Dismiss Notice
Get 12 monthly issues of BeerAdvocate magazine and save $5 when you select "auto-renew."

Subscribe now →
Dismiss Notice
Join our email list →

And we'll send you the latest updates and offers from BeerAdvocate, because knowing is half the battle.

Redhook ESB - Redhook Ale Brewery

Not Rated.
Redhook ESBRedhook ESB

Educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
78
okay

849 Reviews
THE BROS
73
okay

(Read More)
Reviews: 849
Hads: 2,016
Avg: 3.42
pDev: 21.93%
Wants: 28
Gots: 232 | FT: 1
Brewed by:
Redhook Ale Brewery
New Hampshire, United States | website

Style | ABV
Extra Special / Strong Bitter (ESB) | 5.80% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 07-30-2001

Brewed in the style of a traditional British ESB (Extra Special Bitter), we’ve been making ESB continuously since 1987, and it’s now the benchmark for the Amber beer category. Despite having “bitter” in its name, Redhook ESB is really not that bitter at all. This brew is all about the balance of caramel malt sweetness completed by spicy, citrusy hops.

28 IBU
View: Beers (46) | Events
Beer: Reviews & Ratings
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Redhook ESB Alström Bros
Reviews: 849 | Hads: 2,016
Photo of mattLummus
3.14/5  rDev -8.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.25

This one is okay, but not great. Deep head but lacks much of an aroma. If anything its a little nutty. Decent carbonation but light body. Taste is rather bland actually without any noticeable finish. Could definitely choose a better beer by Red Hook.

 250 characters

Photo of tippydog666
4.99/5  rDev +45.9%
look: 4.75 | smell: 5 | taste: 5 | feel: 5 | overall: 5

I'm new to Beer Advocate since I just turned 21. I live in woodinville,wa where Redhook has a big brewery so I've been waiting to legally try them out for a long time. I really like the EBS By Redhook. Nice beer to sip and relax, I buy them in pints and will go through the pint in about 35 to 40 mins. It has a warm bitter taste with just the right amount of boldness. A very smooth beer but not creamy. I highly recommend this beer. Only $2.69 for a pint of good beer, it's pretty much a steal!

 496 characters

Photo of TheBeerDog
4.2/5  rDev +22.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.25

Just polished off my first six-pack of this beer over the past week. I'm very surprised by the lukewarm ratings and reviews. I think it's an excellent beer, well balanced, and very enjoyable. In fact, it inspired me to attempt to homebrew a clone of this beer. If it comes out anywhere near as good as this beer, then I will be a very camper in 4-5 weeks from now.

 364 characters

Photo of ssteakley
3.5/5  rDev +2.3%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.5

I was pleased with the first taste and a bit surprised. This is a beer you car take to the party And share and everyone will be glad you did. This is a well rounded beer for all those weekend occasions, a tailgate, or even a baby shower where the guys are invited.

 264 characters

Photo of Nugganooch
3.31/5  rDev -3.2%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.25

12 oz bottle from the variety pack – Dated Mar. 5, 2013
*notes taken 06/08/13

A: Dark caramel color body sits mostly clear in the glass. Fizzy head of thick taupe foam is quite active only holding form for a minute or so. Some slippery remnants of lace with low cling.

S: Smells of bready malts with a bit of stone fruit pronounced esters coming through. There is a light herbal hop note and a real mineral like quality to the aroma. Aroma seems pretty fair for the style.

T: Tastes offers a nice foundation of bready malts with some understated caramel sweetness and hints of apple or pear like fruity yeast esters. There is a distinct mineral water flavor with a dash of herbals and pine mixed in. Moderate to low levels of bitterness as to be expected with alcohol completely masked. Clean finish. Nothing particularly wrong here but a little pedestrian for me.

M: Lightly on the thin side with a moderately filling body. Soft creaminess provided by the carbonation. Low to moderate bitterness. Touch watery on the finish.

