Dismiss Notice
Hello, is it beer you're looking for?

Learn more about beer. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for as low as 68% off the single issue price.

Subscribe now →

BrewDog / Three Floyds Bitch Please - BrewDog

Not Rated.
BrewDog / Three Floyds Bitch PleaseBrewDog / Three Floyds Bitch Please

Educational use only; do not reuse.

95 Reviews
no score

(Send Samples)
Reviews: 95
Hads: 238
Avg: 3.33
pDev: 25.23%
Wants: 52
Gots: 81 | FT: 2
Brewed by:
BrewDog visit their website
United Kingdom (Scotland)

Style | ABV
American Barleywine |  11.50% ABV

Availability: Limited (brewed once)

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: AgentMunky on 04-29-2011

This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

No notes at this time.
View: Beers (102) | Events
Beer: Reviews & Ratings
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
Reviews: 95 | Hads: 238
Photo of chugalug06
1.68/5  rDev -49.5%
look: 4 | smell: 1 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 1.5

Large tan foamy head rises form a very dark redish brown brew.

Smells like a tire. Way too much smoked malt. Too much peat too.

Taste is like licking a tire. Bitter and over whelming, in a bad way. Syrup-y and way too thick. No hops are present. Way too much peat, BLAH! Nice carbonation.

Horrible mess!!! This is the last 3 Floyds Collab brew I'll buy. I paid $12 to drain pour.. This brew is awful, if you feel other wise BM me and we can discuss it's upside. How would either brewery want their name attached to this brew??

 531 characters

Photo of brystmar
1.96/5  rDev -41.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

How do you soil the Three Floyds name? Collaborate with Mikkeller and/or BrewDog!

Ugly pour, dirty brown with mild head. Smells godawful... So much peat; reminiscent of licking the underside of your hiking boots after spending a week in the forest. Taste isn't much better, with smokey peat malt and dirty socks everywhere you turn. Perfect beer to unclog your drain.

 368 characters

Photo of ESPNman
3.4/5  rDev +2.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A - Reddish brown, looks thick coming out of the bottle. Slight hint of head that dissipates quickly leaving virtually no trace behind.

S - Pretty standard barleywine. Sweet malts with a bit of caramel and only a hint of the scotch / peat to be had on the taste.

T - Yep, this was definitely barrel aged in Scotch barrels. Big smokey, salty, peaty notes overwhelm what was once a probably pretty good barleywine. This is one seriously meaty beer.

M - Viscous, but with more carbonation than I would have expected. Overall a very balanced and surprisingly mellow mouthfeel. For a beer this big I would have expected something heavier and thicker.

O - Good beer, but not great. I think they went a little too far with the aging in Scotch barrels, or perhaps chose too peaty of a scotch. Maybe aging it a while longer will help mellow out the flavors.

Served in a Stone IRS Snifter.

 884 characters

Photo of JustinMatthew
3.74/5  rDev +12.3%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Picked up by a friend in Chicago, poured into a Brooklyn Brewing Tulip glass.

Pours a murky brown color with a quickly dissipating head. Smell is peat, smokey. Taste is Smokey, oak, Some whiskey and bacon. Very boozy. Slightly bitter and pretty delicious. Id drink this again if I had the chance.

 297 characters

Photo of cvm4
3.58/5  rDev +7.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A - Pours a hazy brown in color. Great, 1 finger tan head.

S - Peat, smoke and malt.

T - I was expecting a peat bomb but it's really not. Lovely sweet malt balances out the peaty/smokey characteristics. Some bitterness at the end.

M - Solid, just heavy enough to not be syrupy.

O - Some people get overwhelmed with a real peaty scotch or a real "scotch" beer. I've had homebrews that had more peat in it than this. I can appreciate 3F and Mikkeller branching out with this brew.

 482 characters

Photo of BEERchitect
3.16/5  rDev -5.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

With extreme flavors that favor Scotch whiskey, this Frankenstein of a beer shoves the palate to its brink with a bullyish display of earth, smoke, and bitterness.

The moderately hazy beer carries a firm mohogany hue with a dense and creamy head with a broken and speckled necklace of lace. Firm retention gives this a very formidable appearance.

