Nanny State - BrewDog
Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
Ratings: 64 | Reviews: 36 | Display Reviews Only:
3.45/5 rDev +11.3%
This was pretty impressive, the beer poured out as a nice looking copper color with a foamy white head on top. The lacing is really good on this, very sticky and maintains a great retention. The smell has a nice aroma of malts and hops. The taste of the beer is malty and hoppy also. The flavors are quite nice for a beer with a low ABV. The mouthfeel is drinkable. Overall the beer is good, I would easily say this is the best low ABV beer I've ever had.
09-30-2012 16:08:37 | More by Knapp85
3.08/5 rDev -0.6%
From a 12 oz. bottle, courtesy of DoubleJ,
A: Pours a medium-brown with a crisp white head with good head retention.
S: Lots of hop character. Flowers, pine, cedar bark, black tea.
T: Really it tastes like iced tea, bitter with no sweetness, no malt to be found. Hop tea basically with carbonation.
M: Very light-bodied, it is refreshing in an interesting way. Has some creamy carbonation characteristics.
O: I like weird experiments like this in the beer world, drinking this will never let you take for granted the role malt plays even in the most unbalanced of West Coast IPAs. For low alcohol beer though, this kicks the crap out of O'Douls.
04-20-2012 18:24:29 | More by Halcyondays
3.55/5 rDev +14.5%
You gotta love BrewDog's response to its critics who blasted Tokyo* for containing 18% ABV. A near beer with lots of hops, this "IPA" was given to me as a gift from Sergio while I was in Brazil two months ago. On to the beer:
Dark copper color with solid lace and retention. Ok, whatever. Let me smell it...it's got a good nose. Flowery, some passionfruit. No malt whatsoever.
Halcyondays suggested this is like an iced tea with hops instead of tea leaves. I think he's right on. Iced hops? Lots of crisp hops and very bitter, but the bitterness is on the refreshing side, especially as more of it is tasted. Yeah, we have a sense of the malt, but onlya very hint of it. The body is very light (water anyone?) with some carbonation and crispness to liven it up.
Not all experiments turn out for the best, but I must say I did like Nanny State...the beer, not the group of people made of ignorant control freaks. If I needed to quit drinking, this would be a great step to get there...or would it?
04-20-2012 01:37:32 | More by DoubleJ
2.3/5 rDev -25.8%
Batch 001. The BBD is hand written on the label.
The colour is deep amber, the liquid clear. The three finger head is pale beige and compact. Some thick lacing.
The smell is very hoppy, American style. Sharp, almost artificial bitter flavours with a sour hint. Some sweet notes of honey. Nice flavours, but I think it lacks something.
The taste is very bitter/sour, almost tart. No body at all, nor any sweetness. Chemical bitter notes. Odd off flavours of salt, stable, rubber and wool. The aftertaste is raw and bitter with some lightly roasted malt in the background.
The carbonation is mild; the many small bubbles are quite smooth. The liquid is a bit thin.
As unbalanced as one can expect from a beer of 1.1% ABV and a said bitterness of 225 IBU.
03-07-2010 20:25:36 | More by bark
2.85/5 rDev -8.1%
330 ml bottle, batch 189, best before 7/21/2011. Not sure how fresh this is, but I'll drink it anyway. Served in a pint glass, the beer pours a clear reddish/amber color with a half inch off-white head. Head retention and lacing are both decent. Aroma is grassy and a bit of citrusy (grapefruit) hops, and some bready malt. Unfortunately the taste isn't as nice as the aroma. It tastes like bitter grassy hops, but not much else. The bitterness isn't exactly nice, but for a beer that has just 0.5% ABV, at least it does have some taste to it. Moutheel/body is light/medium, it's a little bit slick and has good carbonation. Drinkability is OK, it's not hard to drink at all. It was nice to try this brew, and would try it again if I had a chance to.
02-27-2011 01:31:31 | More by bluejacket74
2.3/5 rDev -25.8%
A: Pours deep amber with a rather large tan head that dissipates slowly leaving rich lacings.
S: Loads of american hops, both floral and bitter. Pine and citric notes - grapefruit and exotic fruits. The weak part is the malt - I can't sence any malt what so ever.
T: The taste proves that there was weakness in the malt - there's no maltyness in the taste either. Bitter and citric - dry.
