1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Fruet - The Bruery

Not Rated.
FruetFruet

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
99
world-class

679 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 679
Reviews: 128
rAvg: 4.47
pDev: 8.05%
Wants: 226
Gots: 418 | FT: 27
Brewed by:
The Bruery visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
Old Ale |  15.50% ABV

Availability: Limited (brewed once)

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

Unlike previous anniversary beers, ALL Fruet is 100% bourbon barrel-aged.

(Beer added by: MasterSki on 04-23-2012)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 679 | Reviews: 128 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of BeerMeFitz
1.25/5  rDev -72%

BeerMeFitz, Aug 26, 2012
Photo of kojevergas
2.45/5  rDev -45.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Served on-draught into a small generic glass at Beachwood BBQ in Seal Beach, California. Reviewed from notes. I decided to give The Bruery a third or fourth chance after being pissed off many times about their overrated garbage beers that cost an arm and a leg. I keep hoping they have something good to offer other than Black Tuesday, and I keep discovering they do not. Expectations were thus low but strangely hopeful. Cost was $7.50 plus tax and tip (ouch).

Paired with barbecue and sweet potato fries.

A: Pours a 1.5 finger head of nice cream, fair thickness, and okay retention. Colour is a nontransparent dark red. No yeast particles are visible. No bubble show.

Sm: Tart fruit, cream, yeast, booze, and chocolate. A moderate strength aroma. I don't detect bourbon.

T: Tart fruit, booze, cream, and poorly handled mild hops. Badly balanced and built. Foul cherry - as though spoilt - comes through. A bland yeast note is present. Not complex or subtle. Far too boozy, ruining the balance.

Mf: Smooth, wet, and of okay thickness. Carbonation is okay but inadequate to support the flavours (which may be a good thing...). Doesn't suit the flavour profile.

Dr: Drinkable but unremarkable. Certainly not a beer I'd get again. Doesn't hide its ABV really at all. A low quality beer. Overpriced. This is their anniversary offering? Really?

D+

kojevergas, May 20, 2012
Photo of whatsajessica
2.75/5  rDev -38.5%

whatsajessica, May 28, 2012
Photo of ThatsThatDude
3/5  rDev -32.9%

ThatsThatDude, Jan 06, 2014
Photo of CityofBals
3.25/5  rDev -27.3%

CityofBals, Sep 12, 2013
Photo of floridadrift
3.5/5  rDev -21.7%

floridadrift, Nov 04, 2014
Photo of 2dogbrew
3.5/5  rDev -21.7%

2dogbrew, Jan 01, 2013
Photo of Lukafer
3.5/5  rDev -21.7%

Lukafer, Jan 08, 2013
Photo of ste5venla
3.75/5  rDev -16.1%

ste5venla, Sep 01, 2012
Photo of BColton1
3.75/5  rDev -16.1%

BColton1, Monday at 03:22 PM
Photo of pokgye
3.75/5  rDev -16.1%

pokgye, Jan 04, 2013
Photo of djaeon
3.75/5  rDev -16.1%

djaeon, Feb 24, 2013
Photo of amrozga
3.75/5  rDev -16.1%

amrozga, Jun 02, 2012
Photo of kaelingirl
3.75/5  rDev -16.1%

kaelingirl, Jan 06, 2013
Photo of dman5400
3.75/5  rDev -16.1%

dman5400, Feb 10, 2013
Photo of Lovely85
3.75/5  rDev -16.1%

Lovely85, May 15, 2014
Photo of Dicers
3.75/5  rDev -16.1%

Dicers, Nov 06, 2014
Photo of Bluecane
3.75/5  rDev -16.1%

Bluecane, Apr 21, 2013
Photo of jacewg
3.75/5  rDev -16.1%

jacewg, Jul 07, 2012
Photo of Rudy
3.75/5  rDev -16.1%

Rudy, May 26, 2012
Photo of rtaps
3.75/5  rDev -16.1%

rtaps, May 29, 2012
Photo of jrallen34
3.75/5  rDev -16.1%

jrallen34, Jan 22, 2013
Photo of Mister_Joshy
3.75/5  rDev -16.1%

Mister_Joshy, May 29, 2012
Photo of stereosforgeeks
3.9/5  rDev -12.8%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Poured into a Founders tulip.

Appearance: Cloudy dark caramel/brown. Small tan head that dissipates quickly leaving no lacing.

Smell: Lost of candied sugar, molasses, figs, caramel, bourbon, some mild vanilla and oakiness in there too.

Taste: Basically the same as the nose. The bourbon and oakiness really linger in your mouth.

Mouthfeel: Viscous. The beer grabs hold of your mouth and really sticks the favors to them. Only mild carbonation.

Overall: This is one intense beer. Each of the flavors and smells is very intense. Personally I like them to blend together a bit more, but thats just my personal feelings. I feel like this will age very well and smooth off some of the rough edges.

stereosforgeeks, Jan 07, 2013
Photo of Jeffo
3.9/5  rDev -12.8%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Got a couple of these from claaark13 and youbrewidrink. Thanks guys!

From a 750 into a snifter
Bottle 11,169 of one billion
Drunk beside White Chocolate

APPEARANCE: Pours a small, medium looking, light tan head with decent retetion. Head fades rather quickly to a bubbly wisp and a ring. Mahogany red in color with medium levels of carbonation evident. A ring and touches of wisp remain until the end but leave no lacing down the glass.

SMELL: Lots of bourbon on this. Oak, toffee, caramel and booze. Bold and forthcoming with lots of bourbon, though the toffee and caramel notes from the base ale seem to hold up alright.

TASTE: Very boozy up front. Toffee, caramel and brown sugar from the base beer, then lots of bourbon and alcohol from the barrels. Oak, vanilla and some nutty flavors through the middle into the finish. A bold and lingering aftertaste of bourbon barrel, wood, caramelized nuts and some vanilla. Pretty flavorful and interesting, though still too boozy to be top class.

PALATE: Medium body and medium levels of carbonation. Semi-creamy on the palate, goes down okay and finishes sticky. Heat on the palate for sure. Better than average for the ABV and style.

OVERALL: This is actually really good. It's still too hot for top marks, though the complexity is definitely there, as the base beer is able to play a role in the flavor profile and mesh well with the barrel aging. Moreover, the mouthfeel is still good enough not to detract from the experience. This was leagues better than White Chocolate for sure, as the flavor and aroma was bolder and more complex, while the feel was still big and creamy enough to support it all. Definitely recommended, but be wise and share.

Jeffo, Apr 03, 2013
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Fruet from The Bruery
99 out of 100 based on 679 ratings.