D: A decent ESB and nice job of staying true to the style. Nothing particularly flawed however nothing very stand out either.

 1,160 characters

Photo of IchLiebeBier
3.25/5  rDev -5%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

Appearance: Bright amber/gold; medium frothy head, long lasting, effervescent

Aroma: malty; bready; grassy; light citrus

Taste: Juicy, creamy malt on start that flows to hoppy citrus in the mid; finishes slightly dry; smooth and refreshing, but not complex; drinkable, though

Remarks: Did not score A, T, S, M at that time; disregard those scores

 352 characters

Photo of Kooz
3.17/5  rDev -7.3%
look: 2.75 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 3.25

Pours a very light orange color with little head leaving no lacing.

Smells hoppy right up front, then fades to a mellow sweetness. Appetizing!

Bitter and sweet at the same time. This beer has a slight bite to it, but finishes sweet, and there's a sweetness throughout.

Decent mouthfeel. RedHook has come a long way, but it's not quite up to BBC or Dogfish. This beer has some body, and its crispness is nice, but something isn't clicking here.

This is a nice beer, I'm happy I had it, I'd have it again, and I'd recommend it to anyone looking for something to cap off a long day.

 585 characters

Photo of StevenStevens
3/5  rDev -12.3%
look: 3.25 | smell: 2 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3

My wife surprised me tonight by bringing me a "new ESB" for me to try.
I opened it almost immediately and it bored a golden yellow. I could tell, from lack of head, that it was very carbonated. The smell was very woody and a bit skunky.

I was surprised by the taste, as it wasn't looking good, from the look and smell. It drank well enough for an ESB.

I think the best review came from my wife, who said, "It's a beer." I agree. The Reddhook ESB is a beer. Not a particularly an over-the-top beer but it's drinkable. I'm just not rushing to the store to purchase another one anytime soon.

 592 characters

Photo of tigg924
3.36/5  rDev -1.8%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.5

Appearance: dark gold in color, 1/3 inch head, clear, high carbonation

Smell: toasted malt, toffee, woodsy

Taste: meadow, grain, toffee, light lemon and citrus hops

Mouthfeel: medium bodied, high carbonation, nice combo of bitter and sweet

Overall: Nice, complex, and malty with enough hops to add some balance. A solid, if not spectacular beer that is better than most of the rest of what I have had from Redhook. I could do a couple on a hot day but am in no rush to get it again.

 488 characters

Photo of Why-P-A
3.31/5  rDev -3.2%
look: 3.75 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.5

A: Beautiful, red amber color, this is one of the highlights of this beer.

S: Minimal aroma, not much detectable in the way of either hops of malt.

T: The flavor has much more going on that the nose suggests. Very good bready malt body matches the color of the beer. Hops are mild and in the background but their addition help to make this a well rounded beer.

M: Very smooth and drinkable, carbonation in the bottle is usually dialed as it should be for a large brewery like Redhook.

O: It seems like this beer has changed slightly over the years but still is one of the industry standards in the category due to it's lovely color, solid malt body, and subtle bitter finish. Redhook ESB is an easy drinking session beer prefect for any activity or season.

 761 characters

Photo of woodychandler
3.54/5  rDev +3.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.5

One of the last from my foray into the Knickerbocker Hotel's cooler for which I will forever be ashamed. Don't do it to yourself!

From the bottle: "Original Ale"; "Liquid goodness since 1982."

My pour created a finger of bubbly, tawny head with decent retention. Color was a slightly hazy deep amber. The nose emanated a definite malty sweetness with an underlying pine-like hoppiness and it occurred to me that this could be fun. Mouthfeel was medium and the malt and the hops seemed to be having a wrestling match on my tongue to see which would emerge dominant. I am going to declare it a pleasant draw. I could not discern between one or the other, especially on the finish. I would totally enjoy this if they put it in a CAN. I liked it from the bottle, but I would be hard-pressed to choose it for away from home in this format.