High intensity of burnt rubber, rye, black peppercorn, scorched earth, sorghum, grapes, plumbs, cigar tobacco, weathered wood and moss create this meringue of scents that are surprisingly aromatic and perfumy despite being rustic and offensive.

The strong (oh, so strong) taste of peated whiskey, brown sugar, campfire smoke, lit cigars, ash, and the deeply embedded earthen hop balance gives a broad bitterness to the beer but continues to mudden the waters while a dull spiciness of rubber, pine sap, aniseed, rootbeer, and nail polish aptly describe the spicy, herbal, and sharpness that underlying complexities provide.

Full bodied and highly weighted because of the inherent character of creamy smoke and rich residual sweetness- the beer's reprieve rests in the astringency of char and ash with hot boozy alcohols and evaporation of wood tannin and strong powder.

But then how is it that so many unpleasant discriptor words pour out of the lexicon that this beer actually rates well? As offensive as the beer becomes to my beery palate, I feel that the peat influence of Scotch whiskeys plays out with proper balance, bold taste, and crazy-stupid levels of complexity.

 1,526 characters

Photo of mrtripod
3.55/5  rDev +6.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

Medium brown color and creamy off-white head.
Good retention and powerful lacing.

At first a bit harshly - but as the edge wore off I recognized that it was coming from the smokey and slightly robust ingredients.
Itis a bit too overpowered by the peat, but the whiskey is increasingly noticeable with sweet malt.

The taste is quite complex with sweetness from the malt, a hint of caramel, some bitterness and intense whiskey.

Strong carbonation with a contrasting drying sensation.

Went very well with a Monte Cristo corona-sized cigar.

 544 characters

4.08/5  rDev +22.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

330ml bottle. Oversized glass. Enjoyed on may´12. Very dark amber color. Tan colored head, lasting & creamy crown. Aromatic profile shows sweet roasted malts with hints of dark fruits & toffee notes. Sweet coffee at first sip, hints of plum. Ruthless dry bitter explosion overwhelms fruit flavor. Wood aged brandy notes round a hot aftertaste. Watch up your cigarette!! Full body, soft carbonation.

 399 characters

Photo of jrenihan
3.5/5  rDev +5.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

BB 19-03-2016

Beer is a dark, cloudy brown. A bit swampy. Small off-white head. Good retention and lots of lacing.

Lots of toffee and caramel malt in the nose, along with some oak.

Like the nose, the taste has boatloads of toffee and caramel, but is accompanied with lots of peat and smoke. Noticeable booze. Oak and whisky there as well. Tonnes going on but it is really all a bit much. Overload and nothing subtle about it. Not exactly a well integrated bunch of flavours.

Full bodied, moderate carbonation, syrupy. A fair bit of alcohol burn.

Overall, some nice aspects but it is a bit too extreme.

 606 characters

Photo of JohnGalt1
2.24/5  rDev -32.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

$12... Waaay too expensive... too expensive from the brewery and too much markup from the bottleshop.

Poured into my HotD goblet while boxing bottles for trade.... tan head with decent lacing and retention.... the brew is hazed light walnut.

Nose is full of headache acetone and burning rubber... smells like somebody put a palate of Converse on a campfire. Uncapped "Sharpie" markers .. Jesus... Really?

Flavor is making me squint... burning latex.... burning tires... Phenols that should NEVER be in any commercial beer... terrible superglue notes...

Christ.... seriously... I can handle Peaty Scotch, but this is a Train Wreck like nothing else. If you like sniffing Glue, then go at it.


 711 characters

Photo of OneBeertoRTA
1.25/5  rDev -62.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 1.5

Not sure why I picked this up. May have been the cute little bottle and my failure to read any reviews before trying.


Poured bottle into nice mini tulip. The smell is something I can easily describe; Huntington beach sea water the first day after a record rain storm.

I'm almost afraid to try it after the smell.

Taste is well... I can definately get the Scotch and a little Peat. The abv isn't well hidden but I wouldn't call it overpowering. A lot going on which each sip and I'm not sure what's going on.

