1. Don't miss our 7th annual American Craft Beer Fest featuring 640+ beers from 140+ brewers this May 30 & 31 in Boston, MA! Buy your tickets now!
  2. BeerAdvocate on your phone?! True story. Try the beta now.

Stella Artois - Stella Artois

Stella ArtoisStella Artois

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
71
okay

3,278 Ratings
THE BROS
73
okay

(view ratings)
Ratings: 3278
Reviews: 1287
rAvg: 3.07
pDev: 19.54%


Brewed by:
Stella Artois visit their website
Belgium

Style | ABV
Euro Pale Lager |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 09-13-2000)
View: Beers (16) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 3,278 | Reviews: 1,287 | Show All Ratings:
Photo of FickleBeast
FickleBeast

New Jersey

3.1/5  rDev +1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.25

14.9 oz can poured into my FREE Stella Artois chalice.

Pours a crystal clear pale yellow color with two fingers of fluffy foam. Looks quite nice, actually. Aroma is bready, cooked corn, slightly vegetal.

The first sip is a very mild, slightly sweet flavor, with a slight bitter vegetal aftertaste. Bitterness seems to linger and wears on the tongue after a while.

This is a clean-tasting lager with no real offensive flavors. Overall pretty bland, but you can do a lot worse.

Serving type: can

04-13-2014 02:22:06 | More by FickleBeast
Photo of FrozenJoe
FrozenJoe

Arizona

3.43/5  rDev +11.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.25

Appearance
Fluffy white head that dissipates slowly. Good lacing. Clear, light golden beer. Moderate carbonation.

Smell
Mild. Clean malts. Fruity yeast.

Taste
Mild. Clean malts. Fruity yeast. Light hops. A little watery.

Mouthfeel
Light bodied. Watery. Dry but not bitter.

Overall
This brew lacks somewhat in character. It is quite drinkable. Stella Artois is a light, clean, mild lager. Not as good as Heineken.

Serving type: can

03-24-2014 04:44:14 | More by FrozenJoe
Photo of Alexnzx
Alexnzx

Ireland

4.38/5  rDev +42.7%
look: 5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 5 | overall: 4.5

I think this is an absolutely beautiful beer. Defenitely best consumed Ice Cold. Extremely refreshing and light beer. After a long stessful day, I find there is nothing better than popping back a few of these.

I think this is probably the best out of all the major advertised lagers here in Ireland (.ie Fosters, Carling, Heineken, Budweiser). As well as that, it is sold for an extremely good price. Basically, if I just wanted to have a few cans of beer to relax, this would be the one I would buy every time.

Serving type: can

02-14-2014 19:05:36 | More by Alexnzx
Photo of Act25
Act25

New Jersey

3.23/5  rDev +5.2%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.25

Stella Can

Poured into plastic cup from 14.9 oz can on the ferry. Rarely do I have a beer on ferry.
Given an aggressive pour the head becomes more dense and lasts longer.
Look: well carbonated, pils color, with short lived head but nice sticky retention.
S: lemony, malty, but slight.
T: A sufferable mass pilsner/ lager. The rare mass produced that I still enjoy. Malt, lemon, a bit of light weight citrus hops, good tingle.
Like all Belgians, a bit of spice and perfume.
F: Tho a lager, feels a nice weight, not watery. Satisfying, great with light food, like fish, filet, oysters, shellfish, and the salad course. Good aperitif.
Good body for mass produced.


Serving type: can

01-19-2014 01:58:54 | More by Act25
Photo of Scrapss
Scrapss

Pennsylvania

3.75/5  rDev +22.1%
look: 4.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Poured into a Turbnator from the near-pounder sized can.

A: Clear deep straw yellow with a twofinger head that dissipates to a thin disk. Carbonation is present all the way through the quaffing. active. Nice looking Euro pale lager.

S: Pretty neutral on malts, yeast and hop fronts. It's not as skunky as some Euro pale lagers. Inoffensive. Slightly seweresque on initial smell.

