1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Redhook Long Hammer IPA - Redhook Ale Brewery

Not Rated.
Redhook Long Hammer IPARedhook Long Hammer IPA

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
75
okay

2,455 Ratings
THE BROS
67
poor

(view ratings)
Ratings: 2,455
Reviews: 1,097
rAvg: 3.26
pDev: 17.18%
Wants: 10
Gots: 79 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Redhook Ale Brewery visit their website
United States

Style | ABV
American IPA |  6.20% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
The generous addition of hops both during and at the end of the fermentation process (dry-hopping) gives our India Pale Ale its characteristic bitterness and piney citrus aroma and flavor. The medium body, crisp finish, and moderate alcohol and IBU levels makes this one of America’s most drinkable and best-selling IPAs.

44 IBU

(Beer added by: Musky on 01-10-2007)
View: Beers (47) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Redhook Long Hammer IPA Alström Bros
Ratings: 2,455 | Reviews: 1,097 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of kojevergas
kojevergas

Texas

2.8/5  rDev -14.1%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Served on-draught at a Mexican restaurant in Manhattan Beach, California. Reviewed from notes. Cost was $6.00 USD plus tax and tip. Expectations were below average.

Paired with tortilla chips and guacamole.

A: Pours a half finger head of slight cream, decent thickness, and decent retention. Colour is a clear copper. No yeast particles are visible.

Sm: Cream, barley, and clean malts. Indistinct hops. A light aroma. Somewhat weak for an IPA, without much presence.

T: Some cream and restrained hops. Clean malts with some layering, but nothing notable. Hints of light milky notes towards the back end. Simple but pleasant. Balanced alright. Built decently for the style, but weak and noncommital to its flavours.

Mf: Smooth and wet, suiting the flavours and style fairly well. Adequate carbonation. Light. A bit too thin. Too smooth.

Dr: Drinkable but boring. Not a remarkable beer. I wouldn't get it again unless no better offerings were available. A decent IPA for fans of the style, but rather generic and bland all around. Don't expect a hop bomb from this one.

Pairs decently with Mexican food.

Low C

Serving type: on-tap

05-20-2012 21:49:06 | More by kojevergas
Photo of beernads
beernads

Florida

2.75/5  rDev -15.6%

07-03-2013 09:32:48 | More by beernads
Photo of imperialking
imperialking

Illinois

3/5  rDev -8%

11-22-2011 19:07:12 | More by imperialking
Photo of MarkyMOD
MarkyMOD

Colorado

3/5  rDev -8%

04-07-2012 00:39:36 | More by MarkyMOD
Photo of lacqueredmouse
lacqueredmouse

Australia

3.5/5  rDev +7.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Quite a light gold coloured body, lighter than usual for an IPA in my view. Head is pillowy white to begin with, but quickly dissipates to a film that leaves little lacing. Small bead of carbonation. Not a lot. Looks ok.

Nice piney hops on the nose, but with an underlying diacetyl sweetness that's quite unwelcome. For an IPA, it's also pretty tame, no explosion of floral characteristics. Pretty weak.

Taste is a little better, but again, to call this an IPA is a stretch. Light citrus/grapefruit characters on the front palate, and just a hint of reedy, resin character on the back, but that's all the mention of hops there is. Otherwise, there's a sweet honey/butterscotch character that doesn't do it it any favours at all. Mouthfeel is quite light and clean, rather bland which matches the flavour.

I'll say it again: this is a pretty tame IPA. There's certainly some pleasant flavours to it, but it's not the type of IPA I've come to expect - balanced way too much towards sweetness. Hey, it's not a bad beer... But it's not a good IPA either.

Serving type: bottle

09-27-2008 03:58:47 | More by lacqueredmouse
Photo of barleywinefiend
barleywinefiend

Washington

4/5  rDev +22.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Eventhough some people gave this a mediocre rating I thought it was a good IPA. Being from Washington and NOT a RED HOOK fan I tasted this on tap in Solvang, CA and liked it, ALOT. It came to me a orange-yellow, small head, smelled of citrus and floral scents and tasted like it smells. Plenty of hops ot back it up. Eventhough I do not like Red Hook I like Long Hammer.

