1. BeerAdvocate on your phone?! True story. Try the beta now.

Horny Goat Exposed - Horny Goat Brewing Co.

Horny Goat ExposedHorny Goat Exposed

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
67
poor

109 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 109
Reviews: 43
rAvg: 2.81
pDev: 21.35%


Brewed by:
Horny Goat Brewing Co. visit their website
Wisconsin, United States

Style | ABV
Cream Ale |  4.90% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: KarlHungus on 04-21-2009)
View: Beers (19) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Reviewers
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 109 | Reviews: 43 | Show All Ratings:
Photo of KI9A
KI9A

Illinois

1.4/5  rDev -50.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 1

I can't even bring myself to rate this swill. Terrible attempt at a Saison. My God, it's plain horrible. Tasted like an aborted homebrew...This was a absolute drainpour. The smell is sour, which isn't bad, but, the taste is like a adjunct-corn laced lager, with some kind of funk..not a good funk, mind you, just a nasty, rotten, off flavor.

Serving type: bottle

06-20-2010 19:38:34 | More by KI9A
Photo of thydarkprevails
thydarkprevails

Illinois

1.5/5  rDev -46.6%
look: 1.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

In a bar, bottle. Pours a hazy yellow. Inch thick head quickly shrinks. Aroma is apricot, belgian yeast, and bread. Taste is mild and watery for the style. It works because budweiser and miller lite at my other options, otherwise It wouldn’t. Pretty mediocre.

Serving type: bottle

05-18-2012 11:25:11 | More by thydarkprevails
Photo of KarlHungus
KarlHungus

Minnesota

2.05/5  rDev -27%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

I hope this is the right place to post this beer. The Horny Goat Brewery website states it is in Milwaukee. The bottle states it is in Stevens Point. BA lists the other Horny Goat beers to be from a marketing company in Onalaska. My guess is that the beer is brewed at the Stevens Point Brewery for the company in Onalaska.

This beer pours a cloudy pale yellow color. The head is a quarter inch in height, and recedes withing seconds into no lacing whatsoever. The aroma is like most generic pseudo craft beer lagers. The is a very faint hint of spice, but I have to work to hard to find it that it isn't enjoyable. The taste has some wheatiness to it, but no spice. It is quite bland too. The mouthfeel is medium bodied with high carbonation. Overall, this is a bad beer. The "brewery's" website calls this beer a saison, so I listed it as one even though it tastes nothing like one. In fact this is the worst saison I've ever had. Perhaps, it is more of an American Pale Wheat Ale, but it would be a bad one of those too. I will certainly never drink this again.

Serving type: bottle

04-21-2009 19:02:09 | More by KarlHungus
Photo of beerwolf77
beerwolf77

Wisconsin

2.1/5  rDev -25.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Poured from a bottle into pint glass. Less then a quarter inch of head that dissapated within seconds. Nice golden color cloudy enough to pique my interest.

Smell was faintly sweet a bit of citrus. Yet not very appealing.

Taste wasn't bad but wasn't good either. Maybe a touch of sweetness but no spice. Rather dry. Hardly much flavor to speak of.

Mouthfeel was smooth with a bit of carbonation. Reminds me of any average lite beer.

I guess I could drink a few of these. Only since it's not overly offensive but this is a very boring average beer. Too bad this beer gets so much hype in my area. I had high hopes.

Serving type: bottle

06-12-2009 22:39:17 | More by beerwolf77
Photo of goblue3509
goblue3509

Pennsylvania

2.17/5  rDev -22.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Pours a light yellow very transparent color with little head and no lacing. The smell is very faint of citrus. The taste is once again very faint and of citrus. There is not a lot going on taste and smell wise. The mouthfeel is moderate to moderately high carbonation. The drinkability is below average, there is nothing there to bring you back. It is weak for a farmhouse ale.

