1. Extreme Beer Fest tickets go on sale Sat, Sep 27 @ Noon EDT.
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Redhook ESB - Redhook Ale Brewery

Not Rated.
Redhook ESBRedhook ESB

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
78
okay

1,750 Ratings
THE BROS
73
okay

(view ratings)
Ratings: 1,750
Reviews: 821
rAvg: 3.41
pDev: 14.66%
Wants: 20
Gots: 105 | FT: 1
Brewed by:
Redhook Ale Brewery visit their website
United States

Style | ABV
Extra Special / Strong Bitter (ESB) |  5.80% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
Brewed in the style of a traditional British ESB (Extra Special Bitter), we’ve been making ESB continuously since 1987, and it’s now the benchmark for the Amber beer category. Despite having “bitter” in its name, Redhook ESB is really not that bitter at all. This brew is all about the balance of caramel malt sweetness completed by spicy, citrusy hops.

28 IBU

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 07-30-2001)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Redhook ESB Alström Bros
Ratings: 1,750 | Reviews: 821 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of dmarch
2.8/5  rDev -17.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Looks rather pale with a clear orange-amber color. Lots of carbonation as well The only thing I could think of whith the aroma is metallic. The taste seems to be a bit grainy with that same metallic flavor. Thankfully there is a bit of caramel flavor in there as well, but it's just tastes to think to be very enjoyable. Too bad I can't find the double black stout anymore, this redhook was pretty much a disappointment.

dmarch, Sep 12, 2003
Photo of HardTarget
3.2/5  rDev -6.2%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Aroma: Smells like fresh bread, with some mild hops mixed in.
Appearance: Golden amber, make that orange, with some chill haze. Active head died down to a moderate white thin cover.
Flavor: Balance is on the hops (it IS an ESB) but some of the sweet malt peeks through. Guessing they went heavy on bittering hops, light on aroma hops. Overall taste is clean, but I noted a slight metallic twang deep in the first aftertaste, but was hard to find a second time. Hops don’t overpower the taste, but linger in the aftertaste deeply.
Mouthfeel: Light, with a carbonation prickle.
Overall Impression: A moderately good beer. No major flaws, but just not very lively. Drinkability isn’t bad, doesn’t slow you down, doesn’t invite you back for another.

HardTarget, Sep 02, 2003
Photo of MediocreatBest
2.93/5  rDev -14.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

a really average beer....i msut admit it was my first ESB, so i dont have much to weigh it against. The packaging says its an ESB/amber ale, i think amber ale might be more appropriate cause i find little variation between this and other amber ales....its a fine ber don;t get me wrong, goes down easy, smooth, looks nice(redish amber color with quickly disapating head....i'd say its worth an attempt if your at a bar, but don't bother with a 6er of it, as you will be let down that you spent 7 bucks on such an average beer.

MediocreatBest, Aug 29, 2003
Photo of francisweizen
4/5  rDev +17.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

This beer was purchased and drunk at the Belle & Sebastian, Celebrate Brooklyn - Charity concert in Prospect Park in Brooklyn!

It cost $4 for a 12oz bottle which was than poured into a plastic cup. The only other options were bud light and bud 16oz cans at the same price, so I thought that this was the obvious choice :-)

This beer was a nice amber colour with a fluffy, white head. The aromas were heavily malty, with some hops also in the nose. The taste was very malty, and sweet with a bit of a bitter hop finish. This stuff is very light on the palate, and the 5.5+%ABV is not noticeable at all. The mouthfeel isnice and the drinkability is good as well. This is a damn good beer, and it's usually cheap too.

Still, @ $4 a cup, this was a good thirst quencher, as I stood underneath a shady tree, right by the soundboard, watching one of my favorite bands, perform a very rare live concert in front of me...

Thank you and good night!

