1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Rose - Hair of the Dog Brewing Company / Brewery and Tasting Room

Not Rated.
RoseRose

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
81
good

167 Ratings
THE BROS
79
okay

(view ratings)
Ratings: 167
Reviews: 149
rAvg: 3.57
pDev: 17.37%
Wants: 13
Gots: 2 | FT: 1
Brewed by:
Hair of the Dog Brewing Company / Brewery and Tasting Room visit their website
Oregon, United States

Style | ABV
Tripel |  7.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

Originally known as 'Golden Rose' - discontinued in 2005.

"Rose is inspired by the Belgian Tripel style. It is a top fermented ale which has a deep golden color with a light refreshing body. The beer has a subtle hop profile using the Northwest's finest whole hop flowers. We use Aromatic and Honey malts along with Candy Sugar to give it a unique and fruity character. It is 6% alcohol by weight (7.5% by volume)."

(Beer added by: Mitchster on 02-27-2002)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Rose Alström Bros
Ratings: 167 | Reviews: 149 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of sideshowe
sideshowe

Pennsylvania

3/5  rDev -16%

12-20-2011 16:20:45 | More by sideshowe
Photo of rab53
rab53

Washington

3.5/5  rDev -2%

12-01-2011 06:56:25 | More by rab53
Photo of SourNotes
SourNotes

Minnesota

3/5  rDev -16%

11-14-2011 21:08:11 | More by SourNotes
Photo of Beerandraiderfan
Beerandraiderfan

Nevada

3.13/5  rDev -12.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Amberish color, thick head. Aroma was a little citrusy. At first, I was thinking this might be an ipa or something, based on the appearance.

Taste, all over the place. Hot, yeasty, cloudy, peppery, coriander and citrus still. Bottle says golden rose on it. Couldn't get settled into this stuff. Too pricey and challenging to be drinkable.

Serving type: bottle

08-27-2010 22:50:47 | More by Beerandraiderfan
Photo of kjyost
kjyost

Manitoba (Canada)

2.88/5  rDev -19.3%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Batch 40 - Pours with little head and no lacing atop a brownish red body. When looked at from the right angle, you can definately see the 'rose' they were looking for. Smells really nice, with a flowery and wine like bouquet, with a sweet slightly malty aroma.

The taste is odd. Initially I feel like I am drinking a wine. The lack of substantive carbonation furthers the illusion. No bitterness rather sweet and flowery. Not my cup of tea, but if you like a Sauvingon Blanc wirh little oak this would be up your alley.

Had no clue what this was going to be like, expecting a belgian, and I can taste little of what I traditionally understand belgians to be, no spice or fruit. The hibiscus is overpowering. If I weren't so cheap I may have drainpoured it because it wasn't what I was expecting nor looking for.

Serving type: bottle

04-01-2010 02:42:28 | More by kjyost
Photo of nickd717
nickd717

California

3.9/5  rDev +9.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Bottle from Liquid Solutions.

Pours a very murky amber color with a massive white head that never totally goes away.

Aroma is yeast, apple, sweet malt, and candi sugar.

Flavor is lots of Belgian yeast, candi sugar, sweet malt, sour apple and other light fruits, floral notes, sherry-like oxidation, and spices. Gets better as it goes on and is very complex.

Body is medium with average carbonation and a long, spicy finish.

Drinkability is where this beer suffers a bit. I struggled to get through the 12oz bottle. This has aged very well and is good overall, but is still not one of my favorite HotD beers.

Serving type: bottle

11-23-2009 06:22:54 | More by nickd717
Photo of jgasparine
jgasparine

Maryland

2.03/5  rDev -43.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 1

Bottle Serving- Batch #40:

A- A careful pour yielded a thin cream colored head, which immediately receded to edge lacing... the body was a gorgeous medium orange-amber color, with fine carbonation visible from the top and sides of the glass.

S- Orange marmalade and an intense aroma flower pollen are most prominent on the nose. I'm also getting some phenolic aromas, reminiscent of burnt plastic and slightly medicinal as well. Does not smell like a Belgian Tripel at all... definitely a unique nose... not sure if I'll enjoy the taste.

T- Wow. Tastes like I'm drinking floral-scented liquid soap. Or perhaps liquid potpouri. This is far from a pleasurable taste... and I taste nothing belgian about it.

M- The body is on the thin side... well-attenuated... which is the only thing about it that keeps true to the Tripel style. Despite the thin body, I find it somewhat oily, which is nice... and this is well-complimented with an appropriate amount of soft carbonation.

D- I could only get through about 4oz. of this before I decided it was a drain-pour. Shame. This is the first "bad" beer I've ever had from HotD... and my buddy went through great lengths to bring this back to the East Coast for me.