Good thing this was a mini bottle so I don't have to muscle through a bomber.

 601 characters

Photo of ehammond1
1.6/5  rDev -52%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 1 | feel: 3 | overall: 1.5

Bottle (2011)

Stone Brew. Co.
Escondido, CA

Deep auburn in color with a quickly disappearing light khaki colored head. This doesn't leave much more than a few clinging bubbles to the glass.

The aroma is terrible, though in all fairness, the taste was worse. The aroma is a combination of burnt wood, rubber, campfire, a drag strip, and burnt sugars.

The flavor is awful. A few of the descriptors I heard friends offer in defense of this beer:
"Burnt tire"
"Burnt rubber"
"Campfire deliciousness"
"Huge tobacco note...yeeeeaaah"
"Perhaps the worst beer I've ever had"

Medium bodied with low to moderate carbonation.

Disgusting, vile stuff.

 657 characters

Photo of derkfromwi
3.95/5  rDev +18.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Batch 36

A: Finger and a half khaki head, deep brownish amber color, good carbonation and lacing

S: Peaty, smokey, whiskey, touch of hops

T: Same as nose with a bit more of the malts coming through including a touch of sweetness

M: Medium-light body, smooth, a touch thinner than I expected, good carbonation

O: Nice twist on a Barley Wine, different than any I've had before

 380 characters

Photo of sprucetip
3.81/5  rDev +14.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Very active, medium brown color, a finger+ of creamy off-white head, decent retention and pretty thick lacing.

Wicked peaty! At first it was harshly medicinal/band aid, but as the edge wore off I recognized that it was coming from the smoky/peaty ingredients. So far, I am unable to get much else, after about 10 minutes (and at a good temp). I'll keep trying. ... another few minutes, and now I can find some fruit, dark and otherwise. It's still way overpowered by the peat, but there is something else at least.... later still. I get the whiskey and barrel as well as the peat and the increasingly noticeable sweet malt.

The taste isn't dominated entirely by the peat, but it's still the most prominent element. The taste is actually quite complex, at least half deep into the goblet, even warmer yet. The peat/smoke flavor comes in at a more commensurate level than in the nose, and joins a diverse cast of flavor players whose inputs blend together with great synergistic effect. Sweetness from the malt, a hint of caramel, citrus fruit, gentle bitterness, whiskey, and barrel all dance on the charred and peaty foundation.

Strong carbonation and warming, with full-ish body but with a contrasting drying sensation.

This is an expensive beer, so it better be good and interesting. It is, but the aroma was strong and harsh at first. It mellowed, and the taste ended up turning out to be very complex and well balanced, and would probably get even better with time.

 1,476 characters

Photo of Ninjabrew
4.07/5  rDev +22.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Ok this goes down as the most interesting beer I've tried to date.

Appearance: A great color here dark copper or even mohogany color very rich.

Smell: I love this smell it has the same medicinal smell that an Islay scotch would have, very good. Exceptional my favorite for smell!

Taste: While I liked it a lot it couldn't stand up to the aroma. Very earthy with a hint of the scotch taste others have noted at the very end but obviuosly without the burn. Taste is similar to a smoked beer but very much not a smoke beer at the same time. All the band-aid none of the smoke.

Mouthfeel: Not a lot of head to this beer for me (pored in to a tulip glass) but the carbonation is there though you can't see it.

Overall: A must try espessially if you are a beer geek who appreciates a good scotch, even more true if your favorite scotch is an Islay. Like Laphroag where some of this barley comes from.

 899 characters

Photo of Phyl21ca
1.63/5  rDev -51.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1 | overall: 1.5

Bottle: Poured a deep clear amber color ale with a nice large foamy head with good retention and good lacing. Aroma of wood and sickening sweetness doesn’t make for an interesting aroma. Taste is like crunching into an old scotch barrel that has bathed in sugar, i.e. not an interesting proposition. Body is about average with good carbonation and no apparent alcohol. I finally drain poured half the bottle after I couldn’t take any more of the bad scotch ester and the sickening sweetness.