Serving type: bottle

07-25-2009 13:48:20 | More by goblue3509
Photo of matjack85
matjack85

Illinois

2.21/5  rDev -21.4%
look: 1.75 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

I picked this up at the Binny's store in Plainfield, IL as part of a build-your-own six pack for $9.99, making it $1.67 for this single 12oz bottle. No freshness date and no information about the beer on the label.

The beer poured a hazy pale yellow color with a ½-finger of white head that dissipated to nothing (not even a rim) in less than 20 seconds. No lacing whatsoever. Not a very pretty beer.

There's not much smell to this. Picking up just a little grain - probably corn and a little wheat.

Weak flavor that's on the grainy side Tastes like corn sweetener, a little lemon citrus, and a mild hop bitterness (13 IBU's).

This is not creamy at all. Light body with low carbonation.

Not much to recommend here. It's drinkable, but not that good of an example of the style.

Serving type: bottle

12-07-2013 05:57:43 | More by matjack85
Photo of bigfnjoe
bigfnjoe

Pennsylvania

2.24/5  rDev -20.3%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 2.25 | overall: 2

Poured from a bottle into a stemless wine glass

A- pours a cloudy shade of yellow with a one finger white head that fades very quickly. The head was a great color, but didn't stick around at all. The beer looks like lemonade. Yikes.

S- slight corny aroma, though it's not very pleasant...true to style, I guess

T- starts a little cloyingly sweet, finish is actually a tad bitter. Tastes a lot like macro swill, to be honest

M- very thin body, moreso than most typical examples of the style

O- just a disastrous cream ale. When done properly, it's a lovely style, but this is just...no

Serving type: bottle

04-25-2013 23:02:37 | More by bigfnjoe
Photo of BeerFMAndy
BeerFMAndy

Wisconsin

2.33/5  rDev -17.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

12 oz bottle poured into a Unibroue Tulip. No date or info.

A - Exposed isn't very exposed as it poured a lightly hazy, still translucent pale golden yellow. Heavy carbonation is constantly streaming up to a non-existant head. About 1 finger of white foam rose up but dropped almost instantly. All thats left is a lacing-less ring of tiny white bubbles.

S - Devoid of any aromas resembling a saison - one of my favorite styles. I get lightly grassy, extremely low-level hops with a minute pinch of spice and a hearty husky graininess. It smells more like a Miller Lite than anything else.

T - The husky graininess overtakes all in a bad way. The flavor is lacking in every aspect and the hops give off a citric hint. Almost no spices but what's there is cheap tasting. Just a bland adjunct-like flavor not worthy of the glass it's in.

M - Smooth up front with a carbonation finish that's just standard. A tiny citrus finish.

D - Lacking of all-out bad in every regard, it's an awful "saison" (if they can even call it that) that may as well be an adjunct lager with a minimal splash of real flavor, this beer needs some serious work. Also, why is it called Exposed anyway? Just part of the whole gimmick I would imagine. I can drink it fine but every time the style "saison" pops into my head I want to pour it out.

Serving type: bottle

09-22-2009 01:14:02 | More by BeerFMAndy
Photo of SickGnar
SickGnar

Pennsylvania

2.33/5  rDev -17.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

A: A sort of Champagne look. An ever so slightly hazy, super pale golden with lots and lots of fast rising effervescent bubbles. Despite bubbly aspect, it still has a minimalist head that barely tries to leave lacing.

S: Sweet husky grain that some bisquity/ crackery notes. Smells more adjunct macro than saison. And what is there, is rather weak anyway. No yeasty nothing, no distinct ester nor phenols. No hops, let alone spicy, peppery, or other character. Not bad per se, but not good and not to the implied style.

T: ummm.... Not a Saison. More like a macro lager or cream/blonde ale... Only some reserved malts - bready and biscuit notes, maybe some light crystal, a bit of wheat, a grainy sweetness that fades to raspy husk, and more than a hint of dms / cooked corn. Picks up a bit of yeast character if bottom of bottle is swirled and drunken straight, if added to glass then not so much. Some spice does come through in the hops that are otherwise grassy and herbal. Rather insipid.