 836 characters

Photo of JuicesFlowing
3.68/5  rDev +7.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

Poured into a shaker pint glass.

The beer is a light amber color. A foamy white head recedes to a wisp with light white rings of lacing on the glass. The aroma is subdued, but toasty grains and a faint tea-like hop presence emerge. The beer tastes of toasted grains, biscuits, and caramel malt sweetness up front. Some floral and citrusy hops bring in balance on the finish. The mouthfeel is medium to light. Overall, this isn't world class, but it's balanced and complex enough to not regret a 6 pack.

 503 characters

Photo of StJamesGate
3.58/5  rDev +4.7%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Tawny pale body with creamy white foam that settles to film that laces.
Buttery toffee with tea leaf and some orange rind on the nose.
White fruit scone, a big apricot jam hit and orange and cedar hops.
Spicy finish and drying linger.
Light to medium, slight chew, round.

Biggest surprise about this is it does a fair job of reproducing the taste of Maris Otter. The hops hit is very EKG, too. But in the end it's too thin, veers form too sweet to too spicy as it goes cold to warm (extremes, rather than balance) and just doesn't hit the nuance of an English ale.

I could see where it hung around since the 80s, when there was nothing else like it (fresh, anyway) but this isn't anything more than average - as an amber or a special bitter.

 745 characters

Photo of jaycle
3.29/5  rDev -3.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A: Honey colored with a slight haze. A weak head with little retention and large bubbles.

S:oranges

T: fruit and floral, wheat finish. Very mellow. and Balanced

M: medium carbonation, thin feeling, dry finish

O: Good, but average. This was my first ESB, and from what I read, it is to be expected from this style. I enjoyed it, but there are just so many other good beers.

 377 characters

Photo of GratefulEdd
3.19/5  rDev -6.7%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.25

Poured from 12oz bottle into a pint glass.

Appearance is a bright amber color light enough to see all the carbonation to come flowing up. One finger of wheat-colored head shows up and sticks around for the party.

Smell is very middle-of-the-road, walking the line between a piney hop and light malt roast. Nothing too over-powering but where it needs to be for this style.

Taste goes down as smooth as you would wish for a session-able ESB. A little biscuit-y on the tongue to start with, but a mellow finish that begs for another sip.

Mouthfeel goes along with the taste and smell. Very balanced, easy to drink down. I thought the carbonation would be a little too much for an ESB on the pour, but it mellowed out in the glass.

Overall this beer provides a good session beer. It doesn't overwhelm any of the senses but gives you enough to think over while the glasses are going down.

 890 characters

Photo of JesseMurdock
3.79/5  rDev +10.8%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

This is a decent beer. It is an Extra Special Bitter, so don't go into expecting the hop character and depth of flavor of an american IPA. Pours a nice copper with a nice head that quickly recedes to a finger. Smells of malt with a bit of spice and toffee. Crisp and refreshing feel to it. A tasty malt character with hops and caramel in the background. This isn't an exciting beer but for it's style, it's a good beer. A good session beer.

 440 characters

Photo of DerAtomsmasher
3.08/5  rDev -9.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

Sits damn near in the middle of the X/Y axis of beer; hops are there, providing a black tea-reminiscent bitterness & beneath that, a ghost of shortbread-y maltiness. Easy drinking and nothing especially fantastic.

Easy to forget; this is my first bottle in some years - a reminder.

 282 characters

Photo of atr2605
3.5/5  rDev +2.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A-pours a orange copper color with a white head with low retention and leaves a small lace
S-sweet malt, biscuit, honey, low hop aroma
T-malty and sweet with a bit of the dry biscuit in the finish
M-medium-light bodied
O-Extremely drinkable and pretty well balanced. I am not very well versed in this style but I thought it was pretty well done

 344 characters

Photo of fstorey
3.08/5  rDev -9.9%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.25

Served from a 12 oz. bottle in a pint mug.
A - Nice coppery amber color with a thin off-white head that quickly dissipates. Some cloudiness, not like a wheat beer but more than I expected. Not much lacing.
S - malty aroma with caramel and a little bit of walnut. The hops is there but definitely in the background.
T - modest flavor: mild sweetness from the malt
M - good creaminess, finishing with a slight powdery feel.
I like the flavor and mouthfeel so I would definitely drink this again. Not bad.

