1. Extreme Beer Fest tickets go on sale Sat, Sep 27 @ Noon EDT.
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Redhook Long Hammer IPA - Redhook Ale Brewery

Not Rated.
Redhook Long Hammer IPARedhook Long Hammer IPA

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
75
okay

2,647 Ratings
THE BROS
67
poor

(view ratings)
Ratings: 2,647
Reviews: 1,105
rAvg: 3.27
pDev: 17.13%
Wants: 15
Gots: 174 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Redhook Ale Brewery visit their website
United States

Style | ABV
American IPA |  6.20% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
The generous addition of hops both during and at the end of the fermentation process (dry-hopping) gives our India Pale Ale its characteristic bitterness and piney citrus aroma and flavor. The medium body, crisp finish, and moderate alcohol and IBU levels makes this one of America’s most drinkable and best-selling IPAs.

44 IBU

(Beer added by: Musky on 01-10-2007)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Redhook Long Hammer IPA Alström Bros
Ratings: 2,647 | Reviews: 1,105 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Pintofbrown
3.1/5  rDev -5.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I poured Long Hammer into a tulip glass. The bottle shape is cool and the minimalist artwork would make a great poster!

Appearance- The body is a golden-yellow with a slight amber tinge to it. The head was a standard, white foamy blob that reached a finger in width.

Smell- The nose is subtle, but really refreshing. The biscuit malt is the most noticeable, and hints that is going to be a more balanced IPA than a hop forward one. What little hops I can make out seem to have a slight citrus edge to them.

Taste- I take a drink, and I know there is hop bitterness, some malty sweetness, but it is really hard to pick out exactly what these flavors are!

Hop bitterness leads the way, not citrusy like on the nose. They are more grassy and floral. The back end on the drink is a wash between grain and some sweet, biscuit malt. This drinks more like a light lager than an IPA.

Mouth feel- The weight of the drink is not that bad. Almost medium bodied, but for an IPA, it could be much creamier. The lack of carbonation has this one almost feeling watery as it slides over the tongue, slightly fizzy too.

Overall- Long Hammer hints at some nice hop profiles, but they are not nearly as big as they should be. The malt back bone is a nice start, but now Red Hook has to seal the deal by giving this one some hop character and upping the creamy factor of the mouth feel.

Pintofbrown, Nov 22, 2011
Photo of ColForbinBC
3.1/5  rDev -5.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

On cask served in a pint; Advertised as "IPA w/ Summit and Nelson"

Appears a still orange with a foamy off-white cap. Retention is fair and there is minimal lacing.

Aromas of tangerines and hop oil with faint tobacco and a sticky caramel base. Pretty straightforward with nothing really jumping out at me.

The taste is very similar to the nose with tangerines, a dose of hop oil and mild bitterness. Some sticky caramel holds down the low end. Balanced and drinkable.

Oily mouthfeel with a light medium body. Being on cask, the carbonation is low and turns this into more of an english style IPA with a twist.

Pretty easy to drink, but the flavor profile isn't overwhelming enough to keep me happy glass after glass.

ColForbinBC, Mar 06, 2010
Photo of RedChrome
3.1/5  rDev -5.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Crystal clear, light golden colored body. Half an inch of white foamy head faded fast. Above average amount of fast rising carbonation. Sticky lacing spots.

A very malted grain aroma. Hops are subdued but present in the background but don't overpower the bread quality. Sweet on the nose but not typical of style.

Pine taste of hops oil blends with an earthy grain flavor. An aftertaste had a soapy presence. Gritty grape note is also very faint in the back of the throat.

Watery, with a quick sharp burst of carbonation on the tongue. A very generic macro feel.

An average choice. Good to wash down a burger of hot dog. Nothing to go hunting for on the shelves. Weak offering in a field of much better choices.

RedChrome, Nov 09, 2007
Photo of maximum12
3.1/5  rDev -5.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Well, this shouldn't take long.

Not a bad beer, drinkable, but about as mediocre a brew as I have ever tried. The only thing that rose above average was the smell, which was pretty good. Otherwise, middle-of-the-road all 'round. A beer to look for in wastelands of good taste.

maximum12, Mar 31, 2009
Photo of beer2day
3.1/5  rDev -5.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Pours yellow gold with light carbonation and a frothy two-finger head. Little retention. Decent lacing.

Nose is mainly citrus with a faint spiciness present. Lemon zest with a touch of cinnamon.

