1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

The Big DIPA - Blue Frog Grog & Grill

Not Rated.
The Big DIPAThe Big DIPA

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
70
okay

64 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 64
Reviews: 55
rAvg: 2.89
pDev: 23.88%
Wants: 2
Gots: 0 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Blue Frog Grog & Grill visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
American Double / Imperial IPA |  8.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Talisker on 04-21-2007)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 64 | Reviews: 55 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Deuane
2.8/5  rDev -3.1%

A-Golden hued copper with a medium off-white head that left decent lacing behind.

S-Light notes of floral and citrus hops initially with backing support from sweet biscuit and some caramel malts.

T-Overly sweet upfront and not hoppy at all. with some warming citrus/floral notes come through but by then it is too late. This one is a disappointing sweet malty mess to me. It's not "bad" simply not good.

M-Medium-light body with a decent hop bitterness and dry finish.

D-The BIG DIPA, really? Maybe big in the malt department...but one would not expect this coming from a CA brewery. A beer I can safely say I didn't care for all that much. I think I will pass on ever having it again....except I would be curious to try it fresh on draft to see if this is what they are truly aiming for.

Deuane, Aug 18, 2009
Photo of GRG1313
3.55/5  rDev +22.8%

Tasted again a year after prior review; tasted 07/10 - color the same; head thicker and more full than a year ago; flavor profile has not changed but opinion is that beer is very drinkable and somewhat complex. Sweet front palate of coffee/malt that goes to an appealing bitter grapefruit. Very drinkable and quite nice. Big fresh coffee bitter finish. Impression has improved from a year ago.

* * *

Pours a bright orange amber color with a thin white head.

Pleasant citrus-grapefruit nose with nice hints of lime. Mouthfeel is a bit thin, as are the flavors.

Flavor of simple grapefruit with no real character or style. A short pine/grapefruit finish.

A beer that is somewhat one dimensional but acceptable and drinkable-just not out of the ordinary.

GRG1313, Jul 26, 2009
Photo of BuckeyeNation
2.88/5  rDev -0.3%

Blurry apricot with lemon peel highlights and way too much carbonation. The pillowy crown was four fingers after a fairly gentle pour, and isn't shrinking very rapidly. Good thing it has a wonderful texture and is doing a pretty good job in the lace department.

The nose is passable at best. It isn't pungent enough, but at least there are no off-aromas that sneak past the hops. The lineup includes Galena, Summit, Liberty and Cascade. The result is an orange and lemon citrusiness, along with an underlying herbal-earthy vibe.

The Big DIPA... isn't big. In fact, it's one of the weaker beers of this style that I've had in quite some time. Although the bottle is fresh, it tastes like the hops have been mellowing over the past year or so. How is it possible to get a claimed 83 IBUs with such weak hop flavor? And almost no bitterness!

The malt tastes primarily pale, with a hint of something slightly toasted. The grapefruit and orange zest flavors are akin to a scantily hopped APA, not a DIPA. And certainly not a 'Big' DIPA. To be fair, there is a moderate bitterness that accumulates on the tongue over time. No appreciable alcohol makes it an easy drinker... if you don't need much flavor.

Despite initial fears, the mouthfeel isn't too buzzy. In terms of size, it's big for an APA and small for a DIPA. That's another reason why it drinks so easily. Since drinkability is more than 'ease of', the score will stay right where it is.

Blue Frog's The Big DIPA comes in an impressive, silk-screened, wax-dipped 750 ml bottle. Trouble is, none of that matters when the contents of the bottle fail to impress. I hate to be too hard on this 'little' DIPA, but it really does need a lot of work before it can be taken seriously.

BuckeyeNation, Jul 18, 2009
Photo of jdklks
1.55/5  rDev -46.4%

A- Golden amber with a fizzy white head that dissolves itself quickly.

S- Honestly, its pretty tough for beer to smell bad. This is pretty damn bad. Maybe because I was expecting it to smell like a DIPA and it smells more like an under-hopped amber ale.

T- Like the smell suggested, this is no DIPA. It has about as much flavor as a coors light and a similar aftertaste. I can't even describe what I'm tasting because the flavors aren't pronounced enough.