T: Gentle hops are very subtle. Malts are also lighter side of biscuity. Yeast is definitely not a strong variety with respect to breadiness or banana/clove/etc. Very subtle taste profile. There is a gentle metallic note at ultimate finish as it warms.

M: Creamy as carbonation indicates and per style. spritely carbonation lends to a neat clean finish with very a pleasant little bitterness at the end.

O: I really like Stella for sittin' around & having a few beers. It's interesting enough to keep it good, but not so strong in ABV nor flavor to overwhelm your palate. It's the European pale lager favorite for me.

Serving type: can

12-22-2013 21:09:28 | More by Scrapss
Photo of Auraan
Auraan

Arizona

3.11/5  rDev +1.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured a clear yellow with lively carbonation bubbles going up the glass and a half-finger white head that receded to a thin ring of white lace very quickly. Standard for a pale lager, nothing special. Scents of lager yeast, maize, some bready malt and faint grassiness. Typical adjunct lager aromas. Nothing special. Flavor begins sweet, with strong flavors of maize, moving into some bready malt and grainy flavors and some dank herbal hops, finish is grainy with a decent level of earthy hop bitterness. Its a fairly typical adjunct lager flavor, made a bit better by the higher level of hop flavor than usual in American lagers. Mouthfeel is light bodied with high carbonation and a semi-drying mouthfeel. Fairly standard for the style. Overall this is a standard pale lager. Its nothing special, but its better than most American lagers and Heineken by a large margin.

Serving type: can

12-22-2013 05:54:06 | More by Auraan
Photo of StoutHunter
StoutHunter

Michigan

3.24/5  rDev +5.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.25

I picked up a can of Stella Artois for $1.99 last week at Glenns Market. I've haven't had a Stella since right around when I turned 21. I don't remember much about it and I don't know if I liked it or not, I thought I would give it another shot for curiosity's sake, so lets see how it goes. No visible bottling. Poured from a 16oz can into an imperial pint glass since I don't have the odd shaped chalice that they suggest.

A- The can looks nice, it's got a nice and clean design to it. It poured a clear golden color that took on more of a yellow color when held to the light with two and a half fingers worth of fluffy white head that died down to a thin ring that eventually faded away an left some nice lacing behind. I thought this was a nice looking beer, nothing seems out of place for the style.

S- The aroma starts off with a higher amount of sweetness followed by some malts that impart a grainy, pale malt and bread crust like aroma. Up next comes some Belgian yeast that impart a light fruity aroma with an orange aroma seeming to stick out. The aroma was nice and unique for the style.

T- The taste seems to be fairly similar to the aroma and it starts off with a medium amount of sweetness followed by some sweet and pale malt flavor with some bready and stale malt flavors coming through. Up next comes some of that fruity Belgian yeast that I got in the aroma with slight bit of banana coming through. On the finish there's pretty much no bitterness with a grainy, malty, and yeasty aftertaste. This was a nice tasting beer that was unique for it's style.

M- Smooth, crisp, Clean, light bodied with a higher amount of medium carbonation. The mouthfeel was ok and it worked well with this beer.

Overall I thought this was decent beer and a good example of the style, it doesn't taste too similar to some of the other Euro Pale Lagers I have tried and I think that's mainly because of the yeast used in this beer, it imparts a unique flavor for the style. This beer had nice drinkability, it was smooth, crisp, not filling, and the taste did a decent job at holding my attention, I could see myself drinking a few of these if I wanted to catch a buzz. I liked how unique this beer was the most. I liked the slight stale malt flavor the least. I would buy this if I wanted to take some beer to party and wasn't in the mood for craft beer and I think I would order this in a bar if there wasn't any better options. I would recommend this to people looking for a somewhat flavorful session ale. All in all this beer turned out to be better then I thought it would, It's not bad at all, I think it's a solid choice when not much is available.