F

francisweizen, Aug 26, 2003
Photo of brakspear
3.3/5  rDev -3.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

An average beer that is jammed into the ESB category in name only. It pours a slight amber with a moderate head, minimal lacing. The aroma is filled with citrus notes, but not over-the-top. The flavor seems a bit harsh, with the malty flavors not blending particularly well with the hop bitterness. Overall I enjoy this beer more on tap than in the bottle.

brakspear, Aug 20, 2003
Photo of soilguy
2.65/5  rDev -22.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

What a disappointment. It looks decent in the glass, witha copper color and fine white head, but when the serious evaluation begins, this beer just can't stand up. The hop aroma is nonexistent - in fact, this beer is devoid of almost all aroma. At first sip, there is a barely perceptable hop bitterness, and a light malt presence, but that's it! No complex fruity esters or spicy hop flavors that I normally associate with E.S.B's. This beer is completely neutral in flavor. I was barely able to finish my first bottle and luckily I was able to foist off the rest of the six-pack on my unsuspecting neighbor.

soilguy, Aug 16, 2003
Photo of beerinator
3.38/5  rDev -0.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Appearance: Clear golden reddish hue. Lingering white head.

Aroma: Sweet maltyness. Some sharp bitter is noted in the aroma as well.

Taste: Flavor is sharp, finishes mellow, with a bit of sweetness. Crisp beer, with a clean finish. Mouthfeel feels a bit thin for a bitter.

Notes: Thin mouthfeel. Good clean session beer. Not outstanding, not too noteworthy.

beerinator, Aug 14, 2003
Photo of tavernjef
3.88/5  rDev +13.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Color is a clear yellowy amber with a inch high head of off-white spongy foam that settles down slowly to leave spots of lace. Smell is faint of roasty malts kinda breadish like soft pretzels with a nice light dry hop backing. Taste is toasty malts and dry hops, balanced together well, a slight bread tone to the malts with a note of saltyness/nutty and a small bitterness lingers from the hops thats quite easy to handle and favors some herbal qualities and dryness. Feel is close to medium with a small kick just past midway. Not a bad ESB, I'd have it again if offered. So far one of the better beers I've had from Redhook.

tavernjef, Aug 09, 2003
Photo of oberon
3.23/5  rDev -5.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Pours a deep golden/amber color with a light somewhat fizzy head,aroma is lightly sweet but not much there.Taste is malty and a little nutty with some caramel tones,the best part of this beer is the taste.I have had this beer many times hoping it would be better but it never is.At one time I guess this was top-notch.

oberon, Aug 06, 2003
Photo of hotstuff
3.18/5  rDev -6.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

When this beer was poured into my glass, the head was small, ivory, and it contained fine-small bubbles.The body was carbonated and murky.The hue was copper and the lacing was sparse.The nose was hoppy and the flavor consisted of alcohol, hops and some bitterness.The mouthfeel was tingly on my tongue, smooth and somewhat thin.

hotstuff, Aug 06, 2003
Photo of marburg
3.15/5  rDev -7.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Not terribly awe-inspiring. Pretty bland nose with some very subdued hints of citrus from the hops. A little leafiness and some malt. Flavor is plain. Starts with a little malt sweetness but finishes with a slightly grating hop bitterness -- herbal then bitter. Bitterness lingers and not in a pleasant way. A little off for the style, I think. I think they should have opted for a little more of the extra special and a little less of the bitter.

marburg, Jul 25, 2003
Photo of goz
3.3/5  rDev -3.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Clear medium amber, big tan head that diminishes at the speed of light, minimal lacing. Aroma is fairly well balanced by some mild-sweet maltiness, and a mild floral hop aroma. Flavor starts sweet, clean and crisp, ends with some hoppiness and a little acidity. Slightly thin body, some metallic hints showed up middle-end.

goz, Jul 25, 2003
Photo of granger10
2.98/5  rDev -12.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

This has an light red, almost amber color to it. Smells like a good mix of hops and malts. The hops and malts have a lot of interplay in this one, almost like they are each fighting to be the dominant flavor. I can't tell what is dominant in this beer though. I notice dextrin sweetness and some caramel malts. Floral hops are there and citrus fruit hops seem to be there. Finishes grainy and decent but not exceptional. An all around solid beer, but nothing great.

granger10, Jul 22, 2003
Photo of Rumrunner
3/5  rDev -12%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

16Oz. Mug
A drinkable beer when one is in an establishement where Redhook is the most creative beer served. I felt this was an average but drinkable beer.

