1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Horny Goat Hopped Up 'N Horny - Horny Goat Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
Horny Goat Hopped Up 'N HornyHorny Goat Hopped Up 'N Horny

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
71
okay

248 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 248
Reviews: 81
rAvg: 3.02
pDev: 18.87%
Wants: 2
Gots: 12 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Horny Goat Brewing Co. visit their website
Wisconsin, United States

Style | ABV
American IPA |  6.30% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: KarlHungus on 04-21-2009)
View: Beers (23) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 248 | Reviews: 81 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of jenray
jenray

Texas

3/5  rDev -0.7%

11-25-2011 15:03:29 | More by jenray
Photo of drpimento
drpimento

Wisconsin

2.35/5  rDev -22.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

I let this warm some out of the fridge. Poured with an average sized off off white, short lived head and some lace. Color is a clear amber with a couple of slow bubble trails. Aroma is wet grain, malt. Flavor is similar to nose, plus some sweetness and carbonic tang; not much hop. Body is ok and so is carbonation. Finish is like flavor and quite short.

Serving type: bottle

10-24-2011 03:30:11 | More by drpimento
Photo of vette2006c5r
vette2006c5r

South Dakota

2.17/5  rDev -28.1%
look: 3 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Horney Goat Hopped up 'N horney pours a almost hazy golden color, with very little head. The smell is skunky, and smells like a cheap euro lager. The taste is watery, pale, more malty then hoppy. Not very good carbonation, not too easy to drink, not sure I would like another, leave an offesnive taste. Overall this is just an avoidable one, tastes cheap, I hate to not like these really small brews, but this one isnt good.

Serving type: bottle

09-24-2011 03:23:45 | More by vette2006c5r
Photo of normalbeerguy
normalbeerguy

Minnesota

2.58/5  rDev -14.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Pours a nice dark orange from a 12 oz bottle.

Smell is slightly floral with an equally strong bread aroma.

Slight hop taste at first that blends into a malt sweetness. Some lingering hop bitterness after swallowing.

Medium to light mouthfeel.

Overall this beer is OK, but not impressive.

Serving type: bottle

09-13-2011 22:51:58 | More by normalbeerguy
Photo of beerthulhu
beerthulhu

New Jersey

2.98/5  rDev -1.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Beer #5 from sampler pack and hoping for some redemption, after all how hard is it to load up on the hops, dare I speak to soon?

A: A frothy off white head sits a finger high atop a Bengal tiger orange body that had a sharp clarity and a steady light rise of effervesce. The lacing is well enough, providing adequate coverage. So far this is, perhaps the highest rating of any category I think I awarded any of their beers. A tick above average regards.

S: The nose had dry flowers, herbal scents of oregano along with some dried orange peels. A ever so slight mention of garlic was also picked up upon, a dash of summitt hops? The strength was light as with most of their beers but at least had a flash of some mentionable character for a change.

T: Again as with most of their beers things start off watery. After a surprising decent start the more things change, the more they stay the same. Dry herbal notes, dry lemon grass, thing turn a bit fuller on succeeding sips, with some signs of dry toasted grains and pine giving this just enough ummph for average credit here.

M: Light bodied, a bit washy on longer holds, and I do mean washy. Dry pine afterthoughts are light on the mention while things take a step back here.

O: Overall average is perhaps a bit generous, but it doesn’t totally turn you off flavor wise, just disappoint with a less then adequate show of hops and malts. Small flashes of dry hoppiness, toasted grain ad hops manage to come through but the name cashes a check (hopped up and horny) that the beer just cant deliver on. I could go for a second here, a rarity with their other beers, but comes with a shrug and a why not if nothing else is available though reluctantly and unethusiastically.

Serving type: bottle

08-11-2011 22:30:09 | More by beerthulhu
Photo of SkitzIrish3
SkitzIrish3

Illinois

3.03/5  rDev +0.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours amber with head deteriorating quickly and leaving some light lacing along the glass. Hops smell musty. Citrus, floral, bready, and thin taste. Not a special beer, but refreshing, highly drinkable and, something you don't see often with average beers: appropriately priced.