Hits flowery and very thin, almost watery in the mouth. Slight bitters and certainly below average IPA finish - more of a decent pale ale taste to this one.

I'd drink it again, but it would have to be on special and the only IPA available.

beer2day, Apr 24, 2009
Photo of Hollenbeck2
3.1/5  rDev -5.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

this IPA is always in stock at my local grocery, and the price keeps dropping, yesterday $5.79 a six pack, unreal.

although this is not one of the stronger IPA's redhooks standard ipa is better to me.

This one is supposed to have a stronger hop taste, but it does not work so much for me, almost tastes more like a winter beer.

I think this one is dry hopped.

I would suggest a try, but would recommend the standard redhook IPA first.

Hollenbeck2, Jan 05, 2008
Photo of kshankar
3.1/5  rDev -5.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured on tap...a lot of IPA elements. Lacing was there throughout. Yellow with some carbonation. Thick foam. Decent retention.

Aroma was a piney hop one...but it was mild. I didn't get quite a kick from it like I expect.

Taste was basically an IPA light. Mouthfeel was also similar. Drinkability would be "higher" to people who don't really go for IPA's, I guess...its just an IPA starter. Try it out, it isn't bad..but not the greatest IPA

kshankar, Sep 01, 2009
Photo of CHSLBrew
3.1/5  rDev -5.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured into a pint glass.

A-Dark golden beer, ever-so-slightly hazy. The pale white head receded quickly.

S-A thin aroma of resiny, at times grassy, hops. It smells dry.

T-A pleasant, soft resinous hop flavor, backed by a slighter maltiness. Hops could have been more pronounced. Overall, the flavors seem subdued, but also well-balanced. Slight hop flavor persists to the clean, dry finish.

M-Good carbonation, moderate and light. A pleasant medium body. Nondescript.

D-A fine IPA. Certainly nothing near the best, but since this brew seems to be widely available at many restaurants and bars, at least one can have a shot at something moderately hoppy.

CHSLBrew, Jan 30, 2009
Photo of beersarang
3.1/5  rDev -5.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours a pretty gold with a white head that sticks all over the place. Nice appearance.

Slightly bready grassy hoppy aroma, run of the mill.

Thin malt struggles against the grassy hops. Crisp hop bite is pleasant but the malt dies more and more as the beer warms. Actually becomes bland later on. Pretty average.

Thin bodied with normal carbonation, I blame the filtering.

Ok beer, got it for cheap so I won't complain.

beersarang, Jun 26, 2005
Photo of oriolesfan4
3.1/5  rDev -5.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Kind of an average beer all around. Doesn't really taste totally like an IPA but parts of it do making this just an odd beer overall. It's a pretty high ABV and it does go down smooth for sure. But balance wise and style wise the lines are a little bit blurred and make it hard to judge this beer.

oriolesfan4, Oct 05, 2008
Photo of Omnium
3.1/5  rDev -5.2%
look: 3.75 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Bottle > Pint Glass
A - Pours a nice gold color, thin layer of fizzy head, minor lacing.
S - Weird crackery smell, pepper, some hidden pine, and just a really off skunky smell.
T - Taste follows the smell, there's a big time crackery flavor here, its like im eating saltine's people! You definitely get that odd skunk kinda flavor, dont know what thats about. This is a lame flavor for an IPA.
M - So little bitterness for an IPA, bad metallic aftertaste.
O - This is just flat out bad. Horrible example of an IPA, the smell is almost unbearable, and the taste doesnt save it at all.

Omnium, Aug 17, 2013
Photo of Fatduck
3.1/5  rDev -5.2%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 4

Long time IPA lover, first time drinking Long Hammer, boy am I unimpressed.

Beer looks good its a pale coppery color with a light tan head. Smells a bit weak, what hops are there are a bit grassy and mild. Taste is pretty much the same, very mild hops for an IPA, grassy. A bit of caramel malts but mostly its pretty watery. In the mouth it feels thin and weak, like a real IPA with half water, but its a nice drinkable brew, gotta give it that.

This is a pretty bad beer, it tastes like what BMC would do if they made an IPA, oh wait... that's what it is.