The appearance is a nice transparent amber. Decent carbonation. The head was off white with some lacing but the lacing did not finish until the end. A basic smell. I had to give this beer more than a few sniffs. I did not find much in the scent.

The flavor is slightly bitter. I expect more if the word 'bitter' is in the name of the beer. Some fruit flavors and a decent malt. Really nothing to jump up and down over. I little bit more bitter and they would have sold me on this beer. It finishes a bit weak.

It goes down easy and is very drinkable. To reiterate, a good but not great ESB.

Rumrunner, Jul 07, 2003
Photo of ZAP
4/5  rDev +17.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

I really think this is the crown jewel of the Red Hook line....pours a clean looking light orange...a soft white lace rests atop it...I like the nose....Sweet fruit and floral notes in the aroma...wish it was a tich stronger but still nice....body is about right for an ESB...firm and tight.....flavors combine a nice malt balance to the sweet fruit hops....on the finish a nice west coast citrus hop flavor emerges....I'm drinking this out of my brand new English style pint glasses and am happy to baptise them with the underrated ESB...

ZAP, Jun 23, 2003
Photo of far333
3.95/5  rDev +15.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

Honey color with a creamy beige head. Excellent lacing around the glass as I drink. Aroma is strong hop, with floral and pine notes. Flavor is strong hop, not bitter, with pine and mild citrus. Very nice lingering hop aftertaste. Malt flavor seems to broaden and creep up on my tongue as I make my way through the glass. Mouthfeel is crisp and smooth. Not overly complex, but a very enjoyable and very drinkable beer.

far333, Jun 18, 2003
Photo of garymuchow
4.3/5  rDev +26.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

A beer by popular reputation that was worth trying. I wasn't dissappointed. Aroma was lighter than expected, but a nice mix of malt and hops (sweet a little, with a little citrus, but also flowery). Nice looking beer, with a bold amber color, medium head (a little fizzy), good stability and nice lacing. Bold enough flavor, with a good mix of malt foundation (with some sweetness) surrounded by complex hops character (some sour, bitter, citrus, but all pleasing). Nice smoothness (in spite of the bitterness) and the beer softens as it warms. Pleasant richness without excessiveness. I'm pretty impressed. May be a little sweet at times, otherwise very well rounded beer that I won't hesitate to purchase or imbide again.

garymuchow, Jun 02, 2003
Photo of drewbage
3.5/5  rDev +2.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pint Serving on Draft from Spaceland.

This was one of the first micro/craft brews that encouraged me to move away from pale yellow fizzy stuff.

The beer as first served was a little too cold so most aroma notes and flavor notes had to wait a few minutes before attempting.

The beer itself is a nice coppery amber and was clear of any haze. Head was virtually non-existant on this particular serving.

Aroma carried the usual Redhook buttery tones of diacetyl, but this was subdued in comparision to previous tastings. Good flowery hop nose hidden behind the butter and more than a touch of malt.

The taste was a feast of caramel malts with a soft hoppy finish and leaving just a touch of sweetness on the lips.

Overall, it's a long survived classic for a reason. This is an easy to drink beer with just enough character to keep you awake, but not so much as to frighten the natives.

drewbage, May 30, 2003
Photo of Stingray5
3.6/5  rDev +5.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Not a bad beer for every once in a while.

Poured a light brown with a nice white head. Good lace throughout. Slightly cloudy. Faint aromas of malt and fruitiness. Taste was a bit watery, with just an ok finish that diminished way too quickly. Not bitter enough.

A decent choice in limited selections. I liked it better on draught.