Serving type: bottle

07-28-2011 22:33:27 | More by SkitzIrish3
Photo of climax
climax

Missouri

2.98/5  rDev -1.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Well, this one begins as a proper pale should. It's clarity in the amber body is pretty good, and the head is quite large and impressive. The light foamy mass sinks slowly as it leaves webby clumps of lace.

The downfall begins with the aroma. As far as hops goes, it's got about as much kick as Coors. Fizzy lager aromas, with just the tiniest poke of hops (if I didn't know it was a "pale ale" I probably wouldn't have even noticed).

Fortunately flavor is better, albeit not much. The hops do make an appearance with resiny pine flavors and a definite floral finish. It's not the cascade goodness that gets ME hopped up and horny.... Aside from that and a dash of bready caramel malt, I'm left wishing for more.

The body is pretty thin, but it has a nice slick feel and good carbonation to keep it from seeming to diluted. I'm not sure if they just skipped the final hopping for the aroma, or if they're just trying to appeal to the masses (more than likely both). It's more a disappointment than anything.

Serving type: bottle

07-12-2011 23:09:40 | More by climax
Photo of MammothBrew
MammothBrew

Illinois

2.65/5  rDev -12.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Poured into a pint glass.

A: Pours a clear, very light orangish/amber color. White head that measures one finger. Nice retention.

S. Somewhat faint. Mostly getting citrus, malt, and mellow hops.

T. Again, very faint. Taste the hops upfront but that quickly dies down to a watery citrus and malt flavor.

M: Light bodied with low to medium carbonation. Very watery. Pretty weak.

O: I didn't necessarily enjoy this beer. With that said, I'd take it over BMC any day. I'd drink it at a cookout if it was offered, as it seems somewhat quenching and sessionable. This might be a good beer to introduce to the BMC crowd.

Serving type: bottle

07-09-2011 22:20:40 | More by MammothBrew
Photo of emmasdad
emmasdad

Colorado

2.5/5  rDev -17.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Thanks to schmittymack for sharing this one with us at my house. Poured a dark golden color with a little white head. Aromas of biscuit, citrus and light pine. On the palate, this one is medium bodied and kinda flat. Flavors of biscuit, crackers and light citrus.

Serving type: bottle

06-08-2011 05:06:02 | More by emmasdad
Photo of Schmittymack
Schmittymack

Colorado

2.53/5  rDev -16.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Shared this one at Dan's on Saturday. Poured a fairly clear golden color with a creamy white head that didn't last too long. Slight aroma of malt and citrus. Taste was pretty average at best: very slight citrus, malt, biscuit, and no real bitterness in the finish. Not a drainpour by any means but not too impressed. Glad I was able to try it but that's about it.

Serving type: bottle

05-10-2011 07:59:55 | More by Schmittymack
Photo of taez555
taez555

Massachusetts

3.23/5  rDev +7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

This beer pours a golden orange body with a small white head.

Nose is simple and malty, but has a nice mild citric hop smell.

Taste is medium bodied leaning on light with very smooth body. Taste has a very strong cracker and caramel malt taste to it. Hops are very present, but not overwhelming, with a more just bitter flavor than any strong defined citric hop. Very hoppy though, as far as a MOR IPA goes, but not a pallette killer by any means. Ends with a lingering malt and mild hop taste.

Decent beer, it's got some hops in it. Very much an old school mid 90's type "micro brew" IPA. Nothing over the top, just a hoppy drinkable ale.

Serving type: bottle

03-31-2011 22:47:55 | More by taez555
Photo of sleepysmurf
sleepysmurf

Minnesota

3.35/5  rDev +10.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

The color was golden and it was very clear with a soapy and creamy, bright white head. It had a very light earthy hop aroma with a nice malty smell.

The body was ok, and the mouthfeel was slightly carbonation crisp. The carbonation was the only thing noticeable up front. The hoppiness seemed a bit earthy and piney, well worth the money I spent on this, but would not go out of my way to pick one up.

