

This beer is confused like those kids in the square. It's yeasty, dark, smells like a barnyard, and hoppier that a yakima bootlick. It needs to grow up and see the world. Balance may come, it may cut its hair and take out those piercings, hide the tattoos and wear a sweater vest. It may, but I doubt it. Unlike those kids standing on red bricks, this beer wont last. It will leave a taste though, a pleasant one upon my palate, quiet memories of youthful transgressions and silly ideas.

Thank you brewdog, stone, and all you little hippy gals.

Serving type: bottle

02-06-2010 05:33:46 | More by olympuszymurgus
Photo of BMMillsy
BMMillsy

Florida

2.79/5  rDev -28.3%
look: 4.25 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Hunahpu Day pour #12. Pours dark brown with big kahki head. Smells floral with a bit of citrus, hints of roast perhaps, and a little sour. Flavor is heavy scotch and dark fruits, comes in hotter than expected and not much depth in flavor. A bit boozy though only medium on the palate. Not my favorite. Blegh.

Serving type: on-tap

10-15-2013 01:50:00 | More by BMMillsy
Photo of jbphoto88
jbphoto88

Texas

2.83/5  rDev -27.2%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Beer pours the color of black olive brine. Thin and black with ruby highlights. The head is almost non-existent, consisting of only a few off white bubbles and a thin skin of foam.

Smell is quite exactly what I expected from the bottle style description. A black Belgian style double IPA. Yes, yes and yes. Strong citrus hops that are in the grapefruit family and a little flowery. Behind that are deep roasted malts.

The taste is thin like the pour. The flavor is chocolaty and a little malty but watered down. The hops all but disappear in the flavor leaving nothing but a piney residue and a dominating cheap roasted grain note. What happened?

Mouthfeel is best described as weak. This beer is a letdown from the initial nose. There isn't even a great bitterness just a recycled used hops feel. This brew tastes like an afterthought made with a bunch of spent ingredients left over from a good beer. At $6.99 a 12 ounce bottle this is one of the biggest rip offs out there. Avoid.

Serving type: bottle

11-28-2009 03:50:02 | More by jbphoto88
Photo of richkrull
richkrull

Wisconsin

2.88/5  rDev -26%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured a dark black color with a darker tan head on it.

Smell is malty with some hops coming through. Not as much as you'd expect. Some stout-like aroma coming through.

Taste is bitter coffee. Not a great flavor. This is my first black IPA but not what I expected. Some hops in the finish but the coffee flavor is overpowering it.

Mouthfeel is very thick. Pretty heavy for an IPA but it's alright.

Overall it's ok but not one of my favorites at all.

Serving type: bottle

06-17-2011 04:17:23 | More by richkrull
Photo of beavers
beavers

North Carolina

2.9/5  rDev -25.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 2.5

A: Black with dark brown edges when held up to the light. Thin light tan covering with virtually no lacing on the edges of a DR snifter.

S: Interesting blend of pungent grassy hops and roasted malt. Notes of dirt, brown sugar (faint), pecans.

T: Big grassy, earthy hop bite meets burnt malts. Charcoal edges combine with the hops to give an overpowering bitterness. While these flavors mesh rather seamlessly, I'm a bit bored after a few sips. Not a lot of complexity to this one.

M: Medium bodied, but rather thin considering the ABV.

D: Flavor is an interesting combination, but needs a touch of sweetness to round out the flavors. Despite the flavors, it's actually not that difficult to drink...but it's just not that interesting to drink. Especially at 8.6%.

Not sure if my palette is just off, but I'm really not getting the subtle flavors some other seem to have picked up on.

Serving type: bottle

01-28-2010 06:03:04 | More by beavers
Photo of hooliganlife
hooliganlife

Missouri

2.9/5  rDev -25.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

pour was deep black with a light cream head

mostly muted with most barnyard funk. maybe some light chocolate and coffee.

again, mostly muted with barnyard funk really dominating. no real hop flavor and very very muted roasted malts and really no sweetness, some bitterness maybe a dark chocolate bitterness. pretty bland

medium body, medium carbonation, decent body

i thought this was a black IPA? i do not see any IPA in this at all, and NO black IPA. i would have a very hard time classifying this as a strong ale. i could not finish this, it was just too off base. give i like both of these breweries and loved the black pilsner, i was VERY let down by this.

Serving type: bottle

02-20-2010 16:58:11 | More by hooliganlife
Photo of charlzm
charlzm

California

2.9/5  rDev -25.4%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

Consumed Feb 7th, 2010 at Stone World Bistro.

Very dark brown with cola colored highlights. Plenty of bubbles crawling up the sides of the glass, replenishing the very fine head.

Oddly, beer has a light, sweet aroma of roast grain. Reminds me of wort. No hop presence.