Serving type: on-tap

01-06-2008 01:06:48 | More by barleywinefiend
Photo of tempest
tempest

Pennsylvania

2.93/5  rDev -10.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

At first I thought this was actually a decent IPA with a big of hops. Maybe on par with Flying Dog's IPA. As it warmed up a bit, the hops fade to an unpleasantly low level where they're just a bitter herb-like taste. Meh, here I thought Redhook might have made a decent IPA. Alas. I guess I'd call this an extra pale ale based on other XPA's I've had like Summit's out of MN.

Serving type: on-tap

11-12-2007 03:30:03 | More by tempest
Photo of akorsak
akorsak

Pennsylvania

3.6/5  rDev +10.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A 12 oz bottle purchased at Chip's in Kill Devil Hills, NC.

A: The ale opens with a hiss. As it pours into a glass, a luxurious head emerges that gradually coats the sides with fluffy lace. The ale is an amber color, more orange than not with nice clarity.

S: The nose is very inviting, showing off a mouth-water barrage of citrusy hops. The orange peel and grapefruit aromas are punctuated by a peppery zest.

T: The IPA's taste is reserved, hoppy but not too much so. The dry orange peel flavors are strong up front, adding a tobacco flavor that gets drier the longer you've waited since the last sip. As the ale warms, the hops recede a bit, allowing a fuller malt body to emerge.

M: The mouthfeel is IPA, hoppy with a solid citrus edge. The flavors are not revolutionary but for an IPA fan they are comforting.

D: The nice dry finish is good and I'd gladly belly up to a few more bottles.

Serving type: bottle

10-06-2007 00:24:25 | More by akorsak
Photo of Billolick
Billolick

New York

3.5/5  rDev +7.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

12 ouncer , with bottled on dating (04 03 07) etched onto the front label, Pours very clear, light honey amber, with a near white head, leaves long sliding strands of lacing. On the nose I pick up respectable wiffs of leafy fresh hops. Easy drinking and fairly enjoyable ale. Hops moderatly evident, resiny. A wee bit thin in the middle, watery, I would say. This one is missing the complexity, and malt backbone + hop crunch of higher scoring exemplars of the style. A decent sessioner or "in a pinch IPA" but I will always try to find a true "craft beer" if available. Support the little guys, I say..."Eat the Rich"

Serving type: bottle

05-02-2007 01:56:22 | More by Billolick
Photo of rhoadsrage
rhoadsrage

Illinois

3/5  rDev -8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

(Served in an American pint glass)

A- The light golden copper body is clear with a big carbonation of large bubbles and a thin soapy head that does last a good while.

S- The light pine hops aroma has a hint of fresh grain in the background but it is pretty light.

T- The dry crisp malt flavor has a sulfury hint in the finish. The bitter hops have a faint soapy pine taste that gives a note of floor cleaner but the hops have a nice taste.

M- The light mouthfeel has a slippery texture. No alcohol or bitterness in the finish.

D- This beer has the taste of an average lager with some hop character. I would like to see a bit of depth in the malt or some ale fruitiness to give the hops some support.

Serving type: bottle

07-27-2006 20:38:52 | More by rhoadsrage
Photo of oriolesfan4
oriolesfan4

Maryland

3.1/5  rDev -4.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Kind of an average beer all around. Doesn't really taste totally like an IPA but parts of it do making this just an odd beer overall. It's a pretty high ABV and it does go down smooth for sure. But balance wise and style wise the lines are a little bit blurred and make it hard to judge this beer.

Serving type: bottle

10-05-2008 18:32:46 | More by oriolesfan4
Photo of InspectorBob
InspectorBob

New Jersey

3.25/5  rDev -0.3%

05-23-2013 15:50:44 | More by InspectorBob
Photo of XmnwildX12
XmnwildX12

Minnesota

3.5/5  rDev +7.4%

12-11-2013 02:33:42 | More by XmnwildX12
Photo of woodychandler
woodychandler

Pennsylvania

3.75/5  rDev +15%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Thanks, beeragent, for getting me off of the hook! It does, indeed, come in a CAN and I join you in this Serving Type, having scored some at Pinocchio's in Media on Friday. Let nothing stand in The CANQuest's (TM) way!

