1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

J.W. Lees Harvest Ale (Sherry Cask) - J.W. Lees & Co (Brewers) Ltd

Not Rated.
J.W. Lees Harvest Ale (Sherry Cask)J.W. Lees Harvest Ale (Sherry Cask)

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
91
outstanding

276 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 276
Reviews: 169
rAvg: 4.06
pDev: 15.02%
Wants: 33
Gots: 51 | FT: 5
Brewed by:
J.W. Lees & Co (Brewers) Ltd visit their website
United Kingdom (England)

Style | ABV
English Barleywine |  11.50% ABV

Availability: Winter

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: beveragecaptain on 09-27-2005)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 276 | Reviews: 169 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Archemedies
1/5  rDev -75.4%

Archemedies, Apr 14, 2012
Photo of gpawned
1.5/5  rDev -63.1%

gpawned, Aug 17, 2013
Photo of zrab11
2/5  rDev -50.7%

zrab11, Apr 14, 2013
Photo of shbobdb
2.05/5  rDev -49.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 4 | overall: 1

Well . . . it said that it was conditioned in a sherry cask and . . . it tasted like sherry! My girlfriend likes cream sherries and this beer tasted like a cream sherry that I'd expect to pay around $8 for (that's not a lot for sherry). Yeah, it tastes like a cheap cream sherry. It feels, in terms of mouthfeel, like a fine, full, rich english beer on a delightful beer-engine.

Yeah, not cool. The only thing about it that didn't feel like cheap sherry was the mouthfeel. Not worth it unless you really like sherry.

Oh, yeah. I forgot to mention . . . beer isn't sherry.

shbobdb, Mar 23, 2006
Photo of bsuedekum
2.5/5  rDev -38.4%

bsuedekum, Aug 21, 2013
Photo of GreenWBush
2.65/5  rDev -34.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 1

16 oz. pint on special - $5.50.

This particular beer, served from what could have only been an ancient cask (literally a wood cask), seems to contradict everything I know and love about beer. Its a high-gravity barleywine, aged like scotch, that I just did not like. All signs led to "i'll love this one", but that surely was not the case.

This beer pours out an onyx mahogany with absolutely no head whatsoever, and was completely devoid of lace throughout. The nose is strongly sherry-influenced, to the point that I thought the marking was wrong and this was in fact no barleywine, but a sherry. Loads of alcohol in the nose as well, along with plums, raisins, slight tones of malt vinegar. Oaky, cherry, vanilla tones all come through as it warms from cellar to room temperature.

As nice as the nose was, I was shocked when I gagged on the first tipple. There are just too many clashing cloyingly sweet elements for me to distinguish them all. Rotten fruit abounds. Rich, meaty malt character blended with overly alcoholic oaky, sherry.

It looked and tasted like sherry, with no satisfying elements. The mouthfeel is sweetly cask-like, with a slightly slimy liquefied candy.

I've been defeated by a beer. I will have to have this in bottles to either affirm my lack of sophistication or confirm my suspicion that this cask was way long in the tooth.

I had to gag this down to finish.

GreenWBush, Oct 04, 2004
Photo of fx20736
2.68/5  rDev -34%
look: 2 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Poured from a 9.3 oz bottle into a pint glass,served at cellar temp.

Bronze Orange, small head, signs of decent carbonation. Beer was strained prior to serving which may have reduced head somewhat.

Aroma: I smell mellow alcohol which must be the sherry cask.

mouthfeel: soft and syrupy

taste: cloyingly sweet with a warming alcohol vibe. Like a plum flavored syrup.

Notes: Darker, sweeter with less sediment than the Port version of cask aged JWL Harvest. This is simply too sweet to enjoy.

fx20736, Jan 01, 2012
Photo of MuddyFeet
2.7/5  rDev -33.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Overwhelming. Palate overload. Good God, what is this? Is this a barleywine or a bad sherry or a dessert port? Definitely a dessert beer. This is an instance of something that was good product and having what seems like is a great idea, but it backfires. Poured brown with a slight red tinge it to. Slight bubbly head on top. Nose is like a glass of sherry or port wine. Flavor is all the wine with a slight hop kick towards the end. The bittersweetness also provides a slight curl to the taste. Very heavy in the mouth and oily--almost greasy. Definitely a slow sipping dessert beer. Aging in a sherry barrel destroys this as a decent barleywine.

