1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

St. Idesbald Tripel - Brouwerij Huyghe

Not Rated.
St. Idesbald TripelSt. Idesbald Tripel

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
84
good

19 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 19
Reviews: 14
rAvg: 3.67
pDev: 11.17%
Wants: 0
Gots: 3 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Brouwerij Huyghe visit their website
Belgium

Style | ABV
Tripel |  9.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Bierman9 on 08-17-2004)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | Likes | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 19 | Reviews: 14 | Display Reviews Only:
Reviews by Quej:
Photo of Quej
3.6/5  rDev -1.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

A - Very clear blond with much visible carbonation, not much head or head retention.
S - Quite sour and boozy, with lots of citrus notes from the yeast. Fruits such as green apples, green grapes ease the alcohol smell.
T - Lots of fruit tastes immediately, much the same as the smell, citrusy and boozy. The sourness of citrus and unripened green fruit are quite well balanced by their sweetness.
M - Light bodied and nicely carbonated, very agreeable feel.
D - Good for a 9% beer, but not great when warmed up, the abv keeps it a sipper.

More User Reviews:
Photo of mattfancett
3/5  rDev -18.3%

Photo of tempest
3.53/5  rDev -3.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Ordered a few bottles at Dulle Griet in Ghent. My table and I though the medicinal notes were a bit heavy and they take away from an otherwise very drinkable tripel. The sweet light caramel malts were quite nice, though the phenols and spice were too heavy to make for a great beer.

Photo of basica
3.98/5  rDev +8.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A - Pours a hazy golden color with a fairly thin white head (3.5)

S - Aromatic Belgian yeast with fruity notes on the nose (4)

T - Light malty sweetness blended with yeasts and fruity notes in the middle with suggestions of peaches and apricots (4)

M - Light to medium bodied, good carbonation and pleasantly smooth (4)

D - Pleasant and easy drinking tripel with good flavors and feel not showing much of the 9% ABV at all (4)

Tasted this in a bottle at Brauhaus in a session with BA, Chris (Hazehead)
This is a post tasting review.

Photo of MikWalker
3.75/5  rDev +2.2%

Photo of Squelch
4/5  rDev +9%
look: 3 | smell: 5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Appearance: Cloudy straw colored. White 1 finger head.

Smell: Perfect to style. Sweet, funky, yeasty in the perfect balance.

Taste: Not as good as the smell. Has the right flavor balance between the candi sugar and yeast funk, however, slightly overly bitter in the finish.

Mouthfeel: very effervescent. Tingly. Sharp, Hot from the alcohol.

Overall: A very nice triple. I would have again.

Photo of Gusler
4.03/5  rDev +9.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

The beer after its extravasations from the 330ml brown bottle it resides in the triple glass a murky golden-orange with a tremendous amount of suspended solids, the head is most and white, creamy in texture and the left over lace a thin sheet to conceal the glass. Nose is earthy and sweet with the aroma of over ripe plums, crisp and clean, the start is sweet with a pleasant malt profile, the top thin. Finish id ferine in its acidity with the hops spicy and delightful, the aftertaste dry and lingering.

Photo of BlackHaddock
2.48/5  rDev -32.4%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Tall brown 33cl bottle, best before Dec 2010, drank Jun 2010. Poured into a Westmalle chalice.

The sediment leaped out of the bottle, so the appearance reflects that point. Meaning the body was full of floating particles, which took their time to settle down. The light amber/orange body had a white bubbled head at the start, soon to be a thin covering.

Very little aroma for a Belgian beer, some yeast esters if you search hard enough, otherwise nothing. As it warmed a sweet, fruity smell started to come through, but too little, too late.

The taste was as weak as the smell, the alcohol was detectable from the first sip (always a bad sign in my view) because the brew had no real flavours to hide it.

It may well look good in the bottle packaging, but the actual beer is not so great. This is the worst Belgian Tripel I can remember ever having!

Photo of Absumaster
3.73/5  rDev +1.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A orange, golden beer with a creamy head that settles into a creamy 1/2 inch layer of dense foam.

Smell is malty with notes of vanilla and biscuit. A nice fruity smell that has some solvent notes.

Taste is malty with sweet and fruity notes. Spicy with clove notes. A light metallic taste and a light bitterness top off this beer. There is not much hoppiness. Body is medium. This tripel is an average beer with only the mild biscuity notes making it special.

Photo of jdhilt
4/5  rDev +9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

From my notes 6/14/07 pours a two-finger white head that fades quickly, leaving a good lace. Clear amber color. Prune/raisin nose. Good carbonation and medium bodied. Flavor is herb and alcohol with a semi-sweet finish. Best by Mar 2009. €2.00 ($2.74) for a 330ml bottle from de Bier Tempel Brussels, Belgium.