Serving type: can

10-20-2013 20:42:24 | More by StoutHunter
Photo of BeerBateo
BeerBateo

Ontario (Canada)

3.51/5  rDev +14.3%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.5

See: Poured into my mug, this beer looks as pretty as its name. Golden with minimal bubbles/ 2 1/2 inch fine white head/bit of lace. A thin top layer & edge survives the whole trip down.

Smell: Pleasant~has a hint of sweet lemon like in a lemon meringue pie.

Taste: Very smooth at first, then a gradual building bitter bite at the end. Not too overpowering, though.

Feel: Bitterness stays, but its ok. Now my mouth wants fish and chips.

Blanket: This is very burpy beer & I feel bloated out. Wouldn't want to be drinking this on the beach, iykwim.

AKA: Stella Belly (not as pretty)

Serving type: can

07-27-2013 00:38:04 | More by BeerBateo
Photo of Scrylol
Scrylol

Alberta (Canada)

2.3/5  rDev -25.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Pours a clear, golden straw color body with a two finger white head.

Slight grassy smell to it, a tinge of sour aroma to it. Big grain notes.

There seems to be some sort of mix of metallic and skunk taste to it. Big notes of grain. Low hop bitterness.

Mouthfeel feels too watery. Decent amount of carbonation.

A rather bland Euro Pale Lager.

Serving type: can

12-01-2012 04:43:57 | More by Scrylol
Photo of jazzyjeff13
jazzyjeff13

United Kingdom (England)

2.88/5  rDev -6.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A 440ml can with a BB of Nov 2012. Picked up cheap from a supermarket some time back.

Poured into a straight pint glass. A clear pale-gold colour with decent carbonation and faint floating sediment. Forms a smallish head of white foam that rapidly collapses and disappears. Aroma of weak malt with hints of stewed leaves, overdone veg and a harsh note in the background. Uninspiring.

Tastes of light malt with a crisp, dry finish. Hints of stewed hops with a slightly harsh, solventy quality in the background. A restrained bitterness upon swallowing. Mouthfeel is light and tingly, but with a thin, watery body. Mildly astringent, with an aftertaste of faint stewed leaves.

Meh - another run-of-the-mill macro lager. Bland, watery and uninteresting. I guess it would quench your thirst on a hot day, but it serves little other purpose. Give it a miss.

Serving type: can

09-10-2012 20:57:31 | More by jazzyjeff13
Photo of AwYeh
AwYeh

Ohio

2.43/5  rDev -20.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

Thanks to my buddy Jesse13713 for sharing a 16 oz can of this with me.

A: Pours a clear yellow color, with two fingers of foamy white head, leaving solid lacing behind. Hard to fault the appearance after a night of drinking several (craft!) American ales which looked far thinner and left less desirable characteristics behind.

S: Very pale in qualities here; I get a bit of a corny sweetness and a lightly grassy hop character.

T: Possibly a step up from Bud and its peers; this beer has a light sweetness with a faint bitterness in the background to keep things from getting out of control bad. Can't say that I especially enjoy the beer, even if I could tolerate it over a night if it was offered to me. Even accepting the limitations of the style, I'm finding less and less to enjoy on each passing sip. I would need to be on a pretty intense night on the town to appreciate this beer, and even then my appreciation wouldn't be rooted in taste.

M: Medium-bodied with moderate carbonation; the body of this beer does well for the taste that it's working with. It doesn't do much to keep the faint flavors of its taste around, but it does encourage me to take my next sip fairly quickly.

O: Not really a good beer, but if you're looking for a Euro Pale Lager I'm not sure that I could point you in a better direction. This beer is definitely best as an accent of a good night not centered around beer.

Serving type: can

09-07-2012 06:55:45 | More by AwYeh
Photo of JamesMN
JamesMN

Minnesota

3.2/5  rDev +4.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Poured a 16oz can into an english tulip glass resulting in a two fingers of fluffy white head that disappeared very quickly.

Appearance: Completely translucent straw/pale color.

Aroma: Some sweet caramel malt in there. Not much to smell.

Taste: It's a subtle beer. Definite grain notes, almost no hop presence or bitterness. Similar to Heineken but more reserved. A bit of bitterness shows up on the tongue shortly after swallowing.