MuddyFeet, Nov 25, 2005
Photo of Sammy
2.73/5  rDev -32.8%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 2.5

Disapointing version of something I normally like. Big full mouthfeel, but sourish aroma and only average taste. I cellared with for about 20 months and it has a long shelflife. A bit of sherry, but not too complex. Sorry, not finishable. I guess I am not a sherry fan.

Sammy, Mar 28, 2010
Photo of herman77
2.73/5  rDev -32.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

2008 vintage

A: Clear orange amber with a small off white head. No lacing.

S: Lots of honey, molasses, sugar, raisins. Sherry, candied sherry. A tiny bit of oak

T: Wholly hell is this sweet. Just when you think it can't get any sweeter, it does. Pretty much tastes like complex simple syrup. Has a slight oaky, wet tobacco, wet cardboard taste in the finish that isn't pleasant.

M: Fuller body, low carbonation, but there is some left for sure. Sticky.

O: It's just way too damn sweet for me. I would have liked to try the others, not sure if I want to now. But maybe this is just so sweet from the sherry?

herman77, Dec 28, 2012
Photo of mjtiernan
2.75/5  rDev -32.3%

mjtiernan, Jan 11, 2013
Photo of PatYoda
2.83/5  rDev -30.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 2

On the handpull at downtown Indy's BW3. Appearance is a nice deep mahogany with a little bit of foam at first that disappears pretty quickly. Smell is...sweet! A few different types of sweetness combine to create a pretty sickeningly sweet smell. Of course the usual JW Lees toffee and caramel smell is very strong in there, and there is a little bit of malty sweetness, but there is also a strong maple syrup type smell and the sherry cask they aged this in must have been an extremely sweet sherry because it has a very strong influence on this beer. There is also a powerful spiced rum smell in there. The smell is very much in your face and powerful, but not appetizing at all to me. Taste is cloyingly sweet, as expected. There is some definitely depth and complexity here, and I'm sure this is probably what the brewers intended to achieve with this combination, but I can hardly stomach it right now. This is more rich and sweet than almost any dessert I've ever tried. Hardly any balancing bitterness in this one. Mouthfeel is nice and full and slippery without any carbonation. Drinkability is not great. I finished my 10oz goblet and decided that I could potentially enjoy it with dessert, but I definitely won't be ordering one again.

PatYoda, Oct 10, 2005
Photo of Rastacouere
2.9/5  rDev -28.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Golden amber liquid wears no head. Oxidized wine aroma where floral undertones come hidden under strong alcoholic suggestions and milder bread ones. Light liquorice and wood hints. Taste contains a mild grape tartness that is overshadowed by a strong dry wood character, sometimes reminiscent of paper. Bitter alcohol finish imparts an appealing though rough cigar-like aftertaste. Mouthfeel is creamy, full bodied.

Rastacouere, Jan 22, 2005
Photo of seeswo
2.93/5  rDev -27.8%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

2006 bottle. Pours brown with floaties and no head. Ehh. Smells like sugar, apple, caramel. Smells pretty good. Taste is very sweet and smooth in the front - very tasty up front, then the finish dries a bit with a touch of smokiness, though it's still sweet. I can't help but notice the "ham" flavor in the finish. It drives me nuts as it just lingers. Gross. Sugar just hangs out on the tongue with a heavy mouthfeel and almost no carbonation. Not very drinkable because of the ham, but definitely hides booze well. The ham just kills it for me...Hard to get through.

seeswo, Mar 14, 2011
Photo of ConradKenney
3/5  rDev -26.1%

ConradKenney, Jul 11, 2014
Photo of Hellpop65
3/5  rDev -26.1%

Hellpop65, Mar 15, 2014
Photo of wrightst
3/5  rDev -26.1%

wrightst, Aug 12, 2014
Photo of cproioi
3/5  rDev -26.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Poured in a snifter this beer boasts a dark red body with such a little tan head that quickly shrinks to nothing. The aroma is of big sticky malts. Huge sweet fruit notes little to no hops present at all. The taste has faint alocohol notes with a huge malt flavor that reminds me of a lifesaver. Pleasant sweet aftertaste with a large amount of residual sweetness and a slight alcohol warming sensation. This is a sipping beer that would pair wonderfully with a big blue cheese (stilton, anyone?)

cproioi, Apr 24, 2007
Photo of Boilerfood
3/5  rDev -26.1%

Boilerfood, Sep 06, 2013
Photo of meathookjones
3.03/5  rDev -25.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 2