Fatduck, Jan 29, 2009
Photo of barnzy78
3.1/5  rDev -5.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

12oz stubby bottle, pours golden in color with a nice frothy white head, good retention and excellent lace. Doesn't appear to be an IPA. My initial thoughts are that it's mislabeled, but given color isn't everything and it looks good, it gets the 4. Aromas are herbal hops, biscuit, faint citrus. Tastes are biscuity, herbal hops, grassy, sharply astringent, sharp cheddar cheese perhaps. This really tastes more like a pilsner than an IPA to me; and for a pilsner it's pretty good. For an IPA it's lacking some qualities I'd expect for the style. Mouth-feel is thin-to-medium, smooth and dry. Overall, kind of watered down or bland compared to its counterparts in the IPA category.

barnzy78, Jul 16, 2012
Photo of niknar
3.13/5  rDev -4.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Pours out a semi-cloudy copper color with a smallish head (fairly benign pour). Little to no lacing on the glass as the head quickly settles. Seems to me I had a much larger head on this one the other day... but with a more aggressive pour. Aroma is pretty tame, but seems to contain a certain yeasty hint to it. Maybe a tiny touch of citrus as well... but very faint across the board. Taste is rather bland. Hops seem to dominate the flavor characteristics (as you would expect on an IPA), but it lacks the balance and complexity of the better beers in this class. Mouthfeel is light and refreshing, but perhaps slightly overcarbonated. This seemed to give it a little bit of a mouthfeel that is too thin. Still highly drinkable, I'd rate this beer as perhaps a gateway drink for the macro-going-micro crowd. Certainly not an "A" list offering, but still has some merits here or there.

niknar, Aug 10, 2004
Photo of tastybeer
3.13/5  rDev -4.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Tangerine clear color with a white two finger head. Soapy retention and spotty lace remain. Nose is faint but with a swirl, grassy, floral, and candy-like hops reveal themselves. Bready malts are extra faint. Taste is a bit more hoppy and has a punch of bitterness which I say, actually enhances the beer. This could almost be considered and IPA. Mouthfeel is a little disappointing to me. Nothing exciting. Easy to suck down though.

There definitely could be a boatload more hops here, and I would appreciate some malts that hold up a bit better too.

tastybeer, Sep 01, 2006
Photo of PhillyStyle
3.13/5  rDev -4.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A: It was a clear light amber in appearence with a light white head that was not well retained at all.

S: Aroma was mainly hops with a little pine mixed in. Not a lot to it really and certainly not as strong as expected.

T: Taste followed the nose exactly. The hops were not overwhelming by any means, but a nice consistent melo flavor.

M/D: Carbonation was average. The beer was light and had a average dry bitter aftertaste to it. Overall, the beer is decent. I would not call it one of my go to beers, but I will probably pick it up again or order it when I am out, but not my first choice.

PhillyStyle, Feb 09, 2009
Photo of philipquarles
3.13/5  rDev -4.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Pours a clear golden-copper with a decent white head. Retention is mediocre with OK lacing.

Smells of hops, with a bit of raisin. This doesn't carry on to the taste, where the hoppy bitterness dominates, along with other grains and a real 'bready' flavor for an IPA.

Not bad overall, but certainly wouldn't be my first pick unless there were only BMC available.

philipquarles, Sep 16, 2008
Photo of beerthulhu
3.13/5  rDev -4.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A: Poured a medium golden-rod color with a thin sudsy white head.

S: a slight fruitiness upfront and sweet malt, which soon yielded to a light floral pine aroma and citrus.

T: clean, perhaps a tad to much so lacking a good malt backing and pungent hop punch per style. There was some noticeable spicy cascade notes, and grassiness but was very smooth and refined quickly fading off the tongue.

M: light with only a slight flora hoppiness detected that soon ended as well.

D: Ones enough, basically an underachiever by style and not 6 pack worthy.

beerthulhu, Oct 03, 2008
Photo of frickersticker3
3.13/5  rDev -4.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

I consider myself the lord of IPA's, in a small town who is challenged to shelving the goods. Which hasn't stopped me from tasting and such...IPAs are golden and crafted on levels of distinction and taste. And when it comes to this IPA, I would rather crush some Ranger IPA. This IPA hits, but after awhile...the flavor doesn't continue as much as having the first taste.

Had in a bottle, looks like it would pour very lame and clear.

Smell is there, just like any strong righteous IPA.

Taste has value at the start, but after a couple bottles...it's the same taste as the start...no hop to hop 2.

Mouthfeel is there.