From the CAN: "Long Hammer IPA is a big fan of dry hopping, which sounds much dirtier than it is."; "Est. 1981 Seattle"; "Weighs less to pack out than in".

I CAN't believe my CANfusion! I dry-hopped both of yesterday's Dirty Blondes w/my Long Hammer! Tonight, Long Hammer goes BOOM!

The Crack was a total surprise as it was a) brimful and b) foamy as all get-out. This was a fresh CAN that had been refrigerated up until I bought it and directly after I got home following the two-hour trip. Upon settling, I employed the inverted Glug which netted me two fingers of tawny head with good retention. Color was an oh-so-slightly hazy golden-yellow. Nose smelled of minty, grassy hops and my mouth was watering in anticipation. Mouthfeel was slightly thin, but the taste was purely hops in the mouth. It had a mostly peppermint taste, but there was a nice grassiness, also. Finish was dry and tasty with the hops lingering well after the swallow. I would definitely give this some cooler space, either at the beach or on Hula in the Coola Day (01 Feb, annually).

Serving type: can

08-07-2012 04:14:48 | More by woodychandler
Photo of jdhilt
jdhilt

New Hampshire

3.35/5  rDev +2.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Pours a four finger white head that fades quickly to a thin layer leaving some lace. Light clear amber color. Light-medium carbonation and light-medium bodied. Hoppy nose. Flavor actually fairly balanced for an IPA some sweetness with very slight bitter finish. $1.50 for a 12oz bottle from Capital Convenience Concord, NH.

Serving type: bottle

07-11-2007 22:18:18 | More by jdhilt
Photo of Zorro
Zorro

California

3.55/5  rDev +8.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A new beer invading the California Von's Supermarkets.

In the glass this is a paler shade of amber with a decent white head.

The smell is sweet and decently hoppy with a sweet citrus aroma. There is a fair amount of grapefruit and raw hop aroma to this beer. The malt aroma to this is not complex but over all it gives the impression of orange blossom aroma to this when combined with the hops used.

The taste begins sweet with a good solid hop bitter snap in the first sip with a slight pan browned sugar aftertaste. Fairly bitter with a big amount of lemon and lemon zest flavor to it. Quite nice in the bitterness level this is decently hopped to IPA standards.

The mouthfeel is OK, not mediocre though.

Better than expected and far better than this companies mediocre at best IPA. Not going to make me forget DFH 60 minute but good none the less.

Serving type: bottle

02-24-2007 05:49:07 | More by Zorro
Photo of Georgiabeer
Georgiabeer

Georgia

3.43/5  rDev +5.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Definitely a beer that is not worth having at all unless you have it fresh, and preferably on draft. Had that way it is a pleasant enough ipa even if it is nowhere near tops in in its class. Pours golden with little head but decent lacing. The smell is of light citrusy hops and with a light graininess. The taste starts with lemon and grapefruit and some developing bitterness on the finish. Mouthfeel is a little light and spritzy. In the right conditions a pleasant drinker. I have to say that I don't often have Redhook beers anymore. I never thought they were the best beers on the planet, but I feel they have lost a great deal of what charm they once had. The real problem with this beer is that I probably had it in peak condition, and it was just decent. Most people will have it on its way to staleness in the bottle, and the experience just won't be as good.

Serving type: on-tap

07-30-2007 06:29:01 | More by Georgiabeer
Photo of DoubleJ
DoubleJ

California

2.9/5  rDev -11%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I remember this simply being called Redhook IPA until the name change some time ago. So anyway, let's give this a taste drive:

Light bodied blonde in appearance, its head is thin, but leaves some good lacing on the glass. Hoppiness is less powerful in the smell as other IPA's I've had, mixed in with a cooked veggie scent. The taste seems to be more bitter than hoppy, with little action in the malt department. Its easier to drink per se than others, but nothing too encouraging for me to have another of. If you want a tasty IPA, cross this off your wish list.