M: Medium to thin body with active CO2 that contributes noticeably to mouthfeel by giving a softness. Finish is barely semi-dry. Not bad, but not the dryness of a saison.

D: Not bad as a summer wheat brew / lawnmover beer. Not great mind you, but passable. As a Saison? Like they say in Wallonia, "Fuggitaboutit!" But even if they called it something else, the rating would not jump considerably.

Serving type: bottle

12-09-2010 21:11:10 | More by SickGnar
Photo of sweemzander
sweemzander

Illinois

2.38/5  rDev -15.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

12oz. bottle poured into an imperial pint. No bottled date. Thanks to BeerFMAndy for the trade!

(A)- Pours a hazy golden yellow color that produced a pure white head with decent retention.

(S)- Tons of grassy wheat with a bit of lemon & burnt toast. Is this really a Saison?

(T)- Some lemon fruit & wheat amidst some roasted corn. Definitely not reminding me of a Saison.

(M)- Good carbonation level & balance. Simple, but tasty enough. Crisp. Very dissapointing when it comes to the style.

(D)- A decent beer that is a terrible beer when it comes to what style it is trying to be. If it were simply an adjunct lager, this would actually receive a much better score, but I cannot give it since nothing besides the appearance reminds me of a Saison.

Serving type: bottle

11-29-2009 19:54:27 | More by sweemzander
Photo of SkitzIrish3
SkitzIrish3

Illinois

2.4/5  rDev -14.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Pours a hazy, deep gold with fizzy head that immediately disappears. Very active carbonation. Wheat smell, very bland. Very thin body, smooth with only traces of wheat and some citrus. No lasting flavor.

Saison? I'm not sure. It would be refreshing after a hot day of work and is HIGHLY drinkable. It goes down even easier than a BMC. For that purpose it serves. However, don’t sit down looking to enjoy something complex when you pour this because in that regard it fails.

Serving type: bottle

07-31-2011 17:17:47 | More by SkitzIrish3
Photo of wheatyweiss
wheatyweiss

Wisconsin

2.42/5  rDev -13.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Poured from a twelve ounce bottle into a cheap plastic hotel water glass. No freshness date.

Pours a medium straw with a decent head and no cloud. Head leaves a small amount of sticky clumps.

Aroma is very light wheat malt with a touch of actual beer aroma. There is the wheat aroma with a rider of corniness?

Flavor is crystal malt, wheaty twang is so weak that there is no discernable malt profile. Malt profile seems over spoiled by adjuncts and dirty water. There is an off flavor of hard minerals and potato starch, this water must not be the cleanest. Finishes like it starts weak to the point of almost being water. There is no wild yeast flavors or aromas. There is no substantial malt profile. There is a very small amount of fruitness.

Mouthfeel is thin. The only thing that this beer has going for it are the soft edged bubbles that give a little bit of lushness to the mouthfeel.

I had to check the website out, since this is listed under a holding, which seems to be slick tongue for a marketing company that buys stuff. Website is full of cheap sexual innuendos and attempts at machismo grabbing manhood jabs. Weak to say the least. I checked the Brewmaster's name hoping he wasn't associated with any real craft breweries under contract and I was right, he's not.

Save yourself the frustration, this is a beer for frat boys that want to laugh like idiots at the labels. Bad.

Serving type: bottle

06-30-2010 21:53:58 | More by wheatyweiss
Photo of jsprain1
jsprain1

Minnesota

2.45/5  rDev -12.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

A- Pours a shade darker than golden. Head is one finger and white. It looks like it's going to last, but then it falls down.
S- Smell is of pear, peach, a bit of lemon and just a touch of a coriander/pepper aroma.
T- Wow, where did the grassiness come from? It is overwhelmingly grassy. There is a faint lemon and pepper flavor in the finish, but otherwise it is overwhelmingly grassy.
M- Not nearly as sturdy as this style should be. It is almost foamy.
O- It's a nice idea but it's just not a good beer. It looks and smells nice, but then when you drink it it's grassy and just an odd mouthfeel. I'll pass.