Note: I this bottle is simply labeled "ROSE". I have noted that other people here have reviewed bottles labeled "GOLDEN ROSE", which I believe is a different recipe altogether... I am surprised to dislike anything from this brewery... perhaps I have had a bad batch? Not many other people here reviewing batch #40...

Serving type: bottle

10-05-2009 13:06:19 | More by jgasparine
Photo of tmoneyba
tmoneyba

Ohio

3.68/5  rDev +3.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Bottle shared by shigadeyo.

Poured clear brown color with an averaqge frothy white head that lasted with good lacing. Complex spicy fruit and yeasty aroma. Medium body with a sticky texture and flat carbonation. Medium to heavy fruity sweet flavor with a medium sweet finish of moderate to long duration with a small alcohol bite.

This is a good sweet beer.

Serving type: bottle

03-20-2009 00:16:15 | More by tmoneyba
Photo of beachbum1975
beachbum1975

Ohio

2.95/5  rDev -17.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

12 ounce brown bottled shared with pwoods last night in our impromptu Hair of the Dog tasting - batch 41, per the label. We never had any beers from this brewer, so it was a nice treat for both of us. (Another!) Thanks go out to bifrostguard for the quality extras!

Pours a clear amber with orange highlights. (This is a tripel?) Minimal tan head leaving light lacing. Minimal head retention.

The nose starts with a bit tart fruit, like cherries and then a way of condensed, sweet malts hit the palate. After further sniffing, I get some candied Belgian sugars.

Taste reflects the nose. Lots of sweet malts, light smoke and a trailing sweet and sour twang. Unique, but what's going on here? Not certain this is a tripel, but interesting none the less.

Overall, I enjoyed this beer, but I was a little confused to its' style, hence the lowered appearance and taste ratings. Very sweet and sour at times..

Serving type: bottle

02-17-2009 15:44:14 | More by beachbum1975
Photo of pwoods
pwoods

Ohio

2.7/5  rDev -24.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

Thanks to beachbum1975 for sharing this.

12oz. brown bottle split between 2 glasses. Batch 41

A: Pours a crystal clear orangish amber. Shortish head that leaves a fluffy skim. Not much lacing.

S: Spicy, fruity. Very sweet malts. An odd alcohol twang, very different. Some apple juice in the nose.

T/M: Very juice, especially apple juice. Some spicy yeast. Malts aren't as sweet as I thought but this up there. Body is a bit thin for the style and carbonation is low.

D: Easy to drink but pretty off style.

Serving type: bottle

02-17-2009 02:03:32 | More by pwoods
Photo of Floydster
Floydster

California

3.63/5  rDev +1.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

12 ounce bottle purchased from the Stuffed Sandwich for seven dollars, batch 24: "Golden Rose", could not find a date on the website but seemed at least three years old if not more, consumed on 1/12/09, reviewed from notes, poured into my small Ommegang glass, color is not so golden, actually a darker orange, thin 1/4 inch bubbly white head that goes away immediately, no lacing, smell is mostly Belgian candi sugar but also has some honey, floral hops, sweet malts, and vegetables, lots of flowery flavors right up front, sweet malt in the middle mixed with fruits like cherries and blackberries, finish has some bread and pepper, gets sweeter as it warms up with spices and wine-like tastes coming to the surface, it is a complex tripel, sweet, slightly spicy, and fruity mouthfeel, medium bodied, good amount of carbonation, taste lingers a little bit as actually gets dryer as time goes on which was odd, could drink a little more than the bottle but it is heavy because of all its different flavors, some booze are present too which is not a good thing because it is a relatively low alcohol tripel, tried this before popping the Cassis version which I enjoyed more than this one to get an idea of what the base beer was like, not Hair of the Dog's best effort but still an above average tripel, would drink again, should continue to age nicely, recommended

Serving type: bottle

02-07-2009 00:35:37 | More by Floydster
Photo of illidurit
illidurit

California

3.03/5  rDev -15.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Cloudy goldenrod color with a nice white head. Lots of esters and phenols on the nose; dehydrated stone fruits, clove, some berries, nuts? Also a big floralness. Taste is yeasty with mealy fruits and peppery alcohol. Dry, astringent, and hot. Weird beer, sort of heavy, not very drinkable.

Serving type: bottle

01-16-2009 05:36:57 | More by illidurit
Photo of corby112
corby112

Pennsylvania

2.83/5  rDev -20.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I was quite disappointed in this beer. The color was an intriguing pale amber but it had a citrus/floral aroma to it. Tasted very light and flowery like the aroma. This brew is inspired by belgian triples but didn't really taste like one in my opinion.

Serving type: bottle

12-02-2008 08:00:20 | More by corby112
Photo of TheManiacalOne
TheManiacalOne

Rhode Island

2.15/5  rDev -39.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

Acquired via trade from biegaman, so a big "Thank you" goes out to him. Poured from a 12oz bottle into a US tumbler pint glass.