Photo of kojevergas
3.35/5  rDev -8.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Bottle served into an Idesbald goblet in Ghent, Belgium. I'd had this on draught before and had hated it, so expectations were low. Reviewed from notes taken July 2010.

A: Pours a one finger head of slight cream, good thickness, and good retention - especially for the ABV. Body colour is a semitransparent yellow-gold.

Sm: Caramelized malt, alcohol, and slight hints of nutty hops. Well chosen malts are a highlight.

T: Full-bodied barley and malts form the foundation with pleasant cream, floral hops (minimal), and caramelized malt riding atop. Much of the complexity comes merely from the well-executed maltiness. Well balanced.

Mf: The best feature of this beer. It's silky smooth, delicate, and refreshingly wet. Complements the flavours nicely.

Dr: The high ABV comes through, but it's still quite drinkable. Well priced by Belgian standards. The bottled form is far better than the draught version.

B-

Photo of paterlodie
3.95/5  rDev +7.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

BB dec 07. Enormous amounts of carbon dioxide showing in presentation by huge head that lasts well. Getting to rougher texture and mountainious landscape on top an a beautifull amberbrown beer that's cristal clear under it.
Nose shows lots of koriander giving it together with the yeastester a framboise/cherry like arome. Together with fine and fresh maltarome and some candy. Taste is quiet bombastic with good balance between sweetness and alcohol. Fine bitterness to back up and some koreandernotes make it a good but bombastic taste. Well drinkable and enjoyable IMHO, certainly if your into sweet and strong.

Photo of RblWthACoz
3.9/5  rDev +6.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pours a foggy brown touched orange. Nice white head. Heavy dough and spiced nose. Flavor is dough and spices as well. A thick mix of ingredients that produces a hearty ale. Seems to be some fruit tones on there as well. I want to call it as apple. This is a thicker profile than most ales in the same class. Feel is thicker on the liquid body. Carbonation is middle of the road and appropriate. This is fairly easy to drink. A bit thick on most aspects, but still something interesting to try. If you see it, mght as well go for it.

Photo of thierrynantes
3.53/5  rDev -3.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Beer bottle (33cl.), tasted in 2000.

Appearance : blond (troubled) color, with white foamy head.
Smell : yeasty and fruity aromas.
Taste and mouthfeel : grains, a fine bitterness, roundness in the mouth.
Drinkability : an average beer in the style Belgian triple.

Photo of GRUUMSH
3.5/5  rDev -4.6%

Photo of Bierman9
4.33/5  rDev +18%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Stopped into Cafe Take One in Maastricht on 26SEP11 and enjoyed two 0.33l bottles of this nice Tripel, at €3.70 per.

Poured into a nice snifter glass, it was a cloudy, muted golden, with minimal carbo. Head was creamy and off-white, with decent stick. Aroma was a touch malty and teased with some tropical fruit. Quite smooth on the tongue, and the Saint had a medium body to go along.

Tropical fruit presented itself well in the flavor, too. A touch of bitterness was offset by a little mango and pear, with some light sweetness. Quite dry in the finish, yet this was still very pleasant. Taste improved more as it warmed, though it wasn't overly cold to begin with. Solid! Prosit!!

4.33 rDev +15.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

1385

Photo of WOLFGANG
3.5/5  rDev -4.6%

Photo of DARIVA
3.5/5  rDev -4.6%

Photo of jenitivecase
3.98/5  rDev +8.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

A: Pours a clear, pale orangey yellow with a buoyant head, which stays up for a loooong time. Also, I take back every other time I've said a beer was really carbonated - this is just ludicrous carbonation: streams and streams of bubbles constantly rise up. More carbonated than champagne. Ridiculous.

S: Quite nice; spiced with clove/coriander scents and a generous yeasty scent. A nice grain smell is also present. Smells sweeter than some of the other tripels I've had.

T: Hmm. Good balance between alcohol and sweetness, but I'm getting a strange metallic taste, which is kind of unpleasant and definitely distracting. Attempting to ignore the metallic taste, I'm getting a nice profile of sweet spices and grains - pretty consistent with the nose, but slightly more bitter. I expected more complexity than this, but it's a solid flavor. The metallic taste is receding as the beer warms, which is definitely positive, but it's still there, lurking.

M: Creamy; goes down smooth. A bit thin without being excessively watery.

D: I could knock down a bunch of these with no problems. Since it's less complex than the average tripel, it's also more drinkable, which is kind of nice.

Not my favorite beer, but definitely a decent offering.

St. Idesbald Tripel from Brouwerij Huyghe
84 out of 100 based on 19 ratings.