Serving type: bottle

09-14-2011 02:10:18 | More by jsprain1
Photo of beerthulhu
beerthulhu

New Jersey

2.55/5  rDev -9.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Beer#6 from sampler pack. Another stab at a Belgian style.

A: Pale straw blonde coloring shows a small haze in the glass. The head is good on the pour, chalky white, a finger high, but fails to hold and collapses to a skimpy covering of film right before the eyes. On the way no down it fails to cling or lace. The effervesce is strong, medium dense, and quickly paced matching their pale in terms of presentation.

S: Dull and lack luster aroma, pale dry wheat and dry lemon peel. Vague hints of dried apple. Neither musky nor pungently fruity with a scent to light to appreciate.

T: Pale wheat, dry grapefruit with some grassiness. A bit watery with some apple-citrusy notes. A bit of sour funk with training wheels comes on the end but really nothing to write home about nor compare to Belgian standards. Tastes like a watery pale wheat. Musky? Hardly. Disappointing no doubt.

M: Light bodied, starts off crisp enough but quickly turns flat and boring.

O: Again another feeble attempt at a Belgian style it probably has no business to attempt when it can hardly handle the basic styles. You can probably blind taste these beers and struggle to define style. If you cant come close to style you should probably leave well enough alone. Fairly boring limited appeal no repeat quality. Exposed, yeah as another leinenkugel.

Serving type: bottle

08-11-2011 22:33:43 | More by beerthulhu
Photo of Gavage
Gavage

New Jersey

2.55/5  rDev -9.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Appearance: Pours a cloudy light golden yellow color with a 1/4" head. No lace develops.

Smell: some soft grasss and a hint of earthiness is all you can detect.

Taste: light grass, pear, golden apple, a hint of yeast, a hint of pepper, and a touch of bitterness.

Mouthfeel: medium bodied. Lightly crisp throughout. Short aftertaste.

Overall. Not a true farmhouse or saison as the style suggests. A basic macro type beer here.

Serving type: bottle

10-22-2011 21:56:33 | More by Gavage
Photo of mfnmbvp
mfnmbvp

Illinois

2.55/5  rDev -9.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

12 oz. bottle. No bottled on date present. Uncapped and poured to a Boulevard tulip. This will be my first beer resembling the cream ale style, so I'm not too sure what to expect.

A - Pours an extremely cloudy lemon color. Looks like a more full-bodied version of a Miller Lite or some other such swill. Virtually no head on top, with a couple of bubbles stuck to the sides of the glass.

S - Again, on the track to resembling such swill as a Miller Lite or a Miller Genuine Draft. Smells of carbonated chemically treated corn husk with perhaps some vague hint of unrecognizable spice buried in the end. Some very vague citrus note is present in there, also. The "cream" flavor really only begins to present itself by the time the beer has warmed up significantly, and you are practically finished with it.

T - Resembles the smell almost to a tee. Not nearly as carbonated or bloating as I would have expected, judging by the quality of the smell. Definitely tastes very corny and mealy. Dry finish. Not a whole lot of flavor to be had out of this one, though. Cream ale? Doesn't taste at all how the style makes you think it would taste like. Very faint hint of citrus at the end, and a faint cream taste near the end as the beer warms up.

M - Mouth feel is good. Nice medium body, and nicely balanced. Again, very dry in the finish. No real flavor was there in the first place, so nothing really lingers about.

Overall, this brew tastes more like a well-made lager than it does a "cream ale" although this was the first one I've had. Nothing special, more like a quality Miller Lite or Bud Light than it is an actual "craft" beer. Still a step above mass produced swill, but not great by any means, but I would drink it again if I had the chance.