Smoky, nearly burnt malt flavor. Some charcoal. Woody and bitter on the finish. Porterlike. Again, no hop presence.

Thick in the mouth.

Not really a fan of this one; there's really nothing to balance the smoke and charcoal. Hops must have died in the time since beer was packaged, though I'd expect it to have lasted longer. Come on, I drank it AT Stone on draft!

Serving type: on-tap

03-03-2010 18:08:30 | More by charlzm
Photo of Vineyard
Vineyard

Vermont

2.93/5  rDev -24.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Overall: An interesting beer, not really what I was expecting. I don't get as much of a belgian quality as I was hoping for nor as much hop flavor. I was fairly disapointed as I was really hoping for a knock your socks off BIAP.

Appearance: Very black, completely opaque. Thin head swirled up during the pour but quickly receded with virtually no head and minor lacing.

Smell: Some coffee but mainly bittersweet chocolate. A little bit of roasted barley in the background.

Taste: A lot of chocolate, a little bit of funkiness but not enough for my tatste in something labled "belgian". A little bit of burnt malt flavor too(?), some bitterness but not enough for a double IPA and not enough hop. Not too bad a taste overall though.

Mouthfeel: Fairly thin, but not crisp at all.

Drinkability: Average. I could drink more of this beer without feeling bad. But it really doesn't taste or drink like a double IPA.

Serving type: bottle

01-21-2011 04:06:42 | More by Vineyard
Photo of OakedCanuck
OakedCanuck

Washington

2.93/5  rDev -24.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

12oz bottle poured into cervoise.

A - Pours a nice dark black with dark brown edging against the light. Nice light tan head retention and good lacing

S - Bitter piney hops with a nice coffee roast. Some belgian yeast like smell as well. A roasty smoke is also present

T - What? Did I just drink firepit coals? This beer tastes like ash. However, the piney hops do come through a bit at the end in an attempt to save this one, hardly is working though.

M - Good carbonation, medium, drying

O - The ash flavour totally took away from this one but there is some good hop balance hidden in there. Will not be having this one again.

Serving type: bottle

04-27-2011 20:43:34 | More by OakedCanuck
Photo of James773
James773

Illinois

2.94/5  rDev -24.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3

Pours an impressive jet black. Smells like bread, citrus, a little sour. Tastes a little watery and sour, hints of toast. My girlfriend says it reminds her of soy sauce, which I agree with just a little bit. Like a cross between a weak IPA and a stout but not very impressive either way.

Serving type: bottle

12-03-2013 00:29:21 | More by James773
Photo of OlieIPA
OlieIPA

California

2.98/5  rDev -23.4%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Purchased at Walnut Liquorette and poured into a Bruery tulip glass.

A: Pours a brownish hue, but as all the liquid converges together, the appearance takes on that bold black color found in most imperial stouts. The head and lacing is minimal, but when swirled, it gives off colors similar to that of toffee.

S: Roasted chocolate malt in the beginning and then a smack of high alpha-acid hops...perhaps Chinook, Columbus, or Centennial.

T: Some dark roasted malts, but most of the flavor profile seems to consist of sweet hop qualities. The alcohol comes off a bit more as well...and perhaps encourages an overabundance of hops in the flavor in my opinion.

M: Medium to light body brew with some drying qualities to it.

D: I actually enjoyed the flavor and aroma for the first few minutes, but as the beer went on...I found it hard to finish.

Overall: Something I might try again; average at best. Cheers!

Serving type: bottle

12-22-2009 06:42:16 | More by OlieIPA
Photo of Phyl21ca
Phyl21ca

Quebec (Canada)

3/5  rDev -22.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Bottle: Poured a deep clear black color ale with a medium size dark brown foamy head with average retention. Aroma of roasted malt is more powerful and dry then expected. Taste is dominated by dry roasted malt notes with light subtle coffee notes. Body is somewhat light with OK carbonation and no apparent alcohol. I can’t say I was truly impressed by that one – hops profile was more subdued then expected and dry roasted malt was overly dominant.

Serving type: bottle

09-02-2011 15:59:57 | More by Phyl21ca
Photo of seanyfo
seanyfo

United Kingdom (Scotland)

3.03/5  rDev -22.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

33cl bottle poured into shaker pint glass ,aggressive pour.

Batch No. 409, bottled on 02/03/2011????

A- Black/opaque body with no light perception, with a creamy rocky chocolate milkshake brown head, with excellent retention and lots of sticky lace.

S- Metallic note first, with some dark yet creamy chocolate, roasted malt, off vegetable smell(brussel sprout/cabbage) worsens as it warms

T- Malt is very subdued in the beginning but there is a creaminess changing to a strong hop bitterness coming through in the finish and heat of the alcohol lingers strongly on the back of the tongue.

M- Very low carbonation and full mouthfeel.