Serving type: bottle

03-06-2011 04:38:17 | More by sleepysmurf
Photo of Egomachine
Egomachine

Minnesota

3.88/5  rDev +28.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Has a nice amber color, at first I felt it had fairly weak flavor attributes all around, but ounce it warmed up a bit the flavors really started to pop. Very citrus- ey hop flavor. I would drink this again if it was around, but I wouldn't make a special trip to get it.

Serving type: bottle

03-06-2011 04:37:56 | More by Egomachine
Photo of JamnesCameron
JamnesCameron

Illinois

2.4/5  rDev -20.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Poured into a MJ tasting glass.

Pours a clear orange/amber color with about a finger or two of white head that drops rather quickly.

Aromas of light citrus, orange, grapefruit, not much malt character. A little "musty"

Flavors of light bitterness, light malt, rather understated in all aspects. Faint citrus, grapefruit notes. Flinty. Finish is quite short, with nothing really standing out. A bit of a one dimensional beer.

Mouthfeel is thin, almost watery.

Drinkability is low. There is nothing much to distinguish this beer. Muted in every aspect, bitterness, maltiness, mouthfeel. Best part is the appearance.

Serving type: bottle

03-06-2011 02:54:20 | More by JamnesCameron
Photo of OWSLEY069
OWSLEY069

Pennsylvania

3.25/5  rDev +7.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Pours a clean orange-ish color with an off white head. In the aroma, hops, starting big to mild. In the taste, pine to mango like hops, and a nice malt presence. A hop smoothness and medium bodied mouthfeel, with a semi dry hop in the aftertaste. Nice hops, but mellow. Decent, but not fantastic.

Serving type: bottle

02-26-2011 18:33:16 | More by OWSLEY069
Photo of tjsdomer2
tjsdomer2

Illinois

3.13/5  rDev +3.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

Appearance: Good gradient of colors here. Ranges from dark orange to light golden yellow. Thick carbonation. Lacing and foam are only average.

Smell: Good peppery smell. Gives this pale ale a nice bite to it. Some spiced apple as well. Very mild and subtle.

Taste/Mouthfeel: Only a slight bit of hops that fizzles out pretty quickly, making this pretty watery. I do detect some nice notes of sour banana though.

Drinkability: A relative lack of excitement leaves more to desire. A good thirst quencher though.

Overall: A refreshing beer that comes across clean and more like a light lager. Kind of reminds me of Sam Adams Light with less punch in the flavor.

Serving type: bottle

01-12-2011 00:34:24 | More by tjsdomer2
Photo of kkoz
kkoz

Illinois

2.17/5  rDev -28.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

The color was golden and it was very clear with a soapy and creamy, bright white head. It had a very light earthy hop aroma with a nice malty smell.

The body was light and watery, and the mouthfeel was slightly carbonation crisp. The carbonation was the only thing noticeable up front, followed by a bit of a bready maltiness. The hoppiness seemed a bit earthy and piney, but also kind of stale.

This would probably go with almost any food, as the flavors were fairly neutral - pizza, burgers, fries, etc. The hop flavor was no where near as big as the name would suggest, so the hop flavor wouldn't get in the way of any other flavors.

I'm not sure how long it was on the shelf before I got it, and I suspect it may have been there a while, as the hop flavor was not as big as the name suggested. It even tasted a little bit stale. While it was a bit watery, and easily drinkable, it's likely not one I would try again if given the chance.

Serving type: bottle

12-13-2010 03:24:11 | More by kkoz
Photo of richkrull
richkrull

Wisconsin

3.05/5  rDev +1%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

I must admit that I'm pretty new to craft beers and as such, my tastes need to mature a little bit. Pale ales are still pretty strong to me.

That being said, this beer is pretty good. It has a good classic ale flavor I wouldn't mind trying again.

Serving type: bottle

12-08-2010 03:48:03 | More by richkrull
Photo of BlueCat1
BlueCat1

Wisconsin

2.15/5  rDev -28.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

This being a local brewery there was a lot of hubbub about the quality of the beers. Unfounded, in my opinion. I always start with the IPA offering at any brewery because that's my penchant. This one was light in color with larger carbonate bubbles. The first taste was weak so I tried another after waiting a bit to see if it needed to settle. No luck. Weak malt and weak hop taste. No mouthfeel to speak of. Would not try again and I'm wondering who I can give the remaining bottles from the 6 pack to!