M- Overcarbonated and not thick enough for a DIPA.

D- Not sure if I'm even going to get through this one. It might be my second-ever drain pour (the first being Bud American Ale).

jdklks, May 17, 2009
Photo of ffejherb
3.05/5  rDev +5.5%

750ml bottle into half pint. Thanks to Deuane for sharing.

A - Poured a clear golden/amber body with sparse carbonation and frothy off-white bubbly head that deposited subtle lacing on the glass.

S - Pretty muted hop presence for a DIPA, but I do detect some suggestions of citrus, floral and perfumy hops. Malt character is grainy and sweet with hints of caramel.

T - Initial flavor is sweet and not very hoppy. I get some citrus and floral notes, but the hop flavor is lacking. This definitely comes across as more malty and sweet.

M - Light to medium body, a little thin and watery overall, with a slight oily texture. Slightly dry with mild hop bitterness on the palate.

D - I didn't find this to be very DIPA-like. While it is decently drinkable, it certainly isn't very memorable. I would rank this more as a pale ale on the hoppiness scale. Not overly impressed with this one, especially since there are dozens of amazing DIPAs produced in California.

ffejherb, Mar 22, 2009
Photo of htomsirveaux
3.3/5  rDev +14.2%

750 mL bottle tried 3 Jan 2009.

Poured in a Blue Frog pint glass. Corked bottle is nearly impossible to open, had to fight with it for a good 5 minutes, thought it was going to break off in the bottle. Large tight yellowish head, quickly dissipating. Well carbonated. Slightly cloudy orange gold color. Aroma has odd scent of lemon, butted carrots, caramel and resin. Quite caramel sweet upfront which transitions to a bittersweet hop finish. Some cider/apple flavor in finish as well. Ethanol noticeable throughout but quite warming in finish. Medium body.

Large disparity between me and A on the (total)score, which is unusual (she liked it better). Would not get again at this price (~$9, Ledgers).

htomsirveaux, Feb 13, 2009
Photo of trevormiller
2.08/5  rDev -28%

750 mL corked bottle - fairly difficult to get the damn cork out.

A: A pretty bottle with lots of sediment on the bottom - neat! Pours a cloudy medium amber color with a decent head.

S: Phew! Weird! My immediate impession was Macro Lager, oddly enough. Sort of a sour, off smell.

T: Sort of a spoiled sour cherries caked in yeast taste. Not good.

M: Good mouthfeel, oddly, until it goes down. Then, you're left with a sour chalky burn at the back half of your mouth. Instead of wanting more, I wanted some water to rinse it out.

D: None.

I almost feel like this beer was just labeled wrong ... maybe it's more of a saison or some other variety of sour beer. This tasted nothing like any IPA I've ever had. No thank you!

trevormiller, Feb 04, 2009
Photo of hopdog
3.58/5  rDev +23.9%

22oz bottle shared courtesy of weeare138 - special thanks to Tom for verifying with the Brew Pub that they bottle beer (inside joke there).

Poured a medium amber color with an averaged sized off white head. Aromas of citrus, tropical fruits, and caramel. Tastes of caramel, pine, citrus, and tropical fruits.

Notes from 8/15/07

hopdog, Dec 17, 2008
Photo of xhcadamx
2.98/5  rDev +3.1%

Bought at the Blue Frog Brewpub in Fairfield

A - Cloudy apple juice with a tightly bubbled head. I have never seen a DIPA look like this before.

S - Has a faint cider smell. Maybe some hops. Very lacking for a DIPA

T - Bitterness, carmel malt, biscuit, citrus, and a little yeast. Different but good for a DIPA

M - lots of carbonation and pretty smooth and silky.

D - I have no problem drinking this bottle but I wouldnt grab for another

This beer tastes similar to DFH 90 MIN IPA but only half as good.

xhcadamx, Dec 17, 2008
Photo of popery
2.68/5  rDev -7.3%

A mediocre DIPA with an unforgivable lack of hop flavor. DIPAs need to do exactly one thing right: provide a huge hop experience. Sure, it's nice for the beer to be good otherwise, and I imagine you need to know what you're doing in order to highlight the hops properly. However, it doesn't mean much if you fail to provide a big hop flavor, and Blue Frog's DIPA misses the mark in exactly this way. It's not a horrible beer, but particularly compared to other DIPAs, it's just not very good.