 495 characters

Photo of Jules11788
4.24/5  rDev +27.3%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

A: Pours a clear golden-brown; no head; thin, oily lacing

S: Sweet floral hops, sweet malts, oak, and a bourbon earthiness

T: Wow, the taste is really complex, like smoky bourbon-soaked wood covered in musky peat moss. Lots of delicious smoky/bitter/earthy flavors

M: Med-light viscosity with a good dose of booze

O: I had no idea what to expect with this one, but man it blew me away with the first sip. Definitely a great barleywine, I must find some more.

 463 characters

Photo of sweemzander
3.6/5  rDev +8.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 2

12oz. bottle poured into a snifter. 19-03-16 best by date.

(A)- Pours a fairly dark chestnut color with reddish highlights. Some tan froth and lace.

(S)- A nice smoked/peated briney hop character in front of a mellow caramel malt backbone.

(T)- Similar to the smell in alot of ways. The smoky peat note flows into subtle pine and citrus. Very very subtle caramel malt.

(M)- A mellow carbonation level. A nice balance with the whiskey and barrel aging giving the beer quite an in-your-face barleywine.

(D)- Not too shabby. The idea and description of the beer had me intrigued, but at $12 for a single bottle of this, it was wayyy too expensive for what you actually got. Purely based on the price, this is really disappointing, but if you forget about how much you paid for it, its not too bad.

 799 characters

Photo of RumbleBHeavy
3.58/5  rDev +7.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

I loved this beer! Was looking for something different, new and exciting. A bit pricey, but I'll do it for every BREWDOG collaboration.

Tulip pour.

A. Looks beautiful at first glance, and even better after a settle. BRONZE in appearance, light carbonation, looks just right. Minimal head, right up my alley.

S. Very strong, you can definitely tell this was barrel aged. Scotch man all day, so this fit my fancy.

T. Instant explosion, almost unbearable, but every sip afterwards becomes more inviting. Starts off strong with a tempered middle and a glorious aftertaste.

Probably won't buy again, but I have one I'll lay down for a few months and bust it out with some friends after it's all sold out.

Purchased 2.24.12 upon request of beer god Evan Hendrix at my local Whole Foods in Bend, Oregon.

 802 characters

Photo of ThreeWiseMen
2.54/5  rDev -23.7%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 4 | overall: 2.5

Poured into a Delirium Tremens tulip.

Appearance: A sticky white crown retains well atop a murky auburn body. Modest lacing lines the glass walls, while the tulip's etched bottom creates a silky, eye-of-the-hurricane aesthetic atop the brew. Shades of copper and brass shine illuminate the edges. A classy looking beer, no doubt about that.

Smell: Raspberry, leafy hops, and caramel duke it out with whiskey and coarse char. The aroma immediately reminds me of a spent hookah bowl. I get that this was meant to be smokey and peaty, but this a bit much.

Taste: Holy smokes! That whole spent hookah analogy is even more applicable in the taste realm. Jesus! Whiskey, peat, cranberries, grapefruit, and prunes also find their way to the palate, but so does a pile of soot. While intriguing and certainly flavorful, I'm not a fan of this one.

Mouthfeel: Heavy, warm, and malty, but still with a good deal of balance. Subtle carbonation allows the beer to float across the palate, and the finish provides a pleasant amount of dryness. No complaints here.

Overall: If it weren't for the overwhelming smoke flavor, this might be pretty good. The whiskey addition feels pretty strong as well, and could probably use some dulling also. Lots of complexity, just a lack of cohesiveness between the flavors.

 1,301 characters

Photo of SpdKilz
1.84/5  rDev -44.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 1.5

Picked up at my local Binny’s for wayyyy too much money ($12 for a 12oz…sheesh).

Appearance – Pours a murky brown into a tulip with about a finger of off white head that dissipates quickly leaving little lacing.

Smell – Booze, booze, booze. Slight dark fruits and sweetness.

Taste – Holy crap. What is this. Seriously this is disgusting. This is heavy peat and smoke. Rubber, etc. I took one sip and almost gagged.

Mouthfeel – Medium bodied, decent carbonation.

Overall – Drain pour. This is one of the worst beers I’ve had in a while. Ugg.