Mouthfeel: I thought this would be a thin beer but it's actually medium bodied. The carbonation is done right: small bubbles that stay present but don't get in the way of what flavor there is to taste. Highly drinkable.

Final Thoughts: Even though this is a macro-lager, it has a definite edge on it's American counterpart. There is no adjunct taste in this beer. If you're a macro-lager drinker then take that first step and order a Stella Artois. From there, who knows, maybe you'll conquer your fears by ordering some beers with real character. All in all, I wouldn't seek this beer out again, but I can appreciate some of the craftsmanship that goes into it.

Serving type: can

08-02-2012 05:52:33 | More by JamesMN
Photo of MadScientist
MadScientist

New York

2.98/5  rDev -2.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Poured into a large Ommegang fute from a can that is best by 02/2013.

a: Brilliant clarity with a straw color and a frothy white head the quickly dissipated leaving a little ring of foam floating around the edge. There was a huge collection of large bubbles lining inside my glass.

s: Right after the pour there was a moderate yeasty aroma that went away quickly leaving little else. There is a faint graininess and a low spicy hop aroma with a slight green apple aroma.

t: There is a low malt sweetness with low levels of spicy hops flavor and a moderately low hops bitterness. The balance slightly favors the bitterness with a crispy dry finish. There is that slight acidic characteristic from high carbonation levels.

m: This is a medium-light body beer with lots of carbonation.

o: There isn't a lot going on in this beer but there isn't supposed to be much with this style. It's a decent example and a good thirst quenching beer but it's kind of flat and lifeless. The nose is clean with out any defects but it is so faint while there is a bit more substance to the flavor it's not by much.

Serving type: can

07-19-2012 02:24:29 | More by MadScientist
Photo of CloudStrife
CloudStrife

New York

3.05/5  rDev -0.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

14.9 oz can poured into Stella Artois Chalice. 03/2012 on the bottom.

A: Pours a crystal clear golden-straw with a 2 finger puffy white head. Lots of visible carbonation. Head fizzles to a film in 4-5 minutes. Some lacing on the glass.

S: Pale malts, lager yeast, a sweet corn quality.

T: Mild sweet malt in the background, some yeast is present. Light taste, lingering carmel notes.

M: Thin body with mild carbonation. Light on the palate, perhaps a tad watery.

Overall certainly a drinkable lager. Would rather drink this over the macro lagers of America. For a Euro Pale Lager it accomplishes what it needs to.

Serving type: can

06-02-2012 23:12:31 | More by CloudStrife
Photo of dedrinker
dedrinker

Kansas

3/5  rDev -2.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

light straw color with thin white head.

This is a funny lager - it has a faint whiff and taste of better continental pilsener-style lagers with the grassy fresh bread and slight sulfur note, but very much compromised by the corn they use, which adds a characteristic watery lightness with notes of chicken feed.

It is in fact quite drinkable, but goes past your tongue too lightly and quick. It would be a superior American macro-adjunct brew, but as a higher priced Euro-import it is rather bland and flavorless.

This is a great import to have for image conscious consumers that don't want to be burdened by taste, mouth-feel or finish while they look somewhat glamorous holding the bottle in public or private gatherings of distinguished philistines.

Serving type: can

02-25-2012 22:00:21 | More by dedrinker
Photo of EgadBananas
EgadBananas

Louisiana

2.85/5  rDev -7.2%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Unfortunately, my Stella chalice is still packed up from moving, and I'm not about to dig it out from the other 60 pieces still boxed up. Poured into my Stone nonic.

Pours clear, fizzy and yellow. Looks like a pale lager to me. Head was bone white, 2 fingers and leaves a lot of foam in it's wake.

Aroma was slightly corny, with some biscuity tones, but they're muted. Standard crisp, clean, cold lager aroma.

Taste was near the same, albeit with a bit more of a pale malt character and a crisp, ever so slight bitter, grassy finish.