M: Body is thin so thin and carbonation is mild. Aftertaste is decent.
D: I had it yesterday with some friends and one of them called it "hoppy water" - I can't find any other way to describe it...
09-02-2010 19:06:45 | More by Evil_Pidde
4.13/5 rDev +33.2%
Massive piney, lemony passionfruit hop aroma. Lots of citrus and delicious smelling hop character. Mild notes of spice as well. One of the best beers I've ever smelled.
Clear dark amber colour with a creamy, dense light tan head. Great head retention.
Like cold and exceptionally strong black tea. Rounded tea flavour. Lots of bitterness. Mild citrus. A hint of resin. I actually like this. A lot. A bit more hop flavour would be great but the tea like flavour and balance works for me.
Medium-light body with moderately-high carbonation. Good but a bit astringent and tannic.
A really interesting beer and something completely out of the ordinary. A tasty beer and well worth trying even if only for the novelty.
04-01-2011 10:46:31 | More by dgilks
2.45/5 rDev -21%
Pours a red-tinged amber with light but steady bead feeding a beige, quite dense head that sinks in parts, leaving uneven texture on top, but nice retention and a big run-on sentence. No lace but otherwise very nice.
Nose is pleasant enough; hop aroma which is the overriding characteristic. Citric on the front but quickly becomes very metallic, with big brass notes, hint of floral at the back. A bit thin, almost like a hop soft drink, but decent.
Front palate has virtually nothing on it, just thin with slight tang from the hops which come more to the fore midway, nice and citric. Towards the back they become again very metallic, with a real ashy astringency on the back that is just unbalanced and simple with no nuance. It's inevitable from something with no body but I still can't forgive it. The whole palate is as empty as life itself, there's nothing here but bitterness and disappointment.
Watery and flat, couldn't expect much but that doesn't elevate it from nothing.
This beer is evidence that a sense of humour and clever marketing do not equal good beer. Under the circumstances, this is a pretty good brew; but this is the same as saying "That girl's a pretty good ballet dancer, considering she hasn't got any legs."
05-06-2011 05:20:56 | More by laituegonflable
2.88/5 rDev -7.1%
Poured from a 33cL bottle into a BrewDog cervoise glass. Batch 388 (0.5%). Best before 19 December 2011. A self-described "insanely hopped imperial mild."
A: Very clear. Dark, nutty brown with lots of bubbles and an unsustained head that, though large, collapses in on itself. Pretty with lots of lace.
S: REALLY nice. You'd never know this was a (virtually) non-alcoholic beer. Smells as an American IPA should -- boatloads of citrusy, piney hops that are noticeable even from a distance. Mmm. To be fair, the smell fades with time, but I'm leaving the score a notch higher in light of the style.
T: Ah...the downfall of Nanny State. Overly bitter, with no balance from the "8 speciality malts." All I'm getting is weak-bodied, astringent/soapy hops. The aftertaste is surprisingly less of a letdown, with a hoppy/piney linger. Nice. Overall though, completely one-dimensional.
M: Abominably weak. Some sparkle from carbonation and pleasantly drying hops save it from even a worse score.
O: This is my second Nanny State, and I can say that drinking from the bottle may ameliorate/hide the taste, but precludes this beer's best feature: the smell. Still, it has redeeming features (and it's low ABV can even be considered a virtue in some situations) and I would have another if the circumstance warranted. Very nice with spicy food. Only recommended for novelty value.
04-26-2011 19:24:08 | More by AgentMunky
District of Columbia
4.08/5 rDev +31.6%
A heavily hopped .5% provocation. It works!
Presentation: 12 oz bottle. Smudged and a bit trite design of semi erased and dusty fonts displaying the brew name in light green. Side notes goes over brew intent, main characteristics, and brewery ethos. Notes best before date and batch (19/12/11 388). Shows Alc. by Vol. (0.5%) Poured into a tulip glass.
A - Clear amber pour, rich foamy head with nice retention and a persistent surface memory, great lacing.
S - Richly hoppy nose, plenty of resin, citric notes, a bit grassy, quite intense and rich…
T - Taste maintains the range without the intensity, hoppy, citric and resinous with that grassy touch, minimal touch of malt.. the softness can felt already but the lingering bitterness and aroma sustain the brew rather well.