Serving type: bottle

10-15-2010 23:28:00 | More by BlueCat1
Photo of htomsirveaux
htomsirveaux

Texas

2.53/5  rDev -16.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

12 oz. bottle tried 9 Jul 2009. Courtesy of R&S, thanks!

Served in the 0.4 L Hutthurmer mug. Medium sized parchment colored head. Very lightly carbonated. Clear dark honey color. Aroma is sweet and syrupy, not getting a lot of hop aromas. A fast upfront bite of hoppiness that quickly fades, then becomes kind of caramel sour. Light watery body. Light alcohol.

Kind of blah overall.

Serving type: bottle

09-06-2010 15:27:04 | More by htomsirveaux
Photo of Brent
Brent

Kentucky

2.9/5  rDev -4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Pretty underwhelming. Poured a bright copper with minimal head even on hard pour. Up front a bit tart, almost sour. No grain notes, but at the same time the hopping was reserved and bland. Finish was clean. I get the feeling the brewer relies more on the novelty of the name rather than the beer itself for sales.

Serving type: bottle

08-30-2010 15:25:35 | More by Brent
Photo of DukeofAle
DukeofAle

Iowa

3/5  rDev -0.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Of course it compares poorly to IPA's - because it's not one. It's an APA, and it doesn't compare well to those, either. Very mild. For an ale labeled "hopped-up" it isn't very hoppy. Mediocracy rules! Discovered on a recent trip to St. Cloud, MN. Check out Cash Wise liquors while in town.

Serving type: bottle

07-30-2010 23:26:29 | More by DukeofAle
Photo of IPASetter
IPASetter

Michigan

2.17/5  rDev -28.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

To even put this in a category with other IPA's should be a crime but here we go:

A- Dark golden color with a head about an 1/4 inch, that had no retention and created no lacing. Some carbonation occurring throughout.

S-Not much here a faint smell of hops

T- Had a very light hop taste that was almost kind of watery.

M- Pretty light in the mouth with little carbonation occurring.

D- If your new to IPA's then this might be a beer for you other wise steer clear of this one. IPA fans will be highly disappointed you spent money on this.

Serving type: bottle

06-15-2010 01:42:36 | More by IPASetter
Photo of beerman207
beerman207

Kentucky

3.25/5  rDev +7.6%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Wow - been a long hiatus. Have lots of notes to enter but figured I'd sit down and review a few live tonight. The name of this brew was pretty cool so I had to try it.

A: Looks quite clear for an APA - a little too clear for my tastes. Head doesn't stick around long but is white while it lasts

S: Some faint citrus in the nose along with some strong malt presence

T: Barely a hop presence in this one but the result is a brew that goes down very smooth and has a lot of malt and some sweetness that is a nice touch to the flavor. Citrus is there but should be stronger

M: A bit sticky as well as quite refreshing in the finish

D: Could drink this one all night. Easy to drink - no problem - can't say I'd have it again but I wouldn't pass it up either.

Serving type: bottle

06-12-2010 00:25:24 | More by beerman207
Photo of FreshmanPour77
FreshmanPour77

Minnesota

4/5  rDev +32.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Reviewed on 6-6-10
Reviewed cold from a bottle to a glass

A - Golden brown, 1 finger of foam, good lacing ring with a good amount of carbonation

S - Nice malt hop blend, caramel and citrus notes present

T - Hops are present up front followed with a malty backbone, lighter to medium bodied brew that is very smooth

M/D - First Horny goat brew, pretty tasty, well balanced, nice and hoppy upfront but not overly done. I recommend this brew

Serving type: bottle

06-07-2010 05:23:14 | More by FreshmanPour77
Horny Goat Hopped Up 'N Horny from Horny Goat Brewing Co.
71 out of 100 based on 248 ratings.