At any rate, it's a nice looking beer with a strong head and good orange color. Unfortunately, it begins to lose points when you bring the glass to your nose. There are some lingering oily hop notes, but they're weak and seriously underwhelming when compared to the giants of the style that have, in my opinion, some of the finest smells in the beer world. The taste is a similar but worse failing. The hops are relatively weak compared to what you would expect from an 8% abv DIPA. For me, it even seemed a bit stale with acrid yeast notes coming through. My bottle was pretty fresh from the store, and while it may have sat on the shelf for some time, I haven't had similar problems with other beers. Of course, I would prefer to taste it fresh as possible at the brewery, but if a beer is that perishable, maybe it shouldn't be distributed in this manner at all. There is some citrus flavor and it's not particularly hard to imagine a good version of the beer being produced. So, I guess I just wish them luck with improving the character and richness of the beer in the future.

popery, Dec 05, 2008
Photo of magictrokini
2.68/5  rDev -7.3%

Kind of a mess. Cloudy orange with a frothy off-white head. Grassy, piney hops, oats, cereal, and grapefruit in the nose. Caramel and citrusy hops are prevalent, but there is also a lot of soap and a metallic bitterness. Finish is earthy and wheaty. Not worth the price.

magictrokini, Dec 05, 2008
Photo of fostwal
2.2/5  rDev -23.9%

This beer is a clear amber color and the smell is not very impressive. Actually it is a rather light caramel and a unique scent that I couldn't place. What really counts is the taste. The label boasts that the beer was overloaded with everything from malt to hops. It definitely is packed with flavor. Though, not all of them are good. The maltiness and hopiness do not work well together. You really have to let this beer breath like a bottle of wine. Even after that, the first sip is not impressive and the aftertaste is very bitter. The carbonation is about average. Overall, its an ok beer to drink, though for $9/750ml, there are much better options.

fostwal, Nov 25, 2008
Photo of jjayjaye
2.1/5  rDev -27.3%

Pours a hazy dark amber color with a huge pale off white head that resists fadig. I've got to say...it smells like as$. I mean i wanted to puke when i stuck my nose in it. The mouth feel is medium to full bodied. The flavor mirrors the nose..i couldn't keep it in my mouth long enough to describe it. I get some honey, and biscuit malts but the total package is a big let down. Amen, for the bottle art..most redeeming characteristic. i recommend avoiding this one.

jjayjaye, Oct 02, 2008
Photo of stumac
4.65/5  rDev +60.9%

Very good beer for such a little brewpub...

pours a vibrant orange color with a white head....the nose is floral hops and pale malts...the taste has a great malt taste!...chewy, powder chocolate, floral hops....very smoothe hop taste....seems more malty than hoppy....delicious

stumac, Sep 10, 2008
Photo of Onslow
3.23/5  rDev +11.8%

I am extremely surprised of the low low scores of this beer, i mean its not the best IIPA around but it was very decent... here we go, Pours a bottled honey colour, with some decent head ... is very balanced (abit strange in an IIPA) is very smooth ... glad to try!

Onslow, Aug 25, 2008
Photo of barleywinefiend
2.08/5  rDev -28%

Picked this up at Oak Knoll Liquor and wish I hadnt. There was a nice list of ingredients on the bottle. To bad I couldnt taste any of them. Other reviews had the same experience as I.
Poured with a deep yellow, light gold with a small white head.Nose was citrus hops and nothing more. Taste was citrus hops and lots of CO2. BAD! Mouthfeel was much of the same, CO2 with a metallic taste. Something went wrong with this batch or bottling went array.

barleywinefiend, Jul 26, 2008
Photo of WillClark
3.25/5  rDev +12.5%

From the 750ml into a fancy pants wine glass, it pours a murky gold with a decent head that presented some stone fruit and a yeastines that reminds me more of a Belgian golden than a double IPA...which is the same feeling I get when I imbibe. The mouth feel doesn't have the big floral feel, nor the "double" bitterness that you'd think came with a DIPA. It's kinda funky, kinda syrupy, and totally confusing.