D- Not brilliant to be honest as the alcohol is strong in the finish with the hops aiding the bitterness but there is no malt backbone balance which for me it screams out for. So is it a hoppy stout/porter?? I really dont know, but i wont be drinking it again.

Serving type: bottle

05-10-2010 21:32:46 | More by seanyfo
Photo of beesy
beesy

Ohio

3.03/5  rDev -22.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured from a 12oz bottle into a pint glass. Bottled batch 352, bottled 12.19.10.

Had this close to a year ago when released, but seems some was found in a warehouse somewhere and released into disto. Review is for this particular tasting

A - pours an opaque brown with a one finger medium brown head. Head dissipated within a few minutes, leaving a trace of foam around the inside diameter of the glass.

S - chocolate, oxidized hops and malts, peanut butter

T - aged, oxidized chocolate and a slight roast note. The hops have definitely been beat up - a strange minty flavor in the early palate through the late palate with some grassiness showing up later on with a mild bitterness

M - medium bodied.

D - low - too many oxidized/off flavors now.

Overall, not the beer I remember. I originally remember this as being more of a black and tan in a bottle, but the hops have taken a serious beating in the past year. Too bad. I would suggest at this point, just leaving any bottles you might find on the shelf be at one with it's shelf. I do question how well this might have been handled in the past year - it very well may have been in a hot warehouse, which sped up it's ultimate demise.

Serving type: bottle

02-02-2012 01:12:39 | More by beesy
Photo of MetsFanVI
MetsFanVI

Iowa

3.05/5  rDev -21.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

It poured a very dark, almost black color but with very little to no head. I usually expect Belgian-style beers to be quite carbonated (due to the bottle conditioning) so I started pouring carefully. But when there were no bubbles I tilted glass back upright and just went right down the middle. Even then I still got a very small head, about 1/8″. There is almost no lacing.

After it was poured, I tried like hell to get some aroma out of it. I don’t know if I’m stuffed up or what but I got almost no aroma, other than beer, and even then it is faint. Not a good sign for something that claims to be a double IPA, let alone something from Stone. I would expect a face full of hops here.

The initial taste is actually quite good. You get a some bright hop flavor at the front, which gives way to a more roasted taste in the middle. As the beer finishes, you swear you’re drinking a porter, with a pronounced coffee aftertaste. There is little to no “Belgian” in the flavor. I like a beer that has different flavors like this.

As the beer warms up though, it really starts to shine. The hops become a little more pronounced and what I assume to be a Belgian yeast strain starts to come out more. The flavors become more intense but also more blended. (Does that make sense? It does to me.) At this point the 8.6% abv starts to make its presence known as well. The aroma becomes a bit stronger too. But then, as it continues to warm, nearing room temperature, the flavors start to soften and become even more muted than at the beginning. Or maybe my taste buds are starting to become desensitized. Either way the middle third was the sweet spot on this one.

The mouthfeel of the bashah is not that of your typical double IPA. It’s not nearly as viscous or resiny. That’s not to say the beer is bad, just not typical. Again, there is little to no carbonation present.

According to the label, the beer was bottled on 12/25/10. But that doesn’t sound quite right as all the web research I could find had this being brewed in August 2009. Moreover, nothing I could find online says anything it being aged at the brewery or being brewed on more than one occasion. Additionally, it was made with 7500 kg of hops, as you can see in the “recipe” BrewDog posted. But the hops just aren’t there. This all leads me to think the date on the label is wrong. Assuming I’m right, the age on the bottle would explain how hops have mellowed. Another interesting tidbit is the bottle is 11.2 fluid oz. I was cheated out of .8 oz of beer! Must be a Euro thing.

Overall, this is a good beer, but not a great beer. It just seems to be trying to be too many things. Is it a Belgo-IPA? Is it a DIPA? Is it a Black IPA? Either way, it doesn’t do any of it all that well. The Black IPA or Cascadian Dark American Ale or American Black Ale or whatever the hell you want to call it style is very trendy right now. But it’s a style that doesn’t seem to deliver very often in my opinion. They don’t generally have any balance. It’s either all toasted malt or just it just takes like an IPA. The idea of Black IPA really intrigues me. But the execution is often lacking. This would be an example of such a beer coming up short. Again, that’s not to say it’s a bad beer. It just misses what I think is its intended mark.

Serving type: bottle

05-27-2011 13:43:56 | More by MetsFanVI
Photo of HalfFull
HalfFull

California

3.08/5  rDev -20.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Served in a pint glass from an 11.2 oz. bottle that was purchased one day plus one year prior to it being bottled. Yes this 12/24/2009 purchase claims to have been bottled on 12/25/2010. Batch 352 has time travelled to my quaint beach town. Noted as a 'Black Belgian DIPA' on the label.