After trying the other 3 cask aged versions I figured this one could use a little time to sit. I guess that might not have been the case. Fairly clear orange with a light tan head that quickly bubbles down leaving no lacing. Very strong syrupy sweet aromas. Some vinous and buttery notes were there but overpowered for the most part by the sweetness. Taste upon first sip was way too sweet. Light fruitiness and more syrupy sweet flavors follow. Light buttery notes before the sweet finish. Cloying but still drinkable. Mouthfeel is pretty thick and sticky sweet. Drinkability not good at all. It was hard enough drinking this bottle let alone ever wanting another one. Oh well maybe this might have been better earlier.

meathookjones, May 02, 2005
Photo of Alieniloquium
3.15/5  rDev -22.4%
look: 2 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

275 mL bottle poured into a Hunahpu snifter. 2009 vintage.

Appearance - Just a hint of a head that got me so excited that I forgot that the chunks would soon start to flow. Sadly, a giant lump of something gross fell into my glass. It burst into smaller chunks and suspended itself into the murky amber liquid. Like a water sample from Lake Erie. Yum.

Smell - Huge sherry aroma. Like an oxidized barleywine, but without some of that cardboard. Harsh alcohol in the back of the aroma. Lots of raisins and sugars.

Taste - Intense sherry flavor up front that fades to raisins and brown sugar. Then the back end kicks in. Bitter cardboard. Rather unpleasant.

Mouthfeel - Syrupy as every other Harvest Ale. The sherry does nothing to cut the sweetness. Definitely a rough finish with the bitterness and the cardboard. Almost a burnt oak flavor.

Overall - Big beer. A sipper. A sugary sipper. It's complex, though. It's one of those beers you can ponder for a while. Maybe the result of the pondering isn't the best, but the activity of drinking it is nice.

Alieniloquium, Oct 12, 2012
Photo of mdfb79
3.15/5  rDev -22.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

2008 vintage, 9.3 oz. bottle poured into a taster glass. Tried side by side with a 2008 Calvados version.

a - Pours a dark reddish amber color with a few bubbles of off white head and light carbonation evident. Darker then the Calvados, and with less carbonation and head.

s - Smells of sherry, oak, clay, light fruity malts, dark fruits, sugar, and molasses. Not bad, but the clay smell is a littl weird. I think I like the Calvados smell a little better as it is a little sweeter and doesn't have that clay smell to it.

t - Tastes of sherry, sweet dark fruits, fruity malts, molasses, sugar, clay, light smoke, and toasted malts. Again decent, but I think I like Calvados better again.

m - Medium body and low carbonation. Thick and some alcohol to it.

o - Overall a decent beer but my least favorite of the variants so far. I like the normal Harvest Ale, and love English barleywine's in general, but for some reason can't get into the variants at all; I really don't think they add anything good to the base beer. This one had some weird clay-like smells and tastes to it. I'd personally rank them the normal Harvest Ale, Calvados, Port, and then Sherry. Wouldn't seek it out again.

mdfb79, Mar 23, 2012
Photo of BeerNinja007
3.18/5  rDev -21.7%
look: 2 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

2005 vintage aged in sherry cask. 9.3oz bottle for $12 at Discount Beverages on Hoosick St in Troy NY. Shared with me by a friend.

A: Tawny brown color, like fresh apple cider. Chunky precipitate is slow to settle, floats slowly around the glass. Thin eggshell head.

S: Thick, heavily aromatic, toffee, molassas, caramel, apples. Sweet.

T: Brown sugar, creme brulee. Sweet. Not hoppy, not very beerish. More like a sweet malty brandy. Barley port?

M: Light carbonation, mostly flat. Thick and syrupy. No alcohol apparent.

D: Thick and sweet.

Obnoxious price does not buy a good review. Disappointing, not recommended. Sure glad I didn't pay for it. Unbelievably overpriced.

BeerNinja007, Jul 07, 2009
Photo of PicoPapa
3.2/5  rDev -21.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

2005 Vintage. 9.3oz bottle. Pours a rusty brown color with tons of sediment floating around. Thin layer of head that dissipates rapidly. Kind of smells like a boozey caramel apple. Strong alcohol aroma. Flavors of caramel, sherry, alcohol, apple, and slightly bready. Pretty boozey tasting. Even with this beer being less than 12oz the booziness make this a sipper for certain. Overall it is an alright brew but the price helps make this time probably the only time I will drink it.

PicoPapa, Mar 07, 2011
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
J.W. Lees Harvest Ale (Sherry Cask) from J.W. Lees & Co (Brewers) Ltd
91 out of 100 based on 276 ratings.