It's ok. Nothing to get excited about here folks.

WillClark, Jul 06, 2008
Photo of athensbeermaster
3.85/5  rDev +33.2%

BIG huge head from this Dipa!! Nice orange amber color. The nose has fresh mint and citrus aromas.
The taste is very intense with fresh orange and lime citrus flavors. The malt backbone is faint but just enough to hold the hops in check. I detect a minty cilantro taste. with a hint of clove. The mouthfeel is med. body. This brew would be great with some spicy south western dish. HOT green chile!! The drinkabilty would be rated higher if the malt content was higher. Very good ipa with a unique profile. A must try.
at $8.99 you could wait if your on a budget!

athensbeermaster, Jun 10, 2008
Photo of mikesgroove
3.15/5  rDev +9%

Picked this one up in a trade a while back and just got around to trying it over the weekend. The bottle looks great with the 750ml Belgian style bottle coming with a full cork and cage. The frog on front warning that this was going to be a monster, but we shall see.

Appearance - This one poured out a very nice orange amber. Very cloudy with a ton of haze and suspension to it. A huge head of at least three inches in height rose up over the top pretty much immediately. It hung around for a good few minutes before becoming rocky and cratering. Even then it took another few minutes before it decided to finally let down to a half inch layer that crossed the top throughout the entire session. Copious side glass lace throughout. It really had the look of a big Belgian as opposed to a BIG IPA. Nevertheless, we shall see.

Smell - The aroma followed along with where the look was going. I picked up almost no hops off of this one. If there were some, there was extremely light, more of a side effect if anything. This was a Belgian, with tons of grains present, and what hops there were being more like a hay or grass then anything else. Some light yeast aromas, but very bland in nature, and somewhat earthy No real big anything going on here.

Taste - The flavor was a Belgian Pale all the way, and not even that good of one to be honest. It was mostly grain with some light yeast notes, nothing really extravagant or different here. Some light peach maybe way in the back. There was a slight bit of hoppiness in the finish, maybe some grass like notes, but again nothing really insane or crazy here, just some nice hop notes. I was not really impressed here, as even if this was trying to be a hopped up Belgian it was a pour job at it, just too much grainy yeast flavors.

Mouthfeel - Way over carbonated for the style. It was literally exploding with carbonation the entire time. Huge amounts of bubbles rippling throughout it were the main cause for concern here as was the overwhelming head that would not fade. Just overblown for me.

Drinkability - The only thing it really had going for it was the look and the fact the alcohol was completely hidden here. There was literally no trace of it to be found which was nice, however it was too carbonated to really be drank the way the style is supposed to.

Overall, this was not a Double IPA, I think it was an attempt at a hopped up triple, but that did not go right either. Not the worst thing I have ever had by a long shot, just not something I would care to try again. I think I will pass on this one if it comes by.

mikesgroove, Apr 25, 2008
Photo of Vancer
3.48/5  rDev +20.4%

This big ol' DIPA in a corked and caged 750, sent as NO BS BIF 3 from the great one - Soloman420. Many thanks again.

After 10 minutes prying that death cork out, she poured a clear amber with a massive head of thick ivory. Plenty of piney citrus in the aroma - west coast style for sure. Subtle notes of woody pine mix in with the quaff. Tasty brew, but not as lip smacking juicy as I've come to expect from the CA. brews. This would be a very nice English IPA, as the 8% is non-existent in the taste along with the wood resins.

Needs a big more ummph and piney/citrus hops to reach <BIG> DIPA status, but still very nice and I enjoyed every drop.

Vancer, Apr 13, 2008
Photo of scottoale
3.28/5  rDev +13.5%

750ml. cork/caged brown bottle with gold and white silk-screened full wrap label. It pours an orange-gold with a small white head that slowly builds.

The smell is sweet flowery citrus and a slight piney hop. The taste is much the same with a notable bubblegum flavor to it. More sweet than hop bittery, the hop residuals at the end of the bomber did have a bit of bite.