M - Medium/light body. Medium carbonation holding throughout rather well and helping soften the sometimes watery mouthfeel.
O - If the point is to prove that a low Alc. and flavorful brew can be done then this one does it. If somewhat thin on the palate, the aroma shines, the flavor stands and the overall experience is quite pleasing.
Notes: Polemic aside it is actually a rather quaffable brew, full of hoppy flavor, so it is not for all palates, but it has a fun edge to it. I would not mind to have a few of these around. Funny how well I´m told this is selling in some places for people looking for the hops without the alcohol...
09-01-2011 02:41:59 | More by Daniellobo
2.83/5 rDev -8.7%
This review is of the 0.5% ABV version. The beer is clear, amber, has a tan head, a rather quickly receding head, but leaves some lacing and curtains!!
It smells lovely, a dash of toffee, grape-fruit juice and some hay. A proper AIPA so far!
Then the taste, very fruity, lemon, lime, red grape-fruit, no malt at all, much bitterness.
Medium carbonation, NO body, just water, spritzy bubbles.
Well, if you want a near-zero ABV, and want hops, this is probably as good as it gets. That does not mean it's good!
10-31-2010 15:55:38 | More by rarbring
3.6/5 rDev +16.1%
Got this at Bert's Bierhuis in Utrecht. It would always just stare at me in whenever I went in there. Finally I broke down.
From a bottle into a snifter.
Note: 1.1% ABV version
APPEARANCE: Nice looking pour. A bigger, medium looking, three finger beige head forms with decent retention. Deep rosewood red in color with zero carbonation evident. Head slowly fades unevenly to a decent foam cap and leaves pieces of lacing down the top of the snifter. Good wisp remains until the end and leaves sheets of nice lacing down the glass. Good looking brew.
SMELL: Decent nose on this one. Pale malts with some good citrus notes; grapefruit especially. A bit of caramel sweetness and some floral notes, but citrus and grapefruit are much more prevalent. For what it is, the nose is quite impressive.
TASTE: Not as full as the nose. Pale malts, some caramel sweetness, and faint floral hops as well. A touch of citrus through the middle, leading into a very bitter hop finish. The bitter hops are quite prevalent after the swallow. A big, overly bitter aftertaste lingers and lingers on the back of the palate. Packs a good amount of flavor for the ABV, but it's obviously missing an element and the finish is anything but balanced. If you were looking for balanced though, why did you drink this?
PALATE: Medium body and quite creamy on the palate. Goes down smooth and finishes rather dry on the palate, bordering on being too astringent.
OVERALL: The reviews are far too harsh on this one. This is not an attempt at making a balanced IPA, so we shouldn't expect one. For what it is - namely, an attempt at making a very flavorful and bitter IPA with an extremely low ABV - this brew is definitely a success. I'm glad I finally caved and bought a bottle.
Besides the fact that it looks great, it's got a bold nose, lots of great flavor, and a very nice creamy mouthfeel. The only real beef I have is that it is a little astringent on the finish, but that is also a product of its bitterness. This brew may not be as big and bad as some other IPAs, be as "balanced" as some, or have the flavors that the alcohol contributes, but as an attempt at "reverse extreme brewing," for lack of a better term, this one is sure worth the effort. One of the better BrewDog achievements so far. Recommended.
08-31-2010 16:30:14 | More by Jeffo
United Kingdom (England)
2.88/5 rDev -7.1%
A 330ml bottle with a BB of Dec 2011. ABV is 0.5%. I remember hearing about this beer after Brewdog were attacked by the Scottish government for supposedly promoting irresponsible drinking. This was their response. Two fingers up to the establishment I say!
Poured into a Sam Smith's pint glass. A clear coppery-amber colour with good carbonation. Yields a large head of white foam with good retention - this eventually reduces to a nice surface layer. A huge hit of aromatic hops greets your olfactory senses - notes of resinous pine and citrus with an undertone of sweet caramel malt.
Tastes of aromatic hops with some weak malt and a bitter finish. Notes of pine. The hops are there, but the malt is barely present. The bitterness isn't excessive, but the absence of a decent malt backbone leaves it unbalanced. Mouthfeel is equally poor - very thin and watery. Tingly and astringent, but the effect on the palate is more like black tea than beer. Aftertaste of aromatic hops.