Near watery body, but not quite that of say a light lager. Still very light bodied, with a clean finish. Medium carbonation level. Decent feel overall for what it is.

Overall: I drank Stella a lot when I was learning that there were other beers out there besides Miller Lite. I enjoyed it then, but today, it's just an easy drinking, chuggable lager; nothing special, nothing desirable.

Serving type: can

02-04-2012 21:40:56 | More by EgadBananas
Photo of smakawhat
smakawhat

Maryland

3.25/5  rDev +5.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured from the can into an official Stella Artois glass. Call it a take home present en masse.

Out of the can pours a very brassy clear gold with large cola rising bubbles. Head seems quite together at first and small bubbles for the appearance, but as it settles it gets very soapy white and can't hold itself together. Later on some small rising carbonation bubbles are present.

Nose is very sweet smelling, it reminds me of Genny beer. Corny sweet, light bread but not much.

Taste is sweet malts, very light bread and light hop. Slightly crisp but not really much going on.

Overall pretty easy drinking, kind of ordinary, but about as basic as a simple lager gets I would say. I've had lots of this in my life on occasion, and out of the can it works out fine. Stay away from the bottles though, they are more than likely going to be skunked.

Serving type: can

11-18-2011 18:54:58 | More by smakawhat
Photo of UnderPressure
UnderPressure

South Carolina

2.3/5  rDev -25.1%
look: 1.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

14.9 fl oz can

Extremely clear, nearly colorless slightly yellow. Minimal fizzy 1/2 finger "head" melts instantly.

Weak pilsner malt aroma. Not much else to say.

Nearly empty pilsner malt flavor with a slight touch of Belgian funk, and a trace of bitterness.

Thin, heavily carbonated mouthfeel, but not completely contradictory to the style.

I'm not sure what I expected here, but overall I'm not impressed. It's a step above the typical "big three."

Serving type: can

11-13-2011 14:12:54 | More by UnderPressure
Photo of hoptualBrew
hoptualBrew

Florida

3.28/5  rDev +6.8%
look: 2 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

14.9oz white classic looking can. Poured pretty viscious into the glass to create a nice sized off white micro bubble head & active carbonation racing to the surface. Minimal lacing here. In all honesty it looks like a standard american adjunct lager - boring.

Light grain, a shit ton of belgian slightly funk yeast, and mild hops. For the most part its just the yeast that stands out. Tongue follows, pretty balanced & light brew here. Not robust and rich as found in ales, but highly drinkable and crisp like a lager should be, in my opinion.

Serving type: can

10-21-2011 03:58:26 | More by hoptualBrew
Photo of damndirtyape
damndirtyape

Ohio

3.05/5  rDev -0.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

440mL can poured into a Shaker Pint glass. Best by 01/2012

Appearance: Clear pale gold color with a persistent white thin (1/16" thick) head. Big sheets and little strands of persistent lacing all over the place.

Smell: Clean - faint malt. Maybe a hint of corn. Nothing special.

Taste: Quite different than the bottled version. Mild in flavor - no skunked hops at all. Crisp and clean (but mild) malt with a mild bitter (slightly earthy) finish.

Mouthfeel: Good carbonation but otherwise just a hair thicker than water.

Overall / Drinkability: Plus for nice appearance, but with the ingredients of malted barley, water, maize, yeast and hops, this is really an adjunct lager. It's odd...but I think the slightly skunked flavor adds some character to the beer when it's in a bottle. Otherwise, this beer is nothing special. Definitely drinkable, but a bit boring.

Serving type: can

09-22-2011 22:28:53 | More by damndirtyape
Photo of DCon
DCon

Missouri

3.58/5  rDev +16.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Bought a 4-pack of 14.9 FL. OZ. cans of this w/ GeoffTheAleMan @ Dierbergs in Creve Couer, MO for $4.49. Poured from the Awesome White/Silver can into a 16oz Groupon Pint Glass and has BEST BEFORE END: 02/2012 on the bottom of the can. Saw a commercial of this new Stella Can during this past US Open and HAD to go for it.