Serving type: bottle

05-15-2007 18:14:22 | More by DoubleJ
Photo of DrunkinYogi
DrunkinYogi

Connecticut

3.25/5  rDev -0.3%

08-23-2013 21:28:41 | More by DrunkinYogi
Photo of Wasatch
Wasatch

Utah

3.05/5  rDev -6.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

According to the bottle: Bottled 20 Jun 05, 6.5%ABV. Pours a nice clear golden color, small head dissapates quickly, some carbonation, some light lacing afterwards. Scents of hops, citrusy. The taste is not bad, hoppy with a little bite at the end, not as good as others for sure, but not bad. Medium body. This is drinkable, but there are other IPAs way better, but maybe for an intro into the style it would be good.

Serving type: bottle

11-17-2005 00:40:01 | More by Wasatch
Photo of ejimhof
ejimhof

Pennsylvania

2.75/5  rDev -15.6%

10-16-2012 00:40:46 | More by ejimhof
Photo of Stinkypuss
Stinkypuss

Pennsylvania

3.58/5  rDev +9.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A. Poured from a 12 oz. bottle into a pint glass. Clear light yellow with a nice pillowy head. Good lace show too.

S. A faint whiff of pine. Not much else.

T. Though this case is slightly dated, the hops still come through rather nicely. Resinous piney hops. The malt body is somewhat weak. Still pretty tasty.

M. This beer has a very good mouth feel. Perfect level of carbonation, smooth, light bodied and even a bit creamy.

D. Another very easy drinker from RedHook. High ABV a bit dangerous since this is so easily downed. Paired nice with spicey fried rice.

Serving type: bottle

09-10-2008 02:25:40 | More by Stinkypuss
Photo of BillRoth
BillRoth

Maryland

3.5/5  rDev +7.4%

12-28-2013 19:31:33 | More by BillRoth
Photo of biegaman
biegaman

Ontario (Canada)

3.15/5  rDev -3.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Redhook IPA is a lovely golden coloured beer with too many flashing highlights to keep track of them all. My favourite are the sharp amber ones that hit only when held directly up into the light. Although its body is transparent, chill haze (and a bit of suspended proteins) mark up the otherwise clear beer. While it has some head, it could use an upgrade.

The aroma has plenty of hop bitterness but none of the pleasant hop flavours - there's good heavy metal music and then there's music that is just loud and distorted. This is the latter. There's no rhythm, no intricacies and certainly nothing to get your head nodding. Some citrus notes make it through, and some toasted maltiness, but it's not exactly catchy.

I took my first sip and just said 'no'. This isn't what comes to mind when I think IPA and it certainly isn't hitting the spot now that I'm craving one. The flavour on the whole is faint and diluted, but the hoppiness in particular is non-existent save for a weedy, leafy herbal flavour that sort of lingers like bitter greens. Their oiliness sticks to the palate astringently.

Redhook IPA is an easy beer to drink if flavour isn't high on your list of important things and especially if you don't have a palate for bitterer beers. It is at least twice as bitter as commercial swill, mind you, but it won't turn your cheeks inside out. That said, it does leave a distastefully bitter greens taste in the mouth that can be quite pungent and lasting.

Redhook IPA isn't going to win over lager drinkers any more than it will hop heads. It's an IPA that lacks the character typical of the style yet has enough hoppiness to turn away the average Joe. The $2 I paid for this bottle is a fair price but it does not represent good value for money. If you're in the North-West, there are much better options available to you.

Serving type: bottle

08-03-2011 01:34:10 | More by biegaman
Photo of Huhzubendah
Huhzubendah

District of Columbia

3.05/5  rDev -6.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

On draft at Xchange in D.C.

The beer is a light orange / yellow color and appears clear with mild effervescence. The aroma is rather weak, with a light dose of hops and citrus. The flavor is average, and could be bolder. The hop presence is pretty subdued and tame. The finish has a subtle odd note with a hint of alcohol. Overall, a mediocre example of the style. I won't order this again.

Serving type: on-tap

12-02-2010 22:11:48 | More by Huhzubendah
Redhook Long Hammer IPA from Redhook Ale Brewery
75 out of 100 based on 2,455 ratings.