Horny Goat Exposed ---2.5/5

Serving type: bottle

01-19-2013 04:02:10 | More by mfnmbvp
Photo of Onenote81
Onenote81

North Carolina

2.6/5  rDev -7.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Extra received from BeerFMAndy in a recent trade. Thanks!

Poured into my pint glass. Pours a hazy very-pale yellow with a thin white head on top. Disappears to a sheet on top. Leave no lace. Smells of grains, buttered corn, and a splash of lemon zest.

Moderate body with a nice carbonation kick with each sip. Carbo. level is medium/high. Now the flavor is a conundrum. This tastes exactly what a crisp American lager would taste like, a good one at that. Plenty of buttery grains in the mouth, some light citrus, and a light pop of bitterness on the finish. If this was labeled as a lager, I would rate it a 'B' minimum, but as a Saison, this is way off. I can taste very light yeast and funk in the aftertaste, but it is so faint, it may be my imagination. This one needs some work, or at least a re-styling.

Serving type: bottle

11-02-2009 00:50:03 | More by Onenote81
Photo of arboristfish
arboristfish

Wisconsin

2.6/5  rDev -7.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

The appearance of the beer is a hazy white, with a frothy head. The aroma smells of pale sweet malts with a hint of fruit. The taste is bland. There is a faint sweetness that comes through but overall nothing is standing out. The mouthfeel is light, and I guess you could consider it drinkable.

Serving type: bottle

11-17-2010 23:59:14 | More by arboristfish
Photo of climax
climax

Missouri

2.6/5  rDev -7.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

The pour exposed a cloudy pale lemon yellow color. The fizzy white head was pretty solid, and barely receded.

The aroma is subtle, nothing stands out in general but lemon, yeast, wheat, and a touch of noble hops. The fruity flavor typical of the style is pretty much absent, but the complexity is acceptable.

The flavor is an extension of the nose, not a whole lot there. It's quite tart with notes of lemon and bitter strawberry puree, thus the fruit flavors emerging. It finishes with soft wheat.

The carbonation adds modest crispness, but not enough to saver this one, as it is pretty watery. It's soft and smooth but there's just no body here.

Once all is said and extracted, I could definitely leave this one behind.

Serving type: bottle

07-13-2011 22:35:27 | More by climax
Photo of taez555
taez555

Massachusetts

2.63/5  rDev -6.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

This beer poured an extremely clear and dull pale yellow body with a small white head.

Nose was very faint with only some mild malt touches.

Taste is light bodied and rather carbonated. Very classic macro lager sort of taste but with a mild touch of citrus, some non sour lemon juice and a mild touch of wheat. Very simple with not much of a hop taste or bitterness at all. Little mild touch of earth. Ends very clean.

Hmm. It says farmhouse ale, but this alll macro lager with a splash of american wheat beer. Sorry guys, it's an easy drinking lawnmower beer, but not even close to the style.

Serving type: bottle

01-23-2011 21:57:32 | More by taez555
Photo of scruffwhor
scruffwhor

Illinois

2.65/5  rDev -5.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 4

Pours a bright, but faintly hazey sunshine and hay color. Quickly receding two finger head down to a nice film of foam. Pretty good bubbling too. The aroma i faint toasted malts and even more faint spice aroma. Pretty bland smelling overall, makes me think of an attempt at spicing up a blonde ale. The taste is a weak farm house spice with pilsner malts. This beer seems more like a keller bier than a saison. Liked a lightly spiced lager. Very easy to drink, but doesn't fit the style.

Serving type: bottle

07-25-2009 17:12:17 | More by scruffwhor
Photo of barczar
barczar

Kentucky

2.68/5  rDev -4.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Pours a clear straw color with a fairly solid one inch white head that dissipates into a thin ring of foam, leaving no lacing.