A: The beer is a deep amber color, with a thin off-white head that fades quickly and leaves a thin lace on the glass.

S: The aroma is of caramelized malts, Belgian yeast, some spice and a little bit of hops, but none it seems to blend together well.

T: The taste is malty up front with flavors of caramel, brown sugar, some Belgian yeast, a touch of smokiness and a decent hops presence, but again there doesn't seem to be any harmoniousness, which seriously detracts from the complexity that is being attempted here. The malt character is hearty but not too heavy. The after-taste is bitter-sweet.

M: Not too crisp and not very smooth, medium body, medium carbonation, finish is clean.

D: Not very tasty, goes down ok, not too filling, decent kick, not the best representation of style, this one just flat out was not very good at all.

Serving type: bottle

07-10-2008 04:29:54 | More by TheManiacalOne
Photo of jjayjaye
jjayjaye

New York

3.9/5  rDev +9.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

The first 4 of 12 ounces poured gently yields a cloudy golden color with a full finger fizzy white head that is constantly refreshed . Visible effervescence and bits and chunks of suspended goodness. There is a ton more "stuff" where that came from. A good amount of spotty lacing observed. The smell is really good. Light earthy Belgian yeast, Harvest fruits and peppery spice. Well carbonated, the mouth feel has a light texture and body. There is a distinctly sharp peppery note overriding the otherwise fruity apple-pear character. A good drinker, the spicy nature is right on the edge. A really interesting interpretation. Recommended. Thanks goes out to grumpy for this opportunity.

Serving type: bottle

06-01-2008 22:50:30 | More by jjayjaye
Photo of objectivemonkey
objectivemonkey

Minnesota

3.85/5  rDev +7.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Batch #40, into a tulip glass, pours a reddish, copperish, amberish color, with a decent white head to begin with and then some wispy stuff on top, not much lacing. The aroma definitely is different for a tripel, smells kind of funky probably from the beets, don't know what the hibiscus flower would do to this, but the spices most definitely come out, and some vague fruits make up the rest. Taste expounds upon the aroma, a bit tart and then drying, a leafy hop on the tongue when finished, and again, I'm not sure what beets taste like exactly, but I'm imagining that I get them through the middle. Its got some decent body, the carbonation is fair. Overall, its an odd one, can't say I like it all too much, but definitely an interesting take.

Serving type: bottle

04-24-2008 01:11:30 | More by objectivemonkey
Photo of dnichols
dnichols

Washington

3.28/5  rDev -8.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I poured a capped 12 ounce bottle into a tulip.

A: It cloudy, rusty-orange hued amber with a massive off-white foamy three finger head.

S: It had fresh and sweet floral aromas with sweet toasted malt and spicy aromas.

T: It had a creamy malty flavor that included yeasty doughy tastes. There were hints of spicy alcohol and fruity malty flavors.

M: It was a medium bodied brew with a sweet creamy front and and grassy, musty back.

D: It was a bit disappointing given the reputation of the brewery. It had unique flavors that went against type and were unbalanced. An interesting experience but not one I'll repeat soon.

Serving type: bottle

04-14-2008 01:11:05 | More by dnichols
Photo of barleywinebrewer
barleywinebrewer

New Hampshire

3.13/5  rDev -12.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I seem to be hit or miss with this brewery. I bought this as I was curious what they would do with a tripel. Suffice to say this one was strong on the alcohol notes and honey. It stayed just a hair under too sweet so I scored it as noted.

Maybe a honeyed up old ale but far short of a belgian tripel in my opinion. Not one I'd recommend

Serving type: bottle

03-12-2008 20:10:32 | More by barleywinebrewer
Photo of philbe311
philbe311

Pennsylvania

3.48/5  rDev -2.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

A - Dark bronze caramel color, with a 1/2 head... Extremely large amount of unwelcome sediment... I consider myself a rather skilled poorer and find it near impossible to keep the sediment in the bottle... Appearance of so much sediment was worrisome...

S - Fruity with scents of apples, cherries, and pears...

T - Spicy and dry with fruit flavors... Some nutty characteristics... Certain aspects reminded me of a Riesling Wine...

M - Dry but very smooth, very good mouthfeel...

D - The beer would have been quite enjoyable if not for the over abundance of sediment present... The presence of the sediment made an other wise nice beer near undrinkable...

Serving type: bottle

03-03-2008 01:59:22 | More by philbe311
Photo of mcallister
mcallister

Ohio

4.28/5  rDev +19.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

Batch 36

Hazy copper gold in color. Didn't even thing too decant and poured the whole brew into my Gulden Draak chalice. Consequently sediment galore exists. Pours with mass carbonation producing a large whispy head off white leaving lacing here there and everywhere as it fades.

Loads of honey, candy sugar, floral esters, yeast and spicey aromas. Thick with malt and sweet gestures leaning slightly toward clove and hay and pear.