Aroma- Has medium sweet how aroma but no corn or grain! Can also tell there are a good amount of hops used with the floral and light spicy aroma coming through!

Appearance- Pours 4 fingers of extremely bubbly head and actually has descent retention. Has a pale straw body that has perfectly clarity. Leaves nice lacing on the glass.

Flavor- Has a nice sweetness and low but noticeable hop bitterness in here. The finish has an extreme dry sting to the tongue and mouth that doesn't hurt this brew.

Mouthfeel- Light Bodied, HIGHLY Carbonated, Smooth, Crisp, and very refreshing. Not much left on the palate or anything else but definitely average for the style.

Overall Impression- I'm very glad I went out of my way to enjoy this brew again! (Haven't had in almost a year!) These brews aren't very poundable as they have quite a bit of flavor and hop presence. Will not be getting this often in the future but will say, go and get yourself some of the new Stella cans! Very nice. Too bad I don't have the glassware that goes with it...

Serving type: can

09-15-2011 00:49:53 | More by DCon
Photo of tbeckett
tbeckett

Ontario (Canada)

2.45/5  rDev -20.2%
look: 2 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

A can from my buddy while we waited for other stuff in the fridge. From notes.

A - Poured a light to medium gold. Bright. Good carbonation. Two finger soapy white head gone in less than a minute. Bubbles cling to the side of the glass. No lace and no retention.

S - Sweet grain, floral notes, and some grass.

T - Sweet grain, corn, hay. Chemicals? Dusty. Just mostly sweet, slightly offensive grain.

M - Oily? No bad carbonation, light body.

O/D - Not tasty at all. I would never buy this and I'm glad it was free. Typical of the style I guess.

Serving type: can

09-12-2011 19:14:08 | More by tbeckett
Photo of hophunter
hophunter

Michigan

4.18/5  rDev +36.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

14.9 oz. can poured into pint glass.

Appearance: Light gold, thicker/frother white head with tighter bubbles. Very clear.

Aroma: Low grainy malt. Light sweetness. Low hop aroma- almost floral. Green apple.

Flavor: Crisp, dry, low hop flavor and bitterness. Balanced between hop bitterness and malt.

Mouthfeel: Medium light body. carbonated and crisp.

Overall: More fuller bodied and flavorful than American Predecessors. I can see why it gets slightly higher ratings. But then again that's why they are under different guidelines. This is definitely a beer that I would like to have on hand for a rainy day "go to" beer. Especially in the can because I just don't trust green bottles anymore.

Serving type: can

09-02-2011 03:17:19 | More by hophunter
Photo of sfprint
sfprint

Germany

3.83/5  rDev +24.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

A: Single finger head, multiple bubble sizes, very little rising carbonation. Transparent gold.
S: Slightly sweet for a lager, hay, fresh well balanced.
T: Fresh with a very nice slight sweetness. very light bitterness light, great for a lager.
M: Very subtle carbonation light body.
O: Good, a very good lager.

Serving type: can

08-27-2011 20:31:11 | More by sfprint
Photo of evlu1441
evlu1441

Alberta (Canada)

3.35/5  rDev +9.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

I picked up a very official Stella Artois glass from my work, so I felt that this review would be appropriate.

It pours a very pale straw lager colour. The glass lends itself to the production of a nice 2 finger head that slowly dissipates. It leaves some nice lacing.

The aroma is slightly grainy, but there is also a bit of a floral element to it. There isn't any of the typical skunkyness I usually associate with bottled Stella.

The taste is dry and some light matliness comes through. There aren't any off adjunct or grain flavours. There is a bit of that floral aroma too. There is a lot of carbonation on my tongue, which lends itself to a crisp finish.

Overall, this is not a bad lager, and certainly better than the other extremely famous euro lager (Heineken). It is on the pricey side though. The canned version is better than the bottle in the reviewer's opinion.

Serving type: can

08-21-2011 08:31:46 | More by evlu1441
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Stella Artois from Stella Artois
71 out of 100 based on 3,278 ratings.