Aroma is dominated by sweet corn and grain, slightly bready, with notes of herbal hops.

Flavor follows suit, mostly grainy, with herbal hops, almost tea-like, rounding out the finish. Sweet corn is present, as well as a bit of a tangy taste, slightly metallic.

Body is moderate, a touch light, perhaps, with fairly high carbonation. There's astringency in the finish.

Overall, a pretty lackluster brew. The tangy note and astringency detract from what could be a decent beer.

Serving type: bottle

07-27-2012 04:00:21 | More by barczar
Photo of Ricochet
Ricochet

Ohio

2.68/5  rDev -4.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

A: Cloudy yellow, no head and tiny lace.
S: Not much. Just like the Blonde. Cooked grain, slight sweet.
M: Not as much bitter as the Blonde. More of a grain taste. Other than the sweet honey note of the Blonde, this seems the same.
T: See above. Is this the same beer? Bit more alcohol in the profile and maybe a bit more of the grain/corn. A touch of butterscotch.

O: Vaguely a cream ale. Not bad, but for the style, a bit of a miss.

Serving type: bottle

12-05-2012 03:57:03 | More by Ricochet
Photo of SykDoc
SykDoc

Wisconsin

2.7/5  rDev -3.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured from a bottle into a tulip. It pours a slightly hazy straw color. A 1/4 inch white head forms and reduces leaving a partly cloudy lacing. Carbonation is readily visible.

The aroma is a bit unusual with a musty funk. There are some yeast and citrus characters with an almost moss like scent coming behind that.

The taste is primarily wheat with some lemon popping up and not a whole lot more. Minimal spicing if I look for it.

The mouthfeel is medium bodied. Carbonation is on the higher end but cleans up the flavor or lack thereof. Pleasant citrus dryness at the end and it goes down fairly cleanly.

Overall, this is a modestly enjoyable beer. It does not fit the style much but goes down and doesn't make me regret the swallow.

Serving type: bottle

04-19-2010 00:01:22 | More by SykDoc
Photo of joe1510
joe1510

Illinois

2.73/5  rDev -2.8%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

12oz Bottle
$6.99 6-Pack
Steve's, Madison

Exposed flaunts a lemon yellow body with enough haziness to keep me from seeing the logo on the other side of the glass. Straw golden highlights this beer when held up to the window and a dollop of perfectly white head snaps to attention atop the body. Tiny carbonation bubbles stream to the surface and meet the fading head. It settles at a nice cap and leaves some thin lacing down the glass.

If the smell is any indication I don't know how much of a saison this beer actually is. Sugar cookie sweetness combines with an almost cooked corn quality (may be wheat).A touch of earthiness and a zing of lemon peel. The smell isn't all that bad but it's hardly saison at all. To be perfectly honest I don't know what I'd call it. It reminds me of an American-style lager with some American wheat components tossed into the mix.

The flavor is basically the same. A touch of some spiciness that must be from the yeast used. Snappy lemon comes along and leaves just as quickly. Sugar cookie sweetness and a faint touch of that corn comes back as well. There's a wheat twang coming through as this warms a bit. I think the wheat is what steered me in the direction of corn. This beer isn't terrible but no way is it saison worthy. More of a glorified macro type of brew.

The mouthfeel is soft with a touch of fizz on the swallow. The body has a moderate weight to it and seems to fit the beer pretty well.

I could and actually will drink a few of these in a row. It's not a super impressive beer but it's easy drinking and fairly enjoyable.

This, for some reason, kind of reminds me of a Sam Adam's Summer ale. It's not quite as floral or wheaty but there are similarities. This is no saison and that's where the low scores come in, what it is, is an easy summertime drinker.

Serving type: bottle

06-07-2009 20:47:28 | More by joe1510
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Horny Goat Exposed from Horny Goat Brewing Co.
67 out of 100 based on 109 ratings.