Stingray5, May 24, 2003
Photo of AudioGilz
3.15/5  rDev -7.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

It's amber/orange with a small head. My nose is horrible right now, but I do get some fruity notes out of it, nothing all that great. It's creamy at first with some sweet malts, medium bodied, and then crisp carbonation and mild hops finishes the gulp. It comes across as bland for an ESB. It's a pretty boring beer, but I got it for $4.99 a sixer, so it was worth a try at that price.

AudioGilz, May 14, 2003
Photo of Stubbie1
3.33/5  rDev -2.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A dark orange color with a thin white head, short lasting, and little lace. Mostly malt aroma, slight trace of hops. The taste is a bit butterscotch / lightly toasted malt. Smooth and drinkable. Not your typical ESB but drinkable, overall a slight bit above average.

Stubbie1, May 04, 2003
Photo of AtLagerHeads
3.05/5  rDev -10.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

This Redhook poured a cloudy amber with less than a finger height of head, even though I tried to coax it up a bit. The ivory head vanished almost immediately and left only faint traces of lace deposits. This kind of looks like iced tea with a flavor that's not far afield from the same, in it's unsweetened state, of course. The flavor includes some poorly defined hops against the malt background. The nose is very light and gives off both a sense of caramel malt and some light hops. I'd been waiting for a while to sample this beer and I was expecting something much more distinctive, perhaps because of the boldness of the red and yellow labeling. This is an OK beer, but not one I'd seek out unless it was surrounded by purely macro options.

Note: the brewery must be doing less filtering as the beer was definitely cloudy. I drank it slowly and noticed a small amount of light brown sediment in the bottom of the glass.

AtLagerHeads, Apr 27, 2003
Photo of dwarbi
3.38/5  rDev -0.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Pours a nice head, about a centimeter, but very creamy. It settles quickly to a thin layer. Medium amber color. Smells of malts and tastes the same, and a little bitter. Very thick as it rolls around my tongue. It feels as if I almost have to chew it. This experience is nice, but it makes the beer a little less drinkable. Overall, a good beer.

dwarbi, Apr 20, 2003
Photo of jreitman
3.18/5  rDev -6.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Poured a gold orange in color with very little head. Fruity sweet smell with some hints of caramel. The more it warms the more the butterscoth/diacetyl aromas and flavors come through and the more apparent it is that this beer is all about the diacetyl. Biscuity grain and caramel were also percieved on the tongue.

jreitman, Apr 17, 2003
Photo of Thrasher
3.55/5  rDev +4.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

I suppose I am spoiled in that I find this beer only slightly better than average. There are so many wonderful beers at my disposal that, through no fault of its own, this beer falls by the wayside. I went into a new packie tonight, to see how the stock was, and was dismayed to find only Bud Miller Heineken. (O wait, this IS Bud!) Redhook was the only drinkable alternative other than Sam's & St Pauli. (I'm tired of Sam's, and brown bottles always win over green, class.) I'm surprised to discover it as satisying as I am right now. Super-clear with decent head and lace, a citrus-y, buttery, thirst-quenching brew; certainly one of Redhook's better beers (too bad that the Rye is no longer available - now that's one beer that didn't often fall by the wayside!). Lots of lemon flavors, bolstered by diacetyl (butter), quite sweet from malts and some tartness at finish which becomes obliterated by lingering caramel sweetness. Mouthfeel smooth and persuasive, perhaps the high point of the brew. Drinkability good too; now that I think about it, I remember this is my go-to beer at Mustang Harry's whenever I'm in the neighborhood of Madison Square Garden for a game or a concert (although I really should try to squeeze in a visit to the Gingerman if I'm in that area). I'd suggest bringing this to a gathering where obscure microbeers have a low penetration ratio - Redhook beers are very "user friendly." This beer now comes in longnecks! (all the better for that "lets get hammered" scenario when your favored pint glass is unavailable)

Thrasher, Apr 09, 2003
Redhook ESB from Redhook Ale Brewery
78 out of 100 based on 1,750 ratings.