 502 characters

Photo of scot_chale
3.53/5  rDev +3.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A- Dark gold/orange color, crystal clear with lots of carbonation activity, 1 finger of spritzy white head that fades slowly

S- light caramel malt and diacetyl esters, a bit boozy, but pleasant.

T- it's balanced very well, it's kinda malty, kinda hoppy, and has a slight alcohol feel. it's nice beer.

M- it's spritzy, medium-light bodied, and quite dry

O- i like it- it's not amazing, but it's a fair ESB. I'd consider this a session beer for sure. I could see myself ordering it in a bar, but i don't think i'd buy a six pack.

 532 characters

Photo of BigCheese
3.42/5  rDev 0%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A: Clear copper, almost no head, no lacing.

S: Bready english malts, some toffee.

T: Taste is similar, some brown bread malt. Tastes very "red", definitely english style. Some tea like bitterness. Pretty bland/tasteless, though not offensive.

M: Thin body, high carbonation, a bit watery. Quite sessionable.

O: Nothing too fancy, reminds me of a Smithwicks or Killians. Not bad hangout beer but nothing that will blow your mind.

 433 characters

Photo of jimmah120
3.11/5  rDev -9.1%
look: 2 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

12oz no date, generic label

Look is a clear yellow-amber, small head that fades quickly. smell is light grain/spice. taste follows with a slightly bitter, semi sweet, spiced ale. feel is unremarkable and maybe a little slimy.

the best of the winter sampler sans the ipa. after the atrocious pilsner and amber this isn't half bad. this is a better amber than their amber.

 372 characters

Photo of mfnmbvp
3.38/5  rDev -1.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

12 oz. bottle, bottled on date reads March 21, 2012 so it's been chillin in the bottle for a nice 9 months.

A - Pours a cloudy orange color with no head whatsoever and no lacing on the glass.

S - I get a vague musty smell and maybe a slight hint of malts. Other than that, there is really no noticeable smell.

T - Tastes very similar to the Redhook Long Hammer IPA, to me the two are almost interchangeable, this one having the lower alcohol content. The taste is probably the best thing about this brew.

M - Kind of watery, the taste doesn't really linger.

Overall, I would recommend trying the Redhook Long Hammer IPA over this beer, but they are both decent. The IPA has a higher alcohol content and maybe some more flavor to it.

Redhook Extra Special Bitter ---3.5/5

 776 characters

Photo of mckenziac
3.2/5  rDev -6.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured from a 12 oz. bottle into a Samuel Adams Boston Lager glass. Taken from a Redhook mixed twelve pack.

Appearance: Pours a translucent, dull amber color. Has a large, fizzy head that dissipates quickly.

Smell: Has a faint, toasty smell backed by some caramel malts.

Taste: Has some mild, spicy hoppiness up front. Finishes sweet with caramel and toasty malts.

Mouthfeel: Light-bodied with an expressive carbonation.

Overall: A pretty unoffensive ESB. Definitely drinkable, something I could see myself drinking several of without really a thought. Nothing great, but not bad.

 585 characters

Photo of cyclonece09
3.11/5  rDev -9.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Poured from a 12 oz glass into a snifter. Pours a dark straw color with a slight red tint with a small white head that leaves a little lacing in the glass. Smells of fruit and not much else. Tastes of grain mainly, not much bitterness at all, slight fruit flavor. Carbonation is fine for its light body and finish is smooth. Overall, a very average beer.

 354 characters

Redhook ESB from Redhook Ale Brewery
78 out of 100 based on 849 ratings.