 562 characters

Photo of sidetracked
3.33/5  rDev 0%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Pours a dark ruby mahogany with amber highlights. Substantial deep cream head that lingers. Very little lacing.

Aroma of caramel and toffee malt, smoke, whiskey. Slightly sweet, but mostly smokey. Little piney hops? Light alcohol presence.

Upfront taste is caramel malt with a little smoke sneaking in. Slightly sweet caramel malt middle. Some bittering hops at the finish, but smokey wood overtakes it quickly. Lingering smokey campfire and wooden barrel flavors. Light whiskey throughout as it warms.

Medium body with moderate carbonation and a dry finish. Alcohol well masked considering the lightness of the mouthfeel.

Interesting beer. The smoked malts aren't overwhelming which is nice. Vey woody. Doesn't really drink like a barleywine. Overall so-so, but worth a try since it's so different.


 813 characters

Photo of StaveHooks
3.52/5  rDev +5.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

Batch 096 11.2 oz bottle poured into snifter glass.

A - Ruby brown body with a thick collared cream colored head. Spotted lacing.

S - Smoked peat fills the glass. Notes of treated oak wood, beef jerky cure, sweet bread, caramel, alcohol, and herbal hops.

T - Smoked peat just dominates everything. Dry oak wood in the background. Caramel malt, vanilla, and hints of fruit are presents. The finish is smoked peat and wood with an herbal hop oil and scotch left for the aftertaste.

M - Medium body with low carbonation.

This is an odd beer for sure. The oak barrels and heavy peat kinda clash and create an almost artificial "ash tray" flavor. It's more interesting than off-putting. The base barleywine isn't enough to compete with the wood and peat and seems to get lost.
I appreciate the creativity of the brewers but the combined ingredients produce an unusual flavor that probably won't catch on. I'm glad I tried it.

 928 characters

Photo of Arborescence
4.36/5  rDev +30.9%
look: 3 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Appearance: Dark brown, maybe a bit oily, not much of a head.

Aroma: The peat is not very strong, but there is a distinctive aroma of whisky, not too intensive though.

Taste: Rich and malty, typical for a barley wine, but the strong alcohol content is well balanced and does not ruin the taste at all. There is a peculiar aftertaste, most likely due to the toffee:
sugary sweetness. It’s a bit strange in a beer like this, and I can see how it might not be to everyone’s taste, but it’s certainly quite original.

Mouthfeel: Balanced, medium-bodied.

Overall: A very interesting collaborative beer with one of the most inventive and crazy breweries from Scotland (BrewDog) and a good US brewery (Three Floyds), which I’m familiar with but haven’t had the chance to sample their products very much yet.

Being a big fan of single malts and especially the peaty and smoky whiskies coming from Islay and around, I was very curious about this beer. After fermentation the beer has been aged in old Jura single malt whisky barrels for 8 months. I’ve visited Islay and Jura, which are two adjacent islands. The beer didn’t disappoint, although I’d like a more intense whisky or peat flavour — in the US I’ve had a few beers branded as ‘Scotch Ale’ which have had a slightly more intense whisky flavour to them, but without the peat. It’s worth noting that there’s no smokiness in this beer, unlike in many of the Islay whiskies (not so much Jura though).

Recommended if you can get your hands on it. I sampled this one at one of my favourite pubs in Helsinki, Kuikka, but it did cost me 14 euros!

 1,624 characters

Photo of cjacobsen
3.38/5  rDev +1.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Thanks to Sweemzander for sharing this one.

(A) - Dark burnt orange, brownish, copper, clean with slight bubbled head. Leaves lacing

(S) - Smells of booze. Oak and whiskey. Some fig, leather, some heat

(T) - Smoked peat, generally smokey, decent amount of hops. Almost a smoked jerky taste to it.

(M) - Somewhat grainy, ends slightly dry. Medium to full body.

(O) - A lot more peat than I expected. More of a smokiness that is definitely a different spin on a BW.

 468 characters

BrewDog / Three Floyds Bitch Please from BrewDog
77 out of 100 based on 95 ratings.