Great flavorful complex beer. Smooth, creamy, thick and delectable. Honey malt is very apparent and plants a tent on the mid palate. Some florl hop flavors are still apparent and blend tremendously taming the malt and candy sugar still. Yeasty finish has a floral spicy quality that is refreshing with a little help from the depth of carbonation that prickles on and on. Apple, pear, and caramel round out things with a Viognier grape peaking it's head.

Serving type: bottle

02-12-2008 22:47:03 | More by mcallister
Photo of Derek
Derek

British Columbia (Canada)

4/5  rDev +12%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Batch 40.

A very unique, Belgian-inspired brew... but a tripel?

A: Hazy reddish-brown; light tan head, some retention & light lacing.

S: Tangy yeast with a little funk, tropical fruit & a light phenolic spicyness.

T: Light fruity tartness with a little yeast funk, tropical fruit, modest bitterness, slight floral spicyness, modest alcohol warmth.

M: Moderate body, well-carbonated, dry finish.

D: Good for its weight.

Serving type: bottle

01-15-2008 02:28:26 | More by Derek
Photo of bobsy
bobsy

Ontario (Canada)

2.98/5  rDev -16.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

Bottle conditioned and enjoyed at Volo. Poured a nice reddy caramel colour, with a rapidly diminishing head. Nose was floral and a aroma I just couldn't nail down. Predominant flavour was equally elusive - is it fruity or is it more vegetable? I looked at the bottle and realized that I was picking up on the beets added to the brew. Not like any other tripel flavour I've ever come across, but recommended. Finish left a nice hoppy dryness. Interesting drink, if only for the novelty value.

Serving type: bottle

01-13-2008 03:49:57 | More by bobsy
Photo of mikesgroove
mikesgroove

South Carolina

4.58/5  rDev +28.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 5

12oz bottle poured into a Tulip Glass

A – Poured a very nice hazy amber with a good two finger head of frothy white foam on top. Very very hazy with some nice streams of carbonation apparent, rippling up to the service. Nice side glass presentation as well.

S – Aroma was richly spiced with a very nice blend of nutmeg, cinnamon, light apples and pears and a touch of hoppiness. Very spicy and full on the nose it definitely gave you a bit of a tickle. As it warmed it did seem to mellow a touch and bring out more of the hop aromas.

T – Fantastically mellow especially for the style. The flavor was full and very spiced with a good amount of hop in the finish. Nice spiced apple and coriander in the flavor as well as a good amount of cereal grain and a touch of peach. Very full profile to try and decipher. Excellent I have to say.

M – Very smooth, and silky almost due to the tremendous amounts of fine carbonation rippling through. Great light texture really let the flavors speak to themselves and gave you a really fine sense of the flavor.

D – Excellent sipper this really went down well. In fact as it started to warm and mellow a tad I found myself taking bigger and bigger sips. Almost no hint of the abv was present at all.

Overall this was excellent, and another winner from the brewery. I am really liking the fine little touches they are putting on all of their brews, it really adds a lot to it. Great beer and a really great experience, I would highly recommend this to anyone.

Serving type: bottle

11-30-2007 00:48:16 | More by mikesgroove
Photo of BeerManDan
BeerManDan

California

2.85/5  rDev -20.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

When poured, it poured a thick hazy amber, reddish hue. No foam in the glass or lace on the side of the glass.

The smell was of spices and whatever. Not really impressed with the aroma for this Tripel.

The flavor was even less than the smell or aroma. There was just nothing there at the finish. It was thick and not a lot going for it.

I am really dissapointed with his Tripel and Hair of the Dog. This is the weakest ale I've tasted from this brewery. Fred and Adam are my best ale's, so I expected the same with Rose. NOTHING!

Serving type: bottle

08-20-2007 00:31:51 | More by BeerManDan
Photo of czechsaaz
czechsaaz

Washington

4/5  rDev +12%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

Aroma is very fruity and floral with lots of base malt. The aromatics are pretty much fermentation by-products. I can't really pick out any hop character.

Color is nice amber and seems almost pink which to me seems appropriate for the name. Very little head, just a small rim around my glass. But there is a pretty good amount of rising bubbles.

Flavor is really interesting. Very fruity, I almost swear I taste cranberries. Some yeasty spicy flavors. Lots of candi sugar. Good malt backbone but also some hop bitterness. Not really the flavor profile I expect in a triple but I like it.

Medium full bodied with a pretty high carbonation level. Playful and even refreshing.

Not at all what I think of in a tripel style but still a very good beer. Reviewed to style, probably wouldn't do well, but screw style. I like this beer.

Serving type: bottle

08-19-2007 04:38:57 | More by czechsaaz
Rose from Hair of the Dog Brewing Company / Brewery and Tasting Room
81 out of 100 based on 167 ratings.