Startled was I by the lack of 'pfft' upon prying off the cap. Alas, the liquid fills the bottle to the very lip. The pour is deep and dark with red highlights, yet disconcertingly clear. A thin tan head offers very brief retention and light lacing. Perhaps similar bottling line issues as the Tactical Nuclear Penguin.

Rich roasted malt nose occasionally lets some woody hops break through. Belgian yeast influence is subtle at best, revealing itself slightly only after the pour glasses off, along with some rich chocolate. Alcohol esters are notable. Nose improves with warming but never really gets going.

Taste is syrupy and simple with some dark chocolate, cinnamon and a light fruit presence, offering little complexity overall. Feel is rather watery for the ABV and with a boring drinkability.

Carbonation was surely an issue here and is completely unacceptable given that we're supporting twice the usual ego load than normal here. An elaborate definition of 'Bashah' on the label commences with 'What does it mean' before cascading into jibberish. Well, it means I won't be buying any more of this brew.

Value: F

Serving type: bottle

12-27-2009 01:41:33 | More by HalfFull
Photo of jokemon
jokemon

Illinois

3.1/5  rDev -20.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

i didn't know this beer was retired! I picked it up at the local brew stop.

anyway on to the review.

The beer pours a dark hazy color with not that much head.

Smell is sweet, dark sugary sweet. It also has a "burned" type of smell to it with a hint of molasses.

Taste is just like the smell. As you can guess it's malty, sweet, dark, brown sugary molasses type of feel to it.

No hop presence that I can detect.

Overall this beer is ok. I don't think i would go out of my way to get it though.

Serving type: bottle

03-03-2012 23:21:43 | More by jokemon
Photo of PeprSprYoFace
PeprSprYoFace

California

3.15/5  rDev -19%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Pours a dark black with just a film as a head that just turned into a ring around the glass. Very little lacing.

Aroma of roasted grains and some semi noble hops. Not very interesting.

Taste is too bitter. The bitterness of the hops mixed with the bitterness of the grains without the sweetness or hop flavor to balance it out is too much. It really is like a watery stout that is super hop bitter. No other flavors really.

Mouthfeel is good. Wish it was a little more viscous.

Overall I am again not impressed at all with another stone collaboration beer. I have the El Camino in the fridge right now. I'll pop it open but I don't have high hopes. I'll probably always try one of them but never beyond that. Unless they decide to make a better one.

Serving type: bottle

04-09-2010 03:36:27 | More by PeprSprYoFace
Photo of lacqueredmouse
lacqueredmouse

Australia

3.18/5  rDev -18.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

A deep dark brown colour with a speckled head of crispy brown head. Some lacing, but pretty thin. Body is quite thin as well. It doesn't look particularly good overall. The colour's not bad, but otherwise, it leaves something to be desired.

Nose is slightly smoky, very odd and rather not what I expected. Certainly some darkness, minimal hop character - very little like what I was expecting in fact. Dark, and smoky. That's pretty much it.

Again, quite dark on the nose, with minimal hop character, and very little Belgian style. It's as though the bottle has lied to me. As a dark beer, it's rather thin, leaving only a slight black residue on the tongue, and falling away pretty quickly. There's a slight lingering bitterness, but again, I wonder how much this owes to the dark malt, and how little to hop characters.

Overall, I'm particularly disappointed with this brew. It promised far more than it could deliver, and while it's a moderately drinkable dark ale, it rarely if ever rises above that mantle.

Serving type: bottle

03-17-2010 22:08:10 | More by lacqueredmouse
Photo of homebrew311
homebrew311

Illinois

3.2/5  rDev -17.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

It was nice to see a tap handle with the Stone label in Chicago! Had to give this one a try. Not real familiar with Brew Dog's beers, but I have tried one of their IPAs. We all know what kind of IPAs Stone is capable of making. So here we go...

A: pours very dark, no light shines through, black, thin brownish white head appears on pour but quickly disappears

S: piney hops are the first noticeable aroma, smells just like high alpha acid hop pellets (pre-boil). The nose is bitter with some roasted malt character.

T: The taste is similar to the nose, but the hops are way toned down. The flavor falls flat as it doesn't seems to have a nice malt backbone. Something tastes watered down. Maybe this is because I am not used to belgian style IPAs, but something just seems to be missing. The only other black IPA I have tried is ST Iniquity, and I enjoyed that one much better. This one was a bit of a disappointment for me.

MF: thin body for a strong IPA, a tad sharp, hot from the booziness

D: At $7.50 for a 10 oz pour, I don't see myself seeking this beer out again. It was an intriguing attempt, but I feel that Stone and Brew Dog are capable of far superior beers. This was too hot from the ABV to enjoy more than a servings worth

Serving type: on-tap

11-13-2009 03:14:36 | More by homebrew311
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Bashah from BrewDog
87 out of 100 based on 542 ratings.