Well - it's a good stab at a low alcohol beer. It will end up damned with faint praise, but I doubt there's another low-ABV brew out there with so much hop character. It looks great and smells nice, but falls down hard with the flavour and mouthfeel. Bonus points for effort - alcohol-free beer doesn't get much attention over here. Worth trying once.
12-05-2011 23:05:31 | More by jazzyjeff13
3.33/5 rDev +7.4%
Had it the later version – after 2009 - with lower IBU (45) and lower alcohol. The initial version had around 4 times more IBUs and twice as much alcohol.
Dark Amber color with low head with medium retention.
Aroma is pretty good, citric and fruity with notes of passion fruit.
Hoppy flavor with a strong bitterness that keeps strong in the aftertaste, which is also dry and watery.
Medium carbonation with small bubbles. Body too thin.
I am afraid it was quite watery given the very low alcohol. Some malt presence would help as well. Interesting as an experience and good alternative to beer juice drinkers (non-alcoholic).
12-11-2012 17:44:52 | More by FLima
United Kingdom (Northern Ireland)
3.1/5 rDev 0%
330ml "white label" bottle bought from GapWines, Belfast..
Poured a deep amber colour. Slightly off white head poured fairly thick and foamy then fades quite quickly to light patchy covering... some sticky lacing...
Aroma - Juicy, spicy and maybe slightly tropical fruits (lemons, limes, grapefruits, pineapple), spicy yeast, pine, light palm sugar / caramel sweetness, sea salt, light toasted malt, fresh cut wet grass, light herbal notes, floral (lillies maybe ?)...
Taste - Big blast of spicy, piney and floral mouth puckering hop bitterness - maybe just a little on the harsh side, watered down toasty / biscuity maltiness, slightly washed out light caramel sweetness, some tea leaf traces, decent fruitiness (oranges, strong grapefruit), very herbal, perfumed, metallic traces, faint soapy hints... way more flavour than i was expecting in a 1.1% brew...
M&D - Very sharp and dry. Light / medium bodied... Suprisingly drinkable but one is more than enough and you'll be tasting hops all night long !!
Overall - A pretty good experiment and definitely not as undrinkable as some people have stated... worth a try...
11-03-2009 12:23:05 | More by mdagnew
4.69/5 rDev +51.3%
This brew is highly underrated. It should define a new category @ 0.5% ABV and needs to be scored respective of that. Pours a solid brown with lots of chunky lacing - where it lacks is on head and liveliness but otherwise looks great. Nose is hoppy and I'd be fooled blind. Taste's great for next to no alcohol. Great brew and thanks for making this (and for opening a Brewdog pub in London).
11-10-2013 15:49:54 | More by Oakenator
British Columbia (Canada)
2.35/5 rDev -24.2%
Ehhh....so so offering from BrewDog. Very dark amber with definite coppery hues. Extremely hoppy scent, but I do detect some malt in there.
Fairly fruity and spicy taste. Citrus, grass, hints of tobacco. Really one side and boring. Too much hop character.
Fizzy, but not like a soda. Actually not too hard to drink, but really not something to get excited about. By far my least favourite BrewDog beer.
02-14-2010 22:45:14 | More by BDTyre
United Kingdom (Scotland)
2.05/5 rDev -33.9%
Reddish to murky brown colour with tinges of orange in it as well. It is topped buy a foamy white head about the width of a thumb.
Hopped up to begin with along with some floral notes and a touch of tea which I wasn't expecting. It is quite strong at points and there is some background pine and a bit of grapefruit.
Bland right at the start with touches of hops and pine but these are pretty minimal. There is a lot of bitter that follows this and again some floral notes but that's about it really. Not a great taste and in fact barely drinkable.
Incredibly dry on the palate along with being quite bland and almost watery if that is even possible. The beer is light bodied with low to mild carbonation.
Started out really well and I was beginning to think there was actually a low alcohol beer out there that would be able to compete with some pretty good pale ales however the second I took a taste of it I knew that wasn't the case. A pretty poor beer, up there with the worst if taken on taste alone.
1001 Beers Blog: http://abarwithnoname.wordpress.com
07-20-2012 22:16:49 | More by flyingpig
Nanny State from BrewDog
73 out of 100 based on 64 ratings.