Light to medium in body, the mouthfeel a bit watery thin with some tingle on the tongue from the carbonation and hops. Definetly worth a try, but it's not as BIG as it's label suggests.

scottoale, Mar 25, 2008
Photo of watchnerd
3.6/5  rDev +24.6%

750 ml bottle. Poured a cloudy amber color with a modest head and trace lacing.

Aroma was subdued, but the citrusy smell of West Coast IPA hops was there, although not as strong in your nose as in other specimens.

Taste of citrus hops and alcohol esters. Not much yeast detectable, nor particular bitter, so most of the hops must be going into the aroma. But, overall, fairly quaffable.

The 8% ABV isn't exactly hidden given the alcohol taste evident, but it's not in your face, either. Fairly drinkable for a highish ABV ale.

watchnerd, Feb 14, 2008
Photo of ChainGangGuy
3.18/5  rDev +10%

Appearance: Pours a hazy, orange-gold body with a thin, fizzy white head.

Smell: Aroma of biscuity malts, orangey citrus, and good ole fresh, clean soap.

Taste: Biscuit malts with a toffee-like sweetness. Citrusy, soapy hop flavors. Medium bitterness. Bittersweet finish.

Mouthfeel: Medium-bodied. Medium carbonation.

Drinkability: A very fine presentation with the corked 'n' caged bottle, but what awaited me inside, well...

ChainGangGuy, Jan 31, 2008
Photo of largadeer
3.05/5  rDev +5.5%

Appearance - An amber-colored ale with great clarity and effervescence. Head retention is very solid.

Smell - An even balance of hops and sugary malt. Notes of tropical fruit (banana, mango), spice and a bit of lemon rind. The sweet, fruity aroma really comes out as the beer warms.

Taste & mouthfeel - Fruity, pale malt with overtones of banana and spice. Faintly mineral/metallic. Citric hops come through mid-sip and slowly leave an oily, lingering bitterness on the palate. I'm assuming that a Belgian yeast strain is used here; it has a fruity, sugary character that is distinctly Belgian.

Mouthfeel - Fairly light-bodied, but with a slight oiliness from the hops. Ample but gentle effervescence from bottle conditioning.

Notes - More of a Belgian-style IPA than a West Coast hop bomb. Not bad overall, but somewhat mislabeled.

largadeer, Dec 19, 2007
Photo of supermanjace
4.15/5  rDev +43.6%

Look, I am not the expert that so many of the reviewers here are, but I did read the bottle. Maybe that is my mistake. I picked this bad boy up at the WeHo Bevmo this week, after not finding my first choice Double IPA. I came back to read the reviews here, and I was crushed. Everyone seems to hate it. Fine fine, you'll probably call my review one from the school of lowered expectations exceeded. Perhaps, but my wife agrees, and she is a beer drinker too.

Look, is it a perfect double? Absolutely not. Is it pretty good, and absolutely worth a try, you're damn right. Here's the problem: it's overpriced. Yes there are more fermentables from the mash, and maybe that cost a brewery marginably more, but to charge almost twice a regular IPA for a double (despite the name) is insane. But let's remove that and judge the beer on its merits.

It tastes good. It's 8%, but the alcohol is not overpowering. It's there; you feel it, but it's a very drinkable beer. I think the bottle, and a good portion of the reviews I have read across the net have mentioned it's biscuity tones. I wouldn't expect this, but I do enjoy it. Likely an aspect of its tremendous hop profile, I think it's the mouth's reaction to this. I enjoy it personally. Each sip sits with me. Each smack of the lips reminds me I like it.

The color is a good light amber; cloudy. I think it's bottle conditioning has caused this one to be less clear than something like a Ruination. That's not a weakness to me, as much as a byproduct of bottling the way they did. How clear are your homebrews?

I smell a nice citrus-like nose.

I love IPAs, and I look forward to the time when i can try a 90 or 120 minute from dogfish head, but for now, i think this is an enjoyable entry. here's been the key for me: serve it warmer than you would like. I love a cold beer, but have really enjoyed the hell out of the one at room temperature (well, likely colder, but not by much). Maybe give it a try, and see if it doesn't change your mind-- if you can get it on sale or for the cheap.

supermanjace, Oct 27, 2007
The Big DIPA from Blue Frog Grog & Grill
70 out of 100 based on 64 ratings.