If you have heartburn...and a man with balls, drink this. But after awhile...the taste will roll flat...And thats why I suggest the Ranger.

frickersticker3, Jan 02, 2011
Photo of blackie
3.13/5  rDev -4.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

appearance: Pours a .25" white head. The beer is orange-golden in color.

smell: The hop aroma is a mixture of green hops and boiled hop matter, kinda tealike. Some hints of citrus and floral tropical fruit. Not much malt character save for some caramel, the sweetness is moderate.

mouthfeel: Carbonation is medium, and the body on the light side of the medium range.

taste: A tealike, boiled hop character comprises the hop flavor. Some caramel malt gives a light sweetness. A moderate bitterness comes in for the finish.

drinkability: ok, but not a good beer

Bottled on 01/04/06

blackie, Jan 28, 2006
Photo of zoso1967
3.13/5  rDev -4.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

Bottled July 11, 2011

Long Hammer pours your classic IPA medium amber color with a nice and frothy cap of foam. The head is beige in color and has both excellent retention and lacing. I find it interesting that highly tuned beers like this always look fantastic, but sometimes fall short in other categories.

The aroma is nice, but does not really blow me away. It is sweet and hoppy with a pleasant floral citrus character that hints at orange and grapefruit. Unfortunately a hint is about all you get. Even the sweetness seems a bit bland.

The flavor is sweet and pretty boring. The malt character at least has a bit more interest to it in the taste, but this interest is added by a flavor that almost seems stale. I highly doubt this brew would be stale after just a month and a half. The hops are similar to the aroma, but perhaps a bit zestier. The more I drink this the less enthused I am about the hop character in general. The bitterness seems a bit overly harsh.

The mouthfeel is medium with a moderate amount of carbonation. The beer finishes fairly dry despite the sweetness in the flavor, with hop bitterness lingering on the palate.

I remember when this was one of the only IPAs you might find in a chain restaurant or even a local bar. I bought it for old time sake and am not surprised at why they have recently done an overhaul of the branding at Redhook. It is a decent beer that is of obvious quality, but it is pretty tame and lacks soul. I am fairly certain that in this day and age I could do much better, even at a chain.

zoso1967, Sep 01, 2011
Photo of BBM
3.13/5  rDev -4.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Found this beer on tap, looking for a little pep. Well, unfortunately this brew didn't deliver entirely. It looks like an IPA (perhaps a bit too filtered...), it smells nice, with floral and citrus hop, but the taste just isn't there. There's almost no hop bite at all! Faint, fleeting floral and herbal hop notes start out, but the the rest of it is a bit too watery and bland. There's not even a real big malt profile here. To be honest it's not a bad beer, it tasted ok and all, but it's not an IPA. And I had no real desire to have another.

BBM, Jul 11, 2007
Photo of maddogruss
3.13/5  rDev -4.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Got this on draft at the Cloverleaf Tavern.

A: Pours a golden-amber, slightly murky body with a fairly think, white head with pretty nice retention and lacing.

S: A fairly hoppy smell with some sweet malt notes. Seemed nice for the style.

T: A fairly sweet, toffee malt taste with some cascade hop undertones that weren't very powerful. The bittering hop taste seemed to be overpowered by the sweeter malts.

M: The mouthfeel was medium bodied, but a little on the thin side. Overall, still pretty nice feel on the palette.

D: A decent mouthfeel and taste combo makes the beer easy to drink. I was hoping for a bit more hop presence to really balance out the sweeter malts. Still, pretty good beer overall.

maddogruss, Jul 22, 2009
Photo of brewmudgeon
3.13/5  rDev -4.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 1.5

4 A copper and orange, clear, modest off-white head but rings of lace all the way down.
3.5 S served too cold, but detected earthy floral and citrusy hops
3.5 T seemed a bit weak at first, then more flavor emerged. well-balanced. nice bitterness along with the hop flavor and restrained aroma. some alc in the taste
3.5 M light to medium bodied, goes down easy but for abv
1.5 D 6.5 abv a bit excessive for this particular beer. developed severe headache within an hour after finishing-coincidence? it was just one beer!

brewmudgeon, Sep 07, 2008
Photo of Chickenhawk9932
3.13/5  rDev -4.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours a straw yellow with a healthy white head that had decent retention.

Smells of citrus backed by a slight floral bouquet.

Taste was hop forward with citrus leaning towards grapefruit. The flavor started out well, but didn't lead anywhere exciting - just sort of trailed off towards bland. A decent beer, but nothing exciting.

Chickenhawk9932, Jan 09, 2012
Redhook Long Hammer IPA from Redhook Ale Brewery
75 out of 100 based on 2,647 ratings.